Antecedents and Consequences of App Update: An Integrated Research Framework
- 859 Downloads
Abstract
E-commerce firms now compete intensively on mobile applications (apps). The transparency of digital environment has made customers and competitors as major external driving forces of app updates. However, app-related studies mainly focus on how to succeed in the hyper-competitive app market and how platform governance influence app evolution, overlooking the interaction among customers, competitors, and focal firm that shapes continuous app updates. Moreover, extant studies on app updates has drawn inconsistent conclusions regarding the impact of update frequency on market performance. We, therefore, proposed an integrated research framework to explore antecedents and consequences of app updates. We empirically test it by tracking customer reviews, updating notes, and ranks of 20 iOS apps within travel category in China for 60 months. The results indicate that the extreme sentiment expressed by customers will urge focal firm to update frequently and the focal firm will incorporate useful customer feedbacks to release a major update. Interestingly, we find that focal firm is reluctant to release superfluous updates and perform major updates if there are more high-ranking competitors update earlier. Our findings also testify the dual role of the number of total apps focal firm owns in facilitating update frequency and volume, as well as constraining days between two subsequent releases. Lastly, frequent updates will induce a higher degree of rank volatility, while long update intervals will decrease ranks. Our study has important implications for firms to succeed in the fierce competition in mobile commerce.
Keywords
Mobile commerce Mobile apps Competition App updates Digital business strategyNotes
Acknowledgments
This research has been supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant 71372174 and 71702176 and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, China University of Geosciences (Wuhan) under Grant G1323541816.
References
- 1.Feorderer, J., Heinzl, A.: Product updates: attracting new consumers versus alienating existing ones. In: Proceedings of Thirty Eighth International Conference on Information Systems, Seoul (2017)Google Scholar
- 2.Liu, C.Z., Au, Y.A., Choi, H.S.: Effects of freemium strategy in the mobile app market: an empirical study of Google play. J. Manage. Inf. Syst. 31(3), 326–354 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 3.Agarwal, R., Tiwana, A.: Evolvable systems: through the looking glass of IS. Inf. Syst. Res. 26(3), 473–479 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 4.Cavusoglu, H., Cavusoglu, H., Zhang, J.: Security patch management: share the burden or share the damage? Manage. Sci. 54(4), 657–670 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5.Arora, A., Krishnan, R., Telang, R., Yang, Y.: An empirical analysis of software vendors’ patch release behavior: impact of vulnerability disclosure. Inf. Syst. Res. 21(1), 115–132 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 6.Krishnan, M.S., Mukhopadhyay, T., Kriebel, C.H.: A decision model for software maintenance. Inf. Syst. Res. 15(4), 396–412 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.Guzman, E., El-Haliby, M., Bruegge, B.: Ensemble Methods for App Review Classification: An Approach for Software Evolution (N), pp. 771–776 (2015)Google Scholar
- 8.Boudreau, K.J.: Let a thousand flowers bloom?an early look at large numbers of software app developers and patterns of innovation. Organ. Sci. 23(5), 1409–1427 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.Grover, V., Kohli, R.: Revealing your hand: caveats in implementing digital business strategy. MIS Q. 37(2), 655–662 (2013)Google Scholar
- 10.Claussen, J., Kretschmer, T., Mayrhofer, P.: The effects of rewarding user engagement: the case of facebook apps. Inf. Syst. Res. 24(1), 186–200 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.Ghose, A., Han, S.P.: Estimating demand for mobile applications in the new economy. Manage. Sci. 60(6), 1470–1488 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.Lee, G., Raghu, T.S.: Determinants of mobile apps’ success: Evidence from the app store market. J. Manage. Inf. Syst. 31(2), 133–170 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.Roma, P., Zambuto, F., Perrone, G.: The role of the distribution platform in price formation of paid apps. Decis. Support Syst. 91, 13–24 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 14.Song, P.J., Xue, L., Rai, A., Zhang, C.: The ecosystem of software platform: a study of asymmetric cross-side network effects and platform governance. MIS Q. 42(1), 121–142 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.Tiwana, A.: Evolutionary competition in platform ecosystems. Inf. Syst. Res. 26(2), 266–281 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 16.Comino, S., Manenti, F.M., Mariuzzo, F.: Updates management in mobile applications. Itunes Vs Google Play. Med. J. Malaysia 37(4), 354–356 (2015)Google Scholar
- 17.Mcilroy, S., Ali, N., Hassan, A.E.: Fresh apps: An empirical study of frequently-updated mobile apps in the Google Play Store. Empirical Softw. Eng. 21(3), 1346–1370 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 18.Kajanan, S., Pervin, N., Ramasubbu, N., Dutta, K.: Takeoff and sustained success of apps in hypercompetitive mobile platform ecosystems: an empirical analysis. In: Proceedings of Thirty Third International Conference on Information Systems, Orlando (2012)Google Scholar
- 19.Yin, D., Mitra, S., Zhang, H.: Research note—when do consumers value positive vs. negative reviews? an empirical investigation of confirmation bias in online word of mouth. Inf. Syst. Res. 27(1), 131–144 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 20.West, J., Salter, A., Vanhaverbeke, W., Chesbrough, H.: Open innovation: the next decade introduction. Res. Policy 43(5), 805–811 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 21.Barnett, W.P., Hansen, M.T.: The red queen in organization evolution. Strateg. Manage. J. 17, 139–157 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 22.Tiwana, A., Konsynski, B., Bush, A.A.: Research commentary—Platform evolution: Coevolution of platform architecture, governance, and environmental dynamics. Inf. Syst. Res. 21(4), 675–687 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 23.Chen, M.J., Miller, D.: Competitive dynamics: themes, trends, and a prospective research platform. Acad. Manage. Ann. 6, 135–210 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 24.Lim, S.L., Bentley, P.J.: Investigating app store ranking algorithms using a simulation of mobile app ecosystems. In: IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation, Cancún, México (2013)Google Scholar
- 25.Garg, R., Telang, R.: Inferring app demand from publicly available data. MIS Q. 37(4), 1253–1264 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 26.Jabr, W., Zheng, Z.Q.: Know yourself and know your enemy: an analysis of firm recommendations and consumer reviews in a competitive environment. MIS Q. 38(3), 635–654 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 27.Moe, W.W., Trusov, M.: The value of social dynamics in online product ratings forums. J. Mark. Res. 48(3), 444–456 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 28.Hausman, J., Hall, B.H., Griliches, Z.: Econometric models for count data with an application to the patents-R&D relationship. Econometrica 52(4), 909–937 (1984)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 29.Wooldridge, J.M.: Introductory Econometrics: A Modern Approach. Thompson Publishing, Bethesda (2006)Google Scholar
- 30.Hausman, J.: Specification tests in econometrics. Econometrica 46(6), 1251–1271 (1978)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 31.Greene, W.: Econometric Analysis. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River (2007)Google Scholar
- 32.Beck, N., Katz, J.N.: What to do (and not to do) with time-series cross-section data. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 89(3), 634–647 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar