Skip to main content

Diagnosis in SEMS Based on Cognitive Models

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Smart Electromechanical Systems

Part of the book series: Studies in Systems, Decision and Control ((SSDC,volume 174))

Abstract

Problem statement: SEMS is a complex dynamic object in the operational phase of which it is likely that abnormal situations may occur in which the state of the equipment goes beyond the normal functioning, which can subsequently lead to an accident. Despite the importance of the need and importance of effectively solving the problems of diagnostics of SEMS, at the present time there is no single approach to solving similar problems taking into account the variety of emergent contingencies. Therefore, the actual task is the development of methods, algorithms and special diagnostic tools that allow predicting the development of defects, diagnose processes and recognize violations of normal operation at an early stage of their development to ensure the efficiency, reliability and safety of the operation of SEMS in real time. Results: cognitive to diagnose SEMS in conditions of interval uncertainty and fuzzy initial data, cognitive and fuzzy cognitive modeling is used to reflect the problems of SEMS in a simplified form (in the model), to investigate possible scenarios for the emergence of risk situations at an early stage of their development, and to find ways to resolve them in the model of the situation. As an example, a fuzzy cognitive model of SEMS diagnostics is proposed. Pessimistic and optimistic scenarios of possible development of risk situations, developed with the help of impulse simulation, are given and their brief analysis is given. The system indices of the fuzzy cognitive model are calculated, allowing to identify which of the factors have the greatest impact on SEMS and vice versa; To search for the best values of factors reflecting the normal operation of SEMS. Practical significance: the ability to systematically take into account the long-term consequences of possible abnormal situations and identify side effects that allow to take into account the multifactority of the process of diagnosing SEMS in the process of operation. The task of identifying possible risks in general, and at the operational stage in particular, should be an important part of the diagnostics of SEMS equipment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Yurkov, N.K.: A systematic approach to the organization of the life cycle of complex technical systems. Reliability and quality of complex systems. J. Res. Pract. 1, 27–35 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bushueva, M.E., Belyakov, V.V.: Diagnostics of complex technical systems. In: Novgorod, N. (eds.) Proceedings of the First Workshop on the NATO Project SfP-973799 Semiconductors “Development of Radio-Resistant Semiconductor Devices for Communication Systems and Precision Measurements Using Noise Analysis”, pp. 63–99 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Semenov, S.S.: The main provisions of the system analysis in assessing the technical level of complex systems using the expert method. Reliab. Qual. Complex Syst. 4, 45–53 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Krioni, N.K., Kolodenkova, A.E., Korobkin, V.V., Gubanov, N.G.: Intelligent decision-making support system using cognitive modeling for project feasibility assessment on creating complex technical systems. Int. J. Appl. Bus. Econ. Res. 14(10), 7289–7300 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Roberts, F.S.: Discrete Mathematical Models Applied to Social, Biological and Ecological Problems. Nauka, Moscow (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Dickerson, J., Kosko, B.: Virtual worlds as fuzzy cognitive maps. Virtual Reality Annual International Symposium, pp. 471-477 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kosko, B.: Fuzzy cognitive maps. Int. J. Man-Mach. Stud. 1, 65–75 (1986)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Silov, V.B.: Strategic Decision Making in a Fuzzy Environment. INPRO-RES, Moscow (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kulba, V.V., Kononov, D.A., Kovalevsky, S.S.: Scenario analysis of dynamics of behavior of socio-economic systems. IPP RAS, Moscow (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Casty, J.: Large Systems: Connectivity, Complexity and Disasters. Mir, Moscow (1982)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Novichikhin, A.V., Ulankin, A.N.: Methodical features of project programming for the development of enterprises in the resource region (on the example of the coal industry). Min. Inf. Anal. Bull. 3, 332–337 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Sadovnikova, N.P.: Application of the cognitive modeling for analysis of the ecological and economical efficiency of the urban planning project. Internet-Vestnik VolgGASU 5, 1–4 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kazanin, IYu.: Research of social and economic security of Rostov Region, cognitive modeling of development strategy. News SFU Tech. Sci. 3, 12–16 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Bozhenyuk, A.V., Ginis, L.A.: Application of fuzzy models to the analysis of complex systems. Control Syst. Inf. Technol. 51(1.1), 122–126 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Atkin, R.H., Casti, J.: Polyhedral Dynamics and the Geometry of Systems, RR-77-6. International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Laxenburg (1977)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Gorelova, G.V., Zakharova, E.N., Radchenko, S.A.: Investigation of semi-Structured Problems of Socio-economic Systems: A Cognitive Approach. RSU, Rostov-on-Don (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Korostelev, D.A., Lagerev, D.G., Podvesovsky, A.G.: Application of fuzzy cognitive models to formation of a set of alternatives in decision-making problems. Vestnik Bryansk State Techn. Univ. 4, 77–85 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Borisov, V.V., Kruglov, V.V., Fedulov, A.S.: Fuzzy Models and Networks. Goryachaya Linia - Telecom, Moscow (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Kolodenkova, A.E.: Evaluation of the feasibility of the project on the creation of information control systems using the fuzzy cognitive model training procedure. Vestnik USATU, 20(2 (72)), 123–133 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Papageorgiou, E.I.: Unsupervised hebbian algorithm for fuzzy cognitive map training. In: Papageorgiou, E.I., Stylios, C.D., Groumpos, P.P. (eds.) Proceedings of the 5-th International Workshop on Computer Science and Information Technologies. – Ufa, vol. 1., pp. 209–216 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was financially supported by Russian Foundation for Basic Research, Grant No. 17-08-00402.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vladimir V. Korobkin .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Korobkin, V.V., Kolodenkova, A.E. (2019). Diagnosis in SEMS Based on Cognitive Models. In: Gorodetskiy, A., Tarasova, I. (eds) Smart Electromechanical Systems. Studies in Systems, Decision and Control, vol 174. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99759-9_22

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics