Skip to main content

Rule Induction Based on Indiscernible Classes from Rough Sets in Information Tables with Continuous Values

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 11103))

Abstract

Rule induction based on indiscernible classes from neighborhood rough sets is described in information tables with continuous values. An indiscernible range that a value has in an attribute is determined by a threshold on that attribute. The indiscernible class of every object is derived from using the indiscernible range. First, lower and upper approximations are described in complete information tables by using indiscernible classes. Rules are obtained from the approximations. A rule that an object supports, which is called a single rule, is short of applicability. To improve the applicability of rules, a series of single rules is put into one rule expressed in an interval value, which is called a combined rule. Second, these are addressed in incomplete information tables. Incomplete information is expressed in a set of values or an interval value. Two types of indiscernible classes; namely, certainly and possibly indiscernible ones, are obtained from in an information table. The actual indiscernibility class is between the certainly and possibly indiscernible classes. The family of indiscernible classes of an object has a lattice structure. The minimal element is the certainly indiscernible class while the maximal one is the possibly indiscernible class. By using certainly and possibly indiscernible classes, we obtain four types of approximations: certain lower, certain upper, possible lower, and possible upper approximations. From these approximations we obtain four types of combined rules: certain and consistent, certain and inconsistent, possible and consistent, and possible and inconsistent ones. These combined rules have greater applicability than single rules that individual objects support.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    For the sake of simplicity and space limitation, We describe the case of an attribute, although our approach can be easily extended to the case of more than one attribute.

  2. 2.

    Hu and Yao also say that approximations describes by using an interval set in information tables with incomplete information [2].

References

  1. Grzymala-Busse, J.W.: Mining numerical data – a rough set approach. In: Peters, J.F., Skowron, A. (eds.) Transactions on Rough Sets XI. LNCS, vol. 5946, pp. 1–13. Springer, Heidelberg (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-11479-3_1

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Hu, M.J., Yao, Y.Y.: Rough set approximations in an incomplete information table. In: Polkowski, L., et al. (eds.) IJCRS 2017. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 10314, pp. 200–215. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60840-2_14

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Jing, S., She, K., Ali, S.: A universal neighborhood rough sets model for knowledge discovering from incomplete hetergeneous data. Expert Syst. 30(1), 89–96 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0394.2012.00633_x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Kryszkiewicz, M.: Rules in incomplete information systems. Inf. Sci. 113, 271–292 (1999)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Lipski, W.: On semantics issues connected with incomplete information databases. ACM Trans. Database Syst. 4, 262–296 (1979)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Lipski, W.: On databases with incomplete information. J. ACM 28, 41–70 (1981)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Lin, T.Y.: Neighborhood systems: a qualitative theory for fuzzy and rough sets. In: Wang, P. (ed.) Advances in Machine Intelligence and Soft Computing, vol. IV, pp. 132–155. Duke University (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Nakata, M., Sakai, H.: Rough sets handling missing values probabilistically interpreted. In: Ślęzak, D., Wang, G., Szczuka, M., Düntsch, I., Yao, Y. (eds.) RSFDGrC 2005. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3641, pp. 325–334. Springer, Heidelberg (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/11548669_34

    Chapter  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Nakata, M., Sakai, H.: Applying rough sets to information tables containing missing values. In: Proceedings of 39th International Symposium on Multiple-Valued Logic, pp. 286–291. IEEE Press (2009). https://doi.org/10.1109/ISMVL.2009.1

  10. Nakata, M., Sakai, H.: Twofold rough approximations under incomplete information. Int. J. Gener. Syst. 42, 546–571 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1080/17451000.2013.798898

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Nakata, M., Sakai, H.: Describing rough approximations by indiscernibility relations in information tables with incomplete information. In: Carvalho, J.P., Lesot, M.-J., Kaymak, U., Vieira, S., Bouchon-Meunier, B., Yager, R.R. (eds.) IPMU 2016. CCIS, vol. 611, pp. 355–366. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-40581-0_29

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Pawlak, Z.: Rough Sets: Theoretical Aspects of Reasoning about Data. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-3534-4

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Sikora, M.: Decision rule-based data models using TRS and NetTRS – methods and algorithms. In: Peters, J.F., Skowron, A. (eds.) Transactions on Rough Sets XI. LNCS, vol. 5946, pp. 130–160. Springer, Heidelberg (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-11479-3_8

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Skowron, A., Stepaniuk, J.: Tolerance approximation spaces. Fundamenta Informaticae 27, 245–253 (1996)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Stefanowski, J., Tsoukiàs, A.: Incomplete information tables and rough classification. Comput. Intell. 17, 545–566 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Yang, X., Zhang, M., Dou, H., Yang, Y.: Neighborhood systems-based rough sets in incomplete information system. Inf. Sci. 24, 858–867 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2011.03.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Zenga, A., Lia, T., Liuc, D., Zhanga, J., Chena, H.: A fuzzy rough set approach for incremental feature selection on hybrid information systems. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 258, 39–60 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fss.2014.08.014

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Zhao, B., Chen, X., Zeng, Q.: Incomplete hybrid attributes reduction based on neighborhood granulation and approximation. In: 2009 International Conference on Mechatronics and Automation, pp. 2066–2071. IEEE Press (2009)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michinori Nakata .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Nakata, M., Sakai, H., Hara, K. (2018). Rule Induction Based on Indiscernible Classes from Rough Sets in Information Tables with Continuous Values. In: Nguyen, H., Ha, QT., Li, T., Przybyła-Kasperek, M. (eds) Rough Sets. IJCRS 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11103. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99368-3_25

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99368-3_25

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-99367-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-99368-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics