Skip to main content

Industry Organizations and Standards Landscape

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Internet of Things From Hype to Reality
  • 204k Accesses

Abstract

This chapter provides an overview of the IoT standardization landscape and a glimpse into the main standards defining organizations involved in IoT as well as a snapshot of the projects that they are undertaking. It highlights the ongoing convergence towards the Internet Protocol as the normalizing layer for IoT. The chapter covers the following industry organizations: IEEE, IETF, ITU, IPSO Alliance, OCF, IIC, ETSI, oneM2M, AllSeen Alliance, Thread Group, ZigBee Alliance, TIA, Z-Wave Alliance, OASIS and LoRa Alliance. The chapter concludes with a summary of the gaps and provides a scorecard of the industry progress to date.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. D. Wobschall, IEEE 1451 – A Universal Transducer Protocol Standard. https://eesensors.com/media/wysiwyg/docs-pdfs/ESP16_Atest.pdf

  2. B. Li et al., Wireless access for vehicular environments. http://www.mehrpouyan.info/Projects/Group%205.pdf

  3. A. Khattab et al., An overview of IEEE standardization efforts for cognitive radio networks, IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems (ISCAS), Lisbon, Portugal, May 2015

    Google Scholar 

  4. M. Kasparick et al., New IEEE 11073 standards for interoperable, networked Point-of-Care medical devices, 37th annual international conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC), Milan, Italy, August 2015

    Google Scholar 

  5. O. Logvinov, Standard for an architectural framework for the Internet of Things (IoT). http://grouper.ieee.org/groups/2413/Intro-to-IEEE-P2413.pdf

  6. IETF, ROLL Working Group charter. https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/roll/charter/

  7. J.P. Vasseur, Terms used in routing for low-power and Lossy networks, RFC 7102, Jan 2014

    Google Scholar 

  8. P. Levis et al., Overview of Existing Routing Protocols for Low-Power and Lossy Networks, draft-IETF-roll-protocols-survey-07, work in progress, Apr 2009

    Google Scholar 

  9. IETF, CORE Working Group charter. https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/core/charter/

  10. N. Kushalnagar et al., IPv6 over Low-Power Wireless Personal Area Networks (6LoWPANs): overview, assumptions, problem statement, and goals, RFC4919, Aug 2007

    Google Scholar 

  11. G. Montenegro et al., Transmission of IPv6 Packets over IEEE 802.15.4 Networks, RFC4944, Sept 2007

    Google Scholar 

  12. J. Hui et al., Compression Format for IPv6 Datagrams over IEEE 802.15.4-Based Networks, RFC6282, Sept 2011

    Google Scholar 

  13. E. Kim et al., Design and application spaces for IPv6 over Low-Power Wireless Personal Area Networks (6LoWPANs), RFC6568, Apr 2012

    Google Scholar 

  14. E. Kim et al., Problem statement and requirements for IPv6 over Low-Power Wireless Personal Area Network (6LoWPAN) Routing, RFC6606, May 2012

    Google Scholar 

  15. Z. Shelby et al., Neighbor discovery optimization for IPv6 over Low-Power Wireless Personal Area Networks (6LoWPANs), RFC6775, November 2012

    Google Scholar 

  16. IETF, 6TiSCH Working Group Charter. https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/6tisch/charter/

  17. IETF, ACE Working Group Charter. https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/ace/charter/

  18. C. Zavazava, ITU Work on the Internet of Things, Presentation at ICTP Workshop, Mar 2015

    Google Scholar 

  19. IPSO Alliance. http://www.ipso-alliance.org/

  20. IETF, IPSO alliance successfully demonstrates Internet of Things interoperability, IETF Journal, Oct 2012

    Google Scholar 

  21. Open Connectivity Foundation. http://openconnectivity.org/

  22. ETSI IoT. http://www.etsi.org/technologies-clusters/technologies/internet-of-things

  23. oneM2M. http://www.onem2m.org/about-onem2m/why-onem2m

  24. Thread Group. http://www.threadgroup.org/

  25. O. Mazhelis et al., Internet of Things Market, Value Networks, and Business Models: State of the Art Report, 2013

    Google Scholar 

  26. Z-Wave Alliance. http://z-wavealliance.org/

  27. TIA TR-50. http://www.tiaonline.org/all-standards/committees/tr-50

  28. OASIS. https://www.oasis-open.org/committees/tc_cat.php?cat=iot

  29. IBM LoRaWAN Press Release. https://www03.ibm.com/press/us/en/pressrelease/46287.wss

  30. LoRa Alliance. https://www.lora-alliance.org/

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Problems and Exercises

Problems and Exercises

  1. 1.

    Name three established networking standards bodies involved in defining technology standards for IoT?

  2. 2.

    Which devices does IEEE 1451 series address? What does it specifically define? What does TEDS provide for IEEE 1451 devices? Provide specific examples.

  3. 3.

    What are the two mays to implement TEDS?

  4. 4.

    What does the IEEE 1888 standard define?

  5. 5.

    What constraints should routing protocols adhere to in order to meet the requirements of LLNs, as analyzed by the IETF ROLL workgroup?

  6. 6.

    Which RESTful protocol, defined by the IETF CORE workgroup, extends RESTful architectures to constrained devices? Why is REST applicable here?

  7. 7.

    What is the role of the IPSO Alliance among IoT standards organizations?

  8. 8.

    What two standards bodies are developing competing wireless technologies for home automation?

  9. 9.

    What is the scope of the standards being developed by oneM2M?

  10. 10.

    What IoT verticals does the work of the IIC encompass?

  11. 11.

    The LoRA Alliance standardizes the LoRA protocol. Describe the data rate and range characteristics of the technology?

  12. 12.

    Is the IoT standards landscape well defined? What is the net result of this on the industry?

  13. 13.

    Where does the industry stand on the road to a standards-based IoT? State the gaps per protocol layer.

  14. 14.

    Name two IoT Application Protocols that are being standardized by OASIS. Describe what function does each protocol serve.

  15. 15.

    Is the ZigBee stack based on the Internet Protocol? Explain.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Rayes, A., Salam, S. (2019). Industry Organizations and Standards Landscape. In: Internet of Things From Hype to Reality. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99516-8_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99516-8_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-99515-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-99516-8

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics