How Does the Review Tag Function Benefit Highly-Rated Popular Products in Online Markets?
- 881 Downloads
Since online reviews have become an increasingly important information source for consumers to evaluate products during online shopping, many platforms started to adopt review mechanisms to maximize the value of such massive reviews. In recent years, the review tag function has been adopted in practices and leading the research of sentiment and opinion extraction techniques. However, the examination of its impact has been largely overlooked. In this paper, we specifically look into the effect of the tag function on the evaluation of highly-rated popular products and helpfulness perception of their reviews by proposing a framework through the lens of attribution theory. Experimental methods were utilized to test our hypotheses. Our findings demonstrate the importance of tag function application as it further increases consumers’ product evaluation for popular products. We also found that different tag function appearances influence consumers’ cognitive biases in review helpfulness perception.
KeywordsOnline reviews Review tag Product evaluation Perceived bias
This research is supported in part by the General Research Fund from the Hong Kong Research Grants Council (#17514516B), the Seed Funding for Basic Research from the University of Hong Kong (#104003314), and the grants from National Natural Science Foundation of China (Project No. 71701061).
- 2.Dimoka, A., Hong, Y., Pavlou, P.A.: On product uncertainty in online markets: theory and evidence. MIS Q. 36(2), 395–426 (2012)Google Scholar
- 13.Hu, M., Liu, B.: Mining and summarizing customer reviews. In: Proceedings of the Tenth ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. ACM (2004)Google Scholar
- 14.Hu, N., Pavlou, P.A., Zhang, J.: On self-selection biases in online product reviews. MIS Q. 41(2) (2017). https://doi.org/10.25300/misq/2017/41.2.06
- 17.Kelley, H.H., Michela, J.L.: Attribution theory and research. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 31(1), 457–501 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ps.31.020180.002325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 18.Kelley, H.H.: Attribution in social interaction. In: Jones, E.E., et al. (eds.) Attribution: Perceiving the Causes of Behavior. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Hillsdale (1987)Google Scholar
- 19.Kelley, H.H.: Attribution theory in social psychology. In: Nebraska Symposium on Motivation. University of Nebraska Press (1967)Google Scholar
- 26.Lombard, M., Snyder-Duch, J., Bracken, C.C.: Content analysis in mass communication: assessment and reporting of intercoder reliability. Hum. Commun. Res. 28(4), 587–604 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2002.tb00826.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 27.Krippendorff, K.: Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology. Sage, Thousand Oaks (2004)Google Scholar
- 31.DeVellis, R.F.: Scale Development: Theory and Applications, vol. 26. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks (2016)Google Scholar
- 32.Nunnally, J.C.: Psychometric Theory, 3rd edn. McGraw-Hill, New York (1967)Google Scholar
- 33.Hair, J.F., et al.: Multivariate Data Analysis: A Global Perspective, vol. 7. Pearson, Upper Saddle River (2010)Google Scholar
- 35.Tsaparas, P., Ntoulas, A., Terzi, E.: Selecting a comprehensive set of reviews. In: Proceedings of the 17th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. ACM (2011)Google Scholar
- 37.Bao, Z., Chau, M.: A schema-oriented product clustering method using online product reviews. In: International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS 2016) (2016)Google Scholar