Abstract
Chapter two provided a detailed review of four different schools of thought that dominated the strategy literature over the past four decades. Extensive research helped to establish sound theoretical foundations in each research field. Based on these foundations, each approach claims to provide a satisfactory explanation for performance differences between firms. However, with four competing paradigms, one question is particularly interesting: who is right? Can performance be fully explained by industry characteristics as claimed by industrial organization economists? Or do the firm’s unique capabilities make the difference? Does corporate strategy play the decisive role or is it perhaps strategic moves on the business unit level?
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Much of the complexity literature reviewed in this chapter is based on earlier writings of systems dynamics (i.e. Wiener 1961, Gomez/Probst 1987, Vester 1988). This literature has been reviewed, but is not presented in detail in this study.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2004 Deutscher Universitäts-Verlag/GWV Fachverlage GmbH, Wiesbaden
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Raisch, S. (2004). Towards a Dynamic Research Model. In: Dynamic Strategic Analysis. Deutscher Universitätsverlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-81883-6_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-81883-6_3
Publisher Name: Deutscher Universitätsverlag
Print ISBN: 978-3-8244-8249-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-322-81883-6
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive