Zusammenfassung
Jegliche Planung muß auf irgendeine Weise das Problem ihrer Legitimität lösen, d. h. die Frage beantworten, worauf sich ihre Autorität, in gesellschaftliche Prozesse einzugreifen, stützt. Dies gilt vor allem für solche Arten der Sozialreform und Stadtplanung, deren Ziel es ist, soziale Innovationen durchzuführen, d. h. neue Programme und Ideen zu initiieren, um gesellschaftliche Probleme zu verringern und zu lösen.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Anmerkungen
Davis A. Armstrong, “Some Notes on the Concept of Planning” (Tavistock Institute of Human Relations. London, Juli 1961), S. 8 (vervielfältigtes Manuskript).
Wallace S. Sayre und Herbert Kaufman, Governing New York City: Politics in the Metropolis ( New York: Russell Foundation, 1960 ), S. 372.
Siehe: Robert C. Fried, “Professionalism and Politics in Roman Planning”, Journal of the American Institute of Planners, XXXV, Nr. 3 (Mai 1969 ), S. 150 - 159.
Norman Beckman, “The Planner as a Bureaucrat”, Journal of the American Institute of Planners, XXX, No. 4 (Nov. 1964), S. 324; Alan Altshuler, The City Planning Process: A Political Analysis ( New York: Cornell University Press 1965 ).
Chester Rapkin, Louis Winnick und David Blank, Housing Market Analyses: A Study of Theory and Method, A Report from the Institute for Urban Land Use and Housing Studies for the Housing and Home Finance Agency, 1952.
Paul Davidoff und Thomas A. Reiner, “A Choice Theory of Planning”, Journal of the American Institute of Planners, XXVIII, Nr. 2 (Mai 1962 ), S. 108.
Paul Davidoff, “Advocacy and Pluralism in Planning”, Journal of the American Institute of Planners, XXXI (November 1965), S. 331–338.
Herbert Gans, “Social Planning: Regional and Urban Planning”, in International Encyclopedia of the. Social Sciences ( New York: The McMillan Company and The Free Press, 1968 ), S. 131.
Martin Arnold, “Young Insurgents in Planning Commission Charge it Operates in Secrecy”, New York Times, March 30, 1969, S. 34.
Robert Morris und Martin Rein, “Emerging Pattern in Community Planning” in Social Work Practice, 1963 ( New York: Columbia University Press, 1963 ), S. 156.
Alvin W. Gouldner, “The Sociologist as Partisan: Sociology and the Welfare State”, The American Sociologist, III, No. 2 (Mai 1968 ), S. 109.
Harlem Youth Opportunities Unlimited, Youth in the Ghetto: A Study of the Consequences of Powerlessness and A Blueprint for Change (New York: HarYOU, 1964), S. 2/3.
Siehe z. B. Melvin Herman, “Problems of Evaluation”, The American Child, XLVII, Nr$12 (März 1965), S$15-10, und U. S. Congress, Senate, Subcommittee on Employment, Manpower and Poverty of the Committee on Labor and Public Welfare, Hearings auf S. 1545, Teil 10 (Comments on Sar Levitan, “Work Experience and Training”, staff paper), 90th Cong., 1st Sess., 1968, S. 3072 - 3081.
Peter Bachrach, “Elite Consensus and Democracy”, The Journal of Politics, XXIV (1962), S. 451.
James Cunningham, “The Struggle of the American for Freedom and Power”, ein Bericht, der für die Ford-Foundation im August 1967 vor-bereitet wurde. Siehe S. 57–69 für einen Bericht über die Gemeindeaktion in der City von San Francisco.
Hans Spiegel, “How Much Neighborhood Control?” in Citizen Participation in Urban Development ( Washington, DC: NTL Institute of Applied Behavioral Science, 1968 ), S. 271 - 291.
Siehe: Martin Rein und S. M. Miller, “Citizen Participation and Poverty”, University of Connecticut Law Review, I (Dezember 1968 ), S. 221 - 243.
Richard Cloward und Francis Piven, Low-Income People and Political Process, A Paper Presented at the Training Institute Program on Urban Community Development Projects (New York: Mobilization for Youth, Mai 1965 ).
Eugene Litwak und Lydia F. Hylton, “Interorganizational Analysis: A Hypothesis on Coordination Agencies”, Administrative Science Quarterly, IV (März 1962 ), S. 396.
Thomas A. Reiner, The Planner as Value Technician: Two Classes of Utopian Constructs and their Impacts on Planning in: H. Wentworth Eldredge (ed.), Taming Megalopolis (Vol. I, New York: Doubleday and Company, 1967 ), S. 232 - 247.
Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1973 Westdeutscher Verlag GmbH Opladen
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Rein, M. (1973). Sozialplanung: Auf der Suche nach Legitimität. In: Naschold, F., Väth, W. (eds) Politische Planungssysteme. Uni-Taschenbücher / Probleme der Politik. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-86105-4_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-86105-4_10
Publisher Name: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, Wiesbaden
Print ISBN: 978-3-531-11146-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-322-86105-4
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive