Abstract
Biopharmaceuticals are playing an increasing role in therapy; as a subset of therapeutics, their proportional use relative to traditional small drugs is increasing in terms of sales and volume. Often termed biotherapeutics, this drug class is primarily represented by protein pharmaceuticals, which includes a wide range of drug sizes covering 1000–150,000 dalton (Da) molecular weight. Given their relatively large size and their hydrophilic nature and susceptibility to hydrolytic degradation in tissues throughout the body (as opposed to primarily renal and hepatic elimination of small drugs), their absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion (ADME) properties are different in many aspects. This chapter will describe these properties in detail for protein biopharmaceuticals. This presentation will include strategies to mitigate their susceptibility to hydrolysis in order to increase their bioavailability and prolong their residence time in the body. As well, the important role of modification of the physicochemical properties of proteins in influencing rate of their absorption and exposure-time profile will be discussed in the context of insulin and insulin analogs for the treatment of diabetes mellitus. The chapter will conclude with a relatively brief discussion of the ADME properties of heparin, a carbohydrate-based biopharmaceutical, and those associated with the combined cell- and gene-based therapy of two recently marketed products for the treatment of refractory blood-borne cancers.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Agerso H, Seiding Larsen L, Riis A et al (2004) Pharmacokinetics and renal excretion of desmopressin after intravenous administration to healthy subjects and renally impaired patients. Br J Clin Pharmacol 58:352–358
Ait-Oudhia S, Ovacik MA, Mager DE (2017) Systems pharmacology and enhanced pharmacodynamic models for understanding antibody-based drug action and toxicity. MAbs 9:15–28
Alt N, Zhang TY, Motchnik P et al (2016) Determination of critical quality attributes for monoclonal antibodies using quality by design principles. Biologicals 44:291–305
Bara L, Billaud E, Gramond G et al (1985) Comparative pharmacokinetics of a low molecular weight heparin (PK 10 169) and unfractionated heparin after intravenous and subcutaneous administration. Thromb Res 39:631–636
Beshyah SA, Anyaoku V, Niththyananthan R et al (1991) The effect of subcutaneous injection site on absorption of human growth hormone: abdomen versus thigh. Clin Endocrinol 35:409–412
Binder C (1969) Absorption of injected insulin. A clinical-pharmacological study. Acta Pharmacol Toxicol (Copenh) 27:1–84
Bjornsson TD, Wolfram KM, Kitchell BB (1982) Heparin kinetics determined by three assay methods. Clin Pharmacol Ther 31:104–113
Boss AH, Petrucci R, Lorber D (2012) Coverage of prandial insulin requirements by means of an ultra-rapid-acting inhaled insulin. J Diabetes Sci Technol 6:773–779
Bumbaca D, Boswell CA, Fielder PJ et al (2012) Physiochemical and biochemical factors influencing the pharmacokinetics of antibody therapeutics. AAPS J 14:554–558
Chirmule N, Jawa V, Meibohm B (2012) Immunogenicity to therapeutic proteins: impact on PK/PD and efficacy. AAPS J 14:296–302
Cui Y, Cui P, Chen B et al (2017) Monoclonal antibodies: formulations of marketed products and recent advances in novel delivery system. Drug Dev Ind Pharm 43:519–530
De Swart CA, Numeyer B, Roelofs JM et al (1982) Kinetics of intravenously administered heparin in normal humans. Blood 60:1251–1258
Di L (2015) Strategic approaches to optimizing peptide ADME properties. AAPS J 17:134–143
Dirks NL, Meibohm B (2010) Population pharmacokinetics of therapeutic monoclonal antibodies. Clin Pharmacokinet 49:633–659
Drewe J, Meier R, Vonderscher J et al (1992) Enhancement of the oral absorption of cyclosporin in man. Br J Clin Pharmacol 34:60–64
Drucker DJ, Nauck MA (2006) The incretin system: glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors in type 2 diabetes. Lancet 368:1696–1705
Duckworth WC, Bennett RG, Hamel FG (1998) Insulin degradation: progress and potential. Endocr Rev 19:608–624
Ghetie V, Ward ES (1997) FcRn: the MHC class I-related receptor that is more than an IgG transporter. Immunol Today 18:592–598
Goeddel DV, Kleid DG, Bolivar F et al (1979) Expression in Escherichia coli of chemically synthesized genes for human insulin. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 76:106–110
Goetze AM, Liu YD, Zhang Z et al (2011) High-mannose glycans on the Fc region of therapeutic IgG antibodies increase serum clearance in humans. Glycobiology 21:949–959
Heinemann L, Muchmore DB (2012) Ultrafast-acting insulins: state of the art. J Diabetes Sci Technol 6:728–742
Hirsh J, Raschke R (2004) Heparin and low-molecular-weight heparin: the seventh ACCP conference on antithrombotic and thrombolytic therapy. Chest 126:188S–203S
Home PD (2012) The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of rapid-acting insulin analogues and their clinical consequences. Diabetes Obes Metab 14:780–788
Home PD (2015) Plasma insulin profiles after subcutaneous injection: how close can we get to physiology in people with diabetes? Diabetes Obes Metab 17:1011–1020
Hunter J (2008) Subcutaneous injection technique. Nurs Stand 22:41–44
Igawa T, Tsunoda H, Tachibana T et al (2010) Reduced elimination of IgG antibodies by engineering the variable region. Protein Eng Des Sel 23:385–392
Jackisch C, Muller V, Maintz C et al (2014) Subcutaneous administration of monoclonal antibodies in oncology. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 74:343–349
Kagan L (2014) Pharmacokinetic modeling of the subcutaneous absorption of therapeutic proteins. Drug Metab Dispos 42:1890–1905
Keizer RJ, Huitema AD, Schellens JH et al (2010) Clinical pharmacokinetics of therapeutic monoclonal antibodies. Clin Pharmacokinet 49:493–507
Kraynov E, Kamath AV, Walles M et al (2016) Current approaches for absorption, distribution, metabolism, and excretion characterization of antibody-drug conjugates: an industry white paper. Drug Metab Dispos 44:617–623
Krishna M, Nadler SG (2016) Immunogenicity to biotherapeutics – the role of anti-drug immune complexes. Front Immunol 7:21
Leader B, Baca QJ, Golan DE (2008) Protein therapeutics: a summary and pharmacological classification. Nat Rev Drug Discov 7:21–39
Lee WA, Ennis RD, Longenecker JP (1994) The bioavailability of intranasal salmon calcitonin in healthy volunteers with and without a permeation enhancer. Pharm Res 11:747–750
Linhardt RJ, Gunay NS (1999) Production and chemical processing of low molecular weight heparins. Semin Thromb Hemost 25:5–16
Liu L (2015) Antibody glycosylation and its impact on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of monoclonal antibodies and Fc-fusion proteins. J Pharm Sci 104:1866–1884
Liu L (2018) Pharmacokinetics of monoclonal antibodies and Fc-fusion proteins. Protein Cell 9:15–32
Liu L, Stadheim A, Hamuro L et al (2011) Pharmacokinetics of IgG1 monoclonal antibodies produced in humanized Pichia pastoris with specific glycoforms: a comparative study with CHO produced materials. Biologicals 39:205–210
Lobo ED, Hansen RJ, Balthasar JP (2004) Antibody pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. J Pharm Sci 93:2645–2668
Mach H, Gregory SM, Mackiewicz A et al (2011) Electrostatic interactions of monoclonal antibodies with subcutaneous tissue. Ther Deliv 2:727–736
Mager DE (2006) Target-mediated drug disposition and dynamics. Biochem Pharmacol 72:1–10
Mi Y, Lin A, Fiete D et al (2014) Modulation of mannose and asialoglycoprotein receptor expression determines glycoprotein hormone half-life at critical points in the reproductive cycle. J Biol Chem 289:12157–12167
Moots RJ, Xavier RM, Mok CC et al (2017) The impact of anti-drug antibodies on drug concentrations and clinical outcomes in rheumatoid arthritis patients treated with adalimumab, etanercept, or infliximab: results from a multinational, real-world clinical practice, non-interventional study. PLoS One 12:e0175207
Mueller KT, Maude SL, Porter DL et al (2017) Cellular kinetics of CTL019 in relapsed/refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia and chronic lymphocytic leukemia. Blood 130:2317–2325
Nauck M (2016) Incretin therapies: highlighting common features and differences in the modes of action of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists and dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors. Diabetes Obes Metab 18:203–216
Owens DR (2011) Insulin preparations with prolonged effect. Diabetes Technol Ther 13:S5–S14
Pecoraro V, De Santis E, Melegari A et al (2017) The impact of immunogenicity of TNFalpha inhibitors in autoimmune inflammatory disease. A systematic review and meta-analysis. Autoimmun Rev 16:564–575
Porter CJ, Charman SA (2000) Lymphatic transport of proteins after subcutaneous administration. J Pharm Sci 89:297–310
Reddy ST, Berk DA, Jain RK et al (2006) A sensitive in vivo model for quantifying interstitial convective transport of injected macromolecules and nanoparticles. J Appl Physiol 101:1162–1169
Richter WF, Jacobsen B (2014) Subcutaneous absorption of biotherapeutics: knowns and unknowns. Drug Metab Dispos 42:1881–1889
Richter WF, Bhansali SG, Morris ME (2012) Mechanistic determinants of biotherapeutics absorption following SC administration. AAPS J 14:559–570
Roberts ZJ, Better M, Bot A et al (2018) Axicabtagene ciloleucel, a first-in-class CART T cell therapy for aggressive NHL. Leuk Lymphoma 59(8):1785–1796
Roopenian DC, Akilesh S (2007) FcRn: the neonatal Fc receptor comes of age. Nat Rev Immunol 7:715–725
Salar A, Avivi I, Bittner B et al (2014) Comparison of subcutaneous versus intravenous administration of rituximab as maintenance treatment for follicular lymphoma: results from a two-stage, phase IB study. J Clin Oncol 32:1782–1791
Schoch A, Kettenbergher H, Mundigl O et al (2015) Charge-mediated influence of the antibody variable domain on FcRn-dependent pharmacokinetics. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 112:5997–6002
Sedelmeier G, Sedelmeier J (2017) Top 200 drugs by worldwide sales 2016. Chimia (Aarau) 71:730
Shah DK, Betts AM (2013) Antibody biodistribution coefficients: inferring tissue concentrations of monoclonal antibodies based on the plasma concentrations in several preclinical species and human. MAbs 5:297–305
Shpilberg O, Jackisch C (2013) Subcutaneous administration of rituximab (MabThera) and trastuzumab (Herceptin) using hyaluronidase. Br J Cancer 109:1556–1561
Smith A, Manoli H, Jaw S (2016) Unraveling the effect of immunogenicity on the PK/PD, efficacy, and safety of therapeutic proteins. J Immunol Res 2016:9: ID 2342187
Supersaxo A, Hein WR, Steffen H (1990) Effect of molecular weight on the lymphatic absorption of water-soluble compounds following subcutaneous administration. Pharm Res 7:167–169
Ter Braak EW, Woodworth JR, Bianchi R et al (1996) Injection site effects on the pharmacokinetics and glucodynamics of insulin lispro and regular insulin. Diabetes Care 19:1437–1440
Tibbitts J, Canter D, Graff R et al (2016) Key factors influencing ADME properties of therapeutic proteins: a need for ADME characterization in drug discovery and development. MAbs 8:229–245
Usmani SS, Bedi G, Samuel JS et al (2017) THPdb: database of FDA-approved peptide and protein therapeutics. PLoS One 12:e0181748
Vezina HE, Cotreau M, Han TH et al (2017) Antibody-drug conjugates as cancer therapeutics: past, present, and future. J Clin Pharmacol 57:S11–S25
Wang W, Wang EQ, Balthasar JP (2008) Monoclonal antibody pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. Clin Pharmacol Ther 84:548–558
Wu F, Bhansali SG, Law WC et al (2012) Fluorescence imaging of the lymph node uptake of proteins in mice after subcutaneous injection: molecular weight dependence. Pharm Res 29:1843–1853
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Graveno, M., Stratford, R.E. (2018). Absorption, Distribution, Metabolism, and Excretion of Biopharmaceutical Drug Products. In: Talevi, A., Quiroga, P. (eds) ADME Processes in Pharmaceutical Sciences. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99593-9_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99593-9_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-99592-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-99593-9
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)