Skip to main content

Learning to Practice Engineering in Business: The Experiences of Newly Hired Engineers Beginning New Jobs

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Philosophy of Engineering and Technology ((POET,volume 32))

Abstract

This chapter reports on a study of the experiences of engineers beginning new jobs in a business organization. The overriding question guiding the study was: What and how do newly hired engineers learn to work in a business organization? Two major concepts frame this study: First is the idea of an occupational community as a setting for practice, and second, the process of socialization whereby new members of an occupational community learn how to practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Anderson, K. J. B., Courter, S. S., McGlamery, T., Nathans-Kelly, T. M., & Nicometo, C. G. (2010). Understanding engineering work and identity: A cross-case analysis of engineers within six firms. Engineering Studies, 2(3), 153–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barley, S. R. (2005). What we know (and mostly don’t know) about technical work. In S. Ackroyd, R. Batt, P. Thompson, & P. S. Tolbert (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of work and organization (pp. 376–403). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J. S., & Duguid, P. (2001). Knowledge and organization: A social practice perspective. Organization Science, 12(2), 198–213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bucciarelli, L. L. (2003). Engineering philosophy. Delft: Delft University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bucciarelli, L. L., & Kuhn, S. (1997). Engineering education and engineering practice: Improving the fit. In S. R. Barley & J. E. Orr (Eds.), Between craft and science: Technical work in U.S. settings (pp. 210–229). Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chao, G. T., O’Leary-Kelly, A. M., Wolf, S., Klein, H. J., & Gardner, P. D. (1994). Organizational socialization: Its content and consequences. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79(5), 730–743.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper-Thomas, H. D., & Anderson, N. (2006). Organizational socialization: A new theoretical model and recommendations for future research and HRM practices in organizations. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 21(5), 492–516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corradi, G., Gherardi, S., & Verzelloni, L. (2010). Through the practice lens: Where is the bandwagon of practice-based studies heading? Management Learning, 41(3), 265–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Creighton, S., & Hodson, R. (1997). Whose side are they on? Technical workers and management ideology. In S. R. Barley & J. E. Orr (Eds.), Between craft and science: Technical work in U.S. settings, Chapter 3. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–550.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt, K. M., & Graebner, M. E. (2007). Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges. Academy of Management Journal, 50(1), 25–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellinger, A. D., & Watkins, K. E. (1998). Updating the critical incident technique after forty-four years. In R. J. Torraco (Ed.), Academy of Human Resource Development Conference. Oakbrook.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, M. S., & Orlikowski, W. J. (2011). Theorizing practice and practicing theory. Organization Science, 22(5), 1240–1253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flanagan, J. C. (1954). The critical incident technique. Psychological Bulletin, 51, 327–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Godfrey, E., & Parker, L. (2010). Mapping the cultural landscape in engineering education. Journal of Engineering Education, 99(1), 5–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanneman, L., & Gardner, P. (2010). Under the economic turmoil a skills gap simmers. (Research Brief 1-2010). Retrieved from Michigan State, Collegiate Employment Research Institute website: http://wizards/wpcontent/uploads/2010/01/skillsabrief1-2010.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatmaker, D. M. (2012). Practicing engineers: Professional identity construction through role configuration. Engineering Studies, 4(2), 121–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johri, A. (2012). Learning to demo: The sociomateriality of newcomer participation in engineering research practices. Engineering Studies, 4(3), 249–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jonassen, D., Strobel, J., & Lee, C. B. (2006). Everyday problem solving in engineering: Lessons for engineering educators. Journal of Engineering Education, 95(2), 139–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, G. R. (1983). Psychological orientation and the process of organizational socialization: An interactionist perspective. Academy of Management Review, 8(3), 464–474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kammeyer-Mueller, J. D., & Wanberg, C. R. (2003). Unwrapping the organizational entry process: Disentangling multiple antecedents and their pathways to adjustment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 779–794.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kilduff, M., Mehra, A., & Dunn, M. B. (2011). From blue sky research to problem solving: A philosophy of science theory of new knowledge production. Academy of Management Review, 36(2), 297–317.

    Google Scholar 

  • Korte, R. F. (2009). How newcomers learn the social norms of an organization: A case study of the socialization of newly hired engineers. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 20(3), 285–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Korte, R. (2010). First, get to know them: A relational view of organizational socialization. Human Resource Development International, 13(1), 27–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Korte, R. F., Sheppard, S., Jordan, W. C. (2008). A study of the early work experiences of recent graduates in engineering. Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education Conference, 2008. Pittsburgh.

    Google Scholar 

  • Korte, R., Brunhaver, S., & Sheppard, S. (2015). (Mis)interpretations of organizational socialization: The expectations and experiences of newcomers and managers. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 26(2), 185–208. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrdq.21206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lattuca, L. R., Terenzini, P. T., & Volkwein, J. F. (2006). Engineering change: A study of the impact of EC2000. Baltimore: ABET.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Louis, M. R. (1980). Surprise and sense making: What newcomers experience in entering unfamiliar organizational settings. Administrative Science Quarterly, 25, 226–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, P. (2011). It’s time for management version 2.0: Six forces redefining the future of modern management. Futures, 43, 797–808.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merriam-Webster’s online dictionary. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://www.merriam-webster.com

  • Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook, 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miles, R. E., Miles, G., Snow, C. C., Blomqvist, K., & Rocha, H. (2009). The I-form organization. California Management Review, 51(4), 61–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Science Foundation. (2010). The role of the National Science Foundation in the innovation ecosystem (White Paper). Washington, DC: National Science Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicolini, D. (2013). Practice theory, work, and organization: An introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Passow, H. J. (2012). Which ABET competencies do engineering graduates find most important in their work? Journal of Engineering Education, 101(1), 95–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Radcliffe, D. F. (2006). Guest editorial: Shaping the discipline of engineering education. Journal of Engineering Education, 95(4), 263–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schatzki, T. R. (2001). Introduction: Practice theory. In T. R. Schatzki, K. K. Cetina, & E. von Savigny (Eds.), The practice turn in contemporary theory (pp. 1–14). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheppard, S. D., Macatangay, K., Colby, A., & Sullivan, W. M. (2009). Educating engineers: Designing for the future of the field, The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thévenot, L. (2001). Pragmatic regimes governing the engagement with the world. In T. R. Schatzki, K. K. Cetina, & E. von Savigny (Eds.), The practice turn in contemporary theory (pp. 56–73). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trevelyan, J. (2010). Reconstructing engineering from practice. Engineering Studies, 2(3), 175–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trevelyan, J. P. (2014). The making of an expert engineer. Boca Raton: CRC.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Van Maanen, J., & Barley, S. R. (1984). Occupational communities: Culture and control in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 6, 287–365.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Maanen, J., & Schein, E. H. (1979). Toward a theory of organizational socialization. Research in Organizational Behavior, 1, 209–264.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vinck, D. (Ed.). (2003). Everyday engineering. Cambridge, MA: The MIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weick, K. E. (1995). Sensemaking in organizations. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenger, E. (2000). Communities of practice and social learning systems. Organization, 7(2), 225–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Korte, R. (2019). Learning to Practice Engineering in Business: The Experiences of Newly Hired Engineers Beginning New Jobs. In: Christensen, S.H., Delahousse, B., Didier, C., Meganck, M., Murphy, M. (eds) The Engineering-Business Nexus. Philosophy of Engineering and Technology, vol 32. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99636-3_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99636-3_16

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-99635-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-99636-3

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics