Advertisement

Subversive Komplizenschaft

Postkolonialismus als kulturelle Kristallisation
  • Peter Wiechens
Chapter
  • 52 Downloads

Zusammenfassung

Im Rahmen einer Auseinandersetzung mit Fredric Jamesons Aufsatz „Third World Literature in the Era of Multinational Capitalism“ trifft der marxistische Kritiker des Postkolonialismus Aijaz Ahmad folgende Aussage: „I have been reading Jameson’s work now for roughly fifteen years, and at least some of what I know about the literatures and cultures of Western Europe and the USA comes from him; and because I am a Marxist, I had always thought of us, Jameson and myself, as birds of the same feather, even though we never quite flocked together. But then, when I was on the fifth page of this text (specifically, on the sentence starting with ‘All third-world texts are necessarily ...’ etc.), I realized that what was being theorized was, among other things, myself. Now, I was born in India and I write poetry in Urdu, a language not commonly understood among US intellectuals. So I said to myself: ‘All? ... necessarily?’ It felt odd. Matters became much more curious, however. For the further I read, the more I realized, with no little chagrin, that the man whom I had for so long, so affectionately, albeit from a physical distance, taken as a comrade was, in his own opinion, my civilizational Other. It was not a good feeling.“ (Ahmad 1987: 3)

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  1. Ahmad, Aijaz 1987, Jameson’s Rhetoric of Otherness and the „National Allegory“, in: Social Text, 17 (Fall), S. 3–25.Google Scholar
  2. Ahmad, Aijaz 1992, In Theory. Classes, Nations, Literatures, London, New York.Google Scholar
  3. Ahmad, Aijaz 1996 [ 1995 ], The Politics of Literary Postcoloniality, in: Mongia, Padmini (Hrsg.), Postcolonial Theory. A Reader, London, New York, Sydney, Auckland, S. 276–293.Google Scholar
  4. Bhabha, Howi K. 1985, Signs Taken for Wonders. Questions of Ambivalence and Authority Under a Tree Outside Delhi, May 1817, in: Critical Inquiry, 12 (1), S. 144–165.Google Scholar
  5. Bhabha, Homi K. 1988, The Commitment to Theory, in: New Formations, 5, S. 5–23.Google Scholar
  6. Bromley, Roger 1997, New Directions in Cultural Studies. Debates on Cultural Hybridity, unveröffentlichtes Manuskript.Google Scholar
  7. Chambers, Iain 1996, Signs of Silence, Lines of Listening, in: Chambers, Iain/Lidia Curti (Hrsg.), The Post-Colonial Question. Common Skies, Devided Horizons, London, S. 47–62.Google Scholar
  8. Chow, Rey 1994, Where Have All the Natives Gone?, in: Bammer, Angelika (Hrsg.), Displacements. Cultural Identities in Question, Indiana, S. 125–151.Google Scholar
  9. Derrida, Jacques 1997, Einige Statements und Binsenweisheiten über Neologismen, New-Ismen, Post-Ismen, Parasitismen und andere kleine Seismen, Berlin.Google Scholar
  10. De Toro, Fernando 1995, From Where to Speak? Latin American Postmodern/Postcolonial Positionalities, in: World Literature Today, 69 (1), S. 35–40.Google Scholar
  11. Dirlik, Arif 1996 [ 1994 ], The Postcolonial Aura. Third World Criticism in the Age of Global Capitalism, in: Mongia, Padmini (Hrsg.), Postcolonial Theory. A Reader, London, New York, Sydney, Auckland, S. 294–320.Google Scholar
  12. Gehlen, Arnold 1961, Über kulturelle Kristallisation, in: ders., Studien zur Anthropologie und Soziologie, Bremen, S. 311–328.Google Scholar
  13. Landry, Donna/Gerald Maclean(Hrsg.) 1996, The Spivak Reader, London, New York.Google Scholar
  14. Janmohamed, Abdul R. 1985, The Economy of Manichean Allegory. The Function of Racial Difference in Colonialist Literature, in: Critical Inquiry, 12 (1), S. 59–87.Google Scholar
  15. Mcclintock, Anne 1992, The Angel of Progress. Pitfalls of the Term `Post-colonialism’, in: Social Text, 31 /32, S. 84–98.Google Scholar
  16. Moore-Gilbert, Bart 1997, Postcolonial Theory. Contexts, Practices, Politics, London, New York.Google Scholar
  17. Parry, Benita 1987, Problems in Current Theories of Colonial Discourse, in: Oxford Literary Review, 9 (1/2), S. 27–58.Google Scholar
  18. Prakash, Gyan 1995, Postcolonial Criticism and Indian Historiography, in: Nicholson, Linda/Steven Seidman (Hrsg.), Social Postmodernism. Beyond Identity Politics, Cambridge, S. 87–100.Google Scholar
  19. Said, Edward W. 1978, Orientalism, New York.Google Scholar
  20. Said, Edward W. 1994, Kultur und Imperialismus. Einbildungskraft und Politik im Zeitalter der Macht, Frankfurt/M.Google Scholar
  21. Said, Edward W. 1997, Die Welt, der Text und der Kritiker, Frankfurt/M. SALUSINSZKY, IMRE 1987, Interview with Edward Said, in: ders., Criticism in Society, London, New York, S. 123–148.Google Scholar
  22. Shohat, Ella 1992, Notes on the Post-Colonial, in: Social Text, 31 /32, S. 99–113.Google Scholar
  23. Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty 1988, Can the Subaltern Speak?, in: Nelson, Cary/Lawrence Grossberg (Hrsg.), Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture, London, S. 271–313.Google Scholar
  24. Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty 1993, Outside in the Teaching Machine, London, New York.Google Scholar
  25. Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty 1996, Subaltern Talk. Interview with the Editors, in: Landry, Donna/Gerald MacLean (Hrsg.), The Spivak Reader, London, New York, S. 287–308.Google Scholar
  26. Xie, Shabo 1997, Rethinking the Problem of Postcolonialism, in: New Literary History, 28, S. 7–19.Google Scholar
  27. Young, Robert J. C. 1990, White Mythologies. Writing History and the West, London, New York.Google Scholar
  28. Young, Robert J. C. 1996, Gayatri Chakravorty Spivak, Outside in the Teaching Machine, in: Textual Practice, 10 (1), S. 228–238.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Westdeutscher Verlag GmbH, Opladen/Wiesbaden 1999

Authors and Affiliations

  • Peter Wiechens

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations