Advertisement

Vergleichende Krisen- und Konfliktforschung

  • Ekkart Zimmermann
Part of the Uni-Taschenbücher / Probleme der Politik book series (2809, volume 1391)

Zusammenfassung

Die vergleichende Krisen- und Konfliktforschung hat in den letzten Jahrzehnten an Bedeutung gewonnen. Sie beschäftigt sich vornehmlich aus der Sicht makropolitischer Analyse mit Krisen- und Konfliktereignissen von der Französischen Revolution bis zur Gegenwart. Mitunter wird der zeitliche Horizont noch weiter gespannt. Untersucht werden Ereignisse in fortgeschrittenen Industriegesellschaften ebenso wie in Ländern der Dritten Welt. Der Schwerpunkt liegt nicht ausschließlich auf Makrophänomenen, sondern sie berücksichtigt auch Wirkungen oder Bedeutsamkeit bestimmter Konflikt- und Krisenereignisse für strategische Gruppen. So können Kleingruppenphänomene wie der (internationale) Terrorismus angesichts ihrer gesellschaftlichen und politischen Auswirkungen ebenfalls unter den Gegenstand der makropolitischen Konfliktforschung gerechnet werden. Vorrangig ist der internationale Vergleich von Krisen und Konflikten innerhalb von Staaten und nicht zwischen ihnen. Allerdings gibt es zahlreiche Gründe für eine übergreifende Betrachtung (s.u.). Die folgende Übersicht benennt einige Schwerpunkte und führende Vertreter der vergleichenden Krisen- und Konfliktforschung.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Berger, S. (2000): Globalization and Politics. In: Annual Review of Political Science 3, S. 43–62.Google Scholar
  2. Bhagwati, J. (2002): Coping with Antiglobalization: A trilogy of discontents. In: Foreign Affairs 81, 1, S. 2–7.Google Scholar
  3. Bunce, V. (1999): Subversive Institutions. The Design and the Destruction of Socialism and the State. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Burgoon, B. (2001): Globalization and welfare compensation. In: International Organization 55, 3, S. 509–551.Google Scholar
  5. Burstein, P., Linton, A. (2002): The impact of political parties, interest groups, and social movement organizations on public policy: Some recent evidence and theoretical concerns. In: Social Forces 81, 2, S. 381–410.Google Scholar
  6. Collins, R. (1995): Prediction in macrosociology: The case of the Soviet collapse. In: American Journal of Sociology 100, S. 1552–1593.Google Scholar
  7. Colomer, J. M. (1995): Game Theory and the Transition to Democracy. The Spanish Model. Aldershot.Google Scholar
  8. Colomer, J. M. (1991): Transitions by agreement: Modeling the Spanish way. In: American Political Science Review 85, 4, S. 1283–1302.Google Scholar
  9. Cornell, S. E. (2002): Autonomy as a source of conflict. Caucasian conflicts in theoretical perspective. In: World Politics 54, 2, S. 245–276.Google Scholar
  10. DeNardo, J. (1985): Power in Numbers: The Political Strategy of Protest and Rebellion. Princeton.Google Scholar
  11. Deutsch, K.-W. (1966): Nationalism and Social Communication: An Inquiry into the Foundations of Nationality. Cambridge.Google Scholar
  12. Dollar, D., Kray, A. (2002): Spreading the wealth. In: Foreign Affairs 81, 1, S. 120–133.Google Scholar
  13. Eckstein, S. (1982): The Impact of Revolution on Social Welfare in Latin America. In: Theory and Society 11, S. 43–94.Google Scholar
  14. Evans, Peter (1997): The eclipse of the state? Reflections on stateness in an era of globalization. In: World Politics 50, 1, S. 62–87.Google Scholar
  15. Fogg, R. W. (1985): Dealing with Conflict: A Repertoire of Creative, Peace-Google Scholar
  16. ful Approaches. In: Journal of Conflict Resolution 29, 2, S. 330–358.Google Scholar
  17. Gamson, W. A. (1975): The Strategy of Social Protest. Homewood, III. Garrett, G. (1999): Globalization and government spending around the world. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association. Atlanta.Google Scholar
  18. Gelpi, C. (1997): Democratic diversions: governmental structure and the diversion of domestic conflict. In: Journal of Conflict Resolution 41, S. 255–282.Google Scholar
  19. Goldstone, J. A. (1991): Revolution and Rebellion in the Early Modern World. Berkeley.Google Scholar
  20. Goldstone, J. A. (2001): Toward a fourth generation of revolutionary theory. In: Annual Review of Political Science 4, S. 139–87.Google Scholar
  21. Goldstone, J. A., Gurr, T., Harff, B., Levy, M., Marshall, M., Surko, P., Unger, A. et al. (2001): State Failure Task Force Phase III Report. McLean,VA: Sci. Appl. Int. Corp.Google Scholar
  22. Goodwin, J., Skocpol, T. (1989): Explaining Revolutions in the Contemporary Third World. In: Politics and Society 17,4, S. 489–507.Google Scholar
  23. Guigni, M. G., McAdam, D., Tilly, C. (eds.) (1998): Democracy and Contention. Boulder, CO.Google Scholar
  24. Gurr, T. D. (1980a): On the Outcomes of Violent Conflict. In: Gun, T. D. ( Hg. ), Handbook of Political Conflict. New York, S. 238–294.Google Scholar
  25. Gun, T. R. (1970): Why Men Rebel. Princeton.Google Scholar
  26. Gun, T. R. (1974): Persistence and Change in Political Systems, 1800–1971. In: American Political Science Review 68, 4, S. 1482–1504.Google Scholar
  27. Gun, T. R. (1993): Minorities at Risk. A Global View of Ethnopolitical Conflicts. Washington, D.C.: United States Institute of Peace Press.Google Scholar
  28. Gurr, T. R., Pitsch A. (2002): Ethnopolitische Konflikte and separatistische Gewalt. In: Heitmeyer, W., Hagan, J. ( Hg. ): Internationales Handbuch der Gewaltforschung. Opladen, S. 287–312.Google Scholar
  29. Habermas, J. (1973): Legitimationsprobleme im Sp?tkapitalismus. Frankfurt.Google Scholar
  30. Hamilton, R. F. (1991): The Skocpol Prolegomenon. Columbus: Ohio State University, Dept. of Sociology. Mimeo.Google Scholar
  31. Hechter, M., Okamoto, D. (2001): Political consequences of minority group formation. In: Annual Review of Political Science 4, S. 189–215.Google Scholar
  32. Hechter, M. (2000): Containing Nationalism. Oxford.Google Scholar
  33. Heitmeyer, W., Hagan, J. ( Hg. ) (2002): Internationales Handbuch der Gewaltforschung. Opladen.Google Scholar
  34. Heitmeyer, W. (2002): Rechtsextremistische Gewalt, In: Heitmeyer, W., Hagan, J. ( Hg. ): Internationales Handbuch der Gewaltforschung. Opladen, S. 501–546.Google Scholar
  35. Hennis, W., Kiehnansegg, Graf P., Matz, U. (1977, 1979): Regierbarkeit: Studien zu ihrer Problematisierung I+11. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
  36. Hibbs, D. A. (1978): On the Political Economy of Long-Run Trends in Strike Activity. In: British Journal of Political Science 8, 2, S. 153–175.Google Scholar
  37. Hibbs, D. A. (1973): Mass Political Violence: A Cross-National Causal Analysis. New York.Google Scholar
  38. Hobsbawm, E. J. (1974): Social Banditry. In: Landsberger, H. (Hg.): Rural Protest: Peasant Movements and Social Chang. London, S. 142–157.Google Scholar
  39. Hoffmann, S. (2002): Clash of globalizations. In: Foreign Affairs 81, 4, S. 104–115.Google Scholar
  40. Hofman, B. (2001): Terrorismus. Der unerklärte Krieg. Neue Gefahren politischer Gewalt. Frankfurt, M.Google Scholar
  41. Horowitz, D. L. (1985): Ethnic Groups in Conflict. Berkeley.Google Scholar
  42. Huntington, S. P. (1968): Political Order in Changing Societies. New Haven.Google Scholar
  43. Huntington, S. P. (1996): The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order. New York.Google Scholar
  44. Johnson, Th. H., Slater, R., McGowen, P. (1984): Explaining African Military Coups d’ütat, 1860–1982. In: American Political Science Review 78, 3, S. 622–664.Google Scholar
  45. Kalyvas, S. N. (1999): The decay and breakdown of communist one-party systems. Annual Review of Political Science 2, S. 323–344.Google Scholar
  46. Kennedy, P. (1989): The Rise and Fall of the Great Conflict from 1500 to 2000. New York.Google Scholar
  47. Kolodko, G. W. (2001): Globalization and catching-up: from recession to growth in transition economies. In: Communist and Post-Communist Studies 34, 3, S. 279–322.Google Scholar
  48. Konrad, K. A. (2002): Terrorism and the State. Discussion Paper FS IV 0215, Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin.Google Scholar
  49. Korpi, W., Shale, M. (1966): Strikes, Power and Politics in the Western Nations. In: Zeitlin, M. ( Hg. ): Political Power and Social Theory. Greenwich NJ., S. 299–332.Google Scholar
  50. Kriesi, H., Koopmans, R., Duyvendak, J.W., Guigni, M.G. (1995): The Politics of New Social Movements in Western Europe. Minneapolis.Google Scholar
  51. Kuran, T. (1995): The inevitability of future revolutionary surprises. In: American Journal of Sociology 100, 5, S. 1528–1551.Google Scholar
  52. Laitin, D., Warner, C.M. (1992): Structure and Irony in Social Revolutions. In: Political Theory 20, 1, S. 147–151.Google Scholar
  53. Lake, D. A., Rothchild, D. (1996): Containing fear. The origins and management of ethnic conflict. International Security 21, 2, S. 41–75.Google Scholar
  54. Lichbach, M. I., Gurr, T. R. (1981): The Conflict Process: A Formal Model. In: Journal of Conflict Resolution 23, S. 3–29.Google Scholar
  55. Linz, J. J., Stepan, A. ( Hg. ) (1978): The Breakdown of Democratic Regimes. Baltimore.Google Scholar
  56. Linz, J. J., Stepan, A. (1996): Problems of Democratic Transition and Consolidation. Southern Erurope, South America, and Post-Communist Europe. Baltimore.Google Scholar
  57. Mansfield, Edward D., Snyder, J (2002): Democratic transitions, institutional strength, and war. In: International Organization 56, 2, S. 297–338.Google Scholar
  58. McAdam, D., Tilly, C., Tarrow, S. G. (2001): Dynamics of Contention. Camebridge.Google Scholar
  59. Merkel, W. (1999): Systemtransformation. Opladen.Google Scholar
  60. Muller, E. N., Zimmermann, E. (1987): United States Military Aid and coups d’état in the Third World. In: Boswell, T. E., Bergesen, A. ( Hg. ): America’s Changing Role in the World System. New York.Google Scholar
  61. North, D. (1990): Institutions, Institutional Change, and Economic Performance. Cambridge.Google Scholar
  62. O’Connor, J. (1973): The Fiscal Crisis of the State. New York.Google Scholar
  63. Przeworski, A. (1991): Democracy and the Market. Political and Economic Reforms in Eastern Europe and Latin America. Cambridge.Google Scholar
  64. Przeworski, A., Alvarez, M., Cheibub, J. A., Limongi, F. (2000): Democracy and Development: Political Institutions and Economic Performance, 1950–1990. Cambridge.Google Scholar
  65. Ray, D. (1998): Development Economics. Princeton.Google Scholar
  66. Rieger, E., Leibfried, S. (2001): Grundlagen der Globalisierung. Perspektiven des Wohlfahrtsstaates. Frankfurt, M.Google Scholar
  67. Riker, W. H. (1962): The Theory of Political Coalitions. New Haven.Google Scholar
  68. Rodrik, D. (1999): Making Openness Work: The New Global Economy and the Developing Countries. Washington, D.C.: Overseas Development Council.Google Scholar
  69. Rodrik, D. (2002): Institutions, integration, and geography: In search of the deep determinants of economic growth. Harvard University.Google Scholar
  70. Rogowski, R. (1989): Commerce and Coalitions. How Trade Affects Domestic Political Alignments. Princeton.Google Scholar
  71. Rokkan, St. (1970): Citizen, Elections, Parties: Approaches to the Comparative Study of the Processes of Development. Oslo.Google Scholar
  72. Roland, G. (2000): Transition and Economics. Politics, Markets, and Firms. Cambridge.Google Scholar
  73. Rose, R., Peters, G. (1978): Can Government Go Bankrupt? New York. RotbergGoogle Scholar
  74. Robert I. (2002): Failed states in a world of terror. In: Foreign M-fairs 81, 4, S. 127–140.Google Scholar
  75. Rudü, G. (1964): The Crowd in History, 1730–1848. New York.Google Scholar
  76. Russett, B. (1983): International Interactions and Processes: The Internal vs. External Debate Revisited. In: Finifter, A. W. (Hg.): Political Science: The State of the Discipline. Washington, D.C., S. 541–568.Google Scholar
  77. Russett, B. M., Oneal, J. R. (2001): Triangulating Peace. Democracy, Interdependence, and International Organizations. New York.Google Scholar
  78. Sachs, J. (2001): The strategic significance of global inequality. Washington Quarterly 24, 3, S. 187–198.Google Scholar
  79. Sanders, D. (1981): Patterns of Political Instability. London.Google Scholar
  80. Scharpf, F. (1987): Sozialdemokratische Krisenpolitik in Europa. Frankfurt, M.Google Scholar
  81. Schendelen, M. P. C. M. van (1984): The Views of Arend Lijphart and Collected Criticisms. In: Acta Politica 19, 3, S. 19–55.Google Scholar
  82. Schmidt, M. G. (1983): Wirtschaftliche Entwicklungen nach 1945. In: Schmidt, M. G. (Hg.): Westliche Industriegesellschaften. Wörterbuch zur Politik, Bd. 3. München, S. 521–530.Google Scholar
  83. Skocpol, Th. (1979): States and Social Revolutions. A Comparative Analysis of France, Russia, and China. Cambridge.Google Scholar
  84. Skocpol, Th. (1982): Rentier State and Shi’a Islam in the Iranian Revolution. In: Theory and Society 2, 3, S. 265–283.Google Scholar
  85. Thompson, W. R. (1972): Explorations of the military coup. Ph. D. dissertation. University of Washington.Google Scholar
  86. Tilly, Ch. (1978): From Mobilization to Revolution. Reading, Mass.Google Scholar
  87. Tilly, Ch. (1992): Coercion, Capital and European States AD 990–1990. Revised paperback edition, Cambridge.Google Scholar
  88. Tilly, Ch. (1993): European Revolutions, 1492–1992. Oxford.Google Scholar
  89. Tilly, Ch. (1995): Popular Contention in Great Britain: 1754–1837. Cambridge.Google Scholar
  90. Waldmann, P. (1989): Ethnischer Radikalismus. Ursachen und Folgen gewaltsamer Minderheitenkonflikte am Beispiel des Baskenlandes, Nordirlands und Quebecs. Opladen.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Walt, S. M. (1996): Revolution and War. Ithaca.Google Scholar
  92. Walter, B. F. (2002): Committing to Peace. The Successful Settlement of Civil Wars. Princeton.Google Scholar
  93. Walter, B. F., Snyder, J. (eds. ) (1999): Civil Wars, Insecurity, and Intervention. New York.Google Scholar
  94. Weede, E. (1984): Kosten-Nutzen-Kalküle als Grundlage einer allgemeinen Konfliktsoziologie. In: Zeitschrift für Soziologie 13, S. 3–19.Google Scholar
  95. Weede, E. (1985): Entwicklungsländer in der Weltgesellschaft. Opladen. Weede, E. (1986): Konfliktforschung. Einführung und Überblick. Opladen.Google Scholar
  96. Wilensky, H. L. (1981): Democratic Corporatism, Consensus and Social Policy: Reflections on Changing Values and the “Crisis” of the Welfare State. In: The Welfare State in Crisis. OECD. Paris, S. 185–195.Google Scholar
  97. Wissmann, M., Hauck, R. ( Hg. ) (1983): Jugendprotest im demokratischen Staat. Enquête- Kommission des Deutschen Bundestages. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
  98. Zimmermann, E. (1977): Soziologie der politischen Gewalt. Darstellung und Kritik vergleichender Aggregatdatenanalysen aus den USA. Stuttgart.Google Scholar
  99. Zimmermann, E. (1981): Krisen, Staatsstreiche und Revolutionen: Theorien, Daten und neuere Forschungsansätze. Opladen.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Zimmermann, E. (1983): Political Violence, Crisis, and Revolutions: Theories and Research. Cambridge.Google Scholar
  101. Zimmermann, E. (1984): The study of Crisis in Liberal Democracies: Pitfalls and Promises. In: International Political Science Review, No.3, S. 319–343 (sowie 1985, 104 ).Google Scholar
  102. Zimmermann, E. (1985): The 1930s World Economic Crisis in Six European Countries: A first Report on Causes of Political Instability and Reactions to Crisis. In: Johnson, P. M., Thompson, W. R. ( Hg. ): Rhythms in Politics and Economics. New York, S. 84–127.Google Scholar
  103. Zimmermann, E. (1987): Government Stability in Six European Countries during the World Economic Crisis of the 1930s: Some Prelimary Considerations. In: European Journal of Political Research, No.1, S. 23–52.Google Scholar
  104. Zimmermann, E. (1993): Political breakdown and the process of national consensus formation: On collapse of the Weimar Republic in comparative perspective. In: Frederic Weil (ed.) Democratization in Eastern and Western Europe. Research on Democracy and Society. Greenwich, S. 267–297.Google Scholar
  105. Zimmermann, E. (1998): Ressourcenmobilisierung und Gewalt. In: Forschungsjournal Neue Soziale Bewegungen 11, 4, S. 55–67.Google Scholar
  106. Zimmermann, E. (1999a): Gewalt: Rebellion, Revolution, Krieg. In: Albrecht, G., Groenemeyer, A., Stallberg, F. W. ( Hg. ): Handbuch Soziale Probleme. Opladen, S. 556–574.Google Scholar
  107. Zimmermann, E. (1999b): Demokratisierung und Konflikt: Auf dem Wege zu einer theoretischen Bestandsaufnahme. In: Honegger, C., Hradil, S., Trax1er F. (Hg.): Grenzenlose Gesellschaft? Verhandlungen des 29. Kongresses der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Soziologie, Teil 2, 34. Opladen, S. 420–434.Google Scholar
  108. Zimmermann, E. (2000): Coalition games as stabilization or destabilizing factors during the Great Depression. Preliminary evidence from Germany, Sweden, Great Britain France and Germany. In: Larsen, S. ( ed. ): The Challenges of Theories on Democracies. New York, S. 285–308.Google Scholar
  109. Zimmermann, E. (i.V.): System Transformation: East Germany in Comparative Perspective.Google Scholar
  110. Zimmermann, E., Saalfeld, Th. (1988): Economic and Political Reactions to the World Economic Crisis of the 1930s in Six European Countries. In: International Studies Quarterly 32, S. 305–334.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften | GWV Fachverlage GmbH, Wiesbaden 2003

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ekkart Zimmermann

There are no affiliations available

Personalised recommendations