Advertisement

Literaturangaben

  • Helmut E. Lück
  • Ulla Wilke-Birkenhauer
Part of the Forschungsbericht des Landes Nordrhein-Westfalen book series (FOLANW)

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literaturangaben

  1. ADAMS, J.S.: Inequity as social exchange. In: L.Berkowitz (Ed): Advances in experimental social psychology. Vol. II, New York: Academic Press, 1965, S. 267–299.Google Scholar
  2. ADERMANN, D.: Elation, depression, and helping. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1972, 24, S. 91–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. ADERMANN, D.; BERKOWITZ, L.: “Observational set, empathy and helping”. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1970, 14, S. 141–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. BABAD, E.Y.: SES differences in effects of brief social satiation. J. Psychology, 1974, 88 (1), S. 153–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. BERKOWITZ, H.; Butterfield, E.C. und Zigler, E.: The effectiveness of social reinforcers on persistance and learning tasks following positive and negative social interactions. J. Person. soc. Psychol., 1965, 2, S. 706–714.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. BERKOWITZ, L.; CONNOR, D.H.: “Success, failure, and social responsibility”. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1966, 4, S. 664–669.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. BLEVIS, G.A.; MURPHY, T.: “Feeling good and helping: Further phonebooth findings”. Psychological Reports, 1974, 34, S. 326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. BOCHNER, S.: An unobtrusive approach to the study of housing discrimination against aborigines, Australian Journal of Psychology, 1972, 24, S. 335–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. BREER, P.E. und LOCKE, E.A.: Task experience as a source of attitudes. Homewood, III: Dorsey, 1965.Google Scholar
  10. BROTSKY, J.S. and THOMAS, K.: Cooperative behavior in preschool children. Psychonomic Science, 1967, 9, S. 337–338.Google Scholar
  11. BRYAN, J.H.; TEST, M.A.: “Models and helping: Naturalistic studies in aiding behavior”. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1967, 6, S. 400–407.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. BUTTGEREIT, H.: Die Darstellung von Hilfeleistung und unterlassener Hilfeleistung in der deutschen Presse. - Eine inhaltsanalytische Untersuchung. Hausarbeit. Erste Staatsprüfung für das Lehramt an Gymnasien. Gesamthochschule Duisburg, 1979.Google Scholar
  13. CIALDINI, R.B.; KENRICK, D.T.: “Altruism as hedonism: A social development perspective on the relationship of negative mood state and helping’’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1976, 34, S. 907–914.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. CHARLTON, M.; LIEBELT, E.; SOLTZ, J. und TAUSCH, A.M.: Auswirkung von Verhaltensmodellen aus einem Fernsehwestern auf Gruppen-arbeitsverhalten und Agressionsbereitschaft von Grundschülern. Psychol. in Erz. und Unterricht, 1974, 21, S. 164–175. Google Scholar
  15. COHEN, D.J.: Justin and his peers: An experimental analysis of a child’s social world. Child development, 1962, 33, S. 697–717.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. CROWNE, D.P. und MARLOWE, D.: The approval motive. New York, 1964.Google Scholar
  17. DANN, E.: Untersuchungen über den Zusammenhang zwischen Moralent-wicklung von Kindern und elterlichem Erziehungsstil. Diplomarbeit. Gesamthochschule Duisburg, 1978.Google Scholar
  18. DONNERSTEIN, E.; DONNERSTEIN, M.; MUNGER, G.: “Helping behavior as a function of pictorially induced moods”. The Journal of Social Psychology, 1975, 97, S. 221–225.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. DORWART, W.; EZERMAN, R.; LEWIS, M. und ROSENHAN, D.: The effect of social deprivation and subsequent social and nonsocial reinforcement on probability learning. J. Person. soc. Psychol., 1965, 2,S. 111–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. EDWARDS, A.L.: Experimental design in psychological research. New York: Holt, Rinehart und Winston, 1968.Google Scholar
  21. EISENBERGER, R.: Is there a deprivation-satiation function for social approval? Psychol. Bull., 1970, 74, S. 255–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. ENDO, G.T.: Social drive or arousal: A test of two theories of social isolation. J. Exper. Child Psychol., 1968, 6, S. 61–74.Google Scholar
  23. FERCHO, I.: “Experimentelle Studie zur Hilfeleistung”. Unveröffentlichte Diplomarbeit, Universität Köln, 1973.Google Scholar
  24. GAERTNER, S.L.: “Helping behavior an racial discrimination among liberals and conservatives”. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1973, 25, S. 335–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. GAERTNER, S.; BICKMANN, L.: “Effects of race on the elicitation of helping behavior: The wrong number technique.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1971, 20, S. 218–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. GALLIMORE, R.; THARP, R.G. und KEMP, B.: Positive reinforcing ofnegative attention. J. Experim. Child Psychol., 1969, 8, S. 140–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. GERWITZ, J.L. und BAER, D.M.: The effect of brief social deprivation on behaviors for a social reinforcer. J. Abnorm. Soc. Psychol., 1958 (a), 56, S. 49–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. GERWITZ, J.L. und BAER, D.M.: Deprivation and satiation of social reinforcers as drive conditions. J. Abnorm. Soc. Psychol., 1958 (b), 57, S. 165–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. GERWIRTZ, J.L.: A learning analysis of the effects of normal stimulation, privation and deprivation on the acquisition of social motivation and attachement. In: B.M. Foss (Ed): Determinants of Infant Behavior. London: Methuen, 1961, S. 213–299.Google Scholar
  30. GERWITZ, J.L.: Potency of a social reinforcer as a function of satiation and recovery. Develop. Psychol., 1969, 1, S. 2–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. GONSTER, R.: Einfluß von Stimmungen auf Hilfeleistung gegenüber Einheimischen und Ausländern. I Literaturübersicht. Hausarbeit. Erste Staatsprüfung für das Lehramt an Gymnasien. Gesamthochschule, 1978.Google Scholar
  32. HAKE, D.F.; POWELL, J. und OLSEN, R.: Conditioned suppression as a sensitive baseline for social facilitation. J. experim. Anal. Behay., 1969, 12, S. 807–816.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. HAKE, D.F.; VUKELICH, R. and KAPLAN, S.J.: Audit responses: Responses maintained by access to existing self of coactor scores during nonsocial, parallel work, and cooperation procedures. J. exp. Anal. Behay., 1973, 19, S. 409–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. HAKE, D.F. und VUKELICH, R.: Analysis of the control exerted by a complex cooperation procedure. J. experim. Anal. Behay., 1973, 19, S. 3–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. HAKE, D.F.; OLVERA, D. and BELL, J.C.: Switching from competition to sharing or cooperation at large response requirements: Competition requires more responding. J. experim. Anal. Behay., 1975, 24,S. 343–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. HECHELTJEN.K.-G,und MERTESDORF,F.:Entwicklung eines mehrdimensionalen Stimmungsfragebogens(M-S-F).Gruppendynamik,1973,Heft 1,S.110–121Google Scholar
  37. HILL, K.T. and MOELY, B.E.: Social reinforcement as a function of sex of S, age of S, and baseline performance. J. Experim. Child Psychol., 1969, 7, S. 153–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. HOWELL, J.S.: The effects of social isolation and vicarious instigation on Children’s performance of task for social reinforcement. Diss. Abstracts Intern., 1972, Vol. 32, 7311.Google Scholar
  39. HUITS, J.H.: Gewissensbildung. Köln, 1969.Google Scholar
  40. ISEN, A.M.: “Success, failure, attention, and reaction to others: The war glow of success”. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1970, 15, S. 294–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. ISEN, A.M.; LEVIN, P.F.: “Effect of feeling good on helping: Cookies and kindness”. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1972, 21, S. 384–388.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. ISEN, A.M.; HORN, N.; Rosenhan, D.L.: “Effects of success and failure on children’s generosity”. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1973, 27, S. 239–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. ISEN, A.M.; SCHWARTZ, S.: “Duration of the effect of good moon on helping: Footprints on the sands of time”. Journal of Personality an Social Psychology, 1976, 34, S. 385–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. JURGER, S.: Sozialer Einstellungstest (S-E-T), Göttingen: Hogrefe, 1969.Google Scholar
  45. KAZDIN, A.E.; BRYAN, J.H.: “Competence and volunteering”. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1971, 7, S. 87–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. KELLER, F.S. und SCHOENFELD, W.N.: Principles of psychology. New York: Appleton, 1950, S. 357–358.Google Scholar
  47. KEMMLER, L.; WINDHEUSER, H.-J. und Morgenstern, F.: Gruppenanwendung von “Piaget”-Geschichten zum moralischen Urteil bei acht-bis neunjährigen Jungen im Vergleich mit einigen anderen Variablen.Z. f. Entwicklungspsychologie und Pädagogische Psychologie, 1970, 2, S. 113–124.Google Scholar
  48. KIDD, R.F.; BERKOWITZ, L.: “Effects of dissonance arousal on helpfulness”. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1976, 33, S. 613–622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. KOCH, J.; SCHNEIDER, E.: Das Lernen altruistischer Verhaltensweisen anhand von Modellpersonen. Thema Nr. 35, Planungspraktikum Wintersemester 1974/75 Universität Wien. Unveröffentlichtes Manuskript.Google Scholar
  50. KOZMA, A.: The effects of anxiety stimulation, and isolation on social reinforcer effectiveness. J. experim. Child Psychol., 1969, 8,S. 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. KOZMA, A.: Instructional ans isolation effects on susceptibility to social reinforcement. Canadian. J. Behavioral Science, 1971, 3, S. 388–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. KRASNER, L. und ULLMANN, L.P.: Behavior influence and Personality. The social matrix of human action. Holt, Rinehart und Winston: New York, 1973.Google Scholar
  53. KRAUTH, J. und LIENERT, G.A.: KFA - Die Konfigurationsfrequenzanalyse und ihre Anwendung in Psychologie und Medizin. Freiburg: Alber, 1973.Google Scholar
  54. KREBS, D.; WHITTEN, P.: “Geben ist (nicht immer) seliger als Nehmen”. Psychologie Heute, Oktober 1974, S. 62–74.Google Scholar
  55. LADMANN, H.L.: Einfluß von Stimmungen auf Hilfeleistung gegenüber Einheimischen und Ausländern II. Ein Feldexperiment. Hausarbeit.Erste Staatsprüfung für das Lehramt an Gymnasien. Gesamthochschule Duisburg 1978.Google Scholar
  56. LERNER,R.M.;FRANK,P.:Relation on race and sex to supermarket helping behavior.The Journal of Social Psychology,1974(b),94,s.201–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. LEWIS, M. und RICHMAN, S.: Social encounters and their effect on subsequent social reinforcement. J. Abnorm. Soc. Psychol., 1964, 69, S. 253–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. LICHTENBERG, R.P.: Die Adaption von vier amerikanischen Persönlichkeitsskalen zur Prognose prosozialen Verhaltens. Unveröffentlichte Diplomarbeit, Institut für Sozialpsychologie der Universität zu Köln, 1974.Google Scholar
  59. LIENERT, G.A.: Verteilungsfreie Methoden in der Biostatistik. Meisen-heim: Hain, 1962.Google Scholar
  60. LINDSLEY, O.R.: Experimental analysis of social reinforcement: terms and methods. American J. Orthopsychiatry, 1963, 33, S. 624–633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. LINDSLEY, O.R.: Experimental analysis of cooperation und competition In: T. Verhave (Ed): The experimental analysis of behavior.New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1966, S. 470–501.Google Scholar
  62. LOCK, H.E.; TIMAEUS, E.: “Skalen zur Messung manifester Angst (MAS) und sozialer Wünschbarkeit (SDS-E und SDS-CM).” Diagnostica, 1969, 15, S. 134–141.Google Scholar
  63. LOCK, H.E.: Prosoziales Verhalten. Köln, 1975.Google Scholar
  64. LOCK, H.E. (Hrsg.): Mitleid, Vertrauen, Verantwortung. Ergebnisse der Erforschung prosozialen Verhaltens. Stuttgart: Klett, 1977.Google Scholar
  65. LOCK, H.E.: Aspects of a transnational theory of prosocial behavior. In: L. Wispé (hrsg.): Altruism, sympathy, and helping. New York: Academic Press, 1978, S. 209–228.Google Scholar
  66. LOCK, H.E.: Verschiedene empirische Untersuchungen zum prosozialen Verhalten. Bericht 3 des Arbeitsbereichs Psychologie der Fernuniversität Hagen, 1979.Google Scholar
  67. MACK, D. und KNIGHT, G.P.: Identification of the other player’s characteristics in the reiterated prisoner’s dilemma game. Psychol. Reports, 1974, 24, S. 93–100.Google Scholar
  68. MARWELL, G.; SCHMITT, D.R. und SHOTOLA, R.: Cooperation and inter- personal risk. J. person. soc. Psychol., 1971, 18, S. 9–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. MARWELL, G. und SCHMITT, D.R.: Cooperation - An experimental Analysis. Academic Press. New York, 1975.Google Scholar
  70. MCGINNIES, E: Social Behavior: A Functional Analysis. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 1970.Google Scholar
  71. MISCHEL, W.; EBBESEN, E.; ZEISS, A.: “Cogni•tive and attentional mechanismsin delay of gratification”. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1972, 21, S. 204–218.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. MITHAUG, D.E. and BURGESS, R.L.: Effects of different reinforcement procedures in the establishment of group response. J. experim. Child Psychol., 1967, 5, S. 441–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. MITHAUG, D.E. and BURGESS, R.L.: The effects of different reinforcement contigencies in the development of social cooperation. J. experim. Child Psychol., 1968, 6, S. 402–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. MITHAUG, D.E.: The development of cooperation in alternative task situations. J. experim. Child Psychol., 1969, 8, S. 443–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. MOORE, B.; UNDERWOOD, B.; ROSENHAN, D, D.: “Affect and altruism”.In: Wispé, L.G.: “A reexamination of the role of moods and helping behavior”. H.E. Lück erhielt dieses Manuskript vom Verfasser im Juli 1977.Google Scholar
  76. NEMETH, C.: Bargaining and reciprocity. Psychological Bulletin, 1970, 74, S. 297–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. NIE, N.H. u.a. (Hrsg.): SPSS. Statistik-Programmsystem für die Sozialwissenschaften. Stuttgart, New York, 1976 ( Fischer ).Google Scholar
  78. PARTON, D.A. und ROSS, A.O.: Social reinforcement of children’s motor behavior: A review. Psychological Bulletin, 1965, 64, S. 65–73.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. PIAGET, J.: Das moralische Urteil beim Kinde. Zürich, 1954. Original: Le jugement moral chez l’enfant. Paris, 1932.Google Scholar
  80. PILIAVIN, I.; Rodin, J.; Piliavin, J.: “Good samaritanism: An underground phenomenon?” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1969, 13, S. 289–299.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. RICHMOND, B.O. und WEINER. G.P.: Cooperation and competition among young children as a function of ethnic grouping, grade, sex and reward condition. J. Educational Psychol., 1973, 64, S. 329–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. ROSENBERG, S. und HALL, R.L.: The effects of different social feedback conditions upon performance in dyadic teams. J. Abnorm. soc. Psychol., 1958, 57, S. 271–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. ROSENBERG, S.: Cooperative behavior in dyads as a function of reinforcement parameters. J. Abnorm. soc. Psychol., 1960, 60, S. 318–333.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. ROSENBERG, S.: Influence and reward in structured two person interactions. J. Abnorm. soc. Psychol., 1963, 67, S. 379–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. ROSENHAN, D.: Aloneness and togetherness as drive conditions. J. Experim. Research in Person., 1967, 2, S. 32–40.Google Scholar
  86. ROSENHAN, D.L.; Underwood, B.; Moore, B.: “Observation and rehearsal as determinants of prosocial behavior”. In: Wispé, LG.: “Positive forms of social behavior: An overview”. Journal of Social Issues, 1972, 28, S. 1–19.Google Scholar
  87. SCHELLENBERG, J.A.; BLEVINS, G.A.: “Feeling good and helping: How quickly does the smile of dame fade?” Psychological Reports, 1973, 33, S. 72–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. SCHMITT, D.R. und MARWELL, G.: Stimulus control in the experimental study of cooperation. J. experim. Anal. Behavior, 1968, 11,S. 571–574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. SCHMITT, D.R. and MARWELL, G.: Avoidance of risk as a determinant of cooperation. J. experim. Anal. Behavior, 1971, 16, S. 367–374 (b).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. SCHNEIDER, J.; MINKMAR, H.: Deutsche Neukonstruktion einer Konservatismusskala. Diagnostica, 1972, 18, S. 37–48.Google Scholar
  91. SIMON, W.E.: “Helping behavior in the absence of visual contact as a function of sex of person asking for help and sex of person being asked for help.” Psychological Reports, 1971, 28, S. 609–610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. STAPF, K.H.; HERMANN, TH.; STAPF, A. und Stacker, K.H.: Psychologie des elterlichen Erziehungsstils. Stuttgart (Huber/Klett), 1972.Google Scholar
  93. STEVENSON, H.W. und ODOM, R.D.: The effectiveness of social reinforcement following two conditions of social deprivation. J. Abnorm. Soc. Psychol., 1962, 65, S. 429–431.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. STEVENSON, H.W.: Social reinforcement of children’s behavior. In:P. LIPSETT und C.L. SPIKER (Eds): Advances in child development and behavior. Vol. II, New York: Academic Press, 1965, S. 97–126.Google Scholar
  95. TEDESCHI, J.T.; ARANOFF, D.; GAHAGAN, J.P. und HIESTER, D.S.: The partial reinforcement effect and the prisoner’s dilemma. J. Soc. Psychol., 1968, 75, S. 209–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. TIPTON, R.B.; BROWNING, S Journal of Psychology,.: “Altruism:1972, 80, S. Reward or punishment?” The 119–322.Google Scholar
  97. URANOWITZ, S.W.: “Helping and self - attributions: A field experiment”. In: LOCK, H.E.: Mitleid, Vertrauen, Verantwortung“. 1. Kapitel. Stuttgart, 1977 (Dieses Manuskript vom Autor im August 1978 erhalten).Google Scholar
  98. VOGLER, R.E.: On the definition of cooperation. Psychol. Reports, 1969, 25, S. 281–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. WALTERS, R.H. und RAY, E.: Anxiety, social isolation and reinforcer effectiveness. J. Personal., 1960, 20, S. 358–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. WALTERS, R.H. und discrimination 1964 (a), 1, S PARKE, R.D.: Emotional arousal, isolation and learning in children. J. experim. Child Psychol.,. 163–173.Google Scholar
  101. WALTERS, R.H. und PARKE, R.D.: Social motivation, dependency and susceptibility to social influence. In: L. Berkowitz (Ed.): Advances in experimental social psychology. N.Y.: Academic Press, 1964, Vol. 1 (b).Google Scholar
  102. WEINGARTEN, K. Und MECHNER, F.: The contingency as an independent variable of social interaction. In: TH. Verhave: The experimental analysis of behavior. N.Y.: Appleton Century Crofts, 1966, S. 447–459.Google Scholar
  103. WICHMAN, H.: Effects of isolation and communication on cooperation in a two-person-game. J. Person. soc. Psychol., 1970, 16, (1), S. 114–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. WILKE-BIRKENHAUER, U.: Experimentelle Untersuchungen zur Analyse kooperativen Verhaltens bei Kindern. Diss. Univ. Düsseldorf, 1976.Google Scholar
  105. WILKE-BIRKENHAUER, U.: Kooperatives Verhalten bei Kindern - ein Oberblick über theoretische Konzepte und empirische Befunde. In: H. LOCK (Hrsg.): Mitleid, Vertrauen, Verantwortung. Ergebnisse der Erforschung pro-sozialen Verhaltens. Stuttgart: Klett, 1977.Google Scholar
  106. WINER, B.J.: Statistical principles in experimental design. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1962.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. WINER, B.J.: Statistical principles in experimental design. New York: u.a. (McGraw-Hill) 1963.Google Scholar
  108. WISPé, L.G.; KIECOLT, J.; LONG, R.E.: “Cognized helping - nonhelping, moods and helping behavior”. (H.E. Lück erhielt diese Zusammenfassung vom Verfasser im Dezembr 1973; Zusammenfassung im August 1978 von H.E. Lück erhalten).Google Scholar
  109. WISPE, L.G.; FRESHLEY, H.B.: “Race, sex, and sympathetic helping behavior: The broken bag caper”. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1971, 17, S. 59–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. WISPÉ, L.G.: “A reexamination of the role of moods and helping behavior”. Unveröffentlichtes Manuskript, 1977.Google Scholar
  111. WUBBERHORST, J.; GRADFORD, S.; WILLIS, F.N.: “Trust in children as a function of race, sex, and socioeconomic group”. Psychological Reports, 1971, 29, S. 1183–1187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. YOSHINO, N.: Social reinforcement and affiliation: The interpersonal behavior of children: II. Japanese J. Educational Psychol., 1972, 20, S. 236–243.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Westdeutscher Verlag GmbH, Opladen 1981

Authors and Affiliations

  • Helmut E. Lück
    • 1
  • Ulla Wilke-Birkenhauer
    • 2
  1. 1.Fachbereich Erziehungs- und Sozialwissenschaften Arbeitsbereich PsychologieFernuniversität — Gesamthochschule — HagenDeutschland
  2. 2.Fach PsychologieUniversität — Gesamthochschule — DuisburgDeutschland

Personalised recommendations