Advertisement

Towards a Common Vocabulary for Crisis Management Scenarios

  • Jingquan XieEmail author
  • Betim Sojeva
  • Erich Rome
  • Daniel Lückerath
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10707)

Abstract

Crisis management is a complex process, handling critical situations caused by natural or human-made hazards. In the response phase, crisis managers often have limited time to react on unexpected events. Hence, sufficient training during the preparedness phase of crisis management plays a vital role for correct behaviours under time pressure. Significant efforts in the research community have been invested to develop innovative IT-based crisis management training systems with one core idea in mind – create crisis scenarios with sufficient details for the targeted training purposes to better prepare crisis managers. Developing such scenarios is however a time-consuming process and involves contributing a vast amount of human efforts by crisis managers, domain experts and system engineers. Therefore, improved re-usability of well-developed and validated scenarios is of critical importance for crisis management training. To our best knowledge, a widely-accepted method to describe crisis scenarios in a machine understandable fashion is still missing – training systems are normally equipped with proprietary formats that cannot be easily shared with each other. This paper proposes a common machine-readable vocabulary to describe crisis scenarios. In addition, the corresponding software environment to support the generation and execution of crisis scenarios is also elaborated.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The research leading to these results was funded by the European Commission within the Seventh Framework Programme projects CIPRNet (grant agreement \(\hbox {N}^{\circ }\,312450\)) and PREDICT (grant agreement \(\hbox {N}^{\circ }\,60769\)). The authors thank all of the project partners for many constructive discussions and useful suggestions. The contents of this paper do not reflect the official opinion of the European Union. Responsibility for the information and views expressed herein lies entirely with the authors.

References

  1. 1.
    Benjamins, T., Rothkrantz, L.: Interactive simulation in crisis management. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Information Systems for Crisis Response and Management ISCRAM2007, pp. 571–580 (2007)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chambelland, J.C., Raffin, R., Desbenoit, B., Gesquière, G.: SIMFOR: towards a collaborative software platform for urban crisis management. In: The IADIS Computer Graphics, Visualization, Computer Vision and Image Processing (CGVCVIP2011), Rome, Italy (2011)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    European Council: COUNCIL DIRECTIVE 2008/114/EC of 8 December 2008 on the identification and designation of European critical infrastructures and the assessment of the need to improve their protection. Technical report, Official Journal of the European Union, (L 345/75) (2008)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Loreto, I.D., Mora, S., Divitini, M.: Collaborative serious games for crisis management: an overview. In: Enabling Technologies: Infrastructure for Collaborative Enterprises (WETICE), pp. 352–357. IEEE (2012)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Luiijf, E., Klaver, M.: Insufficient situational awareness about critical infrastructures by emergency management. In: Proceedings of the NATO Symposium on C3I for Crisis, Emergency and Consequence Management, Bucharest, 11–12 May 2009, RTO-MP-IST-086. NATO RTA (2009)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Robert, B., Lajtha, C.: A new approach to crisis management. J. Contingencies Cris. Manag. 10(4), 181–191 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Rome, E., Doll, T., Rilling, S., Sojeva, B., Voß, N., Xie, J.: The use of what-if analysis to improve the management of crisis situations. In: Setola, R., Rosato, V., Kyriakides, E., Rome, E. (eds.) Managing the Complexity of Critical Infrastructures: A Modelling and Simulation Approach, pp. 233–277. Springer International Publishing, Cham (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-51043-9_10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Rome, E., Langeslag, P., Usov, A.: Federated modelling and simulation for critical infrastructure protection. In: D’Agostino, G., Scala, A. (eds.) Networks of Networks: The Last Frontier of Complexity. UCS, pp. 225–253. Springer, Cham (2014).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-03518-5_11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Standard for Military Scenario Definition Language (MSDL) (2008)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Standard for Coalition Battle Management Language (C-BML) Phase 1 (2014)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Xie, J., Theocharidou, M., Barbarin, Y.: Knowledge-driven scenario development for critical infrastructure protection. In: Rome, E., Theocharidou, M., Wolthusen, S. (eds.) CRITIS 2015. LNCS, vol. 9578, pp. 91–102. Springer, Cham (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33331-1_8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Xie, J., Vullings, E., Theocharidou, M.: Towards the next generation training system for crisis management. In: 22nd TIEMS Annual Conference, vol. 22. TIEMS, The International Emergency Management Society (2015)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jingquan Xie
    • 1
    Email author
  • Betim Sojeva
    • 1
  • Erich Rome
    • 1
  • Daniel Lückerath
    • 1
  1. 1.Fraunhofer IAISSankt AugustinGermany

Personalised recommendations