Skip to main content

Mobilisierung und Wandel

  • Chapter
Die aktive Gesellschaft

Zusammenfassung

Daß Einheiten, die über ähnliches Wissen und ähnliche Ressourcen verfügen und in grundsätzlich denselben Umwelten agieren, ihre Ziele dennoch in unterschiedlichem Maße verwirklichen, scheint auf Unterschiede im Grad der Bindung an diese Ziele bedingt zu sein. Die überwiegende Zahl der gesamtgesellschaftlichen Einheiten bindet in der Regel nur einen kleinen Bruchteil ihrer Ressourcen an die Verfolgung ihrer kollektiven Ziele. Das Ausmaß dieses Bruchteils ist ein Maß der Intensität ihrer Zielorientierung. Die entscheidende Frage bei der Untersuchung gesamtgesellschaft licher Mobilisierung ist demnach, unter welchen Bedingungen die Bindung einer Einheit stark ist und wächst. Auf gesamtgesellschaftliche Kontrolle bezogen heißt dies, daß der Grad, in dem eine spezifische Kontrollinstanz imstande ist, die von ihren kybernetischen Zentren entworfenen Pläne zu verwirklichen, wesentlich von der Energiemenge abhängt, die sie zu mobilisieren fähig ist.1

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 74.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Anmerkungen

  1. Neil J. Smelser, Theory of Collective Behavior, New York, 1963, S. 17 ff.

    Google Scholar 

  2. William C. Mitchell, The American Polity, New York, 1962, S. 238.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Klaus Knorr, The War Potential of Nations, Princeton, N.J., 1956, S. 19–28, 119–160

    Google Scholar 

  4. James Schlesinger, The Political Economy of National Security, New York, 1960, S. 74–75, 78–103

    Google Scholar 

  5. Charles Hitch und Roland N. McKean, The Economics of Defense in the Nuclear Age, Cambridge, Mass., 1960, S. 218–239.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Karl W. Deutsch unternimmt einen detaillierten Versuch, Mobilisierung auf sieben verschiedenen Dimensionen in 19 Ländern zu messen: Social Mobilization and Pohtical Development, American Political Science Review, Bd. 55, 1961, S. 493–514.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bruce M. Russet, Hayward R. Alker Jr., Karl W. Deutsch und Harold D. Lasswell, World Hand book of Political and Social Indicators, New Haven, Conn., 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Carlton J.H. Hayes, The Historical Evolution of Modern Nationalism, New York, 1950, S. 164–231.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Quincy Wright, A Study of War, Chicago, 1965, S. 1448–1453

    Google Scholar 

  10. Angus Campbell et al., The American Voter, New York, 1960, S. 301–327

    Google Scholar 

  11. Roman Lipsky, Electioneering Among the Minorities, Commentary, Bd. 31, 1961, S. 428–432.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Samuel Lubell, The Negro and the Democratic Coalition, Commentary, Bd. 38, 1964, S. 19–27.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Zbigniew K. Brzezinski, The Soviet Bloc: Unity and Conflict, überarb. Aufl., New York, 1961, S. 157–181

    Google Scholar 

  14. Andrzej Korbonski, COMECON: The Evolution of COMECON, in: International Political Communities, Garden City, N.Y., 1966, S. 351–403.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Marx/Engels: Werke, Bd. 4, 1959, S. 462–463.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Edwin O. Reischauer, Japan: Past and Present, New York, 1946, S. 108–112.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Marion J. Levy, Modernization and the Structure of Societies: A Setting for International Affairs, Princeton, N.J., 1966, Bd I, S. 106, Bd. II, S. 396

    Google Scholar 

  18. Marjorie Hunter, ADA for Tax Rise to Pay for Gains, The New York Times, 5. Jan. 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Arthur Kornhauser, Harold L. Sheppard, Albert J. Mayer, When Labor Votes: A Study of Auto Workers, New York, 1956, S. 122–145, 212–213

    Google Scholar 

  20. Alfred O. Hero, Jr., The American Public and the UN, 1954–1966, The Journal of Conflict Resolution, Bd. 10, 1966, S. 436–475.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Amitai Etzioni, Two Approaches to Organizational Analysis: A Critique and a Suggestion, Administrative Science Quarterly, Bd. 5, 1960, S. 257–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Allen H. Barton, Social Organization under Stress: A Sociological Review of Disaster Studies, Washington, D.C., 1963.

    Google Scholar 

  23. James Q. Wilson, Negro Politics: The Search for Leadership, New York, 1960, S. 4–5.

    Google Scholar 

  24. David Wilson, Nation Buüding and Revolutionary War, in: Karl W. Deutsch und William J. Foltz (Hrsg.), Nation Building, New York, 1963, S. 84–94.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Seymour M. Lipset, Student Opposition in the United States, Government and Opposition, Bd. I, 1966, S. 351–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Jean Lacouture, Le Viet Nam entre deux paix, Paris, 1965, S. 179.

    Google Scholar 

  27. George Rudé, The Crowd in the French Revolution, Oxford, 1959, S. 56, 76, 89, 153–154.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Howard F. Cline, The United States and Mexico, Cambridge, Mass., 1965, S. 121.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Robert E. Lane, Political Life: Why People Get Involved in Politics, New York, 1959.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Julian L. Woodward und Elmo Roper, Political Activity of American Citizens, American Political Science Review, Bd. 44, 1950, S. 872–885.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Seymour M. Lipset, Political Man: The Social Basis of Politics, Garden City, N.Y., 1960, S. 67

    Google Scholar 

  32. Juan Linz, The Social Basis of West German Politics, Ph. D.-Dissertation, Columbia University, N.Y., 1959, S. 804–805

    Google Scholar 

  33. Frantz Wendt, The Nordic Council and Cooperation in Scandinavia, Kopenhagen, 1959, S. 234

    Google Scholar 

  34. Harry S. Truman, Memoirs, Garden City, N.Y., 1956, Bd. II, S. 277–279

    Google Scholar 

  35. Hugh Seton-Watson, Neither War Nor Peace, New York, 1960, S. 19–45, insbes. S. 42.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Robert Coles und Joseph Brenner, American Youth in a Social Struggle: The Mississippi Summer Project, American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, Bd. 35, 1965, S. 909–926.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Dorwin Cartwright, Some Principles of Mass Persuasion: Selected Findings of Research on the Sale of United States War Bonds, in: Daniel Katz et al., Public Opinion and Propaganda, New York, 1954, S. 382–393.

    Google Scholar 

  38. George Brager, Organizing the Unaffiliated in a Low-Income Area, in: Mayer N. Zald (Hrsg.), Social Welfare Institutions, New York, 1965, S. 646–648,

    Google Scholar 

  39. Donald Janson, Dr. King Plagued by Resistance and Apathy in Chicago Slums, The New York Times, 16. Jan. 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Rayden Harrison, Before the Socialists: Studies in Labour and Politics, 1861–1881, London, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Robert Michels, Proletariat und Bourgeoisie in der sozialistischen Bewegung Italiens, Archiv für Sozialwissenschaft, Bd. 21, 1905, S. 379–380.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Lewis Killian und Charles Grigg, Racial Crisis in America: Leadership in Conflict, Englewood Cliffs, N.J., 1964, S. 84–90.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Crane Brinton, The Anatomy of Revolution, New York, 1959, S. 148 ff.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Catherine V. Richards und Norman A. Polansky, Reaching Working Class Youth Leaders, Social Work, Bd. 4, 1959, S. 38.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Brent M. Rutherford, Psychopathology, Decision-Making, and Political Involvement, The Journal of Conflict Resolution, Bd. 10, 1966, S. 387–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Philip Selznick, The Organizational Weapon, New York, 1960, S. 56–65, 276–291.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Joseph Levyveld, Communism, Kerala Style, New York Times Magazine, 30. April 1967, S. 30.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Jacquelyne J. Clarke, These Rights They Seek: A Comparison of the Goals and Techniques of Local Civil Rights Organizations, Washington, D.C., 1962.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Jack Newfîeld, A Prophetic Minority, New York, 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Robert Aron, Histoire de la liberation de la France, juin 1944 -mai 1945, Paris, 1959.

    Google Scholar 

  51. Colin Miller, The Press and the Student Revolt, in: Michael V. Miller und Susan Gilmore (Hrsg.), Revolution at Berkeley, New York, 1965; S. 347.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Mary Ellen Roach und Joanne Bubolz Eicher, Dress, Adornment and the Social Order, New York, 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Mayer N. Zald und Roberta Ash, Social Movement Organizations: Growth, Decay and Change, Social Forces, Bd. 44, 1966, S. 327–341

    Google Scholar 

  54. Sheldon Messinger, Organizational Transformation: A Case Study of a Declining Social Movement, American Sociological Review, Bd. 20, 1955, S. 3–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Herbert Blumer, Social Movements, in: A.M. Lee (Hrsg.), Principles of Sociology, New York, 1955, S. 99–220.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Joseph Gusfield, Symbolic Crusade: Status Politics and the American Temperance Movement, Urbana, Ill., 1963

    Google Scholar 

  57. Brian Crozier, The Rebels: A Study of Post-War Insurrection, London, 1960.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Beispiel N. A. Khan, Resource Mobilization from Agriculture and Economic Development in India, Economic Development and Cultural Change, Bd. 12, 1963, S. 42–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Moshe Lissak, Social Change, Mobilization and Exchange of Services Between the Military Establishment and the Civil Society: The Burmese Case, op. cit., Bd. 13, 1964, S. 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Karl W. Deutsch, Social Mobilization and Political Development, American Political Science Review, Bd. 55, 1961, S. 493–514.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Gino Germani, Politica y sociedad en una época de transicion: De la sociedad tradicional a la sociedad de masas, Buenos Aires, 1962, S. 151

    Google Scholar 

  62. Gino Germani, Social Change and Intergroup Conflict, in: Irving Louis Horowitz (Hrsg.), The New Sociology, New York, 1964, S. 396.

    Google Scholar 

  63. J. P. Nettl, Political Mobilization: A Sociological Analysis of Methods and Concepts, London, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Lucian W. Pyes und Sidney Verbas „Einleitung“ zu dem von ihnen herausgegebenen Buch Political Culture and Political Development, Princeton, N.J., 1965, S. 19–21.

    Google Scholar 

  65. Robert E. Ward und Dankwart A. Rustow gezeigt: Political Modernization in Japan and Turkey, Princeton, N.J., 1964, S. 434–468, insbes. S. 441–447.

    Google Scholar 

  66. Simon Ottenberg, Ibo Receptivity to Change, in: William R. Bascom und Melville J. Herskovits (Hrsg.), Continuity and Change in African Culture, Chicago, 1958, S. 130–143.

    Google Scholar 

  67. S. N. Eisenstadt, Patterns of Leadership and Social Homogeneity in Israel, International Social Science Bulletin, Bd. 8, 1956, S. 36–53.

    Google Scholar 

  68. Karl W. Deutsch et al.. Political Community and the North Atlantic Area, Princeton, N.J., 1957, S. 50.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1975 Westdeutscher Verlag GmbH, Opladen

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Etzioni, A. (1975). Mobilisierung und Wandel. In: Die aktive Gesellschaft. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-83534-5_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-83534-5_15

  • Publisher Name: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-531-11151-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-322-83534-5

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics