Advertisement

Role of Urban Interactions and Damage in Seismic Resilience of Historical Centers

  • Anna BozzaEmail author
  • Domenico Asprone
  • Fulvio Parisi
  • Gaetano Manfredi
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10707)

Abstract

Historical centers are places where local identity principles and contemporary dynamics of urbanization coexist. They conserve cultural heritage, hence the presence of many historical assets makes these places highly vulnerable and exposed.

Accordingly, historical centers need to be managed in order to guarantee proper resilience levels. This is paramount in light of the increasing rate of occurrence of adverse natural and man-made events, above all earthquakes.

This study proposes a methodology, that enables to model any urban environment as a complex network. Different urban components and their interrelations can be considered, and rigorous mathematical measures can be performed. These measures quantify the efficiency of urban functioning.

Reiterating such measures before and after an event occurrence, and in each stage of the recovery of an urban context, enables to compute a unique resilience indices.

The real case study of the inner city Naples is proposed to show the methodology. Results are discussed with regards to seismic scenario analysis for different intensity levels. Hence, the trend of the resilience indices against the event magnitude is observed, in case different recovery strategy are simulated.

Keywords

Disaster resilience Urban networks Earthquakes 

References

  1. 1.
    Cavallaro, M., Asprone, D., Latora, V., Manfredi, G.: Assessment of urban ecosystem resilience through hybrid social–physical complex networks. Comput.-Aided Civil Infrastruct. Eng. 29(8), 608–625 (2014)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bozza, A., Asprone, D., Manfredi, G.: Developing an integrated framework to quantify resilience of urban systems against disasters. Nat. Hazards 78(3), 1729–1748 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ouyang, M., Dueñas-Osorio, L., Min, X.: A three-stage resilience analysis framework for urban infrastructure systems. Struct. Saf. 36, 23–31 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bozza, A., Asprone, D., Parisi, F., Manfredi, G.: Alternative resilience indices for city ecosystems subjected to natural hazards. Comput.-Aided Civil Infrastruct. Eng. (2017).  https://doi.org/10.1111/mice.12275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bozza, A., Asprone, D., Fiasconaro, A., Latora, V., Manfredi, G.: Catastrophe resilience related to urban networks shape: preliminary analysis. In: proceedings of the 5th ECCOMAS Thematic Conference on computational methods in structural dynamics and earthquake engineering, COMPDYN 2015, Crete, Greece (2015)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Franchin, P., Cavalieri, F.: Probabilistic assessment of civil infrastructure resilience to earthquakes. Comput.-Aided Civil Infrastruct. Eng. 30(7), 583–600 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of Naples Federico IINaplesItaly

Personalised recommendations