Advertisement

Vergleichende Demokratieforschung

  • Gerardo L. Munck
Chapter
Part of the Uni-Taschenbücher / Probleme der Politik book series (2809, volume 1391)

Zusammenfassung

Die Demokratisierungswelle, die 1974 in Südeuropa begann und 1989/90 ihren Höhepunkt fand, hat zu einer Vielzahl empirischer Untersuchungen geführt. Diese konzentrierten sich vorwiegend auf Demokratie als nationales politisches System und legten ihren Schwerpunkt auf Demokratie als das Ergebnis (outcome) oder als abhängige Variable. Neben diesem übergreifenden Interesse haben die einzelnen Autoren jedoch eine breite Spanne von Aspekten der Politik in Ländern, die sich im Demokratisierungsprozess befinden, betont, verschiedene theoretische Traditionen herangezogen und sich eines vielfältigen Methodenspektrums bedient.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliographie

  1. Arfi, B. (1998): Democratization and Communal Politics. In: Democratization 5, 1, S. 42–63.Google Scholar
  2. Bendix, R. (1978): Kings or people: Power and the mandate to rule. Berkeley.Google Scholar
  3. Berg-Schlosser, D., Giegel, H.-J. (Hg.) (1999): Perspektiven der Demokratie. Probleme und Chancen im Zeitalter der Globalisierung. Frankfurt, New York.Google Scholar
  4. Beyme, K. von (1996): Transition to Democracy in Eastern Europe. Advances in Political Science. Basingstoke.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bratton, M., Walle, N. van de (1997): Democratic Experiments in Africa: Regime Transitions in Comparative Perspective. New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bunce, V. (1999): Subversive Institutions: The design and the destruction of socialism and the state. Cambridge studies in comparative politics. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chehabi, H. E., Linz, J. J. (1998): Sultanistic Regimes. Baltimore.Google Scholar
  8. Collier, R. B. (1999): Paths toward democracy: The working class and elites in Western Europe and South America. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Collier, R. B., Collier, D. (1991): Shaping the Political Arena: Critical junctures, the labor movement, and regime dynamics in Latin America. Princeton.Google Scholar
  10. Collier, D., Levitsky S. (1997): Democracy with Adjectives: Conceptual In- novation in Comparative Research. In: World Politics 49, 3, S. 430–451.Google Scholar
  11. Coppedge, M. (1997): Modernization and Thresholds of Democracy: Evidence for a Common Path and Process. In: Midlarsky, M. I. (Hg.): Inequality, Democracy and Economic Development. Cambridge.Google Scholar
  12. Coppedge, M. (1999): Thickening Thin Concepts and Theories: Combining Large N and Small in Comparative Politics. In: Comparative Politics 31, 4, S. 465–476.Google Scholar
  13. Dahl, R. A. (1971): Polyarchy: Participation and Opposition. New Haven. Dahl, R. A. ( 1989 ): Democracy and its critics. New Haven.Google Scholar
  14. Diamond, L. J., Linz, J. J., Lipset, S. M. (Hg.) (1989a): Democracy in Developing Countries. Africa. Boulder.Google Scholar
  15. Diamond, L. J., Linz, J. J., Lipset, S. M. (Hg.): (1989b): Democracy in Developing Countries. Asia. Boulder.Google Scholar
  16. Diamond, L. J., Linz, J. J., Lipset, S. M. (Hg.): (1989c): Democracy in Developing Countries. Latin America. Boulder.Google Scholar
  17. Diamond, L. J., Linz, J. J., Lipset S. M. (1995): Introduction: Comparing Experiences with Democracy. In: Diamond, L. J., Linz, J. J., Lipset, S. M. (Hg.): Politics in Developing Countries. Comparing Experiences with Democracy. Boulder.Google Scholar
  18. Dogan, M., Higley, J. (1998): Elites, Crises, and the Origins of Regimes. Boulder.Google Scholar
  19. Finer, S. E. (1975): State-and Nation-Building in Europe: The Role of the Military. In: Tilly, Ch. (Hg.): The Formation of National States in Western Europe. Princeton.Google Scholar
  20. Finer, S. E. (1997): The History of Government from the Earliest Times. Oxford. Foweraker, J. ( 1995 ): Theorizing Social Movements. Critical studies on Latin America. Boulder.Google Scholar
  21. GasiorQwski, M. J. (1995): Economic Crisis and Political Regime Change: An Event History Analysis. In: American Political Science Review 89, 4, S. 882–897.Google Scholar
  22. Geddes, B. (1999): What Do We Know about Democratization after Twenty Years. In: Annual Review of Political Science 2, S. 115–144.Google Scholar
  23. Goldthorpe, J. H. (1998): Causation, Statistics and Sociology, Geary Lecture. Oxford.Google Scholar
  24. Griffm, L., Linden, Marcel van der (Hg.) (1999): New Methods for Social History. Vol. 6. (=International Review of Social History — Supplement). Cambridge.Google Scholar
  25. Haggard, St., Kaufman, R. R. (1995): The Political Economy of Democratic Transitions. Princeton.Google Scholar
  26. Huntington, S. P. (1993): „The clash of civilizations?“ In: Foreign Affairs 72, 3, S. 22–49.Google Scholar
  27. Janoski, T., Hicks, A. (1994): The Comparative Political Economy of the Welfare State. (=Cambridge studies in comparative politics).Google Scholar
  28. Cambridge. Karl, T. L., Schmitter Ph. C. (1991): Modes of Transition in Latin America, Southern and Eastern Europe. In: International Social Science Journal 128, S. 269–284.Google Scholar
  29. Lauth, H.-J., Pickel, G., Welzel, Ch. (Hg.) (2000): Empirische Demokratiemessung. Opladen.Google Scholar
  30. Lijphart, A. (1977): Democracy in Plural Societies: A comparative exploration. New Haven.Google Scholar
  31. Linz, J J (1994): „Presidential or parliamentary democracy: Does it make a difference?“ In: Linz J. J., Valenzuela, A. (Hg.): The Failure of Presidential Democracy. Baltimore.Google Scholar
  32. Lipset, S. M. (1960): Political Man. The social bases of politics. Garden City.Google Scholar
  33. Mahoney, J. (2000): Path Dependence in Historical Sociology. In: Theory and Society 29, S. 507–548.Google Scholar
  34. Mahoney, J., Snyder, R. (1999): Rethinking Agency and Structure in the Study of Regime Change. In: Studies in Comparative International Development 34, 2, S. 3–32.Google Scholar
  35. Mainwaring, S. (1992): Transitions to Democracy and Democratic Consolidation: Theoretical and Comparative Issues. In: Mainwaring, S., O’Donnell, G. A., Valenzuela, J. S. (Hg.): Issues in Democratic Consolidation: The New South American Democracies in Comparative Perspective. South Bend.Google Scholar
  36. Mainwaring, S., Scully, T. (1995): Introduction: Party Systems in Latin America. In: Mainwaring, S., Scully, T. (Hg.): Building Democratic Institutions: Party Systems in Latin America. Stanford.Google Scholar
  37. Mann, M. (1993): The Sources of Social Power. Volume II: The Rise of Classes and Nation-States. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Mazzuca, S. (2000): Southern Cone Leviathans: State Formation in Argentina and Brazil. Berkeley (unveröffentlichtes Manuskript).Google Scholar
  39. Merkel, W. (1999): Systemtransformation. Opladen.Google Scholar
  40. Munck, G. L. (1998): Authoritarianism and Democratization: Soldiers and workers in Argentina, 1976–1983. University Park.Google Scholar
  41. O’Donnell, G. A. (1973): Modernization and bureaucratic-authoritarianism. Studies in South American politics. (=Politics of modernization series, no. 9). Berkeley.Google Scholar
  42. O’Donnell, G. (1996): Illusions about Consolidation. In: Journal of Democracy 7, 2, S. 34–51.Google Scholar
  43. O’Donnell, G. A. (1999): Counterpoints: Selected essays on authoritarianism and democratization. Notre Dame.Google Scholar
  44. O’Donnell, G. A., Schmitter, Ph. C., Whitehead, L. (1986): Transitions from Authoritarian Rule: Prospects for democracy. Baltimore.Google Scholar
  45. Offe, C. (1996): Varieties of Transition: The East European and East German experience. Cambridge.Google Scholar
  46. Przeworski, A. (1985): Capitalism and Social Democracy. Studies in Marxism and social theory. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Przeworski, A. (1991): Democracy and the Market: Political and economic reforms in Eastern Europe and Latin America, Studies in rationality and social change. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Przeworski, A., Limongi, F. (1997): Modernization: Theories and Facts. In: World Politics 49, 2, S. 155–183.Google Scholar
  49. Przeworski, A. et al. (2000): Democracy and Development: Political institutions and material well-being in the world, 1950–1990 (=Cambridge studies in the theory of democracy). Cambridge.Google Scholar
  50. Rueschemeyer, D., Huber, E., Stephens, St., Stephens, J. D. (1992): Capitalist Development and Democracy. Chicago.Google Scholar
  51. Rustow, D. (1970): Transitions to Democracy: Toward a Dynamic Model. In: Comparative Political Studies 2, 3, S. 337–363.Google Scholar
  52. Schedler, A. (1998): What is Democratic Consolidation? In: Journal of Democracy 9, S. 91–107.Google Scholar
  53. Schmitter, Ph. C. (1995): The Consolidation of Political Democracies: Processes, Rhythms, Sequences and Types. In: Pridham, G. (Hg.): Transitions to Democracy. Comparative Perspectives from Southern Europe. Aldershot.Google Scholar
  54. Schumpeter, J. A. (1947): Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. New York.Google Scholar
  55. Shain, Y., Linz, J. J.Berat, L. (1995): Between states: Interim governments and democratic transitions. Cambridge.Google Scholar
  56. Stepan, A. C. (1986): Paths toward Redemocratization: Theoretical and Comparative Considerations. In: O’Donnell, G., Schmitter, P. C., Whitehead, L. (Hg.): Transitions from Authoritarian Rule. Comparative Perspectives. Baltimore.Google Scholar
  57. Tilly, Ch. (1990): Coercion, Capital, and European States, AD 990–1990. (=Studies in social discontinuity). Cambridge.Google Scholar
  58. Wood, E. J. (2000): Forging Democracy from Below: Insurgent transitions in South Africa and El Salvador. (=Cambridge studies in comparative politics ). Cambridge.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften | GWV Fachverlage GmbH, Wiesbaden 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gerardo L. Munck

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations