Advertisement

The UN Sustainable Development Goals and the Biocultural Heritage Lacuna: Where Is Goal Number 18?

  • Alexandria K. PooleEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Ecology and Ethics book series (ECET, volume 3)

Abstract

On 25 September 2015, the Seventieth Session of the General Assembly in the United Nations approved the new Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) through Resolution 70/1 “Transforming our world: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development,” building upon the vision of the original Millennium Development Goals (MDGs). Although intended to account for the shortfalls found in the original MDGs, the SDGs still neglect fundamental qualities of cultural sovereignty that are key for maintaining sustainable practices, values, and lifestyle habits. None of the 17 SDGs emphasize the need to protect local ecological knowledge, cultural heritage—nor its interrelation with biodiversity—as a pathway to sustainability. Further, the factors that threaten local ecological knowledge, traditional lifestyles, and alternative economic practices are absent, provoking indigenous and local peoples to argue that they, and their cultural sovereignty, remain unrecognized by this new “sustainable” development agenda. I argue that focusing on indirect drivers that undermine sustainable management practices must be explicitly addressed to address this conceptual lacuna. Indirect drivers include cultural and ethical facets of the human-nature relationship. Biocultural heritage, reflecting the diverse ways of being between human communities and their local environments, is the rich history of language, heritage, cultural memory, ecological knowledge, and values and should be explicitly be articulated as a key component to any sustainability agenda. Consequently, I propose that to accomplish the SDGs’ mission, it is indispensable to include a sustainable development goal “number 18” that recognizes biocultural heritage.

Keywords

Ethics Local ecological knowledge Biocultural heritage Sustainable Development Goals Human-nature relationship 

References

  1. Agyeman J (2005) Sustainable communities and the challenge of environmental justice. New York University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  2. AOSIS (2016) Alliance of Small Island States, statement by the republic of Maldives on behalf of AOSIS at the high level thematic debate on achieving the sustainable development goals, 21 April 2016. http://aosis.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/2016.04.21-AOSIS-Statemet-HLTD-on-Implementing-SDGs-.pdf. Accessed 9 July 2016
  3. Argumedo A, Pimbert M (2008) Protecting farmers’ rights with indigenous biocultural heritage territories: the experience of the potato park. Available via: IIED/Association ANDES, [No city given]. http://pubs.iied.org/pdfs/G03072.pdf
  4. Argumedo, A, K Swiderska, M Pimbert, Y Song, and R Pant (2011) Implementing farmers’ rights under the FAO International Treaty on PGRFA: the need for a broad approach based on biocultural heritage. Paper presented at the 4th Governing Body of the International Treaty on PGRFA, Bali, 14–18 March 2011. http://cmsdata.iucn.org/downloads/farmers_rights_paper_bali_draft5.pdf
  5. Berkes F, Folke C, Colding J (2000) Linking social and ecological systems: management practices and social mechanisms for building resilience. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  6. Brundtland GH (1987) Report of the world commission on environment and development: our common future. United Nations, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  7. Carpenter SR, De Fries R, Dietz T, Mooney HA, Polasky S, Reid WV, Scholes RJ (2006) Millennium ecosystem assessment: research needs. Science 314(5797):257–258PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Cocks M (2006) Biocultural diversity: moving beyond the realm of ‘indigenous’ and ‘local’ people. Hum Ecol 34(2):185–200Google Scholar
  9. Cocks M (2010) What is biocultural diversity? A theoretical review. In: Bates DG, Tucker J (eds) Human ecology: contemporary research and practice. Springer, Boston, pp 67–77Google Scholar
  10. Congreso de Colombia (1993) Law 70 of Colombia (1993): in recognition of the right of black Colombians to collectively own and occupy their Ancestral Lands, English Translation. (trans: Jackson NL, Jackson P). April 2007. Available via: Benedict College, South Carolina. www.benedict.edu/exec_admin/intnl_programs/other_files/bc-intnl_programs- law_70_of_colombia-english.pdf
  11. Costanza R, de Groot R, Sutton P, van der Ploeg S, Anderson SJ, Kubiszewski I, Farber S, Turner RK (2014) Changes in the global value of ecosystem services. Glob Environ Chang 26:152–158Google Scholar
  12. Davidson-Hunt IJ, Turner KL, Pareake Mead AT, Cabrera-Lopez J, Bolton R, Idrobo CJ, Miretski I, Morrison A, Robson JP (2012) Biocultural design: a new conceptual framework for sustainable development in rural indigenous and local communities. Available via: S.A.P.I.EN.S [Online], 5.2. http://sapiens.revues.org/1382
  13. Escobar A (2011) Encountering development: the making and unmaking of the third world. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  14. Fehling M, Nelson BD, Venkatapuram S (2013) Limitations of the Millennium Development Goals: a literature review. Glob Public Health 8(10):1109–1122PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Gavin MC, McCarter J, Mead A, Berkes F, Stepp JR, Peterson D, Tang R (2015) Defining biocultural approaches to conservation. Trends Ecol Evol 30(3):140–145PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Grear A (2015) The discourse of “biocultural” rights and the search for new epistemic parameters: moving beyond essentialisms and old certainties in an age of Anthropocene complexity? J Hum Rights Environ 6(1):1–6Google Scholar
  17. Hunn E (1999) The value of subsistence for the future of the world. In: Nazarea V (ed) Ethnoecology: situated knowledge/located lives. University of Arizona Press, Tucson, pp 22–36Google Scholar
  18. Hunn E (2007) Ethnobiology in four phases. J Ethnobiology 27(1):1–10Google Scholar
  19. IPCCA (2009) The Indigenous Peoples’ Biocultural Climate Change Assessment Initiative. http://ipcca.info/. Accessed 5 July 2015
  20. IPMG (2014) The Indigenous Peoples Major Group vision and priorities for the sustainable development goals. Major group position paper. March 2014. https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/3447SD2015%20Position%20Paper_Indigenous%20Peoples%20MG_v1_March%202014.pdf
  21. IPMG (2015) The Indigenous People’s Major Group policy brief on sustainable development goals and post 2015 development agenda, a working draft position paper. https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/majorgroups/indigenouspeoples
  22. Kahn PH, Kellert SR (2002) Children and nature: psychological, sociocultural, and evolutionary investigations. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  23. Krauss M (1992) The world’s language in crisis. Language 68:4–10Google Scholar
  24. Liu S, Costanza R, Farber S, Troy A (2010) Valuing ecosystem services. Ann NY Acad Sci 1185(1):54–78PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Maffi L (1998) Language: a resource for nature. Nat Resour 34(4):12–21Google Scholar
  26. Maffi L (2001) On the interdependence of biological and cultural diversity. In: Maffi L (ed) On biocultural diversity: linking language, knowledge, and the environment. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC, pp 1–50Google Scholar
  27. Maffi L (2005) Linguistic, cultural, and biological diversity. Annu Rev Anthropol 34:599–617Google Scholar
  28. Maffi L (2007a) Biocultural diversity and sustainability. In: Pretty J, Ball AS, Benton T, Guiant JS, Lee DR, Orr D, Pfeiffer MJ, Ward H (eds) The SAGE handbook of environment and society. Sage Publications, London, pp 267–278Google Scholar
  29. Maffi L (2007b) Bio-cultural diversity for endogenous development: lessons from research, policy and on-the-ground experiences. Paper presented at conference on endogenous development and bio-cultural diversity: the interplay of worldviews, globalization, and locality, Geneva, October 2006, pp 56–66Google Scholar
  30. Maffi L (2012) Interview with Luisa Maffi 03.04.2012 “Cultures Are No Museums Specimens.” The European. http://www.theeuropean-magazine.com/luisa-maffi%2D%2D2/6068-biocultural-diversity. Accessed 16 March 2015
  31. Maffi L, Woodley E (2012) Biocultural diversity conservation: a global sourcebook. Routledge, Abingdon/New YorkGoogle Scholar
  32. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2003) Ecosystems and human well-being: a framework for assessment. Island Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  33. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005) Ecosystems and human well-being: synthesis. Island Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  34. Mühlhäusler P (2001) Ecolinguistic, linguistic diversity and ecological diversity. In: Maffi L (ed) On biocultural diversity: linking language, knowledge, and the environment. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC, pp 133–144Google Scholar
  35. Nabhan GP (2001) Cultural perceptions of ecological interactions: an “endangered people’s” contribution to the conservation of biological and linguistic diversity. In: Maffi L (ed) On biocultural diversity: linking language, knowledge, and the environment. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC, pp 145–156Google Scholar
  36. Nabhan GP, St. Antoine S (1993) The loss of floral and faunal story: the extinction of experience. In: Wilson EO (ed) The biophilia hypothesis. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, pp 229–250Google Scholar
  37. Nazarea V (ed) (1999) Ethnoecology: situated knowledge/located lives. University of Arizona Press, TucsonGoogle Scholar
  38. Nelson GC (2005) Drivers of ecosystem change: summary chapter. In: Hassan R, Scholes R, Ash N (eds) Ecosystems and human well-being: current state and trends. Island Press, Washington, DC, pp 73–76Google Scholar
  39. Nelson GC, Bennett E, Berhe AA, Cassman K, DeFries RS, Dietz T, Dobermann A, Dobson A, Janetos A, Levy M, Marco D, Nakicenovic N, O’Neill B, Norgaard R, Petschel-Held G, Ojima D, Pingali P, Watson R, Zurek R (2006) Anthropogenic drivers of ecosystem change: an overview. Ecol Soc 11(2):29 http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol11/iss2/art29/ Google Scholar
  40. Orr DW (1992) Ecological literacy: education and the transition to a postmodern world. SUNY Press, SyracuseGoogle Scholar
  41. Persic A, Martin G (2008) Links between biological and cultural diversity: report of the international workshop, 26–28 September 2007. Available via: UNESCO HQ Paris. http://unescodoc.unesco.org/images/0015/001592/1592551
  42. Poole AK (2015) Urban sustainability and the extinction of experience: acknowledging drivers of biocultural loss for socio-ecological well-being. Dissertation, University of North TexasGoogle Scholar
  43. Poole AK (2018) Where is goal 18? The need for biocultural heritage in the sustainable development goals. Environmental Values 27(1):55–80Google Scholar
  44. Poole AK, Hargrove EC, Day P, Forbes W, Berkowitz AR, Feinsinger P, Rozzi R (2013) A call for ethics literacy in environmental education. In: Rozzi R, Pickett STA, Palmer C, Armesto JJ, Callicott JB (eds) Linking ecology and ethics for a changing world: values, philosophy, and action. Ecology and ethics, vol 1. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 349–371Google Scholar
  45. Posey DA, Dutfield G (1996) Beyond intellectual property rights: toward traditional resource rights for indigenous and local communities. IDRC, OttawaGoogle Scholar
  46. Pretty J (2011) Interdisciplinary progress in approaches to address social-ecological and ecocultural systems. Environ Conserv 38(2):127–139Google Scholar
  47. Pretty J, Adams B, Berkes F, de Athayde S, Dudley N, Hunn E, Maffi L, Milton K, Rapport D, Robbins P, Sterling E, Stolton S, Tsing A, Vintinnerk E, Pilgrim S (2009) The intersections of biological diversity and cultural diversity: towards integration. Conserv Soc 7(2):100–112Google Scholar
  48. Rozzi R (2012) Biocultural ethics: the vital links between the inhabitants, their habits and regional habitats. Environ Ethics 34:27–50Google Scholar
  49. Rozzi R (2013) Biocultural ethics: from biocultural homogenization toward biocultural conservation. In: Rozzi R, Pickett STA, Palmer C, Armesto JJ, Callicott JB (eds) Linking ecology and ethics for a changing world: values, philosophy, and action. Ecology and ethics, vol 1. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 9–32Google Scholar
  50. Rozzi R (2015a) Earth stewardship and the biocultural ethic: Latin American perspectives. In: Rozzi R, Chapin FS III, Callicott JB, Pickett STA, Power ME, Armesto JJ, May RH Jr (eds) Earth stewardship: linking ecology and ethics in theory and practice. Ecology and ethics, vol 2. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 87–112Google Scholar
  51. Rozzi R (2015b) Implications of biocultural ethics for earth stewardship. In: Rozzi R, Chapin FS III, Callicott JB, Pickett STA, Power ME, Armesto JJ, May RH Jr (eds) Earth stewardship: linking ecology and ethics in theory and practice. Ecology and ethics, vol 2. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 113–136Google Scholar
  52. Rozzi R, Massardo F, Anderson CB, Heidinger K, Silander JA Jr (2006) Ten principles for biocultural conservation at the southern tip of the Americas: the approach of the Omora Ethnobotanical Park. Ecol Soc 11(1):43 Available via: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol11/iss1/art43/ Google Scholar
  53. Schröter M, Zanden EH, Oudenhoven AP, Remme RP, Serna-Chavez HM, Groot RS, Opdam P (2014) Ecosystem services as a contested concept: a synthesis of critique and counter-arguments. Conserv Lett 7(6):514–523Google Scholar
  54. Slobig Z (2014) Salmon return to Washington’s Elwha River for the first time in 102 years. Takepart, 17 September 2014, http://www.takepart.com/article/2014/09/17/salmon-return-elwha-river-first-time-102-years. Accessed 13 July 2015
  55. UNDRIP (2007). United Nations General Assembly resolution A/61/L.67, United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP – 13 September 2007) Available via: http://www.un.org/esa/socdev/unpfii/documents/DRIPS_en.pdf
  56. UNESCO (2010) 2010 Declaration of bio-cultural diversity. The international conference on cultural and biological diversity for development, Montreal, Canada, 8–10 June 2010 Available via: http://www.unesco.org/mab/doc/iyb/Declaration.pdf. Accessed 7 June 2015
  57. UNGA (2015) United Nations General Assembly resolution 70/1, transforming our world: the 2030 agenda for sustainable development, A/79/L.1 (25 September 2015). Available via: undocs.org/A/RES/70/1
  58. Zent S (2009) Traditional ecological knowledge (TEK) and biocultural diversity: a close-up look at linkages, delearning trends, and changing patterns of transmission. In: Bates P, Chiba M, Kube S, Nakashima D (eds) Learning and knowing in indigenous societies today. UNESCO, Paris, pp 39–58Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Politics, Philosophy and Legal StudiesElizabethtown CollegeElizabethtownUSA

Personalised recommendations