Adapting Smart Dynamic Casting to Thin Folded Geometries
- 1.5k Downloads
The first thin folded concrete prototypes produced with Smart Dynamic Casting (SDC) exposed numerous challenges concerning concrete. The SDC process is modelled to explain the increased difficulty to fabricate thin folded members compared to columns. Due to the smaller volume to surface ratio in formworks for thin folded structures the effect of friction is amplified and the process window narrows down. In order to compensate for this, retarded self-compacting mortar mix designs and acceleration strategies are investigated.
Material testing results provide guidelines of how to achieve a uniform hardening rate over the course of an experiment, while preserving sufficient fluidity and dealing with variations in raw materials. For this, offline penetrometer tests are performed to evaluate material properties and online measurements are recorded to follow the strength evolution of the same mix processed with the experimental setup. In addition, the slipping criterion and the deformability of the concrete are tested in a 1:1 scale robotic experiment to evaluate the fabrication feasibility with the adapted mix. This unveils the potential to produce thin folded members for architectural applications.
KeywordsSmart Dynamic Casting Folded structures Process window
The research is pursued in the interdisciplinary framework of the National Competence Centre of Research (NCCR) Digital Fabrication funded by the SNSF at ETH Zürich.
The authors thank Heinz Richner, Andi Reusser, Michael Lyrenmann for technical assistance, Tom Mundy, Lukas Sigrist, Shaun Wu and Federico Giacomarra for their help during the experiments. The authors are also grateful for the constructive discussions with Nicolas Roussel and Timothy Wangler.
- 1.The third industrial revolution. The Economist (2012)Google Scholar
- 2.Gramazio, F., Kohler, M., Willmann, J.: The Robotic Touch: How Robots Change Architecture, pp. 286–301. Park Books, Zürich (2014)Google Scholar
- 5.Lloret, E., Mettler, L.K., Shahab, A.R., Gramazio, F., Kohler, M., Flatt, R.J.: Smart dynamic casting: a robotic fabrication system for complex structures. In: Proceedings of 1st Concrete Innovation Conference, Oslo, Norway (2014)Google Scholar
- 6.Reiter, L., Palacios, M., Wangler, T., Flatt, R. J.: Putting concrete to sleep and waking it up with chemical admixtures. In: Proceedings 11th Canmet ACI International Conference Superplast Chem Admix Concr, ACI, Ottawa. Ottawa, ON, Canada, pp. 145–154 (2015)Google Scholar
- 7.Lloret Fritschi, E., Reiter, L., Wangler, T., Gramazio, F., Kohler, M., Flatt, R.J.: Smart dynamic casting: slipforming with flexible formwork—inline measurement and control. In: Proceedings of 2nd Concrete Innovation Conference, Tromso, Norway (2017)Google Scholar
- 11.Myrdal, R.: Accelerating admixtures for concrete. SINTEF REPORT Building and Infrastructure Concrete and Innovation Center, Project No: 3D006020, pp. 1–35 (2007)Google Scholar
- 13.Flatt, R.J., Schober I.: Superplasticizers. Understanding the Rheology of Concrete. Roussel, N. (ed.) Woodhead publishing, pp. 144–208 (2012)Google Scholar