Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Emotions: The Spinal Cord of the Creative Thinking Process

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Dynamic Perspectives on Creativity

Part of the book series: Creativity Theory and Action in Education ((CTAE,volume 4))

Abstract

In reviewing the huge effort made by the psychological research in defining the main components of the creative process and of the creative potential, rarely we encounter models and theoretical frameworks considering emotional reactions as main determinants of the creative process, except of the widely and broadly defined concepts of motivation and mood. Emotional phenomena are usually intended as strong (intrinsic or extrinsic) forces able to influence the creative thinking process, and in particular the cognitive processes sustaining idea generation. In this chapter, we maintain that emotional phenomena are not simple influencers of creative thinking, but that they are the spinal cord of the creative process. In considering emotions the core of the process, we sustain that emotional reactions are the conditio sine qua non by which the creative thinking process can occur, or, in different words, the necessary (although not sufficient) determinant of the process. On the basis of the above, taking into account different theoretical approaches to the study of emotions and adopting a dynamical systems framework, we intend to explain the role of emotions in the dynamic emergence of the creative thinking process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Agnoli, S., Franchin, L., Rubaltelli, E., & Corazza, G. E. (2015). An eye-tracking analysis of irrelevance processing as moderator of openness and creative performance. Creativity Research Journal, 27, 125–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Agnoli, S., Franchin, L., Rubaltelli, E., & Corazza, G. E. (2018a). The emotionally intelligent use of attention and affective arousal under creative frustration and creative success. Personality and Individual Differences. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2018.04.041.

  • Agnoli, S., Runco, M. A., Kirsch, C., & Corazza, G. E. (2018b). The role of motivation in the prediction of creative achievement inside and outside of school environment. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 28, 167–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2018.05.005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amabile, T. M. (1983). The social psychology of creativity: A componential conceptualization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45(2), 357–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amabile, T. M. (1993). Motivational synergy: Toward new conceptualizations of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation in the workplace. Human Resource Management Review, 3(3), 185–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amabile, T. M., Barsade, S. G., Mueller, J. S., & Staw, B. M. (2005). Affect and creativity at work. Administrative Science Quarterly, 50(3), 367–403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ariely, D., & Norton, M. I. (2008). How actions create–not just reveal–preferences. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12, 13–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baas, M., De Dreu, C., & Nijstad, B. A. (2012). Emotions that associate with uncertainty lead to structured ideation. Emotion, 12, 1004–1014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Camras, L. A., & Witherington, D. C. (2005). Dynamical systems approaches to emotional development. Developmental Review, 25(3), 328–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corazza, G. E. (2016). Potential originality and effectiveness: The dynamic definition of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 28(3), 258–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corazza, G. E., & Agnoli, S. (2015). On the path towards the science of creative thinking. In G. E. Corazza & S. Agnoli (Eds.), Multidisciplinary contributions to the science of creative thinking (pp. 3–20). Singapore: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corazza, G. E., Agnoli, S., & Martello, S. (2016). A creativity and innovation course for engineers. In Handbook of research on creative problem-solving skill development in higher education (pp. 74–93).

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, M. A. (2009). Understanding the relationship between mood and creativity: A meta-analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 108(1), 25–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Dreu, C. K., Baas, M., & Nijstad, B. A. (2008). Hedonic tone and activation level in the mood-creativity link: Toward a dual pathway to creativity model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94(5), 739–756.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenberg, J. (2002, July). Does individual motivation and creativity predict group creative performance? Yes, but with some surprises. Paper session presented at the International WAM meeting. Lima, Peru.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman Barrett, L. (2017). How emotions are made: The secret life of the brain. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finke, R. A., Ward, T. B., & Smith, S. M. (1992). Creative cognition: Theory, research, and applications. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Floresco, S. B., Blaha, C. D., Yang, C. R., & Phillips, A. G. (2001). Modulation of hippocampal and amygdalar-evoked activity of nucleus accumbens neurons by dopamine: Cellular mechanisms of input selection. The Journal of Neuroscience, 21, 2851–2860.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fogel, A., Nwokah, E., Dedo, J. Y., Messinger, D., Dickson, K. L., Matusov, E., & Holt, S. A. (1992). Social process theory of emotion: A dynamic systems approach. Social Development, 1(2), 122–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frijda, N. (2005). Emotion experience. Cognition & Emotion, 19(4), 473–497.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frijda, N. H. (2007). The laws of emotion. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frijda, N. H., & Scherer, K. R. (2009). Emotion definition (psychological perspectives). In D. Sander & K. R. Scherer (Eds.), Oxford companion to emotion and the affective sciences (pp. 142–143). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glăveanu, V. P., & Lahlou, S. (2012). Through the creator’s eyes: Using the subjective camera to study craft creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 24, 152–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldenberg, J., Mazursky, D., & Solomon, S. (1999). Creative sparks. Science, 285(5433), 1495–1496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gross, J. J., & Feldman Barrett, L. (2011). Emotion generation and emotion regulation: One or two depends on your point of view. Emotion Review, 3(1), 8–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guilford, J. P. (1950). Creativity. American Psychologist, 5, 444–454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hélie, S., & Sun, R. (2010). Incubation, insight, and creative problem solving: A unified theory and a connectionist model. Psychological Review, 117(3), 994–1024.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haber, S. N., & McFarland, N. R. (1999). The Concept of the Ventral Striatum in Nonhuman Primates. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 877(1), 33–48. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-6632.1999.tb09259.x PMID:10415641.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodzic, S., Scharfen, J., Ripoll, P., Holling, H., & Zenasni, F. (2017). How efficient are emotional intelligence trainings: A meta-analysis. Emotion Review. https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073917708613.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Izard, C. E., Ackerman, B. P., Schoff, K. M., & Fine, S. E. (2000). Self-organization of discrete emotions, emotion patterns, and emotion-cognition relations. In M. D. Lewis & P. Granic (Eds.), Emotion, development, and self- organization: Dynamic systems approaches to emotional development (pp. 15–36). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Jansen, L., Luijten, H., & Bakker N. (eds.) (2009), Vincent van Gogh – The letters. Version: December 2010. Amsterdam/The Hague: Van Gogh Museum/Huygens ING.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jauk, E., Benedek, M., & Neubauer, A. C. (2014). The road to creative achievement: A latent variable model of ability and personality predictors. European Journal of Personality, 28(1), 95–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambie, J., & Marcel, A. (2002). Consciousness and emotion experience: A theoretical framework. Psychological Review, 109, 219–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lazarus, R. S. (1982). Thoughts on the relations between emotion and cognition. American Psychologist, 37, 1019–1024.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lazarus, R. S. (1984). On the primacy of cognition. American Psychologist, 39, 124–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leventhal, H., & Scherer, K. (1987). The relationship of emotion to cognition: A functional approach to a semantic controversy. Cognition and Emotion, 1(1), 3–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, D., & Granic, P. (2000). Emotion, development, and self- organization: Dynamic systems approaches to emotional development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lubart, T. (2001). Models of the creative process: Past, present and future. Creativity Research Journal, 13, 295–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lubart, T. I., & Getz, I. (1997). Emotion, metaphor, and the creative process. Creativity Research Journal, 10(4), 285–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moors, A., Ellsworth, P. C., Scherer, K. R., & Frijda, N. H. (2013). Appraisal theories of emotion: State of the art and future development. Emotion Review, 5(2), 119–124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mumford, M. D., Mobley, M. I., Uhlman, C. E., Reiter-Palmon, R., & Doares, L. M. (1991). Process analytic models of creative capacities. Creativity Research Journal, 4, 91–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poincarè, H. (1985). Mathematical creation. In B. Ghiselin (Ed.), The creative process: Asymposium (pp. 22–31). Berkeley: University of California Press (Original work published 1921).

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, K. R. (1987). Toward a dynamic theory of emotion: The component Process model of affective states. Geneva Studies in Emotion and Communication, 1, 1–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, K. R. (2000). Emotions as episodes of subsystem synchronization driven by nonlinear appraisal processes. In M. D. Lewis & I. Granic (Eds.), Emotion, development, and self-organization: Dynamic systems approaches to emotional development (pp. 70–99). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, K. R. (2001). Appraisal considered as a process of multilevel sequential checking. In K. R. Scherer, A. Schorr, & T. John Stone (Eds.), Appraisal processes in emotion: Theory, methods, research (pp. 92–120). New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, K. R. (2009). Emotions are emergent processes: They require a dynamic computational architecture. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 364(1535), 3459–3474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silvia, P. J. (2005a). Cognitive appraisals and interest in visual art: Exploring an appraisal theory of aesthetic emotions. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 23, 119–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silvia, P. J. (2005b). Emotional responses to art: From collation and arousal to cognition and emotion. Review of General Psychology, 9, 342–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silvia, P. J., & Brown, E. M. (2007). Anger, disgust, and the negative aesthetic emotions: Expanding an appraisal model of aesthetic experience. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 1(2), 100–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. J., & Davidson, J. E. (1999). Insight. In M. A. Runco & S. R. Pritzker (Eds.), Encyclopedia of creativity (vol. II, pp. 57–69).

    Google Scholar 

  • Thelen, E., & Smith, L. B. (1994). A dynamic systems approach to the development of cognition and action. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thelen, E., & Smith, L. B. (1998). Dynamic systems theories. In W. Damon & R. M. Lerner (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology, Theoretical models of human development (Vol. 1, pp. 563–634). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tik, M., Sladky, R., Di Bernardi Luft, C., Hoffmann, A., Hummer, A., Banissy M., Bhattacharya J., & Windischberger C. (2015). Ultra-high field fMRI insights on insight: Neural correlates of the “Aha!”. 21st meeting of the Organization for Human Brain Mapping, HBM – Honolulu.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tik, M., Sladky, R., Luft, C. D. B., Willinger, D., Hoffmann, A., Banissy, M. J., et al. (2018). Ultra-high-field fMRI insights on insight: Neural correlates of the Aha -moment. Human Brain Mapping, 39, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.24073.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1983). Extensional versus intuitive reasoning: The conjunction fallacy in probability judgment. Psychological Review, 90, 293–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • von Thienen, J., Meinel, C., & Corazza, G. E. (2017). A short theory of failure. Electronic Colloquium on Design Thinking Research, 17, 1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallas, G. (1926). The art of thought. New York: Harcourt Brace.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zenasni, F., & Lubart, T. (2002). Effects of mood states on creativity. Current Psychology Letters, 8, 33–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zola, E. (1886/1993). The masterpiece. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Marconi Institute for Creativity (MIC), Villa Griffone, Sasso Marconi, Italy

    Sergio Agnoli & Giovanni Emanuele Corazza

  2. Department of Electrical, Electronic, and Information Engineering “Guglielmo Marconi”, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy

    Giovanni Emanuele Corazza

Authors
  1. Sergio Agnoli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Giovanni Emanuele Corazza
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sergio Agnoli .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Neag School of Education, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA

    Ronald A. Beghetto

  2. Marconi Institute for Creativity, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy

    Giovanni Emanuele Corazza

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Agnoli, S., Corazza, G.E. (2019). Emotions: The Spinal Cord of the Creative Thinking Process. In: Beghetto, R.A., Corazza, G.E. (eds) Dynamic Perspectives on Creativity. Creativity Theory and Action in Education, vol 4. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99163-4_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99163-4_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-99162-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-99163-4

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation