Skip to main content

The Influence of Personality on Negotiation — A Canada-France Comparison

  • Chapter
Strategic Management

Abstract

Negotiation is the process by which two or more parties exchange goods or services and attempt to agree upon an exchange rate for them (Wall, 1985; Wall/Blum, 1991). In the negotiation process, each side exercises and articulates its influence in an effort to accomplish its own objectives through its interaction with the other party (Bacharach/Lawler, 1981; Dansereau/Graen/Haga, 1975; Greenhalgh/Nelsin/Gilkey, 1985; Kipnis/Schmidt, 1983). As one of the basic processes of human behaviour, negotiation is something we all do on a daily basis. Negotiation is also widely used in labor-management relations, in business agreements such as mergers and sales, in international relations, and in international business (King/Hinson, 1994). As the world economy becomes more and more globalised, people from different cultures are becoming more frequently engaged in negotiation with one another. Thus, an understanding of the negotiation process and the impact of culture on it are essential to anyone who works with or through other people to accomplish objectives in many different situations (Le-wicki/Litterer/Saunders/Minton, 1994a).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literature

  • Alberti, R.; Emmons, M. (1994): Your Perfect Right: A Guide to Assertive Living, 6th ed., San Luis Obispo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arunachalam, V.; Wall, J. (1998): Hong Kong versus U.S. negotiations: Effects of culture, alternative, outcome scales, and mediation, in: Journal of Applied Social Psychology, Vol. 28, No. 14, pp. 1219–1244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bacharach, S.; Lawler, E. (1981): Bargaining, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barry, B.; Friedman, R.A. (1998): Bargainer characteristics in distributive and integrative negotiation, in: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 74, pp. 345–359.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, J.G.; Heimberg, R.G. (1983): Self-report assessment of assertive behavior: A critical analysis, in: Behavior Modification, Vol. 7, pp. 451–487.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, N.; Graham, J.; Jolibert, A.; Meissmer, H. (1988): Marketing negotiation in France, Germany, the United Kingdom, and the United States, in: Journal of Marketing, Vol. 52, pp. 49–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carnevale, P.; Lawler, E. (1986): Time pressure and the development of integrative agreements in bilateral negotiation, in: Journal of Conflict Resolution, Vol. 30, pp. 636–656.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chan, D.W. (1993): Components of assertiveness: Their relationships with assertive rights and depressed mood among Chinese college students in Hong Kong, in: Behavior Research Therapy, Vol. 31, pp. 529–538.

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchill, G.; Walker, O.; Ford, N. (1990): Sales Force Management, 3rd ed., Homewood.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dansereau, F.; Graen, G.; Haga, W. (1975): A vertical dyad linkage approach to leadership within formal organizations, in: Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, Vol. 13, pp. 46–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dolbear, F.; Lave, L. (1966): Risk orientation as a predictor in the prisoner’s dilemma, in: Journal of Conflict Resolution, Vol. 10, pp. 506–515.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fensterheim, H.; Baer, J. (1975): Don’t say yes when you want to say no: How assertiveness training can change your life, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ford, D. (1983): Effects of personal control belief: An exploratory analysis of bargaining outcomes in inter-group negotiations, in: Group and Organization Studies, Vol. 8, pp. 113–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fry, W. (1985): The effect of dyad Machiavellianism and visual access on integrative bargaining outcomes, in: Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 11, pp. 51–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, J. (1986): The problem-solving approach to negotiation in industrial marketing, in: Journal of Business Research, Vol. 14, pp. 549–566.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, J. (1984): A comparison of Japanese and American business negotiations, in: International Journal of Research, Vol. 1, pp. 51–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham, J. (1983): Brazilian, Japanese and American business negotiations, in: Journal of International Business Studies, Vol. 16, pp. 47–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenhalgh, L.; Nelsin, S.; Gilkey, R. (1985): The effects of negotiator preferences, situational power, and negotiator personality on outcomes of business negotiations, in: Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 28, pp. 9–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, E. (1976): Beyond Culture, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, E. (1983): The Dance of Life: The Other Dimensions of Time, Garden City, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartfield, E.F. (1991): Strategies for conduction of successful negotiations with Japanese firms, in: East Asian Executive Reports, Vol. 13, pp. 13–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G. (1991): Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G. (1980): Culture’s Consequences: International Differences in Work-Related Values, Beverly Hills.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, W.; Hinson, T. (1994): The influence of sex and equity sensitivity on relationship performances, assessment of opponent, and outcomes on a negotiation experiment, in: Journal of Management, Vol. 20, No. 3, pp. 605–624.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kipnis, D.; Schmidt, S. (1983): An influence perspective on bargaining within organizations, in: Bazerman, M.; Lewicki R. (Eds.): Negotiation Inside Organizations, pp. 303–319, Beverly Hills.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirkbride, P.; Tang, S.; Westwood, D. (1991): Chinese conflict preferences and negotiating behaviors: Culture and psychological influence, in: Organization Studies, Vol. 12, No. 3, pp. 365–386.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laurent, A. (1983): The cultural diversity of western conceptions of management, in: International Studies of Management and Organizations, Vol. 13, No. 1–2, pp. 75–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leung, K.; Bond, M. (1984): The impact of cultural collectivism and reward allocation, in: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 47, pp. 793–804.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewicki, R.; Litterer, J.; Minton, J.; Saunders, D. (1994a): Negotiation, 2nd ed., Burr Ridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewicki, R.; Litterer, J.; Saunders, D., Minton, J. (1994b): Negotiation: Readings, Exercises and Cases, 2nd ed., Burr Ridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mead, R. (1994): International Management: Cross-Cultural Dimensions, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mnookin, R.; Peppet, S.; Tulumello, A. (1996): The tension between empathy and assertiveness, in: Negotiation Journal, May, pp. 217–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muldman, F. (1984): La escala de asertividad de Spencer A. Rathus (R.A.S.): Estructura factorial, in: Terapia Psicologia, Vol. 3, pp. 72–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pervin, L. (1990): A brief history of modern personality theory, in: Pervin, L. (Ed.): Handbook of Personality, Theory and Research, pp. 3–18, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pilisuk, M.; Peter, P.; Rapaport, A.; Winter, J. (1965): War hawks and peace doves: Alternate resolution of experimental conflicts, in: Journal of Conflict Resolution, Vol. 9, pp. 491–508.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pruitt, D.; Syna, H. (1985): Mismatching the opponent’s offers in negotiation, in: Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 21, pp. 103–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rathus, S. (1973): A 30-item schedule for assessing assertive behavior, in: Behavior The-rapy, Vol. 4, pp. 398–406.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, J.; Brown, B. (1975): The Social Psychology of Bargaining and Negotiation, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruekert, R.; Churchill, G. (1984): Reliability and validity of alternative measures of channel member satisfaction, in: Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 21, pp. 226–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegel, S.; Fouraker, L. (1960): Bargaining and Group Decision Making: Experiments in Bilateral Monopoly, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spector, B. (1977): Negotiation as a psychological process, in: Journal of Conflict Resolution, Vol. 21, No. 4, pp. 607–618.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R.; Dobson, D. (1987): Resolving interpersonal conflicts: An analysis of stylistic consistency, in: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 52, pp. 794–812.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R.; Soriano, L. (1984): Styles of conflict resolution, in: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 47, pp. 115–126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stolte, J. (1983): Self-efficacy: Sources and consequences in negotiation networks, in: The Journal of Social Psychology, Vol. 199, pp. 69–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, L. (1990): Negotiation behavior and outcomes: Empirical evidence and theoretical issues, in: Psychological Bulletin, Vol. 108, No. 3, pp. 515–532.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, L.; Hastie, R. (1990): Judgment tasks and biases in negotiation., in: Sheppard, B.;. Bazerman, M; Lewicki, R. (Eds.): Research on Negotiation in Organizations, Vol. 2, pp. 31–54, Greenwich.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vector, D. (1992): International Business Communication, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wall, J. (1985): Negotiation: Theory and Practice, Glenview.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wall, J.; Blum, M. (1991): Negotiations, in: Journal of Management, Vol. 17, pp. 273–303.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wanous, J.; Reichers, A.; Hudy, M. (1997): Overall job satisfaction: How good are single-item measures?, in: Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 82, No. 2, pp. 247–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, K.; Gallios, C. (1993): Assertion and its social context, Oxford-New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yik, M.; Bond, M. (1993): Exploring the dimensions of Chinese perception with indigenous and imported constructs: Greeting a culturally balanced scale, in: International Journal of Psychology, Vol. 28, No. 1, pp. 75–95.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2002 Betriebswirtschaftlicher Verlag Dr. Th. Gabler GmbH, Wiesbaden

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Jaeger, A., Ma, Z., Anderson, T. (2002). The Influence of Personality on Negotiation — A Canada-France Comparison. In: Scholz, C., Zentes, J. (eds) Strategic Management. Gabler Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-84457-6_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-84457-6_14

  • Publisher Name: Gabler Verlag

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-322-84458-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-322-84457-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics