Abstract
This chapter explores the rhetorical implications of the mobilization of the category of “crisis” in parliamentary discourse on the current refugee movement to Europe. The analytic corpus consists of transcripts of debates in the Greek parliament that followed from an agreement in March 2016 between the EU and the Turkish government regarding the movement of refugees. Adopting an approach informed by rhetorical psychology and critical discursive social psychology, the analysis indicated that parliamentarians use different constructions of “crisis” to warrant or to challenge particular policy choices and to construct agency at a national or European level. The parliamentary Opposition related the “crisis” to security concerns, and constructed a conflict between “Islamic terrorism” and the European (Western) way of life and values. A value conflict is also constructed in the discourse of the governmental party. This conflict is represented as internal (between humanistic and xenophobic values in Europe), but it is also represented as involving an external threat to Western liberalism. Findings are discussed in relation to the establishment of a narrative concerning the governmentality of immigration that emphasizes a lack of alternatives, and are also related to Peace Psychology’s concern to cast light on the structural causes of population movements.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
A regional agreement between some EU Member States (Austria, Croatia and Slovenia) and non-EU countries (the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia and Serbia) led to the closure of the Greek-FYRoM border, which in turn blocked the migration route out of Greece.
- 2.
It is beyond the scope and the space limits of this chapter to consider this agreement in all its details.
- 3.
Hurricane Katrina, which struck the Gulf coast of the United States in August 2005, was one of the most intense hurricanes in US history.
References
Agamben, G. (2003). State of exception (K. Attell, Trans.). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Agamben, G. (2013a). For a theory of destitute power. Critical Legal Thinking. Retrieved from http://criticallegalthinking.com/2014/02/05/theory-destituent-power/
Agamben, G. (2013b). The endless crisis as an instrument of power: In conversation with Giorgio Agamben. Verso Blog (04 June 2013). Retrieved from http://www.versobooks.com/blogs/1318-the-endless-crisis-as-an-instrument-of-power-in-conversation-with-giorgio-agamben
Amnesty International (2015/2016). Amnesty International report 2015/2016. Retrieved from https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/research/2016/02/annual-report-201516/
Andreouli, E., & Figgou, L. (in press). Critical social psychology of politics. In K. O’Doherty & D. Hodgetts (Eds.), Sage handbook of applied social psychology. London: Sage.
Andreouli, E., Figgou, L., Kadianaki, I., Sapountzis, A., & Xenitidou, M. (2017). “Europe” in Greece: Lay constructions of Europe in the context of Greek immigration debates. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 27, 158–168.
Billig, M. (1987). Arguing and thinking: A rhetorical approach to social psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Billig, M. (1995). Banal nationalism. London: Sage.
Billig, M., Condor, S., Edwards, D., Gane, M., Middleton, D., & Radley, A. R. (1988). Ideological dilemmas: A social psychology of everyday thinking. London: Sage.
Bozatzis, N. (2014). Banal occidentalism. In C. Antaki & S. Condor (Eds.), Rhetoric, ideology and social psychology: Essays in honor of Michael Billig. London: Routledge.
Charteris-Black, J. (2006). Britain as a container: Immigration metaphors in the 2005 election campaign. Discourse & Society, 17, 563–581.
Chilton, P. (2004). Analysing political discourse: Theory and practice. London: Routledge.
Christie, D. J. (1997). Reducing direct and structural violence: The human needs theory. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 3, 315–332.
Christie, D. J. (2006a). What is peace psychology the psychology of? Journal of Social Issues, 62, 1–17.
Christie, D. J. (2006b). Post–Cold War peace psychology: More differentiated, contextualized, and systemic. [Special issue]. Journal of Social Issues, 62(1), 1–17.
Condor, S., Tileagă, C., & Billig, M. (2013). Political rhetoric. In L. Huddy, D. O. Sears, & J. S. Levy (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of political psychology (pp. 262–300). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
De Genova, N., Tazzioli, M., Álvarez-Velasco, S., Fontanari, E., Heller, C., Jansen, Y., et al. (2016). Europe/crisis: New keywords of ‘the crisis’ in and of ‘Europe’. Near Futures Online, 1, 1–45.
Edwards, D. (1991). Categories are for talking: On the cognitive and discursive bases of categorization. Theory & Psychology, 1, 515–542.
Edwards, D., & Potter, J. (1992). Discursive psychology. London: Sage.
Every, D., & Augoustinos, M. (2008). Constructions of Australia in pro-and anti-asylum seeker political discourse. Nations and Nationalism, 14, 562–580.
Figgou, L. (2015). Constructions of ‘illegal’ immigration and entitlement to citizenship: Debating an immigration law in Greece. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 26, 150–163.
Figgou, L. (2016). Everyday politics and the extreme right: Lay representations of the electoral performance of the neo-Nazi political party “Golden Dawn” in Greece. In C. Howarth & E. Andreouli (Eds.), The social psychology of everyday politics (pp. 206–221). London: Routledge.
Finlayson, A. (2007). From beliefs to arguments: Interpretive methodology and rhetorical political analysis. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 9, 545–563.
Gabrielatos, C., & Baker, P. (2008). Fleeing, sneaking, flooding: A corpus analysis of discursive constructions of refugees and asylum seekers in the UK press, 1996-2005. Journal of English Linguistics, 36, 5–38.
Gale, P. (2004). The refugee crisis and fear: Populist politics and media discourse. Journal of Sociology, 40, 321–340.
Gibson, S. (2015). From representations to representing: On social representations and discursive-rhetorical psychology. In G. Sammut, E. Andreouli, G. Gaskell, & J. Valsiner (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of social representations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Gilbert, L. (2013). The discursive production of a Mexican refugee crisis in Canadian media and policy. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 39, 827–843.
Goodman, S., Sirriyeh, A., & McMahon, S. (2017). The evolving (re) categorisations of refugees throughout the ‘refugee/migrant crisis’. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 27, 105–114.
Hanson-Easey, S., & Augoustinos, M. (2011). Complaining about humanitarian refugees: The role of sympathy talk in the design of complaints on talkback radio. Discourse & Communication, 5, 247–271.
Hassan, O. (2010). Constructing crises, (in)securitising terror: The punctuated evolution of EU counter-terror strategy. European Security, 19, 445–466.
Hay, C. (1995). Rethinking crisis: Narratives of the New Right and constructions of crisis. Rethinking Marxism, 8, 60–76.
Hier, S. P., & Greenberg, J. L. (2002). Constructing a discursive crisis: Risk, problematization and illegal Chinese in Canada. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 25, 490–513.
Kirkwood, S. (2017). The humanisation of refugees: A discourse analysis of UK parliamentary debates on the European refugee ‘crisis’. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 27, 115–125.
Kirkwood, S., Goodman, S., McVittie, C., & McKinlay, A. (2016). The language of asylum: Refugees and discourse. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Koselleck, R. (1988). Critique and crisis. Enlightenment and the pathogenesis of modern society. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Koselleck, R., & Richter, M. (2006). Crisis. Journal of the History of Ideas, 67, 357–400.
Lueck, K., Due, C., & Augoustinos, M. (2015). Neoliberalism and nationalism: Representations of asylum seekers in the Australian mainstream news media. Discourse & Society, 26, 608–629.
Lynn, N., & Lea, S. (2003). ‘A phantom menace and the new Apartheid’: The social construction of asylum-seekers in the United Kingdom. Discourse & Society, 14, 425–452.
Nightingale, A., Quayle, M., & Muldoon, O. (2017). ‘It's just heart breaking’: Doing inclusive political solidarity or ambivalent paternalism through sympathetic discourse within the ‘refugee crisis’ debate. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 27, 137–146.
O'Doherty, K., & Lecouteur, A. (2007). “Asylum seekers”, “boat people” and “illegal immigrants”: Social categorization in the media. Australian Journal of Psychology, 59, 1–12.
Pilisuk, M. (1998). The hidden structure of contemporary violence. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 4, 197–216.
Pomerantz, A. (1986). Extreme case formulations: A way of legitimizing claims. Human Studies, 9, 219–229.
Reicher, S., & Hopkins, N. (2001). Psychology and the end of history: A critique and a proposal for the psychology of social categorization. Political Psychology, 22, 383–407.
Roitman, J. (2014). Anti-crisis. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Rojo, L. M., & Van Dijk, T. A. (1997). “There was a problem, and it was solved!”: Legitimating the expulsion of illegal migrants in Spanish parliamentary discourse. Discourse & Society, 8, 523–566.
Rowe, E., & O'Brien, E. (2014). ‘Genuine’ refugees or illegitimate ‘boat people’: Political constructions of asylum seekers and refugees in the Malaysia Deal debate. Australian Journal of Social Issues, 49, 171–193.
Said, E. W. (1995). Orientalism: Western conceptions of the Orient. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.
Sambaraju, R., McVittie, C., & Nolan, P. (2017). ‘This is an EU crisis requiring an EU solution’: Nation and transnational talk in negotiating warrants for further inclusion of refugees. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 27, 169–178.
Shank, J. B. (2008). Crisis: A useful category of post–social scientific historical analysis? The American Historical Review, 113, 1090–1099.
Starn, R. (1971). Historians and ‘crisis’. Past & Present, 52, 3–22.
Tileagă, C. (2010). Cautious morality: Public accountability, moral order and accounting for a conflict of interest. Discourse Studies, 12, 223–239.
United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (2015). Global report 2015. Retrieved from http://www.unhcr.org/gr15/index.xml
United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (2016). Syria regional refugee response – regional overview. Retrieved from http://data.unhcr.org/syrianrefugees/regional.php
Weltman, D., & Billig, M. (2001). The political psychology of contemporary anti-politics: A discursive approach to the end-of-ideology era. Political Psychology, 22, 367–382.
Wetherell, M. (1998). Positioning and interpretative repertoires: Conversation analysis and post-structuralism in dialogue. Discourse & Society, 9, 387–412.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Figgou, L., Sourvinou, M., Anagnostopoulou, D. (2018). Constructing the “Refugee Crisis” in Greece: A Critical Discursive Social Psychological Analysis. In: Gibson, S. (eds) Discourse, Peace, and Conflict. Peace Psychology Book Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99094-1_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99094-1_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-99093-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-99094-1
eBook Packages: Behavioral Science and PsychologyBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)