Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 852))

  • 726 Accesses

Abstract

The performance comparison of two head-controlled interaction systems was made using a multi-directional tapping test on the basis of Fitts’ paradigm, as recommended by ISO 9241-9 standard. Both investigated input systems were based on head position and movements visual recognition by a camera and a special software. The study was made on the sample of 14 healthy subjects without motoric deficiencies, with counterbalanced within-subject experiment design. Both systems were marked by similar error rates (average 23.45%), while their throughput values were significantly different (0.67 versus 1.92 bit/s). Additionally, a comparison of performance characteristics with several other head activated systems was made by means of a literature review.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Fitts, P.M.: The information capacity of the human motor system in controlling the amplitude of movement. J. Exp. Psychol. 47(6), 381–391 (1954)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Soukoreff, R.W., MacKenzie, I.S.: Towards a standard for pointing device evaluation, perspectives on 27 years of Fitts’ law research in HCI. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud. 61(6), 751–789 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Douglas, S.A., Kirkpatrick, A.E., MacKenzie, I.S.: Testing pointing device performance and user assessment with the ISO9241, Part 9 standard. In: Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems CHI 1999, pp. 215–222. ACM, New York (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  4. International Organization for Standardization (ISO): ISO 9241–9. 2000. Ergonomics Requirements for Office Work with Visual Display Terminals (VDTs) – Part 9: Requirements for Non-Keyboard Input Devices. International Organization for Standardization (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  5. International Organization for Standardization (ISO): ISO 9241–411. 2012. Ergonomics of Human-System Interaction – Part 411: Evaluation Methods for the Design of Physical Input Devices. International Organization for Standardization (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Müller-Tomfelde, C.: Dwell-based pointing in applications of human computer interaction. In: Baranauskas, C., Palanque, P., Abascal, J., Barbosa, S.D.J. (eds.) Human-Computer Interaction – INTERACT 2007, vol. 4662. Springer, Berlin (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Majaranta, P., Räihä, K.J.: Text entry by gaze: Utilizing eye-tracking. In: MacKenzie, I.S., Tanaka-Ishii, K. (eds.) Text Entry Systems: Mobility, Accessibility, Universality, pp. 175–187. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Majaranta, P., Ahola, U.K., Špakov, O.: Fast gaze typing with an adjustable dwell time. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 2009), pp. 357–360. ACM, New York (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Špakov, O., Miniotas, D.: On-line adjustment of dwell time for target selection by gaze. In: Proceedings of the Third Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (NordiCHI 2004), pp. 203–206. ACM, New York (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Majaranta, P., MacKenzie, I.S., Aula, A., Räihä, K.J.: Effects of feedback and dwell time on eye typing speed and accuracy. Univ. Access Inf. Soc. 5(2), 199–208 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Räihä, K.J., Ovaska, S.: An exploratory study of eye typing fundamentals: dwell time, text entry rate, errors, and workload. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 2012), pp. 3001–3010. ACM, New York (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Magee, J., Felzer, T., MacKenzie, I.S.: Camera Mouse + ClickerAID: Dwell vs. single-muscle click actuation in mouse-replacement interfaces. In: Antona, M., Stephanidis, C. (eds,) Universal Access in Human-Computer Interaction. Access to Today’s Technologies. UAHCI 2015, vol. 9175. Springer, Cham (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Zuniga, R., Magee, J.: Camera Mouse: dwell vs. computer vision-based intentional click activation. In: Antona, M., Stephanidis, C. (eds.) Universal Access in Human–Computer Interaction. Designing Novel Interactions. UAHCI 2017, vol. 10278, pp. 455–464. Springer, Cham (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Camera Mouse website. http://www.cameramouse.org/. Accessed 20 May 2018

  15. Betke, M., Gips, J., Fleming, P.: The camera mouse: visual tracking of body features to provide computer access for people with severe disabilities. IEEE Trans. Neural Syst. Rehabil. Eng. 10(1), 1–10 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Face Controller website. http://www.face-controller.com/. Accessed 10 May 2018

  17. FittsStudy https://depts.washington.edu/madlab/proj/fittsstudy/. Accessed 19 May 2018

  18. Wobbrock, J.O., Jansen, A., Shinohara, K.: Modeling and predicting pointing errors in two dimensions. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1653–1656. ACM (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Wobbrock, J.O., Shinohara, K., Jansen, A.: The effects of task dimensionality, endpoint deviation, throughput calculation, and experiment design on pointing measures and models. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1639–1648. ACM (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  20. International Organization for Standardization (ISO). ISO 9241-11:2002, Ergonomic requirements for office work with visual display terminals (VDTs) - Part 11: Guidance on usability (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Thomas, P.R.: Performance, characteristics, and error rates of cursor control devices for aircraft cockpit interaction. Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud. 109, 41–53 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Mackenzie, I.S.: Fitts’ Throughput and the remarkable case of touch-based target selection. In: Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics, vol. 9170, pp. 238–249 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Bian, Z.P., Hou, J., Chau, L.P., Magnenat-Thalmann, N.: Facial position and expression-based human-computer interface for persons with tetraplegia. IEEE J. Biomed. Health Inform. 20(3), 915–924 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Javanovic, R., MacKenzie, I.S.: MarkerMouse: mouse cursor control using a head-mounted marker. In: Miesenberger, K., Klaus, J., Zagler, W., Karshmer, A. (eds.) Computers Helping People with Special Needs. ICCHP 2010, vol. 6180. Springer, Berlin (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  25. De Silva, G.C., Lyons, M.J., Kawato, S., Tetsutani, N.: Human factors evaluation of a vision-based facial gesture interface. In: Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshop, CVPRW 2003, vol. 5. IEEE, Madison (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Velasco, M.A, Clemotte, A., Raya, R., Ceres, C., Rocon E.: Human-computer interaction for users with cerebral palsy based on head orientation. Can cursor’s movement be modeled by Fitts’s law? Int. J. Hum.-Comput. Stud. 106, 1–9 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Manresa-Yee, C., Varona, J., Perales, F.J., Salinas, I.: Design recommendations for camera-based head-controlled interfaces that replace the mouse for motion-impaired users. Univ. Access Inf. Soc. 13(4), 471–482 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Cuaresma, J., Mackenzie, I.S.: FittsFace: exploring navigation and selection methods for facial tracking. In: Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics, vol. 10278, pp. 403–416 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Tuisku, O., Rantanen, V., Špakov, O., Surakka, V., Lekkala, J.: Pointing and selecting with facial activity. Interact. Comput. 28(1), 1–12 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

We thank the Polish society “Association for Your New Opportunities” (Stowarzyszenie “Twoje nowe możliwości”) for making Face Controller system available for our usability testing. Special thanks for students Karolina Bochenek and Sandra Trzeciak for their cooperation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marcin Kuliński .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Kuliński, M., Jach, K. (2019). Performance Comparison of Two Head-Controlled Computer Interaction Systems with a Multi-directional Tapping Task. In: Borzemski, L., Świątek, J., Wilimowska, Z. (eds) Information Systems Architecture and Technology: Proceedings of 39th International Conference on Information Systems Architecture and Technology – ISAT 2018. ISAT 2018. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 852. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99981-4_20

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics