Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Schriftenreihe Geriatrie Praxis ((GERIATRIE))

  • 15 Accesses

Zusammenfassung

Die Vielschichtigkeit der Erkrankungen und die daraus resultierenden Probleme machen eine Diagnostik, Beurteilung und Behandlung im interdisziplinären Team erforderlich. Die Zusammensetzung der Arbeitsgruppe hängt von den strukturellen Bedingungen, der Auswahl der Patienten und den Behandlungszielen ab. Typischer-weise besteht das Kernteam aus einem Arzt, Krankenpfleger und Sozialarbeiter [21]. Es wird je nach Anforderung ergänzt durch Krankengymnasten, Ergotherapeuten, Logopäden, Psychologen, Seelsorger, Ernährungsberater.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 44.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Literatur

  1. Allen CM, Becker PM, Mc Vey RN (1986) A randomized, controlled clinical trial of a geriatric consultation team: Compliance with recommendations. JAMA 255: 2617–2621.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Applegate W, Deyo R, Kramer A, Meehan S (1991) Geriatric evaluation and management: Current status and future research directions. J.Am.Geriatr.Soc. 39S: 2–7.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Applegate WB, Miller ST, Graney MJ (1990) A randomized controlled trial of a geriatric assessment unit in a community rehabilitation hospital. N.Engl.J.Med. 322: 1572–1578.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Barker W, Williams T, Zimmer J (1985) Geriatric consultation teams in acute hospitals: Impact on back-up of elderly patients. J.Am.Geriatr.Soc. 33: 422–428.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Becker PM, Mc Vey RN, Saltz C (1987) Hospital-acquired complications in a randomized controlled clinical trial of a geriatric consultation team. JAMA 257: 2313–2317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Blumenfield S, Morris J, Sherman FT (1982) The geriatric team in the acute care hospital: An eductional and consultation modality. J.Am.Geriatr.Soc. 30: 660–664.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Branch LG, Jette AM (1982) A prospective study of long-term care institutionalization among the aged. Am.J.Pub.Health 72: 1373–1379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Burley LE, Currie CT, Smith RG (1979) Contribution from geriatric medicine within acute medical wards. Br.Med.J. 2: 90–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Donaldson U, Clayton DG, Clarke M (1980) The elderly in residential care: Morality in relation to functional capacity. J.Epidemiol.Community Health 34: 96–101.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Epstein AM, Hall JA, Fretwell M (1990) Consultative geriatric assessment for ambulatory patients: A randomized trial in a health maintanance organization. JAMA 263: 538–544.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Gayton D, Wood-Dauphinee S, de Lorimer M (1987) Trial of a geriatric consultation team in an acute care hospital. J.Am.Geriatr.Soc. 35: 726–736.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hendriksen C, Lund E, Stromgârd E (1984) Consequences of assessment and intervention among elderly people: A three year randomized controlled trial. Br.Med.J. 289: 1522–1524.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hogan DB, Fox RA (1990) A prospective controlled trial of a geriatric consultation team in an acute-care hospital. Age Aging 19: 107–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hogan DB, Fox RA, Badley BW (1987) Effect of a geriatric consultation service on management of patients in an acute care hospital. Can.Med.Assoc.J. 136: 713–717.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kane RA, Kane RL (1987) Long-term care principles, programs and policies. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York Tokyo.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Lefton E, Bonstelle S, Frengley JD (1983) Success with an inpatient geriatric unit: A controlled study Of outcome and follow-up. J.Am.Geriatr.Soc. 31: 149–155.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Lowther CP, Mac Leod RD, Williamson J (1970) Evaluation of early diagnostic services for the elderly, Br.Med.J. 3: 275–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Mc Vey RN, Becker PM, Saltz C (1989) Effect of a geriatric consultation team on functional status of elderly hospitalized patients. Ann.Intern.Med. 110: 79–84.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Narain P, Rubenstein LZ, Wieland D (1988) Predictors of immediate and 6 month outcomes in hospitalized patients: The importance of functional status. J.Am.Geriatr.Soc. 36: 775–783.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Popplewell PY, Henschke PJ (1983) What is the value of a geriatric assessmentunit in a teaching hospital? A comparative study. Australian Health Review 6: 23–25.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Rubenstein LZ, Stuck A, Siu A, Wieland D (1991) Impacts of geriatric evaluation and management programs on defined outcomes: Overview of the evidence. J.Am.Geriatr.Soc. 39S: 8–16.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Rubenstein LZ (1987) Documenting impacts of geriatric consultation. J.Am.Geriatr.Soc. 35: 829–830.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Rubenstein LZ, Josephson KR, Wieland GD (1984) Effectiveness of a geriatric evaluation unit: A randomized clinical trial. N.Engl.J.Med. 311: 1664–1670.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Schuman JE, Beattie EJ, Steed DA (1978) The impact of a new geriatric program in a hospital for the chronically ill. Can.Med.Assoc.J. 118: 639–645.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Teasdale T, Schuman L, Snow E (1983) A comparison of placement outcomes of geriatric cohorts receiving care in a geriatric assessment unit on general medicine floors. J.Am.Geriatr.Soc. 31: 529–534.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Tulloch AJ, Moore V (1979) A randomized controlled trial of geriatric screening and surveillance in general practice. J.R.Coll.Gen.Pract. 29: 733–742.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Vetter NJ, Jones DA, Victor CR (1984) Effect of health visitors working with elderly patients in general practice: A randomized controlled trial. Br.Med.J. 288: 369–372.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Weissert WG (1985) Estimating the long-term care population: Prevalence rates and selected characteristics. Health Care Financ.Rev. 6: 83–91.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Welz R (1989) Zitiert nach: Häfner H in: Ergebniszusammenfassung der Expertenanhörung zur geriatrischen Versorgung am 7.7.1989 durch das Ministerium für Arbeit, Gesundheit, Familie und Sozialordnung Baden-Württemberg.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Winograd CH, Gerety MB, Brown E (1988) Targeting the hospitalized elderly for geriatric consultation. J.Am.Geriatr.Soc. 36: 1113–1119.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Zook C, Moore F (1980) High-cost users of medical care. N. Engl.J. Med. 302: 996–1002.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1992 MMV Medizin Verlag GmbH München, München

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Nikolaus, T., Specht-Leible, N. (1992). Rahmenbedingungen. In: Das geriatrische Assessment. Schriftenreihe Geriatrie Praxis. Vieweg+Teubner Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-83145-3_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-83145-3_2

  • Publisher Name: Vieweg+Teubner Verlag

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-528-07850-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-322-83145-3

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics