Abstract
The great influence that the eighteenth-century philosopher David Hume had on Darwin’s conception of his evolutionary theory offers today a paradigmatic case for advancing an interdisciplinary integration between philosophical and scientific ideas. This interdisciplinary integration offers novel approaches to address some of the complex indirect drivers of current socio-environmental problems, such as biocultural homogenization. The identification of philosophical factors linked to losses of biological and cultural diversity adds to the concept of indirect drivers used by the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. In this chapter, I undertake three interrelated goals. The first is to expose philosophical concepts and methods that are helpful to understand some complex indirect drivers of biocultural homogenization. The second is to investigate in Hume’s work philosophical foundations to overcome the prevailing taxonomic bias that favors only a few vertebrates and to contribute overcoming the exclusion of moral consideration for the most diverse groups of animals inhabiting our planet. My third, and the most general, goal is to demonstrate that it is possible to de-homogenize a prevailing negative view about European modern philosophy and to invite readers to discover, instead, some environmental values in Western thinkers and schools of thought that can be key for overcoming taxonomic biases and their associated impact on biocultural homogenization.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
Because Hume dedicates separate sections in THN and EHU to humans and [other] animals, I will maintain Hume’s language in some passages of this paper, by referring to humans and animals. However, for my own analyses, I understand humans as another animal species.
- 2.
The eighteenth-century Samuel Johnson’s Dictionary defines beast as “an animal distinguished from birds, insects, fishes, and man” (see Reddick 1996).
- 3.
Of the 30 phyla of invertebrates that are known to science, only 2 are included in Hume’s examples of invertebrates: Mollusca (oysters, cockles, snails) and Arthropoda (insects [bees, drones [male bees], butterflies, fleas, flies, silkworms], mites) (see Table 11.1).
- 4.
Hume concluded his Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding (p 166) by stating that: “If we take in our hand any volume; of divinity or school metaphysics, for instance; let us ask, Does it contain any abstract reasoning concerning quantity and number? No. Does it contain any experimental reasoning concerning matter of fact and existence? No. Commit it then to the flames, for it can contain nothing but sophistry and illusion” (emphasis added). This passage has played a crucial role in the appropriation of Hume’s philosophical legacy by twentieth-century positivist philosophers (see Frasca-Spada 1996).
- 5.
Major historian on the development of evolutionary theories, Robert Richards (1989), has described David Hume as “Darwin’s favorite philosophical author.” Philosopher Edward Manier (1978) attempted a quantitative analysis of the incidence of different philosophers on Darwin’s thought by composing a table, which provides the numbers of quotes for each philosopher mentioned by Darwin in his notebooks. In Manier’s table, Hume ranks first with nine quotes. Five other philosophers appear below Hume in Darwin’s notebooks ranking of frequency: Auguste Comte (eight quotes), David Hartley (six quotes), Dugald Stewart (six quotes), William Paley (two quotes), and Immanuel Kant (one quote).
- 6.
John T. Bonner and Sir Robert M. May (Bonner and May 1981) elegantly develop this point in their introduction to The Descent of Man by Charles Darwin.
- 7.
See Popkin (1980), which includes “David Hume: His Pyrrhonism and his critique of Pyrrhonism” (pp 103–132), “David Hume and the Pyrrhonian controversy” (pp 133–148), and “Bayle and Hume” (pp 149–160).
References
Bonner JT, May RM (1981) Introduction. In: The Descent of Man (Charles Darwin). Princeton University Press, Princeton
Bowler P (1993) The Norton history of the environmental sciences. WW Norton & Company, New York
Carpenter SR, De Fries R, Dietz T, Mooney HA, Polasky S, Reid WV, Scholes RJ (2006) Millennium Ecosystem Assessment: research needs. Science 314(5797):257–258
Chapman AD (2009) Numbers of living species in Australia and the world. Report for the Australian biological resource study, Department of the Environment, Water, Heritage and the Arts, Australian Government. Canberra: Australia
Clark SRL (1985) Hume, animals and the objectivity of morals. Philos Q 35:117–133
Clark JA, May RM (2002) Taxonomic bias in conservation research. Science 297:191–192
Darwin E (1794) Zoonimia; or the laws of organic life. Republished in 1974. AMS Press, New York
Darwin C (1987) Charles Darwin’s notebooks, 1836–1844. Transcribed and edited by Barrett PH, Gautrey PJ, Herbert S, Kohn D, Smith S. British Museum Natural History/Cornell University Press, Ithaca
Frasca-Spada M (1996) David Hume, the Caliph Omar and the burning issue of metaphysics. Trans Camb Bibliogr Soc 11(1):49–58
Gare AE (1995) Postmodernism and the environmental crisis. Routledge, New York
Gare AE (1998) MacIntyre, narratives, and environmental ethics. Environ Ethics 20:3–21
Gaskin JCA (1995) Hume on religion. In: Norton DF (ed) The Cambridge companion to Hume. Cambridge University Press, New York, pp 313–344
Gruber HE (1974) Darwin on man: a psychological study of scientific creativity. EP Dutton, New York
Harrison J (1971) Erasmus Darwin’s view on evolution. J Hist Ideas XXXII:247–264
Hume D (1948) In: Smith NK (ed) Dialogues concerning natural religion. Social Sciences Publishers, New York
Hume D (1976a) In: Selby-Bigge LA, Nidditch PH (eds) An enquiry of human understanding (EHU). Oxford University Press, Oxford
Hume D (1976b) In: Selby-Bigge LA, Nidditch PH (eds) An enquiry concerning the principles of morals (EPM). Oxford University Press, Oxford
Hume D (1978) In: Selby-Bigge LA, Nidditch PH (eds) A treatise of human nature (THN). Oxford University Press, Oxford
Hume D (1995) The complete works of David Hume, “past masters” CD-roam. InteLex Corporation, Charlottesville
Huntley WB (1972) David Hume and Charles Darwin Journal of the History of Ideas 33:457–470
Logano JV (1972) The poetry and aesthetics of Erasmus Darwin. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Manier E (1978) The young Darwin and his cultural circle: a study of influences which helped shape the language and logic of the first drafts of the theory of natural selection. D. Reidel Pub. Co., Dordrecht
MEA (2005) Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Ecosystems and human well-being: synthesis. Island Press, Washington, DC
Midgley M (1978) Beast and man. The roots of human nature. Cornell University Press, Ithaca
Mora C, Tittensor DP, Simpson AG, Worm B (2011) How many species are there on earth and in the ocean? PLoS Biol 9(8):e1001127
Palmer C (2013) Introduction to environmental philosophy: ethics, epistemology, justice. In: Rozzi R, SF Chapin, JB Callicott, STA Pickett, M Power JJ Armesto, RH May Jr (eds) Earth stewardship: linking ecology and ethics in theory and praxis. Ecology and ethics, vol 1. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 187–190
Passmore J (1974) Man’s responsibility for nature: ecological problems and western traditions. Charles Scribner’s Sons, New York
Passmore J (1975) The treatment of animals. J Hist Ideas 36:195–218
Poole AK (2018) The UN sustainable development goals and the biocultural heritage lacuna: where is goal number 18? In: Rozzi R, May RH Jr, Chapin FS III, Massardo F, Gavin M, Klaver I, Pauchard A, Nuñez MA, Simberloff D (eds) From biocultural homogenization to biocultural conservation. Ecology and ethics, vol 3. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 315–331
Popkin RH (1980) The high road to Pyrrhonism. Austin Hill Press, SanDiego
Reddick A (1996) The making of Johnson’s dictionary 1746–1773. Cambridge studies in publishing and printing history. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Richards RJ (1989) Darwin and the emergence of evolution theories of mind and behavior. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Rozzi R (1999) The reciprocal links between evolutionary-ecological sciences and environmental ethics. Bioscience 49:911–921
Rozzi R (2001) Ética ambiental: raíces y ramas latinoamericanas. In: Primack R, Rozzi R, Feinsinger P, Dirzo R, Massardo F (eds) Fundamentos de Conservación Biológica: Perspectivas Latinoamericanas. Fondo de Cultura Económica, Mexico, pp 311–359
Rozzi R (2015) Implications of biocultural ethics for earth stewardship. In: Rozzi R, Chapin FS III, Callicott JB, Pickett STA, Power ME, Armesto JJ, May RH Jr (eds) Earth stewardship: linking ecology and ethics in theory and practice. Ecology and ethics, vol 2. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 113–136
Rozzi R (2018) Biocultural homogenization: a wicked problem in the Anthropocene. In: Rozzi R, May RH Jr, Chapin FS III, Massardo F, Gavin M, Klaver I, Pauchard A, Nuñez MA, Simberloff D (eds) From biocultural homogenization to biocultural conservation. Ecology and ethics, vol 3. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 21–47
Sessions G (1994) Deep ecology for the twenty-first century. Sambahala, San Francisco
Singer P (1975) Animal liberation. A new ethics for our treatments of animals. Avon Books, New York
Singer P (1993) Practical ethics. Cambridge University Press, New York
Sorabji R (1985) Animal minds & human morals: the origins of the western debate. Cornell University Press, Ithaca
Thorpe WH (1979) Origins and rise of ethology. Heinemann Educational Books, London
Wilson EO (1988) Biodiversity. National Academic Press, Washington, DC
Zimmerman ME (1994) Contesting Earth’s future: radical ecology and postmodernity. University of California Press, Berkeley
Acknowledgments
I thank Donald Baxter, Kurt Heidinger, Scott Lehmann, Francisca Massardo, Peter D’Alesandre, and Roy May for their insightful comments on the manuscript and zoologist Sacha Spector for his valuable help identifying animal kinds in Hume’s work.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Rozzi, R. (2018). Overcoming Biocultural Homogenization in Modern Philosophy: Hume’s Noble Oyster. In: Rozzi, R., et al. From Biocultural Homogenization to Biocultural Conservation. Ecology and Ethics, vol 3. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99513-7_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99513-7_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-99512-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-99513-7
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)