Skip to main content

MMINT-A: A Tool for Automated Change Impact Assessment on Assurance Cases

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Computer Safety, Reliability, and Security (SAFECOMP 2018)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNPSE,volume 11094))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Assurance cases are a means to argue about the safety, security, etc., of software systems in critical domains. As systems evolve, their assurance cases can grow in complexity, making them difficult to maintain. In this paper, we present a tool MMINT-A that can, in the context of model-driven development, assess the impact of system changes on their assurance cases. To achieve this, MMINT-A implements an impact assessment algorithm from previous work [7, 8] and incorporates a graphical assurance case editor, an annotation mechanism, and two summary tables for the assessment results. We demonstrate the usage of MMINT-A on a Power Sliding Door example from the automotive domain.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Attwood, K., Chinneck, P., Clarke, M., et. al.: GSN Community Standard Version 1. Technical report, Origin Consulting (York) Limited (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Calinescu, R., Weyns, D., Gerasimou, S., Iftikhar, M.U., Habli, I., Kelly, T.: Engineering trustworthy self-adaptive software with dynamic assurance cases. In: IEEE TSE 2017, p. 1 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cârlan, C., Barner, S., Diewald, A., Tsalidis, A., Voss, S.: ExplicitCase: integrated model-based development of system and safety cases. In: Tonetta, S., Schoitsch, E., Bitsch, F. (eds.) SAFECOMP 2017. LNCS, vol. 10489, pp. 52–63. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66284-8_5

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Cruanes, S., Hamon, G., Owre, S., Shankar, N.: Tool integration with the evidential tool bus. In: Giacobazzi, R., Berdine, J., Mastroeni, I. (eds.) VMCAI 2013. LNCS, vol. 7737, pp. 275–294. Springer, Heidelberg (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-35873-9_18

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Di Sandro, A., Salay, R., Famelis, M., Kokaly, S., Chechik, M.: MMINT: a graphical tool for interactive model management. In: Proceedings of MoDELS 2015 (demo) (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  6. International Organization for Standardization: ISO 26262: Road Vehicles - Functional Safety, 1st version (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kokaly, S., Salay, R., Cassano, V., Maibaum, T., Chechik, M.: A model management approach for assurance case reuse due to system evolution. In: Proceedings of MoDELS 2016, pp. 196–206 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kokaly, S., Salay, R., Chechik, M., Lawford, M., Maibaum, T.: Safety case impact assessment in automotive software systems: an improved model-based approach. In: Tonetta, S., Schoitsch, E., Bitsch, F. (eds.) SAFECOMP 2017. LNCS, vol. 10488, pp. 69–85. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66266-4_5

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Kokaly, S., Salay, R., Sabetzadeh, M., Chechik, M., Maibaum, T.: Model management for regulatory compliance: a position paper. In: Proceedings of MiSE 2016 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lewis, R.: Safety case development as an information modelling problem. In: Dale, C., Anderson, T. (eds.) Safety-Critical Systems Problems, Process and Practice, pp. 183–193. Springer, London (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84882-349-5_12

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Maksimov, M., Fung, N.L.S., Kokaly, S., Chechik, M.: Two decades of assurance case tools: a survey. In: Proceedings of SAFECOMP 2018 Workshops. Springer (2018, accepted for publication)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Object Management Group (OMG): Structured Assurance Case Metamodel (SACM) Version 2.0 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Salay, R., Kokaly, S., Chechik, M., Maibaum, T.: Heterogeneous megamodel slicing for model evolution. In: Proceedings of ME@MoDELS 2016, pp. 50–59 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Salay, R., Kokaly, S., Di Sandro, A., Chechik, M.: Enriching megamodel management with collection-based operators. In: Proceedings of MODELS 2015 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  15. University of York (UK): D4.2 Compositional Assurance Cases and Arguments for Distributed MILS (2015)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The work reported in this paper has been funded by General Motors and NSERC Canada. The authors thank Mark Lawford, Alan Wassyng and Tom Maibaum for many useful discussions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nick L. S. Fung .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Fung, N.L.S., Kokaly, S., Di Sandro, A., Salay, R., Chechik, M. (2018). MMINT-A: A Tool for Automated Change Impact Assessment on Assurance Cases. In: Gallina, B., Skavhaug, A., Schoitsch, E., Bitsch, F. (eds) Computer Safety, Reliability, and Security. SAFECOMP 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11094. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99229-7_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99229-7_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-99228-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-99229-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics