Abstract
The validation of highly automated driving vehicles is an important challenge to the automotive industry, since even if the system is free from internal faults, its behaviour might still vary from the original intent. Reasons for these deviations from the intended functionality can be found in the unpredictability of environmental conditions as well the intrinsic uncertainties of the Machine Learning (ML) functions used to make sense of this complex input space.
In this paper, we propose a safety assurance case for a pedestrian detection function, a safety-relevant baseline functionality for an automated driving system. Our safety assurance case is presented in the graphical structuring notation (GSN) and combines our arguments against the problems of underspecification [9], the semantic gap [3], and the deductive gap [16].
Keywords
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Alsallakhl, B., Jourabloo, A., Ye, M., Liu, X., Ren, L.: Do convolutional neural networks learn class hierarchy? IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 24(1), 152–162 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2017.2744683
Amarnath, R., Munk, P., Thaden, E., Nordmann, A., Burton, S.: Dependability challenges in the model-driven engineering of automotive systems. In: 2016 IEEE International Symposium on Software Reliability Engineering Workshops, ISSREW, pp. 1–4, October 2016
Bergenhem, C., et al.: How to reach complete safety requirement refinement for autonomous vehicles. Technical report, CARS 2015 - Critical Automotive Applications: Robustness & Safety, Paris, France, September 2015
Burton, S., Gauerhof, L., Heinzemann, C.: Making the case for safety of machine learning in highly automated driving. In: Tonetta, S., Schoitsch, E., Bitsch, F. (eds.) SAFECOMP 2017. LNCS, vol. 10489, pp. 5–16. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66284-8_1
Evtimov, I., et al.: Robust physical-world attacks on deep learning models. Cryptography and Security (2017). https://arxiv.org/abs/1707.08945
Goodfellow, I.J., Shlens, J., Szegedy, C.: Explaining and harnessing adversarial examples (2015). https://arxiv.org/abs/1412.6572
Katz, G., Barrett, C., Dill, D., Julian, K., Kochenderfer, M.: Reluplex: an efficient SMT solver for verifying deep neural networks. Technical report. Stanford University, USA (2017). https://arxiv.org/pdf/1702.01135.pdf
Kendall, A., Gal, Y.: What uncertainties do we need in Bayesian deep learning for computer vision? (2017). http://arxiv.org/abs/1703.04977
Koopman, P., Wagner, M.: Challenges in autonomous vehicle testing and validation. SAE Int. J. Trans. Saf. 4, 15–24 (2016). https://doi.org/10.4271/2016-01-0128
Krizhevsky, A., Sutskever, I., Hinton., G.E.: ImageNet classification with deep convolutional neural networks. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, pp. 1097–1105 (2012)
Leveson, N.: http://psas.scripts.mit.edu/home/2016-stamp-workshop/
Leveson, N.G.: Engineering a Safer World: Systems Thinking Applied to Safety. The MIT Press, Cambridge (2011)
Nguyen, A.M., Yosinski, J., Clune, J.: Multifaceted feature visualization: uncovering the different types of features learned by each neuron in deep neural networks. CoRR abs/1602.03616 (2016). http://arxiv.org/abs/1602.03616
Tas, Ö.Ş., Kuhnt, F., Zllner, J.M., Stiller, C.: Functional system architectures towards fully automated driving. In: 2016 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium, IV (2016). http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/7535402/
Samuel, A.L.: Some studies in machine learning using the game of checkers. IBM J. Res. Dev. 3(3), 210–229 (1959). http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/5392560/
Wilhelm, U., Ebel, S., Weitzel, A.: Functional safety of driver assistance systems and ISO 26262. In: Winner, H., Hakuli, S., Lotz, F., Singer, C. (eds.) Handbook of Driver Assistance Systems, pp. 109–131. Springer, Cham (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12352-3_6
Zeiler, M.D., Fergus, R.: Visualizing and understanding convolutional networks. In: Fleet, D., Pajdla, T., Schiele, B., Tuytelaars, T. (eds.) ECCV 2014. LNCS, vol. 8689, pp. 818–833. Springer, Cham (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10590-1_53
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Gauerhof, L., Munk, P., Burton, S. (2018). Structuring Validation Targets of a Machine Learning Function Applied to Automated Driving. In: Gallina, B., Skavhaug, A., Bitsch, F. (eds) Computer Safety, Reliability, and Security. SAFECOMP 2018. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 11093. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99130-6_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99130-6_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-99129-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-99130-6
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)