Advertisement

STPA Guided Systems Engineering

  • Uwe BeckerEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 11094)

Abstract

Today systems become more and more complex and networked. This increasing complexity requires new methods for systems engineering. In addition, with the number of internal or external components the probability of faulty components within systems increases. At every point of time, some component may be faulty or does not deliver the desired function. This paper presents a new design methodology to design systems that can handle the mentioned issues of the systems by design. The new methodology is based on System-Theoretic Process Analysis and standard systems engineering methods.

Keywords

Systems engineering Safety engineering STPA STAMP MBSE Fault tolerance 

References

  1. 1.
    Leveson, N.G., Thomas, J., Young, W., Williams, A.: An STPA Primer. Version 1 (2013)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Leveson, N.G.: Engineering a Safer World. The MIT Press, Cambridge (2011)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Asplund, F., El-khoury, J.: Safety-guided design through system-theoretic process analysis, benefits and difficulties. KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Sweden (2012)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Asplund, F.: Safety and Tool Integration, A System-Theoretic Process Analysis. TRITA-MMK 2012:01, ISRN/KTH/MMK-R-12/01-SE (2012)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Leveson, N.G.: A new approach to hazard analysis for complex systems. In: Proceedings of the 21st International System Safety Conference, pp. 498–507 (2003)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Leveson, N.G.: The Use of Safety Cases in Certification and Regulation. ESD Working Paper Series. MIT (2011)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Nelson, P.S.: A STAMP Analysis of the LEX Comair 5191 Accident. Master Thesis, Lund University (2008)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ouyang, M., Hong, L., Yu, M.-H., Fei, Q.: STAMP-based analysis on the railway accident and accident spreading: taking the China-Jiaoji railway accident for example. Saf. Sci. 48, 544–555 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Pereira, S.J., Grady, L., Jeffrey, H.: A system-theoretic hazard analysis methodology for a non-advocate safety assessment of the ballistic missile defense system. In: Proceedings of the 2006 AIAA Missile Sciences Conference (2006)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ishimatsu, T., Leveson, N.G., Thomas, J., Katahira, M., Miyamoto, Y., Nakao, H.: Modeling and hazard analysis using STPA. In: Proceedings of the 4th IAASS Conference Making Safety Matter, p. 10 (2010)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ramos, A.L., Vasconcelos Ferreira, J., Barceló, J.: Model-Based Systems Engineering: An Emerging Approach for Modern SystemsGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    INCOSE SE Vision 2020: INCOSE-TP-2004-004-02, September 2007Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Draegerwerk AG&Co KGaALuebeckGermany

Personalised recommendations