Abstract
Those unfamiliar with consciousness study may profess that science has not encountered any anomalous phenomena resulting from consciousness actively interacting with the physical realm. As a result, they may be puzzled about this paper or the entire section on consciousness in this book. However, conventional science has only explored certain aspects of consciousness such as cognition and perception, and in so doing has asked only limited questions. Science is bounded by the present dominant paradigm, which maintains that consciousness is a localised epiphenomenon of complex physical brain processes that manifests only passively in the physical world. Thus, the research questions posed by the scientific community typically reflect this view.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
J. Achterberg, L. Dossey, J. S. Gordon, et al. Mind/Body Interventions. In B. Rubik, B. Berman, R. Pavek, et al. (eds.) Alternative Medicine: Expanding Medical Horizons. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C., in press, 1994.
H. Benson, J. Beary, et al. The relaxation response. Psychiatry 37 (1974), 37–46,.
R. Ader. Developmental psychoneuroimmunology. Dev. Psychobiol. 16 (1983), 251–267.
F. Putnam. Differential autonomic nervous systems in multiple personality disorders. Psychiatric Research J. 31 (1990), 251–260.
R. G. Jahn, B. Dunne, and R.D. Nelson. Engineering anomalies research. J. Scientific Exploration 1(1987), 21–50.
H. Schmidt. Collapse of the state vector and PK effect. Foundations of Physics 12 (1992), 565–581.
H. E. Puthoff and R. Targ. A perceptual channel for information transferred over a conglomerate disturbance: historical perspective and research. Proc. IEEE 64 (1976), 329–354.
R. C. Byrd. Positive therapeutic effects of intercessory prayer in a coronary care unit population. Southern Med. J. 81 (1988), 826–29.
B. Rubik (ed.). The Interrelationship Between Mind and Matter. Center for Frontier Sciences at Temple University, Philadelphia, 1994.
R. Sperry. Mind/brain interaction: mentalism, yes; dualism, no. Neuroscience 2 (1980), 195–206.
W. W. Harman. Towards an adequate epistemology for the scientific exploration of consciousness. J. Scientific Exploration 7 (1993), 133–143.
W. W. Harman. Toward an adequate science of consciousness. Noetic Sciences Review 27 (Autumn 1993), 77–78
W. James. Essays in Radical Empiricism. Longmans, Green, and Co., New York, 1912.
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 1996 Friedr. Vieweg & Sohn Verlagsgesellschaft mbH, Braunschweig/Wiesbaden
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Rubik, B. (1996). The Challenge of Consciousness Study. In: Ghista, D.N. (eds) Biomedical and Life Physics. Vieweg+Teubner Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-85017-1_37
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-85017-1_37
Publisher Name: Vieweg+Teubner Verlag
Print ISBN: 978-3-322-85019-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-322-85017-1
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive