Skip to main content

Using FITradeoff for Supporting a Decision Process of a Multicriteria Decision Problem

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: International Series in Operations Research & Management Science ((ISOR,volume 274))

Abstract

In the scope of MAVT (Multi-Attribute Value Theory), one of the most difficult tasks is the elicitation of criteria scaling constants of an additive model for the aggregation of criteria. That might be the reason why there are so many MCDM/A (Multi-Criteria Decision Making/Aiding) methods, among which is the FITradeoff (Flexible and Interactive Tradeoff) method, which has been developed precisely to meet this challenge. One of its advantages is that it uses partial information about the preferences of a Decision Maker (DM). This requires less effort from the DM, since this method makes comparisons of consequences (or outcomes) based on strict preference rather than on indifference, which is what the traditional tradeoff procedure does. Two case studies are presented using the FITradeoff method: a supplier selection problem and a facility location problem. Using a Decision Support System of FITradeoff for the decision process, the flexibility of this process is analyzed, in order to determine the best one in a specified set of alternatives, or even to rank them.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Belton, V., & Stewart, T. J. (2002). Multiple criteria decision analysis. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Borcherding, K., Eppel, T., & Von Winterfeldt, D. (1991). Comparison of weighting judgments in multiattribute utility measurement. Management Science, 37, 1603–1619. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.37.12.1603.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bouyssou, D. (1986). Some remarks on the notion of compensation in MCDM. European Journal of Operational Research, 26(1), 150–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Almeida, A. T., & Roselli, L. R. P. (2017). Visualization for decision support in FITradeoff method: exploring its evaluation with cognitive neuroscience. In: I. Linden, C. Liu, C. Colot (Eds.), Decision Support Systems VII. Data, Information and Knowledge Visualization in Decision Support Systems. LNBIP 282 (pp. 61–73). Heidelberg: Springer. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57487-5_5

    Google Scholar 

  • de Almeida, A. T., Cavalcante, C. A. V., Alencar, M. H., Ferreira, R. J. P., Almeida-Filho, A. T., & Garcez, T. V. (2015). Multicriteria and multiobjective models for risk, reliability and maintenance decision analysis, International series in operations research & management science (Vol. 231). New York: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17969-8.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • de Almeida, A. T., de Almeida, J. A., Costa, A. P. C. S., & de Almeida-Filho, A. T. (2016). A new method for elicitation of criteria weights in additive models: Flexible and interactive tradeoff. European Journal of Operational Research, 250, 179–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2015.08.058.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Almeida-Filho, A. T., de Almeida, A. T., & Costa, A. C. S. (2017). A flexible elicitation procedure for additive model scale constants. Annals of Operations Research, 259, 65–83. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-017-2519-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dell’Ovo, M., Frej, E. A., Oppio, A., Capolongo, S., Morais, D. C., & de Almeida, A. T. (2017). Multicriteria decision making for healthcare facilities location with visualization based on FITradeoff method. In: I. Linden, C. Liu, C. Colot (Eds.), Decision Support Systems VII. Data, Information and Knowledge Visualization in Decision Support Systems. LNBIP 282 (pp. 32–44). Heidelberg: Springer. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-57487-5_3

    Google Scholar 

  • Eden, C., & Ackermann, F. (2006). Where next for problem structuring methods. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 57(7), 766–768. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2602090.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, W., Miles, R. F., & von Winterfeldt, D. (2007). Advances in decision analysis. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Frej, E. A., Roselli, L. R. P., de Almeida, J. A., & de Almeida, A. T. (2017). A multicriteria decision model for supplier selection in a food industry based on FITradeoff method. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2017, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/4541914.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greco, S., Figueira, J., & Ehrgott, M. (2016). Multiple criteria decision analysis. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keeney, R. L. (2009). Value-focused thinking: A path to creative decision making. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keeney, R. L., & Raiffa, H. (1976). Decision analysis with multiple conflicting objectives. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salo, A. A., & Hämäläinen, R. P. (1992). Preference assessment by imprecise ratio statements. Operations Research, 40, 1053–1061. https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.40.6.1053.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M. (1987). Decision making with incomplete information. European Journal of Operational Research, 28, 44–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M., & Borcherding, K. (1993). Behavioral influences on weight judgments in multiattribute decision making. European Journal of Operational Research, 67, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(93)90318-H.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

This work had partial support from the Brazilian Research Council (CNPq).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eduarda Asfora Frej .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Frej, E.A., de Almeida, A.T., Morais, D.C. (2019). Using FITradeoff for Supporting a Decision Process of a Multicriteria Decision Problem. In: Huber, S., Geiger, M., de Almeida, A. (eds) Multiple Criteria Decision Making and Aiding. International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, vol 274. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99304-1_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics