Skip to main content

Use of Reference Point Sets in a Decomposition-Based Multi-Objective Evolutionary Algorithm

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Parallel Problem Solving from Nature – PPSN XV (PPSN 2018)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 11101))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1757 Accesses

Abstract

In recent years, decomposition-based multi-objective evolutionary algorithms (MOEAs) have gained increasing popularity. However, these MOEAs depend on the consistency between the Pareto front shape and the distribution of the reference weight vectors. In this paper, we propose a decomposition-based MOEA, which uses the modified Euclidean distance (\(d^+\)) as a scalar aggregation function. The proposed approach adopts a novel method for approximating the reference set, based on an hypercube-based method, in order to adapt the reference set for leading the evolutionary process. Our preliminary results indicate that our proposed approach is able to obtain solutions of a similar quality to those obtained by state-of-the-art MOEAs such as MOMBI-II, NSGA-III, RVEA and MOEA/DD in several MOPs, and is able to outperform them in problems with complicated Pareto fronts.

The first author acknowledges support from CONACyT and CINVESTAV-IPN to pursue graduate studies in Computer Science. The second author gratefully acknowledges support from CONACyT project no. 221551.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    It is well-known that Pareto-based MOEAs cannot properly solve many-objective problems [12].

  2. 2.

    The running time of decomposition-based MOEAs is lower than that of indicator-based MOEAs [1, 9] and reference-based MOEAs [14].

  3. 3.

    The weights of the reference point problem should be \(\sum _{i = 0}^{m}{\lambda _i} = 1\).

References

  1. Beume, N., Naujoks, B., Emmerich, M.: SMS-EMOA: multiobjective selection based on dominated hypervolume. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 181(3), 1653–1669 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Cheng, R., Jin, Y., Olhofer, M., Sendhoff, B.: A reference vector guided evolutionary algorithm for many-objective optimization. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 20(5), 773–791 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Cheng, R., et al.: A benchmark test suite for evolutionary many-objective optimization. Complex Intell. Syst. 3(1), 67–81 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Coello Coello, C.A., Reyes Sierra, M.: A study of the parallelization of a coevolutionary multi-objective evolutionary algorithm. In: Monroy, R., Arroyo-Figueroa, G., Sucar, L.E., Sossa, H. (eds.) MICAI 2004. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2972, pp. 688–697. Springer, Heidelberg (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-24694-7_71

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Deb, K., Jain, H.: An evolutionary many-objective optimization algorithm using reference-point-based nondominated sorting approach, part I: solving problems with box constraints. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 18(4), 577–601 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Deb, K., Pratap, A., Agarwal, S., Meyarivan, T.: A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA-II. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 6(2), 182–197 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Deb, K., Thiele, L., Laumanns, M., Zitzler, E.: Scalable test problems for evolutionary multiobjective optimization. In: Abraham, A., Jain, L., Goldberg, R. (eds.) Evolutionary Multiobjective Optimization. Theoretical Advances and Applications, pp. 105–145. Springer, USA (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/1-84628-137-7_6

    Chapter  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Hernández Gómez, R., Coello Coello, C.A.: MOMBI: a new metaheuristic for many-objective optimization based on the R2 indicator. In: 2013 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC 2013), Cancún, México, 20–23 June 2013, pp. 2488–2495. IEEE Press (2013). ISBN 978-1-4799-0454-9

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hernández Gómez, R., Coello Coello, C.A.: Improved metaheuristic based on the R2 indicator for many-objective optimization. In: 2015 Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference (GECCO 2015), Madrid, Spain, 11–15 July 2015, pp. 679–686. ACM Press (2015). ISBN 978-1-4503-3472-3

    Google Scholar 

  10. Huband, S., Hingston, P., Barone, L., While, L.: A review of multiobjective test problems and a scalable test problem toolkit. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 10(5), 477–506 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ishibuchi, H., Masuda, H., Tanigaki, Y., Nojima, Y.: Modified distance calculation in generational distance and inverted generational distance. In: Gaspar-Cunha, A., Henggeler Antunes, C., Coello, C.C. (eds.) EMO 2015. LNCS, vol. 9019, pp. 110–125. Springer, Cham (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15892-1_8

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Ishibuchi, H., Tsukamoto, N., Nojima, Y.: Evolutionary many-objective optimization: a short review. In: 2008 Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC 2008), Hong Kong, June 2008, pp. 2424–2431. IEEE Service Center (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Li, K., Deb, K., Zhang, Q., Kwong, S.: An evolutionary many-objective optimization algorithm based on dominance and decomposition. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 19(5), 694–716 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Manoatl Lopez, E., Coello Coello, C.A.: IGD\(^+\)-EMOA: a multi-objective evolutionary algorithm based on IGD\(^{+}\). In: 2016 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC 2016), Vancouver, Canada, 24–29 July 2016, pp. 999–1006. IEEE Press (2016). ISBN 978-1-5090-0623-9

    Google Scholar 

  15. Veldhuizen, D.A.V.: Multiobjective evolutionary algorithms: classifications, analyses, and new innovations. Ph.D. thesis, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering. Graduate School of Engineering. Air Force Institute of Technology, Wright-Patterson AFB, Ohio, USA, May 1999

    Google Scholar 

  16. Zhang, Q., Li, H.: MOEA/D: a multiobjective evolutionary algorithm based on decomposition. IEEE Trans. Evol. Comput. 11(6), 712–731 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Edgar Manoatl Lopez .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Manoatl Lopez, E., Coello Coello, C.A. (2018). Use of Reference Point Sets in a Decomposition-Based Multi-Objective Evolutionary Algorithm. In: Auger, A., Fonseca, C., Lourenço, N., Machado, P., Paquete, L., Whitley, D. (eds) Parallel Problem Solving from Nature – PPSN XV. PPSN 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11101. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99253-2_30

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99253-2_30

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-99252-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-99253-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics