Advertisement

Training the Mind for the Knowledge and Creative Work

  • A. D. AmarEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Management, Change, Strategy and Positive Leadership book series (MACHSTPOLE)

Abstract

Highlighting the importance of intellectual and mental work in contemporary organizations, this chapter goes over how the Bhagavad Gita analyzes the difficulties of focusing mind and suggests ways to gain control over it to do the knowledge and creative work. The author takes the usual behavior modification theories of stimulus-response-reinforcement (S-R-R) given by the psychologists, during the twentieth century, for controlling worker behavior for mechanical, repetitive, structured work and shows how it fails in controlling the mind of workers for assignments that go beyond the rudimentary. Then, he applies the mind theory of the Bhagavad Gita and modifies the S-R-R model incorporating the Bhagavad Gita’s concept of doing karma without any expectation of reward, describing how a knowledge worker could be motivated even when there was no reinforcement. He goes further in modifying the model by internalizing the motivation such that a knowledge worker will self-pick knowledge and innovation work to do rather than waiting for the supervisor to assign it. The final model emphasizes the Gita’s concept of kartavya (duty) and shows how knowledge workers could perform well on innovation and mental work without any direction, extrinsic control or supervision. This will focus employee’s mind on the innovation and creative work.

Keywords

Innovation work Stimulus-response-reinforcement model Intellectual work Mental work Knowledge work Creativity Innovation 

References

  1. Amar, A. D. (1998). Controls and creativity in organizations. Mid-Atlantic Journal of Business, 34(2), 97–99.Google Scholar
  2. Amar, A. D. (2002). Managing knowledge workers: Unleashing innovation and productivity. Westport, CT: Quorum Books, Praeger.Google Scholar
  3. Chinmayananda, S. (1996). The holy Geeta. Mumbai: Central Chinmaya Mission Trust.Google Scholar
  4. D’Zurilla, T. J., & Goldfried, M. R. (1971). Problem solving and behavior modification. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 78, 107–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Cognitive evaluation theory: Perceived casualty and perceived competence. Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Springer Science + Business Media.Google Scholar
  6. Kohn, A. (1993, September-October). Why incentive plans cannot work. Harvard Business Review, 54–63.Google Scholar
  7. Mitchell, S. (2000). Bhagavad Gita. New York, NY: Harmony Books.Google Scholar
  8. Mukundananda, S. (2014). Bhagavad Gita: The song of God. Plano, TX: Jagadguru Kripaluji Yog. Retrieved from https://www.holy-bhagavad-gita.org/chapter/6/verse/35 Google Scholar
  9. Rajagopalachari, C. (2008). Bhagavad Gita (19th ed.). Mumbai: Bharatiya Vidya Bhavan.Google Scholar
  10. Rampersad, H. (2004). Learning and unlearning in accordance with organizational change. Organization Development Journal, 22, 43–61.Google Scholar
  11. Ramsukhdas, S. (1990). Gita madhurya. Gorakhpur: Gita Press.Google Scholar
  12. Shellenbarger, S. (2011, September 27). Better ideas through failure. Wall Street Journal, D1.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Seton Hall UniversitySouth OrangeUSA

Personalised recommendations