Abstract
In this chapter, we present the views and reflections of academics in 21 countries about the research-practice gap in a public sector context as it applies within their countries. Authors of these accounts have varied backgrounds, experience, and interests. However, a common theme uniting them is their interest in public sector accounting research and, in particular, the practical relevance of accounting research. The commentaries form the basis for a comparative global analysis of the research-practice nexus as it applies in the public sector accounting context.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
ENA (Ecole Nationale d’Administration) is a highly selective school of administration, created in 1945 with the purpose of democratizing access to the civil service.
- 2.
Organic laws (under article 46 of the Constitution of France) have the purpose to specify the organization and operating of public authorities in accordance to the provisions of the Constitution.
- 3.
EPST (Etablissement Public à caractère Scientifique et technologique) is a specific type of research institute, and EPIC (Etablissement Public à caractère Industriel et Commercial) is a specific type of public entity of a commercial and industrial nature, including research institutes, in France.
- 4.
This is University of Professional Studies Accra, one of the Public Universities in Ghana.
- 5.
Ghana Institute of Public Administration, an institution established to train public service staff.
- 6.
Alex Metcalfe
Head of Public Sector Policy, ACCA
References
Agbedia, C., Okoronkwo, I., Onokayeigho, E., & Agbo, M. A. (2014). Nurses’ perspective of the research-practice gap in nursing. Open Journal of Nursing, 4(02), 95–100.
Albu, C. N., & Albu, N. (2012). Accounting tradition in Romania: Challenges and opportunities in a changing environment. EAA Newsletter, 2, 16–19.
Arnaboldi, M. (2013). Consultant-researchers in public sector transformation: An evolving role. Financial & Accountability Management, 29(2), 140–160.
Arquero, J. L., Jiménez, S. M., & Laffarga, J. (2016). Perceived usefulness of academic accounting research. The opinion of academics and practitioners. Spanish Accounting Review, 19(2), 239–251.
Asiyai, R. I. (2013). Challenges of quality in higher education in Nigeria in the 21st century. International Journal of Educational Planning & Administration, 3(2), 159–172.
Ayee, J. (2013). Public administrators under democratic governance in Ghana. International Journal of Public Administration, 36(6), 440–452.
Baber, W., & Gore, A. (2008). Consequences of GAAP disclosure regulation: Evidence from municipal debt issues. The Accounting Review, 83(3), 565–592.
Bawole, J. N., Farhad, H., Domfeh, K. A., Bukari, H. Z., & Sanyyari, F. (2013). Performance appraisal or praising performance? The culture of rhetoric in performance management in Ghana civil service. International Journal of Public Administration, 36, 953–962.
Blum, J., & Brans, M. (2017). Academic policy analysis and research utilisation in policymaking. In M. Brans, M. Howlett, & I.-G. May (Eds.)., (red.), Handbook comparative policy analysis. London: Routledge.
Botes, V. L., & Sharma, U. (2017). A gap in management accounting education: Fact or fiction. Pacific Accounting Review, 29(1), 107–126.
Bozionelos, N. (2014). Careers patterns in Greek academia: Social capital and intelligent careers, but for whom? Career Development International, 19(3), 264–294.
Braun, C., Fenger, M., P, `t Hart, van der Veer, J., & Verheij, T. (2017). Quo vadis, Nederlandse Bestuurskunde? In P. Karré, T. Schillemans, M. van der Steen, & Z. van der Wal (Eds.)., (red.), Toekomst van de Bestuurskunde (pp. 35–50). Deh Haag: Boombestuurskunde.
Broadbent, J., & Guthrie, J. (1992). Changes in the public sector: A review of recent ‘alternative’ accounting research. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 5(2), 3–31.
Brusca, I. (2010). Thirty years of research in public sector accounting and Management in Spain. Spanish Accounting Review, 13(2), 175–209.
Caria, A., & Rodrigues, L. L. (2014). The evolution of financial accounting in Portugal since the 1960s: A new institutional economics perspective. Accounting History, 19(1–2), 227–252.
Carroll, D., & Marlowe, J. (2009). Is there a ‘GAAP Gap’? A politico-economic model of municipal accounting policy. Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management, 21(4), 501.
Central Bank of Malaysia. (2017). Governor’s remarks at the International Shari’ah Research Academy for Islamic Finance Alumni Hi-Tea. http://www.bnm.gov.my/index.php?ch=en_speech&pg=en_speech&ac=756. Accessed 20 Nov 2017.
Cepiku, D. (2011). Two ships passing in the night? Practice and academia in public management. Public Money & Management, 31(2), 131–138. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2011.560711.
CGU. (2018). Relatório de Ouvidoria Ativa no Programa Nacional de Alimentação Escolar no Estado do Pará. 28pp. http://www.ouvidorias.gov.br/arquivos/relatorio-ouvidoria-ativa-pnae-para-fase-3-1.pdf
Christensen, M., & Skærbæk, P. (2010). Consultancy outputs and the purification of accounting technologies. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 35(5), 524–545.
Costa, G. (2015). A investigação, o ensino e a prática da contabilidade em Portugal: A sua relação e perceção. Presented at the 1st seminar on accounting, School of Economics and Management, University of Minho, 13 November/Braga, Portugal.
De Onzoño, I. S., & Carmona, S. (2016). The academic triathlon – Bridging the agora and academia. Journal of Management Development, 35(7), 854–865.
Elm-Larsen, R. (2001). Offentligt regnskab og revision- Et dansk og international perspektiv. Copenhagen: Forlaget Thomson.
Elm-Larsen, R. (2010). Offentlig revision- Empiri og teori. New York: Thomson Reuters.
Evans, E., Burritt, R., & Guthrie, J. (Eds.). (2010). Accounting education at a crossroad in 2010, Academic leadership series (Vol. 1). Sydney: The Institute of Chartered Accountants in Australia and the Centre for Accounting, Governance and Sustainability.
Evans, E., Burritt, R., & Guthrie, J. (Eds.). (2011). Bridging the gap between academic accounting research and professional practice, Academic leadership series (Vol. 2). Sydney: The Institute of Chartered Accountants in Australia and the Centre for Accounting, Governance and Sustainability.
EY, Task 2 – Findings on the long-term benefits of EPSAS and public accounting harmonisation, Final Report, November 2017. https://circabc.europa.eu/sd/a/c59c1ba2-6c9b-4051-9a65-3ed2e67b74ca/Item%207%20-%20Collection%20of%20information%20related%20to%20the%20potential%20impacts%20of%20EPSAS.pdf. Accessed 12 Oct 2017.
Eyraud, C. (2016). Comptabilité publique (réforme). Une comptabilité d’entreprise pour l’Etat français (XXe s.–XXIe s.). In Dictionnaire historique de comptabilité des entreprises (pp. 145–151). Villeneuve d’Ascq: Presses universitaires du Septentrion.
Feijó, P. H. (2013). Entendendo as mudanças na contabilidade aplicada ao setor público (224pp). Brasília: Gestão Pública. isbn:978-85-62880-02-5.
Frissen, P., & van Twist, M. (2010). Bestuurskundige advisering als avontuur. In H. Aardema, W. Derksen, M. Herweijer, & P. de Jong (Eds.)., (red.), Meerwaarde van de bestuurskunde: Liber Amirocum voor prof. dr. Arno F.A. Korsten (pp. 37–47). Den Haag: Boom Lemma Uitgevers.
Gendron, Y., & Bédard, J. (2001). Academic auditing research: An exploratory investigation into its usefulness. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 12(3), 339–368.
Greve, C. (2003). Public sector reform in Denmark: Organizational transformation and evaluation. Public Organization Review: A Global Journal, 3, 269–280.
Greve, C., Flinders, M., & Van Thiel, S. (1999). Quangos—What’s in a name? Defining Quangos from a comparative perspective. Governance, 12(2), 129–146.
Guthrie, J., & Parker, L. D. (2016). Whither the accounting profession, accountants and accounting researchers? Commentary and projections. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 29(1), 2–10.
Guthrie, J., Olson, O., & Humphrey, C. (1997). Public financial management changes in OECD nations. Advances in International Comparative Management, Supplement, 3, 255–269.
Guthrie, J., Parker, L., & English, L. (2003). A review of new public financial management change in Australia. In Barton, A (ed.), Australian Accounting Review 13(2), 3–9.
Guthrie, J., Evans, E., & Burritt, R. (2014). Australian accounting academics: Challenges and possibilities. Meditari Accountancy Research, 22(1), 20–37.
Guthrie, J., Evans, E., & Burritt, R. (Eds.). (2017). Improving collaboration and innovation between industry and business schools in Australia, Academic leadership series (Vol. 8). Sydney: Chartered Accountants Australia and New Zealand.
Hoppe, R. (1999). Policy analysis, science and politics: From ‘speaking truth to power’ to ‘making sense together’. Science and Public Policy, 26(3), 201–210.
Humphrey, C., & Gendron, Y. (2015). What is going on? The sustainability of accounting academia. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 26, 47–66.
Humphrey, C. G., & Miller, P. (2012). Rethinking impact and redefining responsibility: The parameters and coordinates of accounting and public management reforms. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 25(2), 295–327.
Jones, R. (2017). Enlightenment through engagement? The potential contribution of greater engagement between researchers and practitioners. Accounting Education, 26(5/6), 414–430.
Keerasuntonpong, P., & Komutputipong, N. (2017). Accountability stakeholders of Thai government. Paper presented at the American Accounting Association 2017, San Diego, USA.
Keerasuntonpong, P., Manowan, P., & Shutibhinyo, W. (2017). Public accountability of Thai central government. Paper presented at the 21st international research society on public management conference, Corvinus University of Budapest.
Khumawala, S., Marlowe, J., & Neely, D. (2014). Accounting professionalism and local government GAAP adoption: A national study. Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management, 26(1), 292–312.
KPMG. (2017). Governments look to unlock the funding paradigm. https://home.kpmg.com/tn/en/home/industries/government-public-sector.html
LOLF. (2001). Loi organique n° 2001–692 from August 1st 2001. Modified version retrieved March 26, 2018, from https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/
Lüder, K. (1999). Konzeptionelle Grundlagen des Neuen Kommunalen Rechnungswesens (Speyerer Verfahren). Schriftenreihe des Innenministeriums Baden-Württemberg zum kommunalen Haushalts- und Rechnungswesen, Heft, 6, 1999.
Lüder, K. (2001). Neues öffentliches Haushalts- und Rechnungswesen Anforderungen, Konzept, Perspektiven.
Machado, N. (2002). Sistema de Informação de custo: diretrizes para integração ao orçamento público e à contabilidade governamental. Thesis. São Paulo University. 221pp. http://www.socialiris.org/antigo/imagem/boletim/arq5533ffd3aed73.pdf
Martin-Sardesai, A., Irvine, H., Tooley, S., & Guthrie, J. (2017). Organizational change in an Australian university: Responses to a research assessment exercise. The British Accounting Review, 49(4), 399–412.
Meszarits, V., & Saliterer, I. (2013). Die Haushaltsrechtsreform des Bundes – Ausgangspunkt oder Zielkorridor für eine neue Voranschlags – und Rechnungsabschlussverordnung. Zeitschrift für Recht und Rechnungswesen, 7(8), 43–59.
Ministry of Education and Culture. (2017). State capitalizes universities with 150 million euros. http://minedu.fi/artikkeli/-/asset_publisher/vastinraha
Mohr, Z., & Esterle, M. (2017). State Collection of County Financial Data Sources. deathandtaxes.sog.unc.edu
Montesinos, V. M. (1998). Accounting and business economics in Spain. European Accounting Review, 7(3), 357–380.
Moya, S., Prior, D., & Rodríguez-Pérez, G. (2015). Performance-based incentives and the behavior of accounting academics: Responding to changes. Accounting Education, 24(3), 208–232.
Nakpodia, F., & Adegbite, E. (2017). Corporate governance and elites. Accounting Forum, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.accfor.2017.11.002.
Nicolai, A., & Seidl, D. (2010). That’s relevant! Different forms of practical relevance in management science. Organization Studies, 31(9–10), 1257–1285.
Niven, P. R. (2002). Balanced scorecard step-by-step: Maximizing performance and maintaining results. Hoboken: Wiley.
Ohemeng, F. L. K. (2011). Institutionalizing the performance management system in public organizations in Ghana. Public Performance and Management Review, 34(4), 467–488.
Ohemeng, F. K., & Anebo, F. K. (2012). The politics of administrative reforms in Ghana: Perspectives from path dependency and punctuated equilibrium theories. International Journal of Public Administration, 35(3), 161–176.
Olson, O., Humphrey, C., & Guthrie, J. (2001). Caught in an Evaluatory trap: The dilemma of public services under NPFM. European Accounting Review, 10(3), 505–522.
Osagie, R. O. (2012). Federal government funding in universities in Nigeria, the University of Benin as a case study. International Education Studies, 5(6), 73–79.
Parker, L. D. (2005). Corporate governance crisis down under post-Enron accounting education and research inertia. European Accounting Review, 14(2), 383–394.
Parker, L. D. (2007). Financial and external reporting research: The broadening corporate governance challenge. Accounting & Business Research, 37(1), 39–54.
Parker, L. (2012). From privatised to hybrid corporatised higher education: A global financial management discourse. Financial Accountability and Management, 28(3), 247–268.
Parker, L. D. (2013). Contemporary university strategising: The financial imperative. Financial Accountability & Management, 29(1), 1–25.
Pearson, D. (2010). Auditor-General, Victorian Auditor-General’s Office, Level 24, 35 Collins Street, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia 3000 dated 28 September 2010, Letter from.
Rauskala, I., & Saliterer, I. (2015). Public sector accounting and auditing in Austria. In I. Brusca, E. Caperchione, S. Cohen, & F. Manes Rossi (Eds.), Public sector accounting and auditing in Europe. The challenge of harmonization (pp. 12–26). Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
Rezende, F., Cunha, A., & Cardoso, R. L. (2010). Custos no setor público (Editorial). RAP, 44(4), 789–90. http://bibliotecadigital.fgv.br/ojs/index.php/rap/article/view/6948/5515
Rolfo, S., & Finardi, U. (2014). University third mission in Italy: Organization, faculty attitude and academic specialization. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 39(3), 472–486. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-012-9284-5.
Silva, L. M. (2004). Contabilidade Governamental (7th ed.). São Paulo: Atlas., 385pp. isbn:85-224-3911-7.
Skærbæk, P. (2005). Annual reports as interaction devices : The hidden constructions of mediated communication. Financial Accountability & Management, 21(4), 385–411.
Skærbæk, P., & Tryggestad, K. (2010). The role of accounting devices in performing strategy. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 35(1), 108–124.
Steger, G. (2010). Austria’s budget reform: How to create consensus for a decisive change of fiscal rules. OECD Journal on Budgeting, 10(1), 7–20.
The Malaysian Reserve. (2017). Bridging the gap between theory and actual practice. https://themalaysianreserve.com/2017/10/30/bridging-gap-theory-actual-practice/. Accessed 23 Nov 2017.
Times Higher Education. (2017). World University Rankings 2016–2017. https://www.timeshighereducation.com/news/world-university-rankings-2016-2017-results-announced. Accessed 15 Nov 2017.
Times Higher Education, World University Rankings. (2018). https://www.timeshighereducation.com/world-university-rankings/2018/world-ranking#!/page/0/length/25/sort_by/rank/sort_order/asc/cols/stats
Tucker, B., & Parker, L. D. (2014). In our ivory towers? The research-practice gap in management accounting: An academic perspective. Accounting and Business Research, 44(2), 104–143.
Van Helden, G. J., & Northcott, D. (2010). Examining the practical relevance of public sector management accounting research. Financial Accountability & Management, 26(2), 213–240.
Van Poelje, G. A. (1942). Algemene inleiding tot de bestuurskunde. Alphen aan de Rijn: Samson.
Weiss, C. H. (1979). The many meanings of research utilization. Public Administration Review, 39(5), 426–431.
Welsh Government. The review of higher education funding and student finance arrangements in Wales (diamond review), September 2016.
Wolf, E. E. A., & Van Dooren, W. (2017). How policies become contested: A spiral of imagination and evidence in a large infrastructure project. Policy Sciences, 50, 1–20.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Appendices
Rebecca McCaffry
Public Sector Research, CIMA
Gillian Fawcett
Head of International, CIPFA
Association of Chartered Certified Accountants (ACCA)
3.1.1 An International Analysis of the Research-Practice Gap on Accounting in the Public Services
3.1.1.1 ACCA View of What Affects the Research-Practice Gap
The relationship between academic research , polic y making, and impact on various professions has always been important in driving original and innovative thinking. The accounting profession in the public sector is no different.
ACCA produces a number of global thought leadership insights every year, and our team of internal experts is supplemented with experts from the profession, practice, and academia. This mix ensures our insights balance the needs of our members with pure academic research that seeks to push boundaries. Academics are involved in various ways at ACCA, primarily through our global forum network—including the global forum for the public sector.
ACCA often commissions academics to conduct research or to assess any internal research conducted as a ‘critical friend’ before wider publication. ACCA also has a strong research function completing many surveys of its members and trainees—with a global reach extending over 180 countries, 200,000 members, and nearly half a million students—which offers a rich and diverse data source.
From ACCA’s experience in operating between practitioner s and academics, we are able to perceive a few key drivers of the research-practice gap. First, many professional accountants working in the public sector do not have access to the academic content that is published in their field. Academic journals and published work are primarily accessed through universit y credentials and are not easily accessed by public sector practitioner s, who will be required to make a business case to spend public funds on accessing academic content. Furthermore, for public sector practitioner s that are able to access certain academic material, it can be difficult for them to apply the conceptual thinking and academic writing to their day-to-day work.
The time horizons for the publication of academic research often do not align with the needs of professional accountants in the public sector. Clearly, it takes time to conduct insightful research, and this may not fit easily with the polic y making agenda. Once research has been conducted, it needs to undergo the rigour of peer review and publication in appropriate academic journals, all of which contribute to delaying the availability of the work to relevant practitioner s. This is further exacerbated by the fact that most practitioner s are focussed on the short-term, operational needs of their organization and will find it difficult to engage with academic output that can have comparatively longer completion.
Finally, the resources and viewpoints of academics and practitioner s diverge. Though a simplification, typically, academics are concept rich and data poor—while practitioner s in the public sector often have access to substantial datasets, but are concept and idea poor. In many ways, these differences speak to the significant opportunities that exist for academics and practitioner s that are willing to commit to bridging the research-practice gap.
3.1.1.2 The Role of Institutions in Widening/Narrowing the Gap
Practitioner s need to be honest with their limitations and only present findings that they can properly interpret. The risk of misrepresentation of research results also extends to practitioners that are looking to support a particular political imperative.
There are also issues of capability and capacity. Governments may not have the capacity or capability (e.g. knowledge of different qualitative and quantitative methodological techniques) to ensure results and interpretations are based on appropriate methodologies. Current civil service reform programmes are looking to external polic y think tanks and other academic commentators as core to government’s polic y reform agenda, which has typically been the domain of policy leads in the civil service.
3.1.1.3 The Roles of Academics in Widening/Narrowing the Gap
Polic y making does not easily fit into the production time of most academic work, although the rigour that the research undergoes adds to the value of the published insights. Second, academic articles are (often mistakenly) seen as inaccessible by practitioner s as they are required to be written in a certain way for an academic audience, and may need translating into a different tone for polic y makers and others to digest. For academics to help narrow the gap, they should consider—as part of their research projects—producing timely results that are accessible to a wider, more practical, audience.
3.1.1.4 Examples of Good Practice
There are many examples where academics have had a significant impact on government polic y and practice. For instance, Sir Andrew Likiermann was instrumental in the UK central government’s move to implement accruals accounting. This has continued to evolve and is brought together into one of the world’s largest (and arguably the most comprehensive) whole of government accounts (WGA) consolidation.
Many public sector organizations are data rich and could benefit from the academic rigour and insight that can be applied to these datasets. The UK Government’s work in consolidating public data on data.gov.uk has created a platform for academics to engage with detailed public sector datasets. At the same time, the exercise of consolidating public data has promoted Government officials to bring more data into the public domain, with a coalition government commitment to ‘open (data) by default’.
Finally, there are cases of effective collaboration in Government bodies that employ academics on their boards or committees. For example, the Financial Reporting Advisory Board comprises an independent chair and members, as well as academics, preparers, and representatives from the preparer communities, the NAO, and HM Treasury.
Clearly there are challenges to overcome to further improve linkages between academic and practitioner communities. Despite these challenges, academia will continue to have an important role in the development of thought leadership, and their analytic rigour adds value to implementing best practices for public sector accountants.
Chartered Institute of Management Accountants (CIMA)
Rebecca McCaffry
Public Sector Research, CIMA
3.1.1 Specific Features That Affect the Research-Practice Gap from CIMA’s Perspective
As a representative of professional accounting institutes, CIMA has a role to play as conduit for academic research. Regular engagement with academics helps ensure that our syllabus is relevant for business. In addition, this engagement helps promote management accounting, which is important for sustaining its continuing relevance to employers and educational institutions.
As representatives of accountants in business, we have a particular interest in business-focused research, a market dominated by consultants, whose industry is worth around £6bn in the UK alone. From a practitioner perspective, consultants are perceived as adding solutions, understanding, and predictions to the problem at hand. Academics, however, are perceived as adding complexity. In addition, academics often avoid making recommendations, resulting in work that lacks practical impact.
CIMA’s academic programme is designed to promote and develop the science of management accountancy as stipulated in our Royal Charter. We have formal mechanisms of engaging with academic researchers, through sponsorship of academic conferences around the world and funding academic research topics of interest to CIMA members through our grants scheme. In addition, we co-sponsor the Impact on Practice award, presented annually at the AAA, for academic work judged to have the greatest potential impact on management accounting practice.
We are pleased that an increasing number of CIMA members and other professional accountants have joined academia and believe those willing and able to balance practitioner understanding with academic rigour will have a significant role to play in developing accessible, insightful, and impactful academic research in all sectors.
3.1.2 The Role of Institutions in Widening/Narrowing the Gap
As a professional accountancy institute, CIMA aims to ensure its syllabus and assessments help bridge the gap between education and employment, and our syllabus reviews are where we see fruitful interaction between business (as employers of management accountants) and academia. During this extended process, we ask employers to identify their business challenges; the performance they require to meet those challenges; and finally, the skills and competencies they require people to perform, to help organizations meet those business challenges. CIMA then works with academics and educators, to help translate those practical competencies into educational learning outcomes. They are then placed into appropriate academic levels and linked to levels of the CIMA syllabus. We also work with academics, as well as practitioner s and psychometricians, in developing rigorous, robust, and appropriate assessments. In working with academics and their partners in industry, we can share insights to help frame the next generation of professional accountants.
Through our accreditation programme, we work with over 1,300 universit ies across 110 countries, engaging with academics from a range of specialisms, who often come from a background in industry. We accredit some 5,000 accounting, finance, and business programmes to provide a faster track for their graduates to CGMA status. The increased range of students joining leads to a diverse and multitalented membership base.
As part of our wider research programme, we aim to build a bridge between academia and practice to ensure research is more relevant to practitioner s. The challenge is to find topics and research methods that fit the criteria of both sides, balancing academic rigour with demands of the wider audience.
3.1.3 The Roles of Academics in Widening/Narrowing the Gap
CIMA wants academic research to achieve its A* journal ambition and recognizes increasing pressure on academics from vice-chancellors to achieve this level of publication. Funding and editorship issues mean that most academic research is aimed at high-grade journals, and this often necessitates a ‘traditional’ approach and presentation that vastly differ from the way the majority of today’s practitioner s consume information. The big question is how to balance academic rigour with mass-market appeal, without ‘dumbing down’. A new method of dissemination needs to emerge in which abstracts and conclusions are translated into accessible, impactful information.
While there is a great deal of relevant experimental research, the way it is presented often renders it unattractive to practice. Practitioner s find heavily theoretical work and language difficult to engage with, preferring ‘real life’ case study examples covering a range of topics. Currently, we find much academic research focuses on behavioural studies and incentives, ignoring topics such as strategic planning, budgeting, decision-making, cost accounting, and cost estimation. Yet we hear from our government and public sector stakeholders that these are the areas that need to be addressed.
Academic research has the rigour and independence to make a difference to this sector, but at present its lack of, and unwillingness to address, accessibility is creating barriers to impact. CIMA believes that adopting a more integrated and inclusive approach, which addresses the needs of all audiences, would address this issue.
3.1.4 Examples of Good Practice
CIMA awards research grants based on academic rigour, quality, originality, and practical benefit to our members. Recent work relating to the public sector and non-profits includes:
-
Impact assessment in a non-government organization (2017)
-
Demands for funding accountability require professionalized impact assessment. The report suggests an organization-wide approach to demonstrate value externally and improve internal decision-making.
-
-
Management control systems in public networks (2016)
-
Public collaborative networks can help address challenges in public service delivery. Packages of control mechanisms play an important role in building collaboration and supporting goal achievement.
-
-
Governmental financial resilience under austerity: the case of English local authorities (2015)
-
Post 2008, the language of resilience became fundamental to success. Over a 10-year period, two main approaches to financial resilience are identified.
-
-
Financial performance of SOEs in emerging economies (2012)
-
Examines the factors that have contributed to the poor financial performance of SOEs, identifies shortcomings in financial management systems, and suggests measures for improvement.
-
-
Assessing the effectiveness of NHS budgeting (2011)
-
Examines the complex nature of budgetary and associated financial systems, providing a checklist for effectiveness of budgeting systems.
-
-
Costing in the National Health Service: from reporting to managing (2010).
-
Highlights potential benefits and pitfalls of costing tools, developing the evidence base by making clear the reasons underlying their effectiveness.
-
Chartered Institute of Public Finance and Accountancy (CIPFA)
Gillian Fawcett
Head of International, CIPFA
3.1.1 Specific Features That Affect the Research-Practice Gap from CIPFA’s Perspective
It was recently announced in the press that a prominent academic would spearhead a revitalized London Finance Commission to identify a wide-ranging suite of devolution opportunities including powers to use taxation generated locally. This is one of a number of examples where academics and practitioner communities come together to collaborate and innovate in key public policy areas, in this case city devolution.
Over the years, the Chartered Institute of Public Finance and Accountancy (CIPFA ), the professional accountancy body for finance professionals working within the public sector across the globe, has collaborated with academia in a number of ways to shape polic y, share insights, and develop practice in relation to public financial management. As far back as the 1980s, CIPFA has developed effective and sustainable working relationships with academia to explore the evolution of public management and the application of accounting concepts and techniques. These collaborations, supported by evidence-based research and exchange of ideas and information, have helped shape the accounting practices for public finances that are applied today.
The Public Money and Management (PMM) journal is a good example of a CIPFA-sponsored international, academic, and professional journal covering public sector finance, polic y, and management. Academics and practitioner s alike review articles jointly to ensure credibility, relevance, and impact. For over 30 years, it has published articles on new and emerging areas; for example, in a recent edition, it sought articles on sustainability reporting in the public sector. This is an area where there is little academic research opposed to the wealth of research on sustainability reporting in the corporate sector.
3.1.2 The Role of Institutions in Widening/Narrowing the Gap
In relation to the professional accountancy world more broadly, there have been many collaborations between universit ies and the profession in topical research areas across a broad range of public financial management subjects, such as implementation of PPPs, effectiveness of parliamentary financial scrutiny, and so on. They have helped inform polic y debate and at times led to a change in policy. Other high-profile bodies such as Financial Reporting Advisory Board (FRAB) in the UK, which oversees financial reporting developments across government, also benefit from academic input and insights and have an academic on the Board.
3.1.3 The Roles of Academics in Widening/Narrowing the Gap
The relationship between academics and the accountancy profession is evolving and collaborating in new and innovative ways. Most recently, parliamentary select committees in England have welcomed having two independent advisors to support their inquiries from both the practitioner and academic communities. The former bringing practical knowledge and experience about application and implementation of polic y, and the latter bringing expertise and evidenced-based research relating to the policy area under discussion. For example, following the abolition of the Audit Commission, the House of Commons Select Committee on Communities and Local Government held an inquiry into the future of local government audit, which was supported by Ron Hodges and myself. The benefits of such a dual approach were that parliamentarians were better briefed and informed on issues affecting the local government audit landscape, as well as having access and knowledge to research and current academic thinking on public audit. Both sets of skills complemented one another and supported committee members in having a more robust inquiry. This was the first time that a parliamentary select committee had made joint appointments, and because of its success, the model was implemented by a number of other House of Commons Select Committees.
3.1.4 Examples of Good Practice
However, there have been academic and practice gaps. These have manifested themselves in different ways. For example, in development of EPSAS, the academic voice has been less prominent. Academia’s response to a Eurostat public consultation on the governance of EPSAS was negligible. Out of 203 respondents, 194 were from EU countries with the remainder from public bodies and associations. The development of EPSAS standards is an area where you would perhaps expect the academic community to have a view and guide accounting standards developments. Also, there are areas where you would expect to find evidenced-based research on issues such as who are the users of financial reports and how are they being used, but surprisingly little international research has been carried out. This is an example of one area that would benefit from further research so practitioner s can get a better understanding of user needs and begin to stimulate the demand side for information.
There is little doubt that stronger links between practitioner s and academia will help in the development of public financial management, and in particular in new and emerging areas such as integrated reporting, finding solutions for financial resilience, and so on. By bringing academic rigour and practical experience together, we can have more effective polic y making on public financial management well into the future.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ferry, L., Saliterer, I., Steccolini, I., Tucker, B. (2019). A Global View of the Research-Practice Gap in a Public Sector Context. In: The Research-Practice Gap on Accounting in the Public Services. Public Sector Financial Management. Palgrave Pivot, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99432-1_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99432-1_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Pivot, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-99431-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-99432-1
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)