Advertisement

Why Some Exotic Species Are Deeply Integrated into Local Cultures While Others Are Reviled

  • Martin A. Nuñez
  • Romina D. Dimarco
  • Daniel Simberloff
Chapter
Part of the Ecology and Ethics book series (ECET, volume 3)

Abstract

One key challenge for invasive species management is finding support from local communities. Without local support, management plans can be severely compromised. What makes people support or reject management of invasive species can be linked to their perception of the target invasive species. In other words, it can be harder to control invasive species that are assimilated into the local community. We identify five factors associated with how quickly invasive species can become culturally assimilated. These factors are arrival time, economic impact, aesthetic value, effect on human health, and origin of nonnative species and of human immigrants. We suggest that understanding how these factors contribute to the incorporation of nonnative species into local cultures is important in determining effective control measures. In this vein, publicly accessible educational programs explaining the problems that invasive species produce will be required to implement effective invasive species management.

Keywords

Invasive species Management Culture impact Nonnative species 

References

  1. Alencar NL, Santoro FR, Albuquerque UP (2014) What is the role of exotic medicinal plants in local medical systems? A study from the perspective of utilitarian redundancy. Rev Bras 24:506–515Google Scholar
  2. Anthony L (2017) The aliens among us. Yale University Press, New HavenGoogle Scholar
  3. Bennett BC, Prance GT (2000) Introduced plants in the indigenous pharmacopeia of South America. Econ Bot 54:90–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bertness MD (1984) Habitat and community modification by an introduced herbivorous snail. Ecology 65:370–381CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bertolino S, Genovesi P (2003) Spread and attempted eradication of the grey squirrel (Sciurus carolinensis) in Italy, and consequences for the red squirrel (Sciurus vulgaris) in Eurasia. Biol Conserv 109:351–358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Capella WD (1998) Pasos cordilleranos, grupos sociales y procesos hegemónicos en norpatagonia hacia fines del siglo XIX. Revista de Historia – Universidad de Concepción 7:215–228Google Scholar
  7. Cardozo K, Subramaniam B (2013) Assembling Asian/American naturecultures. J Asian Am Stud 16:1–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chapman JW, Blakeslee AMH, Carlton JT, Bellinger MR (2008) Parsimony dictates a human introduction: on the use of genetic and other data to distinguish between the natural and human-mediated invasion of the European snail Littorina littorea in North America. Biol Invasions 10:131–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Clément G (2002) Éloge des vagabondes. Herbes, arbres et fleurs à la conquête du monde. Nil éditions, ParisGoogle Scholar
  10. Coates P (2006) Strangers on the land. American perceptions of immigrant and invasive species. University of California Press, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  11. Crego R, Rozzi R, Jiménez JE (2018) Fur trade and the biotic homogenization of sub-polar ecosystems. In: Rozzi R, May R, Chapin SF, Massardo F, Gavin M, Klaver I, Pauchard A, Nuñez MA, Simberloff D (eds) From biocultural homogenization to biocultural conservation. Ecology and ethics, vol 3. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 233–243Google Scholar
  12. Crosby AW (1986) Ecological imperialism: the biological expansion of Europe. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 900–1900Google Scholar
  13. Crosby AW (2003) The Columbian exchange: biological and cultural consequences of 1492. Greenwood Publishing Group, WestportGoogle Scholar
  14. Crowley SL, Hinchliffe S, Redpath SM, McDonald RA (2017) Disagreement about invasive species does not equate to denialism: a response to Russell and Blackburn. Trends Ecol Evol 32:228–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Culley TM, Hardiman NA, Hawkes J (2011) The role of horticulture in plant invasions: how grafting in cultivars of Callery pear (Pyrus calleryana) can facilitate spread into natural areas. Biol Invasions 13:739–746CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dickie IA, Bennett BM, Burrows LE, Nuñez MA, Peltzer DA, Porté A, Richardson DM, Rejmánek M, Rundel PW, van Wilgen BW (2014) Conflicting values: ecosystem services and invasive tree management. Biol Invasions 16(3):705–719Google Scholar
  17. Dillingham WF (1936) Hui Manu: friend of birds. Parad Pac 48:20–21Google Scholar
  18. Dolan EJ (2003) Snakehead. A fish out of water. Smithsonian Books, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  19. Dorcas ME, Willson JD, Reed RN, Snow RW, Rochford MR, Miller MA, Meshaka WE Jr et al (2012) Severe mammal declines coincide with proliferation of invasive Burmese pythons in Everglades National Park. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109:2418–2422CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Evans-Pritchard EE (1940) The Nuer, a description of the modes of livelihood and political institutions of a Nilotic people. Clarendon Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  21. Fuller PL, Benson AJ, Nunez G, Fusaro A, Neilson M (2017) Channa argus. USGS nonindigenous aquatic species database. https://nas.er.usgs.gov/queries/factsheet.sspx?speciesid=2265
  22. Guild E (1938) Tahitian aviculture: acclimatization of foreign birds. Avic Mag 3:8–11Google Scholar
  23. Helgen KM, Wilson DE (2003) Taxonomic status and conservation relevance of the raccoons (Procyon spp.) of the West Indies. J Zool 259(1):69–76Google Scholar
  24. Helzer J, Machado E (2011) The new blue islands: Azorean immigration, settlement, and cultural landscapes in California’s San Joaquin Valley. Calif Geogr 51(6), on-line URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10211.2/2817
  25. Holou RAY, Achigan–Dako EG, Sinsin B (2013) Ecology and management of invasive plants in Africa. In: Jose S, Singh HP, Batish DR, Kohli RK (eds) Invasive plant ecology. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 161–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Johnson MT (2016) Managing conflict over biological control: the case of strawberry guava in Hawaii. In: Van Driesche R, Simberloff D, Blossey B, Causton C, Hoddle M, Marks C, Heinz K, Wagner D, Warner K (eds) Integrating biological control into conservation practice. Wiley Blackwell, Chichester, pp 264–276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lambertucci SA, Speziale KL (2011) Protecting invaders for profit. Science 332(6025):35–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lever C (1992) They dined on eland: the story of the acclimatisation societies. Quiller, LondonGoogle Scholar
  29. Lockwood JL, Hoopes MF, Marchetti MP (2013) Invasion ecology. Wiley, West SussexGoogle Scholar
  30. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005) Ecosystems and human well-being: synthesis. Island Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  31. Moll E, Moll G (1994) Common trees of South Africa. Struik, Cape TownGoogle Scholar
  32. Moure N (1982) Impressionism, post-impressionism, and the eucalyptus school in Southern California. In: Westphal R (ed) Plein air painters of California: the Southland. 1, Irvine, pp 4–15Google Scholar
  33. Musters GC (1964) Vida Entre los Patagones. Ediciones Solar, Buenos AiresGoogle Scholar
  34. Nogueira-Filho SLG, Nogueira SSC, Fragoso JMV (2009) Ecological impacts of feral pigs in the Hawaiian Islands. Biodivers Conserv 18:3677–3683CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Norton PT (1993) Fossils of the Maine state capitol. Maine Nat 1(4):193–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Nuñez MA, Simberloff D (2005) Invasive species and the cultural keystone species concept. Ecol Soc 10(1):r4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Nuñez MA, Kuebbing S, Dimarco RD, Simberloff D (2012) Invasive species: to eat or not to eat, that is the question. Conserv Lett 5(5):334–341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Nuñez MA, Chiuffo MC, Torres A, Paul T, Dimarco RD, Raal P, Policelli N, Moyano J, García RA, van Wilgen BW, Pauchard A, Richardson DM (2017) Ecology and management of invasive Pinaceae around the world: progress and challenges. Biol Invasions 19(11):3099–3120Google Scholar
  39. Nur S (2015) Analysis of interpersonal metafunction in public speeches: a case study of Nelson Mandela’s presidential inauguration speech. Int J Soc Sci Humanit Stud 30(1):52–63Google Scholar
  40. Öhman A, Mineka S (2003) The malicious serpent: snakes as a prototypical stimulus for an evolved module of fear. Curr Dir Psychol Sci 12:5–9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Olick JK, Robbins J (1998) Social memory studies: from “collective memory” to the historical sociology of mnemonic practices. Annu Rev Sociol 24:105–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Palmer CT (2004) The inclusion of recently introduced plants in the Hawaiian ethnopharmacopeia. Econ Bot 58(Suppl):S280–S293CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Perry G, Rodda GH (2011) Brown treesnake. In: Simberloff D, Rejmánek M (eds) Encyclopedia of biological invasions. University of California Press, Berkeley, pp 78–81Google Scholar
  44. Pringle A, Adams RI, Cross HB, Bruns TD (2009) The ectomycorrhizal fungus Amanita phalloides was introduced and is expanding its range on the west coast of North America. Mol Ecol 18(5):817–833.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2008.04030.x
  45. Relva MA, Nuñez MA, Simberloff D (2010) Introduced deer affect native plant communities and facilitate non-native tree species in a temperate forests in Patagonia, Argentina. Biol Invasions 12(2):303–311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Rotherham ID, Lambert RA (eds) (2011) Invasive and introduced plants and animals. Human perceptions, attitudes and approaches to management. Routledge, AbingdonGoogle Scholar
  47. Servick K (2016) Winged warriors. Science 354:164–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Simberloff D (2003) Confronting introduced species: a form of xenophobia? Biol Invasions 5(3):179–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Simberloff D (2010) Hawaii: paradise lost. In: Weber K (ed) Cane toads and other rogue species. Public Affairs, New York, pp 81–97Google Scholar
  50. Simberloff D (2012) Nature, natives, nativism, and management: worldviews underlying controversies in invasion biology. Environ Ethics 34:5–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Simberloff D (2017) Biological invasions in the national parks and Park Science. In: Beissinger SR, Ackerly DD, Doremus H, Machlis GE (eds) Science, conservation, and national Parks. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 161–188Google Scholar
  52. Simberloff D, Martin J-L, Genovesi P, Maris V, Wardle DA, Aronson J, Courchamp F, Galil B, García-Berthou E, Pascal M, Pyšek P, Sousa R, Tabacchi E, Vilà M (2013) Impacts of biological invasions: what’s what and the way forward. Trends Ecol Evol 28:58–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Speziale KL, Lambertucci SA, Carrete M, Tella JL (2012) Dealing with non-native species: what makes the difference in South America? Biol Invasions 14(8):1609–1621Google Scholar
  54. Thomson GM (1922) The naturalisation of animals and plants in New Zealand. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Tomes N (1998) The gospel of germs. Men, women, and the microbe in American life. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  56. Trim G, Lepp H, Hall M, McKeown R, McCaughan G, Duggin G (1999) Poisoning by Amanita phalloides (“deathcap”) mushrooms in the Australian capital territory. Med J Aust 171:247–249Google Scholar
  57. Tsing AL (1995) Empowering nature, or: some gleanings in bee culture. In: Yanagisako S, Delaney C (eds) Naturalizing power. Essays in feminist cultural analysis. Routledge, New York, pp 113–143Google Scholar
  58. Van Driesche R, Simberloff D, Blossey B, Causton C, Hoddle M, Marks C, Heinz K, Wagner D, Warner K (eds) (2016) Integrating biological control into conservation practice. Wiley Blackwell, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
  59. Vigliano PH, Alonso MF, Aquaculture M (2007) Salmonid introductions in Patagonia: a mixed blessing. In: Bert TM (ed) Ecological and genetic implications of aquaculture activities. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 315–331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Wegleitner BJ, Tucker A, Chadderton WL, Mahon AR (2016) Identifying the genetic structure of introduced populations of northern snakehead (Channa argus) in Eastern USA. Aquat Invasions 11:199–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Williams T (2002) America’s largest weed. Audubon 104(1):24–31Google Scholar
  62. Zengeya T, Ivey P, Woodford DJ, Weyl O, Novoa A, Shackleton R, Richardson D, van Wilgen B (2017) Managing conflict-generating invasive species in South Africa: challenges and trade-offs. Bothalia Afr Biodivers Conserv 47(2): online URL:  https://doi.org/10.4102/abc.v47i2.2160

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Martin A. Nuñez
    • 1
  • Romina D. Dimarco
    • 2
  • Daniel Simberloff
    • 3
  1. 1.Grupo de Ecología de InvasionesINIBIOMA, CONICET-Universidad Nacional del ComahueBarilocheArgentina
  2. 2.Grupo de Ecología de Poblaciones de InsectosCONICET, INTABarilocheArgentina
  3. 3.Department of Ecology and Evolutionary BiologyUniversity of TennesseeKnoxvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations