Skip to main content

Abstract

The organizational structure of an enterprise is continuously exposed to increasing complexity induced by growing dynamics and complexity of its environment. It is therefore not surprising that the simplification of structural solutions is becoming increasingly important and implies challenging Ashby’s law. In the literature on the structuring of organizations, the principle of simplicity appears to be ambiguous and not well articulated. Moreover, the following research problem seems to be left unaddressed: can the simplification of an organizational structure be solely narrowed down to its complexity reduction or should it be complemented by other measures, such as an increase in employee participation (in the simplification process), to be effective? The concept proposed in this paper represents an attempt to unravel it. It is based on J. Maeda’s ten laws of simplicity of product design which, as it turns out, have significant transfer potential into the field of organizing. It stresses that an effective simplification of an organizational structure cannot be based solely on complexity reduction but requires as well an active development of the so-called bottom-up organizational culture and continuous improvement of the self-management system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    In this paper “simplification” is understood in accordance with the interpretation of Gregory and Rawling [9] as the removal of sources of complexity and waste in the organization.

  2. 2.

    They were: environment uncertainty, organizational dependence on the environment, degree of diversification, organizational culture, professionalism of the employees, leadership, management aspiration to simplify the organization, manufacturing technology, use of IT, organization history and its size (number of employees, revenues).

  3. 3.

    This is not a stand-alone view, as in some management concepts like lean management particular attention is given to this level of hierarchy (see key lean management guidelines as “go and see”, “respect the front line employee” or “teamwork”).

References

  1. Ashby, R.: An Introduction to Cybernetics. Univ. Paperbacks, London (1956)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Ashkenas, R.: Nowe szaty organizacji. In: Hasselbein, F., Goldsmith, M., Beckhard, R. (eds.) Organizacja przyszłości. Business Press, Warszawa (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ashkenas, R., Siegal, W., Spiegel, M.: Mastering organizational complexity: a core competence for 21st century leaders. In: Woodman, R., Pasmore, W., Shani, A.B. (eds.) Research in Organizational Change and Development, pp. 29–58. Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Benkler, Y.: The unselfish gene. Harv. Bus. Rev. 89(7/8), 77–85 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Crozier, M.: Przedsiębiorstwo na podsłuchu: jak uczyć się zarządzania postindustrialnego. Państwowe Wydawnictwo Ekonomiczne, Warszawa (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Drucker, P.F.: The Practice of Management. HarperBusiness, New York (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ghoshal, S., Nohria, N.: Horses for courses: organizational forms for multinational corporations. Sloan Manag. Rev. 34(2), 23–35 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Girod, S.J.G., Karim, S.: Restructure or reconfigure. Harv. Bus. Rev. 95(2), 128–132 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Gregory, I., Rawling, S.: Profit from Time: Speed Up Business Improvement by Time Compression. Macmillan Business, London (1997)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  10. Griesbach, D., Kaudela-Baum, S., Wyss, S.: Innovationspotential von Einfachkeit. ZfO 6, 377–383 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hopej, M., Kamiński, R., Tworek, K., Walecka-Jankowska, K., Zgrzywa-Ziemak, A.: Community-oriented culture and simple organizational structure. Organizacja i Kierowanie 4A, 75–93 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hopej-Kamińska, M., Zgrzywa-Ziemak, A., Hopej, M., Kamiński, R., Martan, J.: Simplicity as a feature of an organizational structure. Argum. Oecon. 1(34), 259–276 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Koch, R.: Menedżer 80/20. Pracuj mniej, osiągaj więcej. MT Biznes Ltd., Warszawa (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Krames, J.A.: Sygnowano Jack Welch: 24 lekcje najwybitniejszego CEO na świecie. Wydawnictwo Studio Emka, Warszawa (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Łobos, K.: Organizacje – proste idee, zasady, narzędzia. Wydawnictwo Wyższej Szkoły Bankowej w Poznaniu, Poznań (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Maeda, J.: The Laws of Simplicity. MIT Press, Cambridge (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Malik, F.: Kieruj działaj żyj. Zawód menedżer. MT Biznes Ltd., Warszawa (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Mintzberg, H.: The Structuring of Organizations. A Synthesis of the Research. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1979)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Nowak, M.A.: Five rules for the evolution of cooperation. Science 314(5805), 1560–1563 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Pszczołowski, T.: Mała encyklopedia prakseologii i teorii organizacji. Ossolineum, Wrocław (1978)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Schneider, J., Hoffmann, W.H.: Die einfache Organisation. ZfO 85(6), 372–376 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Steinmann, H., Schreyögg, G.: Zarządzanie. Oficyna Wydawnicza Politechniki Wrocławskiej, Wrocław (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Sztompka, P.: Zaufanie. Fundament społeczeństwa. Znak, Kraków (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Tichy, N.M., Charan, R.: Speed, simplicity, self-confidence: an interview with Jack Welch. Harv. Bus. Rev. 67(5), 112–120 (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Tworek, K., Hopej, M., Martan, J.: Into organizational structure simplicity. In: Proceedings of the 38th International Conference on Information Systems Architecture and Technology, pp. 173–183 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marcin Kandora .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Hopej, M., Kandora, M. (2019). The Simplification of Organizational Structure: Lessons from Product Design. In: Wilimowska, Z., Borzemski, L., Świątek, J. (eds) Information Systems Architecture and Technology: Proceedings of 39th International Conference on Information Systems Architecture and Technology – ISAT 2018. ISAT 2018. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 854. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99993-7_17

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics