Skip to main content

Probabilistic Coverage

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Location Covering Models

Part of the book series: Advances in Spatial Science ((ADVSPATIAL))

  • 696 Accesses

Abstract

Much of the book is focused on facilities of various types, represented as points, nodes, lines, arcs, paths, tours, areas, etc., providing a wide range of services. The underlying assumption has generally been that facilities, or personnel at/from the facility, are available to serve when needed. This is not too surprising because a sizable number of location covering models are firmly rooted in the initial work Toregas and ReVelle (1972) on the location set covering problem (LSCP), where they were specifically interested in public sector issues involving equity of access to service. In the LSCP facilities were viewed as available for service when needed. In particular, the application of the LSCP to site emergency services, like fire, ambulance and police response, helped to design and relocate such services so that they provide coverage to all. Little has changed, in fact, over the intervening years as emergency service contexts remain of great interest and coverage models have time and again been instrumental in helping to both understand existing service systems as well as develop management plans for emergency response while promoting fairness and equity in service access. Of course, there are many other areas of application for coverage models as well, but the emergency response context has continued to be both challenging and interesting as we better understand such systems and have better supporting data. The focus of this chapter involves the fact that facilities (or personnel) may not always be available when needed. That is, there is a non-zero probability that facility service coverage may not be provided even when every demand is within a desired maximal service standard of a facility. There are clearly many ways in which a facility would be unavailable for service. One situation is that personnel are already busy serving another demand. This is depicted in Fig. 4.1, where the fire engine has traveled from the fire station in response to a fire. However, while busy fighting this fire, another incident (vehicle crash and fire) has occurred across town). It is therefore not possible for a fire crew to respond immediately. Another situation is that a facility may be unavailable due to a failure of some sort, such as equipment being broken, a power outage, a flood, or even an accident.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The literature has often called these variants MALP I and MALP II, as introduced in ReVelle and Hogan (1989). Such a distinction is avoided in this chapter because the only difference is a change in model coefficients, with most of the variables and constraint structure remaining the same.

References

  • Aktaş E, Özaydın Ö, Bozkaya B, Ülengin F, Önsel Ş (2013) Optimizing fire station locations for the Istanbul metropolitan municipality. Interfaces 43(3):240–255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Altınel İK, Aras N, Güney E, Ersoy C (2008) Binary integer programming formulation and heuristics for differentiated coverage in heterogeneous sensor networks. Comput Netw 52(12):2419–2431

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ball MO, Lin FL (1993) A reliability model applied to emergency service vehicle location. Oper Res 41(1):18–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Batta R, Dolan JM, Krishnamurthy NN (1989) The maximal expected covering location problem: revisited. Transp Sci 23(4):277–287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baron O, Berman O, Kim S, Krass D (2009) Ensuring feasibility in location problems with stochastic demands and congestion. IIE Trans 41(5):467–481

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borras F, Pastor JT (2002) The ex-post evaluation of the minimum local reliability level: an enhanced probabilistic location set covering model. Ann Oper Res 111(1):51–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brotcorne L, Laporte G, Semet F (2003) Ambulance location and relocation models. Eur J Oper Res 147(3):451–463

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chapman S, White J (1974) Probabilistic formulation of the emergency service facilities location problems, presented at ORSA/TIMS National Meeting, San Juan, Puerto Rico (Reprint series no. 7407)

    Google Scholar 

  • Church RL, Gerrard RA (2003) The multi-level location set covering model. Geogr Anal 35:277–289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Church RL, Weaver JR (1986) Theoretical links between median and coverage location problems. Ann Oper Res 6(1):1–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Church R, Sorensen P, Corrigan W (2001) Manpower deployment in emergency services. Fire Technol 37(3):219–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daskin M (1982) Application of an expected covering model to emergency medical service system design. Decis Sci 13:416–439

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daskin M (1983) A maximum expected covering location model; formulation, properties, and heuristic solution. Transp Sci 17:48–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erkut E, Polat S (1992) A simulation model for an urban fire fighting system. Omega 20(4):535–542

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg J, Dietrich R, Chen JM, Mitwasi MG, Valenzuela T, Criss E (1990) Validating and applying a model for locating emergency medical vehicles in Tuczon, AZ. Eur J Oper Res 49(3):308–324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heller M, Cohon JL, Revelle CS (1989) The use of simulation in validating a multiobjective EMS location model. Ann Oper Res 18(1):303–322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kolesar P, Walker WE (1974) An algorithm for the dynamic relocation of fire companies. Oper Res 22(2):249–274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lei TL, Tong D, Church RL (2014) Designing robust coverage systems: a maximal covering model with geographically varying failure probabilities. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 104(5):922–938

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marianov V, Revelle C (1994) The queuing probabilistic location set covering problem and some extensions. Socio-Econ Plan Sci 28(3):167–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marianov V, ReVelle C (1996) The queueing maximal availability location problem: a model for the siting of emergency vehicles. Eur J Oper Res 93(1):110–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marianov V, Serra D (1998) Probabilistic, maximal covering location—allocation models for congested systems. J Reg Sci 38(3):401–424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murray AT (2015) Fire station siting. In: Eiselt HA, Marianov V (eds) Applications of location analysis. Springer, Berlin, pp 293–306

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Murray AT, Church RL (1992) The reliability of α-reliability. Presented at ORSA/TIMS Joint National Meeting, San Francisco, California, USA, November 1–4, 1992

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Hanley JR, Scaparra MP, García S (2013) Probability chains: a general linearization technique for modeling reliability in facility location and related problems. Eur J Oper Res 230(1):63–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pérez J, Maldonado S, Marianov V (2016) A reconfiguration of fire station and fleet locations for the Santiago Fire Department. Int J Prod Res 54(11):3170–3186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plane DR, Hendrick TE (1977) Mathematical programming and the location of fire companies for the Denver fire department. Oper Res 25(4):563–578

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rajagopalan HK, Saydam C, Xiao J (2008) A multiperiod set covering location model for dynamic redeployment of ambulances. Comput Oper Res 35(3):814–826

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Repede JF, Bernardo JJ (1994) Developing and validating a decision support system for locating emergency medical vehicles in Louisville, Kentucky. Eur J Oper Res 75(3):567–581

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ReVelle C, Hogan K (1988) A reliability-constrained siting model with local estimates of busy fractions. Environ Plan B: Plan Des 15(2):143–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ReVelle C, Hogan K (1989) The maximum availability location problem. Transp Sci 23(3):192–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sorensen P, Church R (2010) Integrating expected coverage and local reliability for emergency medical services location problems. Socio-Econ Plan Sci 44(1):8–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toregas C (1970) A covering formulation for the location of public service facilities. Masters Thesis, Cornel University, Ithaca

    Google Scholar 

  • Toregas C, Revelle C (1973) Binary logic solutions to a class of location problem. Geogr Anal 5(2):145–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toregas C, Swain R, ReVelle C, Bergman L (1971) The location of emergency service facilities. Oper Res 19(6):1363–1373

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weaver JR, Church RL (1985) A median location model with nonclosest facility service. Transp Sci 19(1):58–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Church, R.L., Murray, A. (2018). Probabilistic Coverage. In: Location Covering Models. Advances in Spatial Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99846-6_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics