Skip to main content

An Optimization View on Intuitionistic Fuzzy Three-Way Decisions

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Rough Sets (IJCRS 2018)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 11103))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

From an optimization point of view, we propose a new method to determine the loss funtion of intuitionistic fuzzy three-way decisions. First, two linear programming models are constructed to determine a pair of thresholds in three-way decisions based on their practical semantics. Meanwhile, the validity of the models is verified by KKT conditions. Second, the models are further extended to intuitionistic fuzzy three-way decisions (IF-3WD) and the corresponding nonlinear models are established. Third, the uniqueness of solution for models is proven and a LINGO software is employed to solve the models. We then obtain both thresholds of IF-3WD and its decision rules. Finally, an example is given to show the effectiveness of our method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Yao, Y.Y., Wong, S.K.M., Lingras, P.: A decision-theoretic rough set model. In: Methodologies for Intelligent Systems, vol. 5, pp. 17–24. North-Holland, New York (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Yao, Y.Y.: Three-way decisions with probabilistic rough sets. Inf. Sci. 180(3), 341–353 (2010)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Jia, X., Zheng, K., Li, W., Liu, T., Shang, L.: Three-way decisions solution to filter spam email: an empirical study. In: Yao, J.T., et al. (eds.) RSCTC 2012. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 7413, pp. 287–296. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-32115-3_34

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Li, H.X., Zhang, L.B., Huang, B.: Sequential three-way decision and granulation for cost-sensitive face recognition. Knowl. Based Syst. 91(1), 241–251 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Li, H.X., Zhang, L.B., Zhou, X.Z., et al.: Cost-sensitive sequential three-way decision modeling using a deep neural network. Int. J. Approximate Reasoning 85, 68–78 (2017)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Li, J.H., Huang, C.C., Qi, J.J.: Three-way cognitive concept learning via multi-granularity. Inf. Sci. 378, 244–263 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Yu, H., Wang, X.C., Wang, G.Y., et al.: An active three-way clustering method via low-rank matrices for multi-view data. Inf. Sci. (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2018.03.009

  8. Sun, B.Z., Ma, W.M., Li, B.J.: Three-way decisions approach to multiple attribute group decision making with linguistic information-based decision-theoretic rough fuzzy set. Int. J. Approximate Reasoning 93, 424–442 (2018)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Li, H.X., Zhou, X.Z.: Risk decision making based on decision-theoretic rough set: a three-way view decision model. Int. J. Comput. Intell. Syst. 4, 1–11 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Jia, X.Y., Tang, Z.M., Liao, W.H., et al.: On an optimization representation of decision-theoretic rough set model. Int. J. Approximate Reasoning 55, 156–166 (2014)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Deng, X.F., Yao, Y.Y.: A multifaceted analysis of probabilistic three-way decisions. Fundamenta Informaticae 132, 291–313 (2014)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Zhang, Y., Yao, J.T.: Determining three-way decision regions with Gini coefficients. In: Cornelis, C., Kryszkiewicz, M., Ślȩzak, D., Ruiz, E.M., Bello, R., Shang, L. (eds.) RSCTC 2014. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 8536, pp. 160–171. Springer, Cham (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08644-6_17

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Azama, N., Zhang, Y., Yao, J.T.: Evaluation functions and decision conditions of three-way decisions with game-theoretic rough sets. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 261, 704–714 (2017)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Qian, Y.H., Zhang, H., Sang, Y.L., et al.: Multigranulation decision-theoretic rough sets. Int. J. Approximate Reasoning 55, 225–237 (2014)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Liang, D.C., Liu, D.: Systematic studies on three-way decisions with interval-valued decision-theoretic rough sets. Inf. Sci. 276, 186–203 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Liang, D.C., Pedrycz, W., Liu, D., et al.: Three-way decisions based on decision-theoretic rough sets under linguistic assessment with the aid of group decision making. Appl. Soft Comput. 29, 256–269 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Liang, D.C., Liu, D.: Deriving three-way decisions from intuitionistic fuzzy decision-theoretic rough sets. Inf. Sci. 300, 28–48 (2015)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Liang, D.C., Xu, Z.S., Liu, D.: Three-way decisions with intuitionistic fuzzy decision-theoretic rough sets based on point operators. Inf. Sci. 375, 183–201 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Liu, J.B., Zhou, X.Z., Huang, B., Li, H.: A three-way decision model based on intuitionistic fuzzy decision systems. In: Polkowski, L. (ed.) IJCRS 2017. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 10314, pp. 249–263. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60840-2_18

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  20. Liang, D.C., Liu, D.: A novel risk decision-making based on decision-theoretic rough sets under hesitant fuzzy information. IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst. 23(2), 237–247 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Liang, D.C., Xu, Z.S., Liu, D.: Three-way decisions based on decision-theoretic rough sets with dual hesitant fuzzy information. Inf. Sci. 396, 127–143 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Atanassov, K.T.: Intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 20, 87–96 (1986)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  23. Wan, S.P., Wang, F., Dong, J.Y.: A novel risk attitudinal ranking method for intuitionistic fuzzy values and application to MADM. Appl. Soft Comput. 40, 98–112 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Chen, B.L.: Optimization Theory and Algorithm. Tsinghua University Press, Beijing (2005)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 71671086, 61773208, 61473157, 71732003 and 71201076), the National Key Research and Development Program of China (No.2016YFD0702100), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (No. 011814380021), the Central military equipment development of the “13th Five-Year” pre research project (No. 315050202), the Nanjing University Innovation and Creative Program for PhD candidate (No. CXCY17-08) and the pre-research project (No. 3151001**).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Huaxiong Li .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Liu, J., Zhou, X., Li, H., Huang, B., Zhang, L., Jia, X. (2018). An Optimization View on Intuitionistic Fuzzy Three-Way Decisions. In: Nguyen, H., Ha, QT., Li, T., Przybyła-Kasperek, M. (eds) Rough Sets. IJCRS 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11103. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99368-3_28

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99368-3_28

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-99367-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-99368-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics