Advertisement

Dealing with Functional Safety Requirements for Automotive Systems: A Cyber-Physical-Social Approach

  • Mohamad GharibEmail author
  • Paolo Lollini
  • Andrea Ceccarelli
  • Andrea Bondavalli
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10707)

Abstract

Road transport system is one of the essential infrastructures in the world, where the majority of the population use its facilities on a daily basis. That is why ensuring their safety has been always a growing concern for most authorities. The automotive industry is already aware of that, and the ISO 26262, a standard for developing functional safety systems for vehicles, has been developed. Although current studies have shown that the root cause for most of the accidents has shifted from vehicle-centric to driver-centric, the main objective of ISO 26262 is covering electronic and electric (E/E) systems of vehicles with almost no emphasis on the driver itself. To this end, we propose a holistic approach based on the ISO 26262 standard that not only considers the E/E systems of the vehicle but also the driver’s behaviour. We illustrate the utility of the approach with an example from the automotive domain.

Keywords

Transport Automotive systems Functional safety requirements ISO 26262 Cyber-Physical-Social Systems 

Notes

Acknowledgment

This work has been partially supported by the “Ente Cassa Di Risparmio di Firenze”, Bando per progetti 2016, and by the FAR-FAS 2014 TOSCA-FI project funded by the Tuscany Region.

References

  1. 1.
    Ridderhof, W., Gross, H.-G., Doerr, H.: Establishing evidence for safety cases in automotive systems – a case study. In: Saglietti, F., Oster, N. (eds.) SAFECOMP 2007. LNCS, vol. 4680, pp. 1–13. Springer, Heidelberg (2007).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-75101-4_1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Törner, F., Öhman, P.: Automotive safety case a qualitative case study of drivers, usages, and issues. In: 11th HASE, pp. 313–322. IEEE (2008)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Zhang, H., Li, W., Chen, W.: Model-based hazard analysis method on automotive programmable electronic system. In: International Conference on Biomedical Engineering and Informatics (BMEI), pp. 2658–2661. IEEE (2010)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    ISO: 26262: Road Vehicles-Functional safety. IS ISO/FDIS 26262 (2011)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    McCall, J.C., Trivedi, M.M.: Driver behavior and situation aware brake assistance for intelligent vehicles. Proc.-IEEE 95(2), 374 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Taib, R., Yu, K., Jung, J., Hess, A., Maier, A.: Human-centric analysis of driver inattention. In: Intelligent Vehicles Symposium Workshops, pp. 7–12. IEEE (2013)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dong, Y., Hu, Z., Uchimura, K., Murayama, N.: Driver inattention monitoring system for intelligent vehicles: a review. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. 12(2, SI), 596–614 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lee, J.D., Young, K.L., Regan, M.A.: Defining driver distraction. Driv. Distraction: Theor. Eff. Mitig. 13(4), 31–40 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Tawari, A., Sivaraman, S., Trivedi, M.M., Shannon, T., Tippelhofer, M.: Looking-in and looking-out vision for urban intelligent assistance: estimation of driver attentive state and dynamic surround for safe merging and braking. In: Intelligent Vehicles Symposium Proceedings, pp. 115–120. IEEE (2014)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Jesty, P.H., Hobley, K.M., Evans, R., Kendall, I.: Safety analysis of vehicle-based systems. In: Proceedings of the Safety-Critical Systems Symposium, pp. 90–110 (2000)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Giese, H., Tichy, M., Schilling, D.: Compositional hazard analysis of UML component and deployment models. In: Heisel, M., Liggesmeyer, P., Wittmann, S. (eds.) SAFECOMP 2004. LNCS, vol. 3219, pp. 166–179. Springer, Heidelberg (2004).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-30138-7_15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Li, W., Zhang, H.: A software hazard analysis method for automotive control system. In: International Conference on Computer Science and Automation Engineering (CSAE), vol. 3, pp. 744–748. IEEE (2011)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Basir, N., Denney, E., Fischer, B.: Deriving safety cases for hierarchical structure in model-based development. In: Schoitsch, E. (ed.) SAFECOMP 2010. LNCS, vol. 6351, pp. 68–81. Springer, Heidelberg (2010).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-15651-9_6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Palin, R., Ward, D., Habli, I., Rivett, R.: ISO 26262 safety cases: compliance and assurance. In: International Conference on System Safety, pp. 1–6 (2011)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Habli, I., Ibarra, I., Rivett, R.S., Kelly, T.: Model-based assurance for justifying automotive functional safety. Technical report, SAE Technical Paper (2010)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mehrpouyan, H., Bunus, P., Kurtoglu, T.: Model-based hazard analysis of undesirable environmental and components interaction. In: Aerospace Conference, pp. 1–8. IEEE (2012)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mohamad Gharib
    • 1
    Email author
  • Paolo Lollini
    • 1
  • Andrea Ceccarelli
    • 1
  • Andrea Bondavalli
    • 1
  1. 1.University of Florence - DiMaIFlorenceItaly

Personalised recommendations