Skip to main content

The Competitiveness of Inland Shipping in Serving the Hinterland of the Seaports: A Case Study of the Oder Waterway and the Szczecin-Świnoujście Port Complex

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Integration as Solution for Advanced Smart Urban Transport Systems (TSTP 2018)

Abstract

The aim of this article is to verify the existing knowledge in the area of competitiveness factors of hinterland modes of transport in land-sea transport chains. In order to fulfill the primary objectives of the article, a case study of the Oder Waterway and Szczecin-Świnoujście port complex was applied. The verification of competitiveness factors of inland shipping in serving seaports hinterland was made on the basis of in-depth interviews among shippers who represented the most important exporters and importers using sea transport, and whose premises were located in the areas that gravitate towards inland waterway transport. The study provided evidence that the most important factor is to assure reliability of delivery. It is the necessary condition for a modal shift between competitive transport branches. Lower transport costs without the certainty of delivery on time will not convince shippers to a modal shift.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. De Langen, P.W., Chouly, A.: Hinterland access regimes in seaports. Eur. J. Transp. Infrastruct. Res. 4(4), 361–380 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Notteboom, T.E., Rodrigue, J.P.: Port regionalization: towards a new phase in port development. Marit. Policy Manag. 32(3), 297–313 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Van Der Horst, M.R., De Langen, P.W.: Coordination in hinterland transport chains: a major challenge for the seaport community. Marit. Econ. Logist. 10(1–2), 108–129 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Panayides, P.M., Cullinane, K.: Competitive advantage in liner shipping: a review and research agenda. Int. J. Marit. Econ. 4(3), 189–209 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Visser, J., Konings, R., Pielage, B.J., Wiegmans, B.: A new hinterland transport concept for the port of Rotterdam: organisational and/or technological challenges? In: Proceedings of the Transportation Research Forum. North Dakota State University (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Frémont, A., Franc, P.: Hinterland transportation in Europe: combined transport versus road transport. J. Transp. Geogr. 18(4), 548–556 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Caris, A., Macharis, C., Janssens, G.K.: Network analysis of container barge transport in the port of Antwerp by means of simulation. J. Transp. Geogr. 19(1), 125–133 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Monios, J.: The role of inland terminal development in the hinterland access strategies of Spanish ports. Res. Transp. Econ. 33(1), 59–66 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Brons, M., Panayotis, C.: External cost calculator for Marco Polo freight transport project proposals-call 2013 version. In: JRC Scientific and Policy Reports, JRC81002. Institute for Prospective and Technological Studies, Joint Research Centre, European Commission (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Álvarez-SanJaime, Ó., Cantos-Sánchez, P., Moner-Colonques, R., Sempere-Monerris, J.J.: The impact on port competition of the integration of port and inland transport services. Transp. Res. Part B: Methodol. 80, 291–302 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. European Commission: Inland waterways. What do we want to achieve? http://ec.europa.eu/transport/modes/inland/index_en.htm. Accessed 21 June 2017

  12. Kreft, A.: The concepts of development of the Oder Waterway. The cost of upgrading OW to class III and IV. The strengths and weaknesses of the proposed solutions. In: Presentation in Conference Waterways Expo in Bydgoszcz (2014). (in Polish)

    Google Scholar 

  13. The Journal of Laws of the Republic of Poland: The Ordinance of the Council of Ministers of 7 May 2002 on the classification of inland waterways (2002). (in Polish)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Data of the Szczecin and Świnoujście Seaports Authority (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Konings, R., Ludema, M.: The competitiveness of the river–sea transport system: market perspectives on the United Kingdom-Germany corridor. J. Transp. Geogr. 8(3), 221–228 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hunt, C.E.: Thirsty planet: strategies for sustainable water management. Academic Foundation, New Delhi (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Konings, R.: Intermodal Barge Transport: Network Design, Nodes and Competitiveness (TRAIL Thesis Series No. T2009/11, Doctoral thesis). TRAIL Research School, Delft (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Ministry of Maritime Economy and Inland Navigation: The Assumptions of the Development Programmes for Inland Waterways in Poland for the years 2016–2020 with an outlook to the year 2030. Ministry of Maritime Economy and Inland Navigation, Warszawa (2016). (in Polish)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Cullinane, K., Toy, N.: Identifying influential attributes in freight route/mode choice decisions: a content analysis. Transp. Res. Part E Logist. Transp. Rev. 36(1), 41–53 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Moon, D.S., Kim, D.J., Lee, E.K.: A study on competitiveness of sea transport by comparing international transport routes between Korea and EU. Asian J. Shipp. Logist. 31(1), 1–20 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Danielis, R., Marcucci, E.: Attribute cut-offs in freight service selection. Transp. Res. Part E Logist. Transp. Rev. 43(5), 506–515 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Crainic, T.G., Kim, K.H.: Intermodal transportation. Handb. Oper. Res. Manag. Sci. 14, 467–537 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Sierpiński, G.: Travel behaviour and alternative modes of transportation. In: International Conference on Transport Systems Telematics. Springer, Berlin, pp. 86–93 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Liu, Z., Meng, Q., Wang, S., Sun, Z.: Global intermodal liner shipping network design. Transp. Res. Part E Logist. Transp. Rev. 61, 28–39 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Arencibia, A.I., Feo-Valero, M., García-Menéndez, L., Román, C.: Modelling mode choice for freight transport using advanced choice experiments. Transp. Res. Part A Policy Pract. 75, 252–267 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Lupi, M., Farina, A., Orsi, D., Pratelli, A.: The capability of Motorways of the Sea of being competitive against road transport. The case of the Italian mainland and Sicily. J. Transp. Geogr. 58, 9–21 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Wiegmans, B., Konings, R. (eds.): Inland Waterway Transport: Challenges and Prospects. Routledge, New York (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Meersman, H., Sys, C., Van de Voorde, E., Vanelslander, T.: Road pricing and port hinterland competitiveness: an application to the Hamburg–Le Havre range. Int. J. Sustain. Transp. 10(3), 170–179 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Song, D.P., Lyons, A., Li, D., Sharifi, H.: Modeling port competition from a transport chain perspective. Transp. Res. Part E Logist. Transp. Rev. 87, 75–96 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Kim, N.S., Van Wee, B.: The relative importance of factors that influence the break-even distance of intermodal freight transport systems. J. Transp. Geogr. 19(4), 859–875 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Wiegmans, B., Konings, R.: Intermodal inland waterway transport: modelling conditions influencing its cost competitiveness. Asian J. Shipp. Logist. 31(2), 273–294 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Bergantino, A.S., et al.: Taste heterogeneity and latent preferences in the choice behaviour of freight transport operators. Transp. Policy 30, 77–91 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Xiao, T., Qi, X.: A two-stage supply chain with demand sensitive to price, delivery time, and reliability of delivery. Ann. Oper. Res. 241(1–2), 475–496 (2016)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research outcome has been achieved under the research projects MUS 8/S/IZT/2017 and US 503-2500-230 675 financed from a subsidy of the Ministry of Science and Higher Education for statutory activities.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Izabela Kotowska .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Kotowska, I., Mańkowska, M., Pluciński, M. (2019). The Competitiveness of Inland Shipping in Serving the Hinterland of the Seaports: A Case Study of the Oder Waterway and the Szczecin-Świnoujście Port Complex. In: Sierpiński, G. (eds) Integration as Solution for Advanced Smart Urban Transport Systems. TSTP 2018. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 844. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99477-2_23

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics