Abstract
The purposes of higher education have been debated ever since tertiary education emerged. Not surprisingly these discussions have also addressed the purposes of Business, Engineering and Technology (BE&T) programs in higher education. Furthermore, given the obvious and frequently threatening challenges of contemporary society, there have been multiple voices calling for attention to the social welfare of all of the world citizens and their quality of life. The intersection of these concerns with the pragmatic nature of BE&T programs has engendered some calls for change. The authors of this chapter examine the extent to which the actual undergraduate plans of study reflect any evidence of attention to ethics, corporate social responsibility, and conscious capitalism – collectively referred to as larger outcomes. In addition to an analysis of the plans of study of BET programs, the authors interviewed thought leaders, reviewed literature, and conducted two case studies/vignettes of exemplary programs to see what the future might hold. The chapter ends with a provocative set of conclusions, recommendations for practice and for further research.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
- 2.
The authors of this chapter are members of the Polytechnic’s faculty, Professor Emeritus and Dean respectively
- 3.
R1 refers to a category of doctoral universities that award a minimum of 20 research/scholarship doctoral degrees and have the highest level of research activity. This classification system was established by the Carnegie Commission on Higher Education (Adapted from http://carnegieclassifications.iu.edu/classification_descriptions/basic.php)
- 4.
K-12 refers to school grades Kindergarten to 12th Grade
References
Abowitz, K. A. (2008). On the public and civic purposes of education. Educational Theory, 58(3), 357–376.
Accrediting Board for Engineering and Technology (2015a). Criteria for accrediting engineering programs. Effective for reviews during the 2016–2017 accreditation cycle. Baltimore: http://www.abet.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/E001-16-17-EAC-Criteria-10-20-15.pdf
Accrediting Board for Engineering and Technology (2015b). Criteria for accrediting engineering technology programs. Effective for reviews during the 2016–2017 accreditation cycle. Baltimore: http://www.abet.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/T001-16-17-ETAC-Criteria-10-16-15.pdf
Association of American Colleges and Universities (2013). Key findings from 2013 survey of employers. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved from https://aacu.org/sites/default/files/files/LEAP/KeyFindingsfrom2013SurveyofEmployers.pdf
Association of Technology, Management and Applied Engineering. (2016). List of accredited programs. Elmhurst: Author. Retrieved from http://c.ymcdn.com/sites/www.atmae.org/resource/resmgr/docs/accredprograms_by_state.pdf
Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business. (2016a). List of accredited institutions. Tampa: Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business Retrieved from http://www.aacsb.edu/accreditation/accredited-members/global-listing.
Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business. (2016b). Eligibility procedures and accreditation standards for business accreditation. Tampa: Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business Retrieved from http://www.aacsb.edu/ ~/media/AACSB/Docs/Accreditation/Standards/2013-bus-standards-update.ashx.
Cheville, A. (2012). Engineering education today: Capturing the afterlife of Sisyphus in five snapshots. Proceedings of the IEEE, 100, 1361.
Christensen, C. M., & Eyring, H. J. (2011). The innovative university: Changing the DNA of higher education from the inside out. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Commission on the Reorganization of Secondary Education. (1918). Cardinal principles of secondary education. Washington, DC: National Education Association.
Committee on Public Understanding of Engineering Messages. (2008). Changing the conversation: Messages for improving public understanding of engineering. Washington, DC: National Academies Press https://www.nap.edu/catalog/12187/changing-the-conversation-messages-for-improving-public-understanding-of-engineering.
Delbanco, A. (2014). College: What it was, is, and should be. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Dyrenfurth, M. (1999). Engineering & technology – the nature of the relationship, session I: Issues in the foundations of the profession. Mississippi Valley Technology Teacher Education Conference, 86th Conference, St. Louis, Missouri.
Engineers Dedicated to a Better Tomorrow. (2016). The online guide to engineering schools. Menlo Park: Engineers Dedicated to a Better Tomorrow Retrieved Aug 30, 2016 from http://www.dedicatedengineers.org/.
Froyd, J.E., Wankat, P.C., Smith, K.A. (2012). Five major shifts in 100 years of engineering education. Proceedings of the IEEE, 100, Centennial Special Issue, May 13, https://doi.org/10.1109/JPROC.2012.2190167.
Institute for the Advancement of University Learning. (2001). Paper 1: Higher education and higher learning. Oxford: University of Oxford Retrieved from http://www.learning.ox.ac.uk/media/global/ wwwadminoxauk/localsites/oxfordlearninginstitute/documents/supportresources/ lecturersteaching staff/resources/resources/Higher_Education_and_Higher_Learning.pdf.
Koen, B. V. (2010). Quo Vadis humans? Engineering the survival of the human species. In I. van de Poel & D. Goldberg (Eds.), Philosophy and engineering: An emerging agenda. New York: Springer.
Lönngren, J., & Hanning, A. (2013). Is it sustainable to educate engineers? Reflections on the purpose of engineering education. Retrieved from http://www-csd.eng.cam.ac.uk/proceedings-of-the-eesd13-conference-cambridge-2013-v-2/keynote-synopsis-lonngren-and-hanning/view.
Lucena, J., Downey, G., Jesiek, B., & Elber, S. (2008). Competencies beyond countries: The re-organization of engineering education in the United States, Europe, and Latin America. Journal of Engineering Education, 97, 433–447. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2008.tb00991.x.
Mackey, J., & Sisodia, R. (2014). Conscious capitalism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business Review Press.
National Academy of Engineering, Infusing Ethics Selection Committee. (2016). Infusing ethics into the development of engineers: Exemplary education activities and programs. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/21889.
National Center for Education Statistics. (2013). Digest of education statistics: 2013. Washington, DC: US Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics Retrieved July 30, 2016 from http://nces.ed.gov/programs/digest/d13/ch_3.asp.
National Center for Education Statistics. (2016a). Condition of education 2016. Washington, DC: US Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics Retrieved July 30, 2016 from http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2016/2016144.pdf.
National Center for Education Statistics. (2016b). Fast facts: Most popular majors. Washington, DC: US Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics Retrieved July 30, 2016 from https://nces.ed.gov/fastfacts/display.asp?id=37.
Pellegrino, J. W., & Hilton, M. L. (Eds.). (2012). Education for life and work developing transferable knowledge and skills in the 21st century. Washington, DC: National Research Council.
Rego, M. A. S. (2014). Purposes of the university and employability challenges in higher education (Fines de la Universidad y Retos de la Empleabilidad en la Educación Superior). XIII international congress on theory of education. XIII Congreso Internacional de Teoría de la Educación. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 139, 16–25.
Saichie, K., & Morphew, C. C. (2014). What college and university websites reveal about the purposes of higher education. The Journal of Higher Education, 85(4), 499–530. https://doi.org/10.1353/jhe.2014.0024 Retrieved July 2016 from http://muse.jhu.edu/article/548203.
Schwab, K. (2016). The fourth industrial revolution. Geneva: World Economic Forum.
Seely, B. E. (2005). Patterns in the history of engineering education reform: A brief essay. In Educating the engineer of 2020: Adapting engineering education to the new century. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
Teehankee, B.L. (2016). Reclaiming the purpose of business education. Business world online posted on February 25, 2015 10:10:00 PM http://www.bworldonline.com.
The Economist. (2009). Triple bottom line. Online extra http://www.economist.com/node/14301663.
Yoder, B. L. (2016). Engineering by the numbers. Washington, DC: American Society for Engineering Education Retrieved from https://www.asee.org/papers-and-publications/publications/college-profiles/15EngineeringbytheNumbersPart1.pdf.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Dyrenfurth, M., Bertoline, G. (2019). To What Ends: Engineering, Technology, and Business Program Perspectives as to Their Key Purposes with Regard to the Society Housing Them. In: Christensen, S.H., Delahousse, B., Didier, C., Meganck, M., Murphy, M. (eds) The Engineering-Business Nexus. Philosophy of Engineering and Technology, vol 32. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99636-3_18
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99636-3_18
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-99635-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-99636-3
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)