Abstract
Since online reviews have become an increasingly important information source for consumers to evaluate products during online shopping, many platforms started to adopt review mechanisms to maximize the value of such massive reviews. In recent years, the review tag function has been adopted in practices and leading the research of sentiment and opinion extraction techniques. However, the examination of its impact has been largely overlooked. In this paper, we specifically look into the effect of the tag function on the evaluation of highly-rated popular products and helpfulness perception of their reviews by proposing a framework through the lens of attribution theory. Experimental methods were utilized to test our hypotheses. Our findings demonstrate the importance of tag function application as it further increases consumers’ product evaluation for popular products. We also found that different tag function appearances influence consumers’ cognitive biases in review helpfulness perception.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Mudambi, S.M., Schuff, D.: What makes a helpful online review? A study of customer reviews on Amazon.com. MIS Q. 34(1), 185–200 (2010). https://doi.org/10.2307/20721420
Dimoka, A., Hong, Y., Pavlou, P.A.: On product uncertainty in online markets: theory and evidence. MIS Q. 36(2), 395–426 (2012)
Dellarocas, C.: The digitization of word of mouth: promise and challenges of online feedback mechanisms. Manag. Sci. 49(10), 1407–1424 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.49.10.1407.17308
Lu, X., et al.: Promotional marketing or word-of-mouth? Evidence from online restaurant reviews. Inf. Syst. Res. 24(3), 596–612 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1120.0454
Forman, C., Ghose, A., Wiesenfeld, B.: Examining the relationship between reviews and sales: the role of reviewer identity disclosure in electronic markets. Inf. Syst. Res. 19(3), 291–313 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1080.0193
Yin, D., Mitra, S., Zhang, H.: Research note—when do consumers value positive vs. negative reviews? An empirical investigation of confirmation bias in online word of mouth. Inf. Syst. Res. 27(1), 131–144 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2015.0617
Sun, M.: How does the variance of product ratings matter? Manag. Sci. 58(4), 696–707 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1110.1458
Ba, S., Pavlou, P.A.: Evidence of the effect of trust building technology in electronic markets: price premiums and buyer behavior. MIS Q. 26(3), 243–268 (2002). https://doi.org/10.2307/4132332
Yan, X., Wang, J., Chau, M.: Customer revisit intention to restaurants: evidence from online reviews. Inf. Syst. Front. 17(3), 645–657 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-013-9446-5
Archak, N., Ghose, A., Ipeirotis, P.G.: Deriving the pricing power of product features by mining consumer reviews. Manag. Sci. 57(8), 1485–1509 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1110.1370
Chen, P.-Y., Hong, Y., Liu, Y.: The value of multi-dimensional rating systems: evidence from a natural experiment and randomized experiments. Manag. Sci. (2017). https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2017.2852
Pan, Y., Zhang, J.Q.: Born unequal: a study of the helpfulness of user-generated product reviews. J. Retail. 87(4), 598–612 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretai.2011.05.002
Hu, M., Liu, B.: Mining and summarizing customer reviews. In: Proceedings of the Tenth ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. ACM (2004)
Hu, N., Pavlou, P.A., Zhang, J.: On self-selection biases in online product reviews. MIS Q. 41(2) (2017). https://doi.org/10.25300/misq/2017/41.2.06
Heider, F.: The Psychology of Interpersonal Relations. Psychology Press, London (1958)
Försterling, F.: Attributional conceptions in clinical psychology. Am. Psychol. 41(3), 275 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.41.3.275
Kelley, H.H., Michela, J.L.: Attribution theory and research. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 31(1), 457–501 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ps.31.020180.002325
Kelley, H.H.: Attribution in social interaction. In: Jones, E.E., et al. (eds.) Attribution: Perceiving the Causes of Behavior. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Hillsdale (1987)
Kelley, H.H.: Attribution theory in social psychology. In: Nebraska Symposium on Motivation. University of Nebraska Press (1967)
Kelley, H.H.: The processes of causal attribution. Am. Psychol. 28(2), 107 (1973). https://doi.org/10.1037/h0034225
McGill, A.L.: Context effects in judgments of causation. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 57(2), 189 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.57.2.189
Kassin, S.M.: Consensus information, prediction, and causal attribution: a review of the literature and issues. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 37(11), 1966 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.37.11.1966
Wells, G.L., Harvey, J.H.: Do people use consensus information in making causal attributions? J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 35(5), 279 (1977). https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.35.5.279
He, S.X., Bond, S.D.: Why is the crowd divided? Attribution for dispersion in online word of mouth. J. Consum. Res. 41(6), 1509–1527 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1086/680667
Chen, Z., Lurie, N.H.: Temporal contiguity and negativity bias in the impact of online word of mouth. J. Mark. Res. 50(4), 463–476 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1509/jmr.12.0063
Lombard, M., Snyder-Duch, J., Bracken, C.C.: Content analysis in mass communication: assessment and reporting of intercoder reliability. Hum. Commun. Res. 28(4), 587–604 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2002.tb00826.x
Krippendorff, K.: Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology. Sage, Thousand Oaks (2004)
Cohen, J.: Weighted kappa: nominal scale agreement provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit. Psychol. Bull. 70(4), 213 (1968). https://doi.org/10.1037/h0026256
Sen, S., Lerman, D.: Why are you telling me this? An examination into negative consumer reviews on the web. J. Interact. Mark. 21(4), 76–94 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1002/dir.20090
Yin, D., Bond, S., Zhang, H.: Anxious or angry? Effects of discrete emotions on the perceived helpfulness of online reviews. MIS Q. 38(2), 539–560 (2014). https://doi.org/10.25300/MISQ/2014/38.2.10
DeVellis, R.F.: Scale Development: Theory and Applications, vol. 26. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks (2016)
Nunnally, J.C.: Psychometric Theory, 3rd edn. McGraw-Hill, New York (1967)
Hair, J.F., et al.: Multivariate Data Analysis: A Global Perspective, vol. 7. Pearson, Upper Saddle River (2010)
Fornell, C., Larcker, D.F.: Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J. Mark. Res. 18(1), 39–50 (1981). https://doi.org/10.2307/3151312
Tsaparas, P., Ntoulas, A., Terzi, E.: Selecting a comprehensive set of reviews. In: Proceedings of the 17th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. ACM (2011)
Chevalier, J.A., Mayzlin, D.: The effect of word of mouth on sales: online book reviews. J. Mark. Res. 43(3), 345–354 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.43.3.345
Bao, Z., Chau, M.: A schema-oriented product clustering method using online product reviews. In: International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS 2016) (2016)
Huang, P., Lurie, N.H., Mitra, S.: Searching for experience on the web: an empirical examination of consumer behavior for search and experience goods. J. Mark. 73(2), 55–69 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkg.73.2.55
Acknowledgement
This research is supported in part by the General Research Fund from the Hong Kong Research Grants Council (#17514516B), the Seed Funding for Basic Research from the University of Hong Kong (#104003314), and the grants from National Natural Science Foundation of China (Project No. 71701061).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Bao, Z., Li, W., Yin, P., Chau, M. (2018). How Does the Review Tag Function Benefit Highly-Rated Popular Products in Online Markets?. In: Cho, W., Fan, M., Shaw, M., Yoo, B., Zhang, H. (eds) Digital Transformation: Challenges and Opportunities. WEB 2017. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 328. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99936-4_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99936-4_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-99935-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-99936-4
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)