Advertisement

Users and Standardisation

  • Kai Jakobs
Chapter
Part of the Professional Computing book series (XPCOMP)

Abstract

This chapter first introduces a simplistic initial description of the standards setting process. A discussion of the relation between the different stakeholders of this process will lead to a more realistic description, which will draw upon standards setting professionals’ comments. Subsequently, both committee members and users’ views on perceived potential benefits and drawbacks that may come with increased user involvement will be reported. Finally, some explanations for the reluctance on the users’ side to commit resources to standards setting activities will be given.

Keywords

Service Provider User Group Committee Member User Requirement Information Infrastructure 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [Hanseth, 1996]
    Hanseth, O. et al.: Developing Information Infrastructure: The Tension Between Standardization and Flexibility Science, Technology & Human Values, vol. 21, no. 4, 1996.Google Scholar
  2. [Lindgard, 1994]
    Lindgaard, G.: Usability Testing and System Evaluation Chapman & Hall, 1994Google Scholar
  3. [RFC, 1994]
    IETF Secretariat, Malkin, G.: The Tao of IETF - A Guide for New Attendees of’the Internet Engineering Task Force Internet RFC 1718, 1994Google Scholar
  4. [Spring, 1995]
    Spring, M.B. et al. Improving the Standardization Process: Working with Bulldogs an Turtles In: Kahin, B.; Abbate, J. (eds): “Standards Policy for Information Infrastructure”. MIT Press, 1995Google Scholar

Further Readings

  1. Aden, M.; Harris, M.: “A Practitioner’s Guide to Standards and the Government.”. ACM StandardView, vol. 1, no. 2, 1993.Google Scholar
  2. Alexander, D.: “Infrastructure evolution and the global electronic marketplace: a European IT user’s perspective”. In: Hawkins, R.W. et al. (eds): “Standards, Innovation and Competitiveness”. Edward Elgar Publishers, 1995Google Scholar
  3. Bach, C.: “The Standards Process: Evolution or Revolution”. ACM StandardView, vol. 3, no. 1, 1995.Google Scholar
  4. Branscomb, L.M.; Kahin, K.: “Standards Processes and Objectives for the National Information Infrastructure”. In: Kahin, B.; Abbate, J. (eds): “Standards Policy for Information Infrastructure”. MIT Press, 1995.Google Scholar
  5. Cargill, C.F, C.F.: “Information Technology Standardization - Theory, Process and Organizations. Digital Press, 1989Google Scholar
  6. Dankbaar, B. and Tulder, R.: “The Influence of Users in Standardization: The Case of MAP”. In: Dierkes, M.; Hoffmann, U. (eds): “New Technologies at the Outset - Social Forces in the Shaping of Technological Innovations”. Campus/Westview, 1992Google Scholar
  7. Davis, F.D.: “Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology”. MIS Quarterly 13 (3), September 1989.Google Scholar
  8. Farrell, J.: “The Economic of Standardization: A Guide for Non-Economists”. In: Berg, J.L.; Schumny, H. (eds): “An Analysis of the Information Technology Standardization Process”. North-Holland, 1990.Google Scholar
  9. Ferné, G.: “Information Technology Standardization and Users: International Challenges Move the Process Forward”. In: Kahin, B.; Abbate, J. (eds): “Standards Policy for Information Infrastructure”. MIT Press, 1995.Google Scholar
  10. Fischer, P.: “The Role of the User in the Standardization Process - Workshop Report”. In: Berg, J.L.; Schumny, H. (eds): “An Analysis of the Information Technology Standardization Process”. North-Holland, 1990.Google Scholar
  11. Foray, D.: “Coalitions and Committees: How Users Get Involved in Information Technology Standardisation”. In: Hawkins, R.W. et al. (eds): “Standards, Innovation and Competitiveness”. Edward Elgar Publishers, 1995Google Scholar
  12. Genschel, P.: “Standards in der Informationstechnik ( Standards in Information Technology)”. Campus Publishers, 1995.Google Scholar
  13. Hawkins, R.W.: “Standards-making as technological diplomacy: assessing objectives and methodologies in standards institutions”. In: Hawkins, R.W. et al. (eds): “Standards, Innovation and Competitiveness”. Edward Elgar Publishers, 1995Google Scholar
  14. International Telecommunication Union: “Strategic plan 1995–1999”. ITU 1994Google Scholar
  15. Jakobs, K.; Procter, R.; Williams, R.; Fichtner, M.: “Corporate E-Mail in Europe - Requirements, Usage and Ways Ahead:”Proc. 4th Int. Conf. on Telecommunication Systems, Modelling and Analysis, 1996Google Scholar
  16. Johnson, J.L. at al.: “The Role of the Government in Standardization: Improved Service to Citizenry”. ACM StandardView, vol. 1, no. 2, 1993.Google Scholar
  17. Larmouth, J.:“Understanding OSI”. http://www.salford.ac.uk/iti/books/osi/osi.html
  18. Libicki, M.C.: “Information Technology Standards - Quest for the Common Byte”. Digital Press, 1995Google Scholar
  19. Lindgaard, G.: “Some Important Factors for Successful Technology Transfer:”Diffusion, Transfer and Implementation of Information Technology“, North-Holland, 1994.Google Scholar
  20. Markus, M.L.: “Finding a Happy Medium: Explaining the Negative Effects of Electronic Communication on Social Life at Work”. ACM Trans. on Information Systems, vol. 12, no. 2, April 1994.Google Scholar
  21. Naemura, K.: “User involvement in the lifecycle of information technology and telecommunication standards”. In: Hawkins, R.W. et al. (eds): “Standards, Innovation and Competitiveness”. Edward Elgar Publishers, 1995Google Scholar
  22. Nielsen, J.: “Usability Engineering”. AP Professional, 1994.Google Scholar
  23. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development:“Information Technology Standards: The Economic Dimension”. Information Computer Communications Policy, no. 25, 1991Google Scholar
  24. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development: “Information Technology (IT) Diffusion Policies for Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises (SMEs)”. OECD, Paris 1995.Google Scholar
  25. Office of Technology Assesnt: “Global Standards - Buidling Blocks for the Future”. OTA-TCT-512, 1992Google Scholar
  26. Repussard, J.: “Problems and Issues for Public Sector Involvement in Voluntary Standardisation. In: Hawkins, R.W. et al. (eds): ”Standards, Innovation and Competitiveness“. Edward Elgar Publishers, 1995Google Scholar
  27. Rutkowski, A.M.: “The Present and the Future of the Internet: Five faces”. Keynote Address at Networld+Interop ‘84, 1994.Google Scholar
  28. Rutkowski, A.M.: “Today’s Cooperative Competitive Standards Environment For Open Information and Telecommunication Networks and the Internet Standards-Making Model”. In: Kahin, B.; Abbate, J. (eds): “Standards Policy for Information Infrastructure”. MIT Press, 1995.Google Scholar
  29. SNMP Research: “Backgrounder on the SNMPv2 Standardization Process”. http://www.snmp.com/pressrel/v2-background.html, 1996.
  30. Solomon, R.J.; Rutkowski, A.M.: “Standards-making for IT: Old vs. New Models”. Conf. on the Economic Dimension of Standards, 1992Google Scholar
  31. Spring, M.B.; Weiss, M.B.H.: “Financing the Standards Development Process”. In: Kahin, B.; Abbate, J. (eds): “Standards Policy for Information Infrastructure”. MIT Press, 1995.Google Scholar
  32. Sproull, L. and Kiesler, S.: “Reducing social context cues: electronic mail in organizational communications”. Management Science 32, (11), 1986.Google Scholar
  33. Wagner, C.S. et al.: “Open Systems Standards in Manufacturing: Implications for the National Information Infrastructure”. In: Kahin, B.; Abbate, J. (eds): “Standards Policy for Information Infrastructure”. MIT Press, 1995.Google Scholar
  34. Weiss, M.B.H.: “The Standards Development Process: A View from Political Theory”. ACM StandardView, vol. 1, no. 2, 1993.Google Scholar
  35. Yaverbaum, G.J.: “Critical Factors in the User Environment: An Experimental Study of Users, Organizations and Tasks”. MIS Quarterly 12 (1), 1988, pp 75–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Friedr. Vieweg & Sohn Verlagsgesellschaft mbH, Braunschweig/Wiesbaden 2000

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kai Jakobs

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations