Abstract
This chapter provides an introduction to the volume, and maps out some of the core conceptual and analytic principles of discursive psychology, whilst noting some of the debates and disagreements within the field, as well as providing an orientation to some of the foundational concerns of peace psychology. An initial sketch of the possibilities for a discursive peace psychology is set out through a brief illustrative analysis of an extract from a televised political debate concerning the 2003 invasion of Iraq. The chapter concludes by providing brief summary overviews of the remaining chapters in the book.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
The transcriptuses the transcription conventions developed by Gail Jefferson (e.g. 2004). These conventions, typically labelled Jeffersonian, were originally developed for use in conversation analysis, but have increasingly been used by many—but by no means all—discursive psychologists. An overview of the transcription conventions can be found in the Appendix.
References
Anderson, A., & Christie, D. J. (2001). Some contributions of psychology to policies promoting cultures of peace. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 7, 173–185.
Antaki, C. (1994). Explaining and arguing: The social organization of accounts. London: Sage.
Antaki, C., Condor, S., & Levine, M. (1996). Social identities in talk: Speakers’ own orientations. British Journal of Social Psychology, 35, 473–492.
Antaki, C., & Widdicombe, S. (Eds.) (1998). Identities in talk. London: Sage.
Augoustinos, M., & Every, D. (2007). The language of “race” an prejudice: A discourse of denial, reason, and liberal-practical politics. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 26, 123–141.
Augoustinos, M., & Tileagă, C. (2012). Twenty five years of discursive psychology [Special issue]. British Journal of Social Psychology, 51(3), 405–412.
Avdi, E., & Georgaca, E. (2007). Discourse analysis and psychotherapy: A critical review. European Journal of Psychotherapy and Counselling, 9, 157–176.
Billig, M. (1991). Ideology and opinions: Studies in rhetorical psychology. London: Sage.
Billig, M. (1996). Arguing and thinking: A rhetorical approach to social psychology (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Billig, M. (1999). Freudian repression: Conversation creating the unconscious. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Billig, M., & MacMillan, K. (2005). Metaphor, idiom and ideology: The search for ‘no smoking guns’ across time. Discourse & Society, 16, 459–480.
Billig, M. (2012). Undiscipline beginnings, academic success, and discursive psychology. British Journal of Social Psychology, 51, 413–424. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309.2011.02086.x
Blumberg, H. H., Hare, A. P., & Costin, A. (2006). Peace psychology: A comprehensive introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Boehnke, K., Fuss, D., & Kindervater, A. (2005). Peace psychology in Germany. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 11, 229–237.
Bretherton, D., & Balvin, N. (Eds.). (2012). Peace psychology in Australia. New York: Springer.
Bretherton, D., & Law, S. F. (Eds.). (2015). Methodologies in peace psychology: Peace research by peaceful means. New York: Springer.
Brown, G., & Yule, G. (1983). Discourse analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cameron, L., Maslen, R., & Todd, Z. (2013). The dialogic construction of self and other in response to terrorism. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 19, 3–22.
Christie, D. J. (1999). Peace studies: The multidisciplinary foundations of peace psychology. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 5, 95–99.
Christie, D. J. (2006). What is peace psychology the psychology of? Journal of Social Issues, 62, 1–17.
Christie, D. J. (Ed.). (2012). The encyclopedia of peace psychology. New York: Wiley.
Christie, D. J., Wagner, R. V., & Winter, D. D. (2001). Peace, conflict, and violence: Peace psychology for the 21st century. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Clayman, S. E. (1988). Displaying neutrality in television news interviews. Social Problems, 35, 474–492.
Cohrs, J. C., & Moschner, B. (2002). Antiwar knowledge and generalized political attitudes as determinants of attitude toward the Kosovo war. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 8, 139–155.
Cohrs, J. C., Moschner, B., Maes, J., & Kielmann, S. (2005). Personal values and attitudes toward war. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 11, 293–312.
Condor, S., Tileagă, C., & Billig, M. (2013). Political rhetoric. In L. Huddy, D. O. Sears, & J. S. Levy (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of political psychology (2nd ed., pp. 262–297). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
de Rivera, J. (2004). Assessing cultures of peace. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 10, 95–100.
de Rivera, J. (Ed.). (2008). Handbook on building cultures of peace. New York: Springer.
Demasi, M. (in press). Facts as social action in political debates about Great Britain and the European Union. Political Psychology.
Dick, P. (2013). The politics of experience: A discursive psychology approach to understanding different accounts of sexism in the workplace. Human Relations, 66, 645–669.
Durrheim, K. (1997). Peace talk and violence: An analysis of the power of ‘peace’. In A. Levett, A. Kottler, E. Burman, & I. Parker (Eds.), Culture, power and difference: Discourse analysis in South Africa (pp. 31–43). London: Zed Books.
Earp, B. D., & Trafimow, D. (2015). Replication, falsification, and the crisis of confidence in social psychology. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 621.
Edley, N., & Wetherell, M. (1995). Men in perspective: Practice, power and identity. London: Prentice Hall-Harvester Wheatsheaf.
Edwards, D. (1991). Categories are for talking: On the cognitive and discursive bases of categorization. Theory and Psychology, 1, 515–542.
Edwards, D. (1994). Script formulations: A study of event descriptions in conversation. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 13, 211–247.
Edwards, D. (1997). Discourse and cognition. London: Sage.
Edwards, D. (1999). Emotion discourse. Culture & Psychology, 5, 271–291.
Edwards, D., & Potter, J. (1992). Discursive psychology. London: Sage.
Edwards, D., & Potter, J. (1993). Language and causation: A discursive action model of description and attribution. Psychological Review, 100, 23–41.
Fairclough, N. (2013). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language (2nd ed.). Abingdon: Routledge.
Faye, C. (2012). American social psychology: Examining the contours of the 1970s crisis. Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 43, 514–521. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsc.2011.11.010
Finlay, W. M. L. (2018). Language and civilian deaths: Denying responsibility for causalities in the Gaza Conflict 2014. Political Psychology, 39, 595–609.
Fox, D., Prilleltensky, I., & Austin, S. (2009). Critical psychology: An introduction. London: Sage.
Galtung, J. (1969). Violence, peace, and peace research. Journal of Peace Research, 6, 167–191.
Galtung, J. (1990). Cultural violence. Journal of Peace Research, 27, 291–305.
Gavriely-Nuri, D. (2010). The idiosyncratic language of Israeli ‘peace’: A cultural approach to critical discourse analysis (CCDA). Discourse & Society, 21, 565–585.
Gergen, K. J. (1999). An invitation to social construction. London: Sage.
Gergen, K. J. (2001). Social construction in context. London: Sage.
Gibson, S. (2011). Social psychology, war and peace: Towards a critical discursive peace psychology. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 5, 239–250.
Gibson, S. (2012a). ‘I’m not a war monger but…’: Discourse analysis and social psychological peace research. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 22, 159–173.
Gibson, S. (2012b). History in action: The construction of historical analogies in televised debates concerning the Iraq War. Papers on Social Representations, 21, 13.1–13.35.
Gibson, S. (2012c). Supporting the troops, serving the country: Rhetorical commonplaces in the representation of military service. In S. Gibson & S. Mollan (Eds.), Representations of peace and conflict (pp. 143–159). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Gibson, S. (2013). Milgram’s obedience experiments: A rhetorical analysis. British Journal of Social Psychology, 52, 290–309.
Gibson, S. (in press). Arguing, obeying and defying: A rhetorical perspective on Stanley Milgram’s obedience experiments. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Goffman, E. (1981). Forms of talk. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Goodman, S. (2014). Developing an understanding of race talk. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 8, 147–155.
Goodman, S., Sirriyeh, A., & McMahon, S. (2017). The evolving (re)categorisations of refugees throughout the “refugee/migrant crisis”. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 27, 105–114.
Gough, B. (Ed.). (2017). The Palgrave handbook of critical social psychology. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Gough, B., McFaddden, M., & McDonald, M. (2013). Critical social psychology (2nd ed.). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Griffin, C. (2007). Being dead and being there: Research interviews, sharing hand cream and the preference for analysing ‘naturally occurring data’. Discourse Studies, 9, 246–269.
Harré, R. (1992). Introduction: The second cognitive revolution. American Behavioral Scientist, 36, 5–7.
Hepburn, A. (2003). An introduction to critical social psychology. London: Sage.
Hepburn, A., & Potter, J. (2011). Threats: Power, family mealtimes, and social influence. British Journal of Social Psychology, 50, 99–120.
Hewitt, J. P., & Stokes, R. (1975). Disclaimers. American Sociological Review, 40, 1–11.
Hodges, A., & Nilep, C. (Eds.). (2011). Discourse, war and terrorism. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Hutchby, I., & Wooffitt, R. (1998). Conversation analysis: Principles, practices and applications. Cambridge: Polity.
Ibáñez, T., & ĺñiguez, L. (Eds.). (1997). Critical social psychology. London: Sage.
Jackson, R. (2005). Writing the war on terrorism: Language, politics and counter-terrorism. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Jefferson, G. (2004). Glossary of transcription symbols with an introduction. In G. H. Lerner (Ed.), Conversation analysis: Studies from the first generation (pp. 13–31). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Karlberg, M. (2012). Discourse theory and peace. In D. J. Christie (Ed.), The encyclopedia of peace psychology. New York: Wiley.
Kiguwa, P., & Ally, Y. (2018). Constructed representations of street protest violence: Speaking violence, speaking race. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 24, 36–43.
Kilby, L. (2017). Social representations of peace in terrorism talk: A United Kingdom talk-radio analysis. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 23, 106–116.
Kroger, R. O., & Wood, L. A. (1998). The turn to discourse in social psychology. Canadian Psychology, 39, 266–279.
Leudar, I., Marsland, V., & Nekvapil, J. (2004). On membership categorisation: ‘Us’, ‘them’ and ‘doing violence’ in political discourse. Discourse & Society, 15, 243–266.
Lilienfeld, S. O. (2017). Psychology’s replication crisis and the grant culture: Righting the ship. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12, 660–664.
Locke, A. (2008). Managing agency for athletic performance: A discursive approach to the zone. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 5, 103–126.
MacNair, R. M. (2012). The psychology of peace: An introduction (2nd ed.). Santa Barbara, CA: Praeger.
Maxwell, S. E., Lau, M. Y., & Howard, G. S. (2015). Is psychology suffering from a replication crisis? What does “failure to replicate” really mean? American Psychologist, 70, 487–498.
McKinlay, A., & McVittie, C. (2008). Social psychology and discourse. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
McKinlay, A., McVittie, C., & Sambaraju, R. (2012). ‘This is ordinary behaviour’: Categorization and culpability in Hamas leaders’ accounts of the Palestinian/Israeli conflict. British Journal of Social Psychology, 51, 534–550.
Middleton, D., & Edwards, D. (Eds.). (1990). Collective remembering. London: Sage.
Miller, P. K. (2012). Arsene didn’t see it: Coaching, research and the promise of a discursive psychology. International Journal of Sports Science and Coaching, 7, 615–628.
Montiel, C. J. (2003). Peace psychology in Asia. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 9, 195–218.
Montiel, C. J. (2018). Peace psychologists and social transformation: A global south perspective. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 24, 64–70.
Montiel, C. J., & Noor, N. M. (Eds.). (2009). Peace psychology in Asia. New York: Springer.
Morawski, J. G., & Goldstein, S. E. (1985). Psychology and nuclear war: A chapter in our legacy of social responsibility. American Psychologist, 40, 276–284.
O’Reilly, M., Kiyimba, N., & Lester, J. N. (2018). Discursive psychology as a method of analysis for the study of couple and family therapy. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 44(3), 409–425. https://doi.org/10.1111/jmft.12288.
Opotow, S., & Luke, T. J. (2013). Diverse contexts and approaches in peace psychology research. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 19, 1–2.
Parker, I. (2015). Critical discursive psychology (2nd ed.). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Parker, I. (1992). Discourse dynamics: Critical analysis for social and individual psychology. London: Routledge.
Potter, J. (1996). Representing reality: Discourse, rhetoric and social construction. London: Sage.
Potter, J. (1998). Discursive social psychology: From attitudes to evaluative practices. European Review of Social Psychology, 9, 233–266. https://doi.org/10.1080/14792779843000090
Potter, J. (2007). Discourse and psychology (Vols. I-III). London: Sage.
Potter, J., & Edwards, D. (1999). Social representations and discursive psychology: From cognition to action. Culture & Psychology, 5, 447–458. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354067X9954004
Potter, J. (2000). Post-cognitive psychology. Theory & Psychology, 10, 31–37.
Potter, J., & Edwards, D. (2001). Discursive social psychology. In W. P. Robinson & H. Giles (Eds.), The new handbook of language and social psychology (pp. 103–118). Chichester: Wiley.
Potter, J., & Hepburn, A. (2005). Qualitative interviews in psychology: Problems and possibilities. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 2, 281–307.
Potter, J., & Hepburn, A. (2007). Life is out there: A comment on Griffin. Discourse Studies, 9, 276–282.
Potter, J., & Hepburn, A. (2008). Discursive constructionism. In J. A. Holstein & J. F. Gubrium (Eds.), Handbook of constructionist research (pp. 275–293). New York: Guilford Press.
Potter, J., & Hepburn, A. (2012). Eight challenges for interview researchers. In J. F. Gubrium, J. A. Holstein, A. B. Marvasti, & K. D. McKinney (Eds.), The Sage handbook of interview research: The complexity of the craft (2nd ed., pp. 555–570). London: Sage.
Potter, J., & Wetherell, M. (1987). Discourse and social psychology: Beyond attitudes and behaviour. London: Sage.
Rapley, T. (2016). Questions of context: Qualitative interviews as a source of knowledge. In C. Tileagă & E. Stokoe (Eds.), Discursive psychology: Classic and contemporary issues (pp. 70–84). London: Routledge.
Rijsman, J., & Stroebe, W. (1989). The two social psychologies or whatever happened to the crisis? European Journal of Social Psychology, 19, 339-344. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420190502
Sacks, H. (1995). Lectures on conversation. Oxford: Blackwell.
Saucier, D. A., Webster, R. J., McManus, J. L., Sonnentag, T. L., O’Dea, C. J., & Strain, M. L. (2018). Individual difference in masculine honor beliefs predict attitudes toward aggressive security measures, war, and peace. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 24, 112–116.
Schegloff, E. A. (2007). Sequence organization in interaction: A primer in conversation analysis (Vol. 1). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Schäffner, C., & Wenden, A. L. (1995). Language and peace. London: Routledge.
Schegloff, E. A. (1972). Notes on a conversational practice: Formulating place. In D. Sudnow (Ed.), Studies in social interaction (pp. 75–119). New York: The Free Press.
Schegloff, E. A. (1997). Whose text? Whose context? Discourse & Society, 8, 165–187.
Schegloff, E. A. (1998). Reply to Wetherell. Discourse & Society, 9, 413–416.
Seedat, M., Suffla, S., & Christie, D. J. (Eds.). (2017). Enlarging the scope of peace psychology: African and world-regional contributions. New York: Springer.
Seymour-Smith, S. (2015). Applying discursive approaches to health psychology. Health Psychology, 34, 371–380.
Shotter, J. (1993). Conversational realities: Constructing life through language. London: Sage.
Simić, O., Volčič, Z., & Philpot, C. R. (2012). Peace psychology in the Balkans: Dealing with a violent past while building peace. New York: Springer.
Speer, S. A., & Stokoe, E. (Eds.). (2011). Conversation and gender. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Stokoe, E., & Wiggins, S. (2005). Discursive approaches. In J. Miles & P. Gilbert (Eds.), A handbook of research methods for clinical & health psychology (pp. 161–174). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Sundberg, R. (2014). Violent values: Exploring the relationship between human values and violent attitudes. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 20, 68–83.
Symon, G. (2000). Everyday rhetoric: Argument and persuasion in everyday life. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 9, 477–488.
te Molder, H. (2016). What happened to post-cognitive psychology? In C. Tileagă & E. Stokoe (Eds.), Discursive psychology: Classic and contemporary issues (pp. 87–100). Abingdon: Routledge.
Tileagă, C. (2013). Political psychology: Critical perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Tileagă, C., & Stokoe, E. (Eds.) (2016). Discursive psychology: Classic and contemporary issues. London: Routledge.
Tuffin, K. (2005). Understanding critical social psychology. London: Sage.
Vollhardt, J. K., & Bilali, R. (2008). Social psychology’s contribution to the psychological study of peace: A review. Social Psychology, 39, 12–25.
Weatherall, A. (2016). Interpretative repertories, conversation analysis and being critical. In C. Tileagă & E. Stokoe (Eds.), Discursive psychology: Classic and contemporary issues (pp. 15–28). Abingdon: Routledge.
Wessells, M. G. (1996). A history of Division 48 (peace psychology). In D. A. Dewsbury (Ed.), Unification through division: Histories of the Divisions of the American Psychological Association (Volume 1) (pp. 265–298). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Wetherell, M. (1998). Positioning and interpretative repertoires: Conversation analysis and post-structuralism in dialogue. Discourse & Society, 9, 387–412.
Wetherell, M. (2012). Affect and emotion: A new social science understanding. London: Sage.
Wetherell, M. (2015). Discursive psychology: Key tenets, some splits, and two examples. In I. Parker (Ed.), Handbook of critical psychology (pp. 315–324). Hove: Routledge.
Wetherell, M., & Edley, N. (2014). A discursive psychological framework for analysing men and masculinities. Psychology of Men and Masculinity, 15, 355–364.
Wetherell, M., & Potter, J. (1992). Mapping the language of racism: Discourse and the legitimation of exploitation. London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
Wetherell, M., Stiven, H., & Potter, J. (1987). Unequal egalitarianism: A preliminary study of discourses concerning gender and employment opportunities. British Journal of Social Psychology, 26, 59–71.
Wiggins, S. (2017). Discursive psychology: Theory, method and applications. London: Sage.
Willig, C. (2008). Introducing qualitative research in psychology: Adventures in theory and method (2nd ed.). Maidenhead: Open University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Appendix
Appendix
Transcription Conventions (adapted from Hutchby & Wooffitt, 1998, pp. vi–vii)
(1.0) The number in parentheses indicates a time gap to the nearest tenth of a second.
(.) A dot enclosed in parentheses indicates a pause in the talk of less than two-tenths of a second.
[ ] Square brackets between adjacent lines of concurrent speech indicate the onset and end of a spate of overlapping talk.
.hh A dot before an ‘h’ indicates speaker in-breath. The more h’s, the longer the in-breath.
hh An ‘h’ indicates an out-breath. The more h’s, the longer the breath.
(( )) A description enclosed in double parentheses indicates a non-verbal activity. For example, ((pointing)). Alternatively double parentheses may enclose the transcriber’s comments on contextual or other features.
- A dash indicates the sharp cut-off of the prior word or sound.
: Colons indicate that the speaker has stretched the preceding sound. The more the colons, the greater the extent of stretching.
! Exclamation marks are used to indicate an animated or emphatic tone.
that Underlined fragments indicate speaker emphasis.
° ° Degree signs are used to indicate that the talk they encompass is spoken noticeably quieter than the surrounding talk.
> < ‘More than’ and ‘less than’ signs indicate that the talk they encompass was produced noticeably quicker than the surrounding talk.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Gibson, S. (2018). Discursive Psychology and Peace Psychology. In: Gibson, S. (eds) Discourse, Peace, and Conflict. Peace Psychology Book Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99094-1_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99094-1_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-99093-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-99094-1
eBook Packages: Behavioral Science and PsychologyBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)