Skip to main content

Diffusion and Adoption: Factors Impacting Adoption of Sustainable Agricultural Practices

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Sustainability in Plant and Crop Protection ((SUPP))

Abstract

Managing natural resources, and at the same time increasing productivity in agriculture, is the thrust of research and extension all over the world. Achieving long-term food security without depleting natural resources can be achieved by adoption of sustainable agricultural practices. Sustainable agricultural practices, or agriculture per se, seek the wider adoption of practices that are ecologically sound and maintain the long-term ecological and biological integrity of natural resources. Sustainable practices in agriculture include integrated pest management, integrated nutrient management, soil conservation and water management, among others. Much of the dynamics of the diffusion process of sustainable agricultural practices, for adoption or rejection of these practices, can be analysed and understood on the basis of sound understanding of diffusion and adoption theory. The diffusion researchers have mostly analysed farmers’ differences in analysing adoption or rejection of innovation/technology. Very little attention has been paid to technology attributes or technology inappropriateness. In this chapter, we have analysed factors impacting diffusion and adoption of sustainable natural resource management practices in agriculture and different models that can be employed to predict adoption or rejection, in future times. The researchers involved in an innovation development process should consider factors propelling adoption or rejection before commercialisation of a technology. Diffusion researchers need to employ alternative field experimental before-after designs, in which data are gathered at different points in time rather than post hoc data collection, to overcome farmer blame and pro-technology biases. We are of the firm belief that diffusion of innovation research must be given full recognition by research and development, and change agencies involved in agricultural sciences.

Diffusion of innovations has the status of a bastard child with respect to the parent interests in social and cultural change: too big to ignore but unlikely to be given full recognition.

Fliegal and Kivlin (1966)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    “Diffusion” includes both the panned and the spontaneous spread of innovations and “dissemination” is directed and managed spread of innovations (Rogers 1983). In this chapter, we use the word “diffusion” and “dissemination” interchangeably.

Abbreviations

ETL:

Economic threshold level

FAO:

Food and Agriculture Organisation

IBM:

International Business Machines

IPM:

Integrated pest management

IRM:

Insecticide resistance management

PAU:

Punjab Agricultural University

SDGs:

Sustainable Development Goals

References

  • Addo, J.O. (2016). Moderating factors of celebrity endorsement on diffusion. Global Journal of Management and Business Research: E Marketing, 16(1),19–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Akinola, A. A. (1986). An application of Bass model in the analysis of diffusion of cocoa spraying among Nigerian cocoa farmers. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 37(3), 395–404. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-9552.1986.tb01607.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bass, F. M. (1969). A new product growth model for consumer durables. Management Science, 13(5), 215–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bass, F. M. (2004). Comments on a new product growth for model consumer durables. Management Science, 50(12), 1833–1840.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhatia, B. S. (1990). Adoption of farm mechanization in a developing economy. New Delhi: Daya Publishing House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cain, M., & Mittman, R. (2002). Diffusion of innovation in health care. Oakland: California Health Care Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Downs, G. W., & Mohr, L. B. (1976). Conceptual issues in the study of innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 21, 700–714.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FAO. (2017). Food and agriculture: Driving action across the 2030 agenda for sustainable development. Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations. 40p. http://www.fao.org/publications/card/en/c/b31f7040-a387-466d-99e2-04896d421fca/. Accessed 12 May 2018.

  • Feder, G., & Umali, D. (1993). The adoption of agricultural innovations: A review. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 43(3–4), 215–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fliegal, F. C., & Kivlin, J. E. (1966). Attributes of innovations as factors in diffusion. American Journal of Sociology, 72(3), 235S–248S.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flower, J. H., & Christakis, N. A. (2010). Cooperative behaviour cascades in human social networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107(12), 1287–1300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galjart, B. (1971). Rural development and sociological concepts: A critique. Rural Sociology, 36(1), 31–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hashemi, S. M., Peshin, R., & Feola, G. (2014). From the farmers’ perspective: Pesticide use and pest control. In D. Pimentel & R. Peshin (Eds.), Integrated pest management pesticide problems (Vol. 3, pp. 409–432). New York/Heidelberg/Dordrecht/London: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kearns, K. P. (1992). Innovations in local government: A socio-cognitive network approach. Knowledge and Policy, 5(2), 45–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knowler, D., & Bradshaw, B. (2007). Farmers’ adoption of conservation agriculture: A review and synthesis of recent research. Food Policy, 32, 25–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kremer, K. S., Crolan, M., Gaiteyer, S., Tirmizi, S. N., Korsching, P. F., Peter, G., & Tong, P. (2000). Evolution of an agricultural innovation: The N-track soil nitrogen test: Adopt, and discontinuance, or reject? Technology in Society, 23, 93–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawton, S. B., & Lawton, W. H. (1979). An autocatalytic model for diffusion of educational innovations. Educational Administration Quarterly, 15(1), 19–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Litsinger, J. A., Libetario, E. M., & Canapi, B. L. (2009). Eliciting farmer knowledge, attitudes, and practices in the development of integrated pest management programs for rice in Asia. In R. Peshin & A. K. Dhawan (Eds.), Integrated pest management: Dissemination and impact (Vol. 2, pp. 119–274). Dordrecht: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8990-9_5.

  • Mahajan, V., Muller, E., & Bass, F. M. (1990). New product diffusion models in marketing: A review and direction for research. In N. Nakicenovic & A. Grubler (Eds.), Diffusion of technologies and social behaviour (pp. 125–177). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menzel, H. (1960). Innovation, integration, and marginality: A survey of physicians. American Sociological Review, 25, 704–713.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nanda, R., Peshin, R., Sharma, L. K., Sharma, R., Sharma, P., & Liyaqat, A. (2017). Determinants of income diversification of family farm household for livelihood security in J&K. Jammu: Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology of Jammu, India.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norris, R. F., Caswell-Chen, E. P., & Kogan, M. (2003). Concept in integrated pest management. New Delhi: Prentice-Hall of India Private Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pattanayak, S. K., Mercer, D. E., Sills, E., & Yang, J. C. (2003). Taking stock of agroforestry adoption studies. Agroforestry Systems, 57, 173–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peshin, R. (2005). Evaluation of dissemination of insecticides resistance management technology in cotton crop in Punjab. PhD dissertation, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peshin, R. (2013). Farmers’ adoptability of integrated pest management of cotton: Revealed by a new methodology. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 33(3), 563–572. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-012-0127-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peshin, R., Dhawan, A. K., Kranthi, K. R., & Singh, K. (2009a). Evaluation of the benefits of an insecticide resistance management programme in Punjab in India. International Journal of Pest Management, 55(3), 207–220. https://doi.org/10.1080/09670870902738786.

  • Peshin, R., Bandral, R. S., Zhang, W. J., Wilson, L., & Dhawan, A. K. (2009b). Integrated pest management: A global overview of history, programs and adoption. In R. Peshin & A. K. Dhawan (Eds.), Integrated pest management: Innovation-development process (Vol. 1, pp. 1–49). Dordrecht: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8992-3_1.

  • Peshin, R., Jayaratne, J., & Singh, G. (2009c). Evaluation research: Methodologies for evaluation of IPM programmes. In R. Peshin & A. K. Dhawan (Eds.), Integrated pest management: Dissemination and impact (Vol. 2, pp. 31–78). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peshin, R., Kranthi, K. R., & Sharma, R. (2014). Pesticide use and experiences with integrated pest management programs and Bt cotton in India. In R. Peshin & D. Pimentel (Eds.), Integrated pest management, experiences with implementation: Global overview (Vol. 4, pp. 269–306). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peshin, R., Hansra, B. S., Nanda, R., Singh, K., & Sharma, R. (2017). Impact evaluation of integrated pest management technologies. Division of Agricultural Extension Education, Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology of Jammu, India.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rebaudo, F., & Dangles, O. (2011). Coupled information diffusion—pest dynamics models predict delayed benefits of farmer cooperation in pest management programs. PLoS Computational Biology, 7(10), 1–10., E1002222. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002222.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rebaudo, F., Carpio, C., Crespo-Perez, V., Herrara, M., Scurrah, M. M. D., Canto, R. C., Montanez, A. G., Bonifacio, A., Mamani, M., Saravia, R., & Dangles, O. (2014). Agent-based models and integrated pest management: Diffusion in small scale farmer communities. In R. Peshin & D. Pimentel (Eds.), Integrated pest management, experiences with implementation: Global overview (Vol. 4, pp. 367–383). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, E. M. (1962). Diffusion of innovations. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, E. M. (1983). Diffusion of innovations (3rd ed.). New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, E. M. (1995). Diffusion of innovations (4th ed.). New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roling, N. (1988). Extension science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, B., & Gross, N. (1943). The diffusion of hybrid seed corn in two Iowa communities. Rural Sociology, 8(1), 15–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, R. (2011). Evaluation of the vegetable integrated pest management farmer field school programme in Jammu region. Ph.D. dissertation, Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology of Jammu, India.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, R., & Peshin, R. (2016). Impact of integrated pest management of vegetables on pesticide use in subtropical Jammu, India. Crop Protection, 84, 105–112 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cropro.2016.02.014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sidhu, R. S., Vatta, K., & Dhaliwal, H. S. (2010). Conservation agriculture in Punjab: Economic implication of technologies and practices. Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 65(3), 413–427.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sidhu, R. S., Vatta, K., & Lall, U. (2011). Climate change—Its impact on agriculture productivity and livelihood: The policy response-climate change impact and management strategies for sustainable water-energy-agriculture outcomes in Punjab. Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 66, 328–339.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, R. (1979). An extension strategy for scientific storage of food grains at the farm level. Department of Extension Education, Punjab Agricultural University Ludhiana, India (Technical paper).

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, K. (2015). My experiences with KVK Jalandhar. Invited lecture delivered in the department of extension education. Punjab Agricultural University Ludhiana, India (Unpublished data).

    Google Scholar 

  • Till, B. D., & Shimp, TA (1998). Endorsers in advertising: The case of negative celebrity information. Journal of Advertising, 27(1), 67–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, J., Luo, Q., Deng, H., & Yan, Y. (2008). Opportunities and challenges of sustainable agricultural development in China. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 363(1492), 893–904.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to Rizwan Jeelani, Ph.D student at the Division of the Veterinary Extension Education of Sher-e-Kashmir University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology of Jammu for Figs. 14.3 and 14.5.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rajinder Peshin .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Peshin, R., Bano, F., Kumar, R. (2019). Diffusion and Adoption: Factors Impacting Adoption of Sustainable Agricultural Practices. In: Peshin, R., Dhawan, A. (eds) Natural Resource Management: Ecological Perspectives . Sustainability in Plant and Crop Protection. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99768-1_14

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics