Does High-Frequency Trading Matter?

  • Chia-Hsuan YehEmail author
  • Chun-Yi Yang
Conference paper
Part of the Springer Proceedings in Complexity book series (SPCOM)


Over the past few decades, financial markets have undergone remarkable reforms as a result of developments in computer technology and changing regulations, which have dramatically altered the structures and the properties of financial markets. The advances in technology have largely increased the speed of communication and trading. This has given birth to the development of algorithmic trading (AT) and high-frequency trading (HFT). The proliferation of AT and HFT has raised many issues regarding their impacts on the market. This paper proposes a framework characterized by an agent-based artificial stock market where market phenomena result from the interaction between many heterogeneous non-HFTs and HFTs. In comparison with the existing literature on the agent-based modeling of HFT, the traders in our model adopt a genetic programming (GP) learning algorithm. Since they are more adaptive and heuristic, they can form quite diverse trading strategies, rather than zero-intelligence strategies or pre-specified fundamentalist or chartist strategies. Based on this framework, this paper examines the effects of HFT on price discovery, market stability, volume, and allocative efficiency loss.


High-frequency trading Agent-based modeling Artificial stock market Continuous double action Genetic programming 



Research support from MOST Grant no. 103-2410-H-155-004-MY2 is gratefully acknowledged.


  1. 1.
    Arthur, W. B., Holland, J., LeBaron, B., Palmer, R., & Tayler, P. (1997). Asset pricing under endogenous expectations in an artificial stock market. In W. B. Arthur, S. Durlauf, & D. Lane (Eds.), The economy as an evolving complex system II (pp. 15-44). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bottazzi, G., Dosi, G., & Rebesco, I. (2005). Institutional architectures and behavioral ecologies in the dynamics of financial markets. Journal of Mathematical Economics, 41(1–2), 197–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Brock, W. A., & Hommes. C. H. (1998). Heterogeneous beliefs and routes to chaos in a simple asset pricing model. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 22(8–9), 1235–1274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Carrion, A. (2013). Very fast money: High-frequency trading on the NASDAQ. Journal of Financial Markets, 16(4), 680–711.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cartea, Á., & Penalva, J. (2012). Where is the value in high frequency trading? Quarterly Journal of Finance, 2(3), 1250014-1–1250014-46.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chen, S.-H., & Yeh, C.-H. (2001). Evolving traders and the business school with genetic programming: A new architecture of the agent-based artificial stock market. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 25(3–4), 363–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cliff, D., & Bruten, J. (1997). Zero is Not Enough: On the Lower Limit of Agent Intelligence for Continuous Double Auction Markets. HP Technical Report, HPL-97-141.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gsell, M. (2008). Assessing the Impact of Algorithmic Trading on Markets: A Simulation Approach. Working paper.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hagströmer, B., & Lars Nordén, L. (2013). The diversity of high-frequency traders. Journal of Financial Markets, 16(4), 741–770.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hanson, T. A. (2011). The Effects of High frequency Traders in a Simulated Market. Working paper.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hasbrouck, J., & Saar, G. (2013). Low-latency trading. Journal of Financial Markets, 15(4), 646–679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    He, X.-Z., & Li, Y. (2007). Power-law behaviour, heterogeneity, and trend chasing. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 31(10), 3396–3426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hendersgott, T., Jones, C. M., & Menkveld, A. J. (2011). Does algorithmic trading improve liquidity? The Journal of Finance, 66(1), 1–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hill, B. M. (1975). A simple general approach to inference about the tail of a distribution. Annals of Statistics, 3(5), 1163–1174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hommes, C. H. (2006) Heterogeneous agent models in economics and finance. In L. Tesfatsion & K. L. Judd (Eds.), Handbook of computational economics (Vol. 2, Chap. 23, pp. 1109–1186). Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Jacob Leal, S., Napoletano, M., Roventini, A., & Fagiolo, G. (2014). Rock around the clock: An agent-based model of low- and high-frequency trading. In: Paper Presented at the 20th International Conference on Computing in Economics (CEF’2014).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Jarrow, R. A., & Protter, P. (2012). A dysfunctional role of high frequency trading in electronic markets. International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Finance, 15(3), 1250022-1–1250022-15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kirman, A. P. (2006). Heterogeneity in economics. Journal of Economic Interaction and Coordination, 1(1), 89–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    LeBaron, B. (2006). Agent-based computational finance. In L. Tesfatsion & K. L. Judd (Eds.), Handbook of computational economics (Vol. 2, Chap. 24, pp. 1187–1233). Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    LeBaron, B., Arthur, W. B., & Palmer, R. (1999). Time series properties of an artificial stock market. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 23(9–10), 1487–1516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Prewitt, M. (2012). High-frequency trading: should regulators do more? Michigan Telecommunications and Technology Law Review, 19(1), 1–31.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Sornette, D., & von der Becke, S. (2011). Crashes and High Frequency Trading. Swiss Finance Institute Research Paper No. 11–63.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Wah, E., & Wellman, M. P. (2013). Latency arbitrage, market fragmentation, and efficiency: A two-market model. In Proceedings of the Fourteenth ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce (pp. 855–872). New York: ACM.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Walsh, T., Xiong, B., & Chung, C. (2012). The Impact of Algorithmic Trading in a Simulated Asset Market. Working paper.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Westerhoff, F. (2003). Speculative markets and the effectiveness of price limits. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 28(3), 493–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Yeh, C.-H. (2008). The effects of intelligence on price discovery and market efficiency. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 68(3-4), 613–625.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Yeh, C.-H., & Yang, C.-Y. (2010). Examining the effectiveness of price limits in an artificial stock market. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 34(10), 2089–2108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Zhang, X. F. (2010). High-Frequency Trading, Stock Volatility, and Price Discovery. Working paper.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Information ManagementYuan Ze UniversityTaoyuan, ChungliTaiwan
  2. 2.Department of Computational and Data Sciences, College of Science, Krasnow Institute for Advanced StudyGeorge Mason UniversityFairfaxUSA

Personalised recommendations