Skip to main content

Towards an AUX Evaluation Framework for User Tools in Virtual Communities

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Collaboration and Technology (CRIWG 2018)

Abstract

A virtual community is a social group of any size that shares common interests and communicates through the Internet. A user joins a virtual community not only because of its popularity or the quality of its contents, but also owing to the user experience that the platform offers. Anticipated User eXperience (AUX) allows knowing the idealisations, hopes, and desires of the users in a very early stage of any development. Participation is a crucial component in the growth and survival of any virtual community. An essential element for people to participate in a virtual community is that the platform should provide suitable user tools, which are widgets that allow users to interact with their peers. We propose an AUX evaluation framework for user tools, whose intention is to improve their design, and through it, the participation of users.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Ergonomics of human-system interaction - part 210: Human-centred design for interactive systems. Standard [9241-210:2010(2.15)], International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, March 2010

    Google Scholar 

  2. Apostolou, B., Bélanger, F., Schaupp, L.C.: Online communities: satisfaction and continued use intention. Inf. Res. 22(4), 1–27 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bargas-Avila, J.A., Hornbæk, K.: Old wine in new bottles or novel challenges: a critical analysis of empirical studies of user experience. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI 2011, pp. 2689–2698. ACM, Vancouver (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Chen, L.S., Chang, P.C.: Identifying crucial website quality factors of virtual communities. In: Proceedings of the International MultiConference of Engineers and Computer Scientists, vol. 1, pp. 17–19 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chen, V.H.H., Duh, H.B.L.: Investigating user experience of online communities: the influence of community type. In: 2009 International Conference on Computational Science and Engineering, vol. 4, pp. 509–514, August 2009

    Google Scholar 

  6. Davis, F.D.: A technology acceptance model for empirically testing new end-user information systems: theory and results. Ph.D. thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Eilu, E., Baguma, R.: Anticipated user experience (AUX) framework for improving acceptance of using mobile phones for voting. In: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance, ICEGOV 2017, pp. 87–96. ACM, New Delhi (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  8. El Morr, C., Eftychiou, L.: Evaluation frameworks for health virtual communities. In: Menvielle, L., Audrain-Pontevia, A.F., Menvielle, W. (eds.) The Digitization of Healthcare, pp. 99–118. Palgrave Macmillan, London (2017). https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-349-95173-4_6

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Fragidis, G., Ignatiadis, I., Wills, C.: Value co-creation and customer-driven innovation in social networking systems. In: Morin, J.H., Ralyté, J., Snene, M. (eds.) IESS 2010. LNBIP, vol. 53, pp. 254–258. Springer, Heidelberg (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14319-9_20

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Hassenzahl, M., Platz, A., Burmester, M., Lehner, K.: Hedonic and ergonomic quality aspects determine a software’s appeal. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI 2000, pp. 201–208. ACM, The Hague (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hummel, J., Lechner, U.: Social profiles of virtual communities. In: Proceedings of the 35th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, pp. 2245–2254, January 2002

    Google Scholar 

  12. Iriberri, A., Leroy, G.: A life-cycle perspective on online community success. ACM Comput. Surv. 41(2), 11:1–11:29 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Jacobsen, L.F., Tudoran, A.A., Lähteenmäki, L.: Consumers’ motivation to interact in virtual food communities - the importance of self-presentation and learning. Food Qual. Prefer. 62, 8–16 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Karapanos, E., Zimmerman, J., Forlizzi, J., Martens, J.B.: User experience over time: an initial framework. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI 2009, pp. 729–738. ACM, Boston (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Koh, J., Kim, Y.G., Butler, B., Bock, G.W.: Encouraging participation in virtual communities. Commun. ACM 50(2), 68–73 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kukka, H., Pakanen, M., Badri, M., Ojala, T.: Immersive street-level social media in the 3D virtual city: anticipated user experience and conceptual development. In: Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing, CSCW 2017, pp. 2422–2435. ACM, Portland (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Lamprecht, J., Siemon, D., Robra-Bissantz, S.: Cooperation isn’t just about doing the same thing – using personality for a cooperation-recommender-system in online social networks. In: Yuizono, T., Ogata, H., Hoppe, U., Vassileva, J. (eds.) CRIWG 2016. LNCS, vol. 9848, pp. 131–138. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44799-5_10

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. Laubis, K., Konstantinov, M., Simko, V., Gröschel, A., Weinhardt, C.: Enabling crowdsensing-based road condition monitoring service by intermediary. Electron. Mark. 1–16, March 2018. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-018-0292-7

  19. Lee, F.S., Vogel, D., Limayem, M.: Virtual community informatics: a review and research agenda. JITTA: J. Inf. Technol. Theory Appl. 5(1), 47 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Mai, H.T.X., Olsen, S.O.: Consumer participation in virtual communities: the role of personal values and personality. J. Mark. Commun. 21(2), 144–164 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. McCormick, T.J.: A success-oriented framework to enable co-created e-services. The George Washington University (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Morville, P.: Experience design unplugged. In: ACM SIGGRAPH 2005 Web Program, SIGGRAPH 2005. ACM, New York (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Nov, O., Ye, C.: Why do people tag?: motivations for photo tagging. Commun. ACM 53(7), 128–131 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Patrício, L., de Pinho, N.F., Teixeira, J.G., Fisk, R.P.: Service design for value networks: enabling value cocreation interactions in healthcare. Serv. Sci. 10(1), 76–97 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Peffers, K., Tuunanen, T., Rothenberger, M., Chatterjee, S.: A design science research methodology for information systems research. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 24(3), 45–77 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Preece, J.: Online Communities: Designing Usability and Supporting Sociability. Wiley, Hoboken (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Preece, J.: Sociability and usability in online communities: determining and measuring success. Behav. Inf. Technol. 20(5), 347–356 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Preece, J., Abras, C., Maloney-Krichmar, D.: Designing and evaluating online communities: research speaks to emerging practice. Int. J. Web Based Communities 1(1), 2–18 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Roto, V., Law, E., Vermeeren, A., Hoonhout, J.: User experience white paper. Bringing clarity to the concept of user experience. In: Proceedings of Dagstuhl Seminar on Demarcating User Experience, vol. 22, pp. 6–15, September 2011

    Google Scholar 

  30. Shneiderman, B., Plaisant, C., Cohen, M., Jacobs, S., Elmqvist, N., Diakopoulos, N.: Grand challenges for HCI researchers. Interactions 23(5), 24–25 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Stone, D., Jarrett, C., Woodroffe, M., Minocha, S.: User Interface Design and Evaluation. Morgan Kaufmann Series in Interactive Technologies. Morgan Kaufmann, Burlington (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Tella, A., Babatunde, B.J.: Determinants of continuance intention of Facebook usage among library and information science female undergraduates in selected Nigerian universities. Int. J. E-Adopt. (IJEA) 9(2), 59–76 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Vermeeren, A.P.O.S., Law, E.L.C., Roto, V., Obrist, M., Hoonhout, J., Väänänen-Vainio-Mattila, K.: User experience evaluation methods: current state and development needs. In: Proceedings of the 6th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Extending Boundaries, NordiCHI 2010, pp. 521–530. ACM, Reykjavik (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Wang, Y., Li, Y.: Proactive engagement of opinion leaders and organization advocates on social networking sites. Int. J. Strateg. Commun. 10(2), 115–132 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Wurhofer, D., Krischkowsky, A., Obrist, M., Karapanos, E., Niforatos, E., Tscheligi, M.: Everyday commuting: prediction, actual experience and recall of anger and frustration in the car. In: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, AutomotiveUI 2015, pp. 233–240. ACM, Nottingham (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Yogasara, T., Popovic, V., Kraal, B.J., Chamorro-Koc, M.: General characteristics of anticipated user experience (AUX) with interactive products. In: Proceedings of IASDR2011: The 4th World Conference on Design Research: Diversity and Unity, pp. 1–11 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Zhou, T.: Understanding online community user participation: a social influence perspective. Internet Res. 21(1), 67–81 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

We thank CONACyT (Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología) for funding Luis Martín Sánchez Adame’s doctoral fellowship. Scholarship number: 294598.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Luis Martín Sánchez-Adame .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Sánchez-Adame, L.M., Mendoza, S., González-Beltrán, B.A., Meneses Viveros, A., Rodríguez, J. (2018). Towards an AUX Evaluation Framework for User Tools in Virtual Communities. In: Rodrigues, A., Fonseca, B., Preguiça, N. (eds) Collaboration and Technology. CRIWG 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11001. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99504-5_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99504-5_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-99503-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-99504-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics