Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Expert-Based Policy or Policy-Based Expertise? Regulating GM Crops in Europe

  • Chapter
Book cover Wozu Experten?

Abstract

The days have long passed when governments could simply defend safety claims by invoking ‘sound science’. Facing several food scandals since the mid-1990s, European risk regulation has faced illegitimacy problems. Before the BSE crisis erupted, for example, expert advice had downplayed important uncertainties and assumed that risk-management measures would be adequately implemented. Such advice was deployed to reassure the public, while allowing politicians to avoid full responsibility for decisions. As an EU report later noted,

“While being increasingly relied upon, however, expertise is also increasingly contested. ‘Traditional’ science is confronted with the ethical, environmental, health, e-conomic and social implications of ist technological applications. Scientific expertise must therefore interact and at times conflict with other types of expertise” (Liberatore 2001:6).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Andow, David/Alstad, David (1998): F2 screen for rare resistance alleles. In: Journal of Economic Entomology Vol. 91, No. 3, p. 572–578

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, Ulrich (1996): Risk society and the provident state. In: Lash, S./Szerszynski, B./Wynne, B. (Eds.): Risk, Environment and Modernity. London: Sage, p. 27–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, David (2002): Speech at inaugural meeting of the EFSA Management Board, 18 September

    Google Scholar 

  • CEC (2000a): Communication from the Commission on the Precautionary Principle, Brussels: Commission of the European Communities, http://europa.eu.int/comm/off/com/health_consumer/precaution/htm

    Google Scholar 

  • CEC (2000b): Comments from the European Commission Services to the Codex Secretariat. In: EU position papers for Codex Alimentarius, http://europa.eu.int/comm/food/fs/ifsi/eupositions/ccgp/ccgp01_en.html

    Google Scholar 

  • CEC (2001): Commission proposal for a Regulation on GM food and feed. COM 2001–425 final, 25 July, http://europa.eu.int/comm/food/fs/biotech/biotech08_en.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • CEC (2002): Towards a European Food Safety Authority, http://europa.eu.int/comm/food/fs/efa/index_en.html

    Google Scholar 

  • EC (1990): Council Directive 90/220 on the Deliberate Release to the Environment of Genetically Modified Organisms. In: Official Journal of the European Communities, L117, p. 15–27

    Google Scholar 

  • EC (1996): Commission Decision 96/158/EC of 6 February 1996 concerning the placing on the market of a product consisting of a GMO, hybrid herbicide-tolerant swede-rape seeds. In: Official Journal of the European Communities, L 37, p. 30–31

    Google Scholar 

  • EC (1997): Commission Decision 97/98/EC of 23 January 1997 concerning the placing on the market of genetically modified maize. In: Official Journal of the European Communities, L 31, p. 69–70

    Google Scholar 

  • EC (1998): Commission decision concerning the placing on the market of a genetically modified maize (Zea mays L. line MON 810), pursuant to Council Directive 90/220/EEC. In: Official Journal of the European Communities, 5 May, L 131, p. 32–33

    Google Scholar 

  • EC (2001): Directive 2001/18. In: Official Journal of the European Communities, L 106, p. 1–39, http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/en/lif/dat/2001/en_301L0018.html

    Google Scholar 

  • EC (2002): Regulation 178/2002 of 28 January 2002 laying down the general principles and requirements of food law, establishing the European Food Safety Authority, and laying down procedures in matters of food safety. In: Official Journal of the European Communities, L31, p. 1–23 http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/pri/en/oj/dat/2002/1_031/1_03120020201en00010024.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • EcoStrat (2000): Review on Non-Target Organisms and Bt Plants. Hilbeck, Angelika/Meier, Matthias/Raps, Andrea. Amsterdam: Greenpeace International, http://www. greenpeaceusa.org/media/press_releases/gmo-report-complete.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • EU Council (2000): Council Resolution on the Precautionary Principle. Nice European Council

    Google Scholar 

  • FoEE (1996–99): various Mailouts. Brussels: Friends of the Earth Europe Biotechnology Programme

    Google Scholar 

  • James, Philip/Kemper, Fritz/Pascal, Gerard (1999): The Future of Scientific Advice in the EU, http://europa.eu.int/comm/food/fs/sc/future_en.html

    Google Scholar 

  • Levidow, Les (2001): Precautionary uncertainty: regulating GM crops in Europe. In: Social Studies of Science Vol. 31, No. 6, p. 845–878

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levidow, Les/Tait, Joyce (1991): The greening of biotechnology: GMOs as environment-friendly products. In: Science & Public Policy Vol. 18, No. 5, p. 271–280

    Google Scholar 

  • Levidow, Les/Carr, Susan/von Schomberg, Rene/Wield, David (1996): Regulating agricultural biotechnology in Europe: harmonization difficulties, opportunities, dilemmas. In: Science & Public Policy Vol. 23, No. 3, p. 135–157

    Google Scholar 

  • Levidow, Les/Carr, Susan/Wield, David (1997): European biotechnology regulation: framing the risk assessment of a herbicide-tolerant crop. In: Science, Technology and Human Values Vol. 22, No. 4, p. 472–505

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levidow, Les/Carr, Susan/Wield, David (2000): Genetically modified crops in the European Union: regulatory conflicts as precautionary opportunities. In: Journal of Risk Research Vol. 3, No. 3, p. 189–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levidow, Les/Marris, Claire (2001): Science and Governance in Europe: lessons from the case of agricultural biotechnology. In: Science and Public Policy, Vol. 28, No. 5, p. 345–360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Majone, Giandomenico (1996): Regulating Europe. London: Routledge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Majone, Giandomenico (1997): From the positive to the regulatory state: causes and consequences of changes in the mode of governance. In: Journal of Public Policy, Vol. 17, p. 139–167

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OXERA (2000): Policy, Risk and Science: Securing and Using Scientific Advice. Oxford Economic Research Associates Ltd, contract research report for Health & Safety Executive, http://www.hse.gov.uk/research/crr_pdf/2000/crr00295.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Renn, Ortwin (1995): Styles of using scientific expertise: a comparative analysis. In: Science & Public Policy, Vol. 22, No. 3, p. 147–156

    Google Scholar 

  • Roqueplo, Philippe (1995): Scientific expertise among political powers, administrations and public opinion. In: Science & Public Policy, Vol. 22, No. 3, p. 175–182

    Google Scholar 

  • Roy, Alexis/Joly, Pierre-Benoit (2000): France: broadening precautionary expertise? In: Journal of Risk Research, Vol. 3, No. 3, p. 247–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, Joanne (2000): Trade and environment in the EU and WTO. In: Weiler, J. (Hg.): The EU, the WTO and NAFTA, Oxford: Oxford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • SCP (1998a): Opinion of the Scientific Committee on Plants Regarding Monsanto’s MON10 Bt maize, 10 February

    Google Scholar 

  • SCP (1998b): Opinion of the Scientific Committee on Plants Regarding Pioneer’s MON9 Bt, glyphosate-tolerant maize, 19 May

    Google Scholar 

  • SCP (1998c): Opinion of the Scientific Committee on Plants Regarding PGS’ MS8xRF3 glufosinate-tolerant hybrid oilseed rape, 19 May

    Google Scholar 

  • SCP (1999): Opinion of the Scientific Committee on Plants on Bt Resistance Monitoring, 4 March

    Google Scholar 

  • SCP (2000): Opinion of the Scientific Committee on Plants on the invocation by Germany of Article 16 of Council Directive 90/220/EEC regarding GM Bt maize 176 notified by Ciba-Geigy, 22 September

    Google Scholar 

  • Setbon, Michel (Ed.) (2001): Risques et sécurité sanitaire. Paris: CNRS, Comité National de Sécurité Sanitaire

    Google Scholar 

  • Stirling, Andy (1999): On Science and Precaution in the Management of Technological Risk [based on contributions from O.Renn, A.Rip, A.Salo]. Final Report for EC Forward Studies Unit, Sussex: SPRU, ftp://ftp.jrc.es/pub/EURdoc/eurl9056en.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Stirling, Andy (2001): The Precautionary Principle in science and technology, p. 61–94 in: O’Riordan, T./Cameron, J./Jordan, A. (Eds.): Reinterpreting the Precautionary Principle. London: Cameron May

    Google Scholar 

  • Wynne, Brian (1992): Uncertainty and environmental learning: reconceiving science and policy in the preventive paradigm. In: Global Environmental Change Vol. 2, No. 2, p. 111–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wynne, Brian et al. (2001): “Public Attitudes towards Agricultural Biotechnologies in Europe (PABE). Final report of project with five partner country teams (Spain, Italy, Germany, France UK), funded by DG-Research, Brussels. Coordinated by Brian Wynne and Peter Simmons, Centre for the Study of Environmental Change (CSEC), Lancaster University, http://www.lancaster.ac.uk/users/csec.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Les Levidow
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Alexander Bogner Helge Torgersen

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften/GWV Fachverlage GmbH, Wiesbaden

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Levidow, L. (2005). Expert-Based Policy or Policy-Based Expertise? Regulating GM Crops in Europe. In: Bogner, A., Torgersen, H. (eds) Wozu Experten?. VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-80692-5_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-80692-5_5

  • Publisher Name: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-531-14515-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-322-80692-5

  • eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Science (German Language)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation