Advertisement

The Moral Responsibility Gap and the Increasing Autonomy of Systems

  • Zoë PorterEmail author
  • Ibrahim Habli
  • Helen Monkhouse
  • John Bragg
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 11094)

Abstract

The ethical and social implications of autonomous systems are forcing safety engineers and ethicists alike to confront new questions. This paper focuses on just one of these questions - moral responsibility - bringing together inter-disciplinary insights to an issue of growing public and regulatory concern. The central thesis is that, on a conception of moral responsibility that presupposes control, the increasing autonomy of systems prima facie diminishes the extent to which engineers and users can be considered morally responsible for system behaviour. This challenge to our normal attributions of moral responsibility as a result of autonomy has come to be known as the ‘responsibility gap’. We provide a characterisation of the moral responsibility gap, which we argue has two dimensions: causal and epistemic. At the end of the paper we highlight considerations for future work.

Keywords

Moral responsibility Ethics Autonomous systems Safety 

References

  1. 1.
    Lucas, J.R.: Responsibility (1993)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Talbert, M.: Moral Responsibility. Polity Press, Cambridge, UK (2015)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Aristotle: The Nichomachean Ethics. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2009)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Strawson, P.F.: Freedom and resentment. In: Watson, G., (ed) Proceedings of the British Academy, vol. 48, pp. 1–25. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1962)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Eshleman, A.: Moral responsibility (2016). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2016/entries/moral-responsibility/ Accessed 20 June 2018
  6. 6.
    Fischer, J.M., Ravizza, M.: Responsibility and control: A Theory of Moral Responsibility. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK (2000)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hyman, J.: Action, Knowledge, and Will. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Brink, D.O., Nelkin, D.: Fairness and the architecture of responsibility. Oxford Stud. Agency Responsib. 1, 284–313 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Matthias, A.: The responsibility gap: ascribing responsibility for the actions of learning automata. Ethics Inf. Technol. 6(3), 175–183 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Noorman, M.: Computing and moral responsibility (2018). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2018/entries/computing-responsibility/ Accessed 08 Mar 2018
  11. 11.
    Jonas, H.: The imperative of responsibility. Search of an Ethics for the Technological Age. University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1985)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Zoë Porter
    • 1
    Email author
  • Ibrahim Habli
    • 1
  • Helen Monkhouse
    • 2
  • John Bragg
    • 3
  1. 1.University of YorkYorkUK
  2. 2.HORIBA MIRAWarwickshireUK
  3. 3.MBDA UK Ltd.FiltonUK

Personalised recommendations