Advertisement

Bond Strength in 3D Printed Geopolymer Mortar

  • Biranchi PandaEmail author
  • Nisar Ahamed Noor Mohamed
  • Yi Wei Daniel Tay
  • Ming Jen Tan
Conference paper
Part of the RILEM Bookseries book series (RILEM, volume 19)

Abstract

3D printing is getting significant attention in the construction industry. This technology, which has been talked for years, is now delivering tangible results, however it is not yet ready for mass production in mainstream construction. Thixotropy material, 3D printer together with 3-dimensional computer model are the key elements required for robust concrete printing. For a freshly printed material, the increase in structural buildup at rest, prior to the placement of a successive layer can result poor interlayer bond strength and therefore, in this paper, we aimed to investigate the structuration effect of a nano-clay modified geopolymer, used for 3D concrete printing. Different structuration rate was achieved by changing molar ratio of activator and experimental results conclude that, there exists an optimum printing zone for different molar ratios, beyond which interlayer bond strength will be very weak.

Keywords

Digital construction Geopolymer Structural buildup Bond strength 

Notes

Acknowledgement

The authors would like to acknowledge Sembcorp Architects & Engineers Pte Ltd and National Research Foundation (NRF), Singapore for their funding and support in this research project.

References

  1. 1.
    Tay, Y.W.D., Panda, B., Paul, S.C., Noor Mohamed, N.A., Tan, M.J., Leong, K.F.: 3D printing trends in building and construction industry: a review. Virtual Phys. Prototyp. 12(3), 261–276 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bos, F., Wolfs, R., Ahmed, Z., Salet, T.: Additive manufacturing of concrete in construction: potentials and challenges of 3D concrete printing. Virtual Phys. Prototyp. 11(3), 209–225 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Perrot, A., Rangeard, D., Pierre, A.: Structural built-up of cement-based materials used for 3D-printing extrusion techniques. Mater. Struct. 49(4), 1213–1220 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Mettler, L.K., Wittel, F.K., Flatt, R.J., Herrmann, H.J.: Evolution of strength and failure of SCC during early hydration. Cem. Concr. Res. 89, 288–296 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Megid, W.A., Khayat, K.H.: Bond strength in multilayer casting of self-consolidating concrete. ACI Mater. J. 114(3), 467–476 (2017)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Roussel, N., Cussigh, F.: Distinct-layer casting of SCC: the mechanical consequences of thixotropy. Cem. Concr. Res. 38(5), 624–632 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Panda, B., Paul, S.C., Mohamed, N.A.N., Tay, Y.W.D., Tan, M.J.: Measurement of tensile bond strength of 3D printed geopolymer mortar. Measurement 113, 108–116 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Favier, A., Hot, J., Habert, G., Roussel, N., de Lacaillerie, J.B.D.E.: Flow properties of MK-based geopolymer pastes. A comparative study with standard Portland cement pastes. Soft Matter 10(8), 1134–1141 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ma, S., Qian, Y., Kawashima, S.: Experimental and modeling study on the non-linear structural build-up of fresh cement pastes incorporating viscosity modifying admixtures. Cem. Concr. Res. 108, 1–9 (2018)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Panda, B., Tan, M.J.: Experimental study on mix proportion and fresh properties of fly ash based geopolymer for 3D concrete printing. Ceram. Int. (2018).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2018.03.031CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ouyang, J., Tan, Y., Corr, D.J., Shah, S.P.: The thixotropic behavior of fresh cement asphalt emulsion paste. Constr. Build. Mater. 114, 906–912 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Li, H., Tan, Y.J., Leong, K.F., Li, L.: 3D bioprinting of highly thixotropic alginate/methylcellulose hydrogel with strong interface bonding. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces. 9(23), 20086–20097 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Panda, B., Paul, S.C., Hui, L.J., Tay, Y.W.D., Tan, M.J.: Additive manufacturing of geopolymer for sustainable built environment. J. Clean. Prod. 167, 281–288 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Favier, A., Hot, J., Habert, G., de Lacaillerie, J.D.E., Roussel, N.: Rheology of geopolymer: comparative study between Portland cement and metakaolin based geopolymer. In: 1st RILEM International Conference on Rheology and Processing of Construction Materials, Paris, vol. 1, p. 4794 (2014)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Duxson, P., Provis, J.L.: Designing precursors for geopolymer cements. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 91(12), 3864–3869 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© RILEM 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Biranchi Panda
    • 1
    Email author
  • Nisar Ahamed Noor Mohamed
    • 1
  • Yi Wei Daniel Tay
    • 1
  • Ming Jen Tan
    • 1
  1. 1.Singapore Centre for 3D Printing, School of Mechanical and Aerospace EngineeringNanyang Technological UniversitySingaporeSingapore

Personalised recommendations