Abstract
This chapter contains a discursive analysis of the gun control debate in the USA. This is a controversial debate that has implications for peace and conflict, as the debate relates to policies regarding weapons and the potential prevention of mass shootings. However, there has been a lack of detailed analysis of the ways in which the arguments in this debate are made. As the discursive approach can overcome these limitations, it is used to analyse texts produced by two key players in this debate, (then) President Barack Obama in support of tighter controls and Wayne LaPierre of the National Rifle Association (NRA) against. The results demonstrate two polarised dichotomies. The first of these sees both speakers present themselves as working to protect something important. Obama presents his measures as in the service of protecting lives whereas LaPierre presents his opposition to the same measures as designed to protect freedom. A second dichotomy can be seen where Obama constructs those who support gun control as ‘courageous’, whereas for LaPierre these same people are constructed as villains. The analysis is used to identify the ways in which both speakers attempt to present their arguments as legitimate. It is therefore shown how discursive psychology, when applied to the gun control debate, helps us understand how issues of peace and conflict are drawn upon and how such debates can influence policy regarding the continuation of armed violence.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
A video of the Obama’s speech is available here: http://www.nytimes.com/video/us/politics/100000002177815/president-obama-on-the-gun-vote.html. A transcript of Obama’s speech is available here: http://swampland.time.com/2013/04/17/president-obamas-speech-on-gun-control-bill-defeat-transcript/#ixzz2j88uLhPc
- 2.
A video of LaPierre’s speech is available here: http://www.nranews.com/a1f/video/cpac-2013-nra-ceo-evp-wayne-lapierre/list/lapierre-speeches A transcript of LaPierre’s speech is available here: http://home.nra.org/pdf/Wayne_LaPierre_3_15_13.pdf
References
25 Deadliest Mass Shootings in U.S. History Fast Facts. (2017, June 28), CNN. Retrieved from http://edition.cnn.com/2013/09/16/us/20-deadliest-mass-shootings-in-u-s-history-fast-facts/
Abell, J., & Stokoe, E. (2001). Broadcasting the royal role: Constructing culturally situated identities in the Princess Diana Panorama interview. British Journal of Social Psychology, 40, 417–435.
Berlet, C., & Lyons, M. N. (2000). Right-wing populism in America: Too close for comfort. New York: Guilford Press.
Billig, M. (2001). Discursive, rhetorical and ideological messages. In M. Wetherell, S. Taylor, & S. J. Yates (Eds.), Discourse theory and practice: A reader (pp. 210–221). London: Sage.
Blendon, R. J., Young, J. T., & Hemenway, D. (1996). The American public and the gun control debate. The Journal of the American Medical Association, 275, 1719–1722.
Bouffard, J. A., Nobles, M. R., Wells, W., & Cavanaugh, M. R. (2012). How many more guns? Estimating the effect of allowing licensed concealed handguns on a college campus. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 27, 316–343.
Braman, D., & Kahan, D. M. (2003). More statistics, less persuasion: A cultural theory of gun-risk perceptions. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 51, 1291–1327.
Capdevila, R., & Callaghan, J. (2008). ‘It’s not racist. It’s common sense’. A critical analysis of political discourse around asylum and immigration in the UK. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 18, 1–16.
Christensen, J. (2013, February 5). How the violent mentally ill can buy guns. CNN. Retrieved from http://edition.cnn.com/2013/01/30/health/mental-illness-guns/index.html
Downs, D. (2002). Representing gun owners: Frame identification as social responsibility in news media discourse. Written Communication, 19, 44–75.
Edwards, D. (1997). Discourse and cognition. London: Sage.
Edwards, D., & Potter, J. (1992). Discursive psychology. London: Sage.
Gibson, S. (2012). ‘I’m not a war monger but…’: Discourse analysis and social psychological peace research. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 22, 159–173.
Graham, P., Keenan, T., & Dowd, A.-M. (2004). A call to arms at the end of history: A discourse-historical analysis of George W. Bush’s declaration of War on Terror. Discourse and Society, 15, 199–221.
Gun Violence Archive. (2017). Past summary ledgers. Retrieved from http://www.gunviolencearchive.org/past-tolls
Johnson, A. J., & Goodman, S. (2013). Reversing racism and the elite conspiracy: Strategies used by the British National Party leader in response to hostile media appearances. Discourse, Context and Media, 2, 156–164.
Kleck, G., Gertz, M., & Bratton, J. (2009). Why do people support gun control? Alternative explanations of support for handgun bans. Journal of Criminal Justice, 37, 496–504.
Leudar, I., & Nekvapil, J. (2004). Media dialogical networks and political argumentation. Journal of Language and Politics, 3, 247–266.
McDonald, G., LeBrun, E., Berman, E., & Krause, K. (Eds.). (2012). Small arms survey 2012: Moving targets. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
McGinty, E. E., Webster, D. W., & Barry, C. L. (2013). Effects of news media messages about mass shootings on attitudes towards persons with serious mental illness and public support for gun control policies. American Journal of Psychiatry, 170, 494–501.
McKinlay, A., & Dunnet, A. (1998). How gun-owners accomplish being deadly average. In C. Antaki & S. Widdicombe (Eds.), Identities in talk (pp. 34–51). London: Sage.
O’Grady, W., Parnaby, P. F., & Schikschneit, J. (2010). Guns, gangs, and the underclass: A constructionist analysis of gun violence in a Toronto high school. Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice, 52, 55–77.
O’Neill, K. L. (2007). Armed citizens and the stories they tell: The National Rifle Association’s achievement of terror and masculinity. Men and Masculinities, 9, 457–475.
Patten, R., Thomas, M. O., & Wada, J. C. (2013). Packing heat: Attitudes regarding concealed weapons on college campuses. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 38, 551–569.
Potter, J. (2004). Discourse analysis as a way of analysing naturally occurring talk. In D. Silverman (Ed.), Qualitative analysis: Issues of theory and method (2nd ed., pp. 200–221). London: Sage.
Ricento, T. (2003). The discursive construction of Americanism. Discourse and Society, 14, 611–637.
Seate, A. A., Cohen, E. L., Fujioka, Y., & Hoffner, C. (2012). Exploring gun ownership as a social identity to understanding the perceived media influence of the Virginia Tech news coverage on attitudes toward gun control policy. Communication Research Reports, 29, 130–139.
The Economist. (2013). Why the NRA keeps talking about mental illness, rather than guns. Retrieved from http://www.economist.com/blogs/lexington/2013/03/guns-and-mentally-ill
Tileagă, C. (2013). Political psychology: Critical perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wetherell, M. (1998). Positioning and interpretative repertoires: Conversation analysis and post-structuralism in dialogue. Discourse and Society, 9, 387–412.
Winkler, A. (2013). Gunfight: The battle over the right to bear arms in America. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.
Wintemute, G. J. (2014). Support for a comprehensive background check requirement and expanded denial criteria for firearm transfers: Findings from the firearms licensee survey. Journal of Urban Health, 91, 303–319.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Goodman, S., Perry, B. (2018). The American Gun Control Debate: A Discursive Analysis. In: Gibson, S. (eds) Discourse, Peace, and Conflict. Peace Psychology Book Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99094-1_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99094-1_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-99093-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-99094-1
eBook Packages: Behavioral Science and PsychologyBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)