Skip to main content

Discursive Psychology and Peace Psychology

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Discourse, Peace, and Conflict

Part of the book series: Peace Psychology Book Series ((PPBS))

Abstract

This chapter provides an introduction to the volume, and maps out some of the core conceptual and analytic principles of discursive psychology, whilst noting some of the debates and disagreements within the field, as well as providing an orientation to some of the foundational concerns of peace psychology. An initial sketch of the possibilities for a discursive peace psychology is set out through a brief illustrative analysis of an extract from a televised political debate concerning the 2003 invasion of Iraq. The chapter concludes by providing brief summary overviews of the remaining chapters in the book.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The transcriptuses the transcription conventions developed by Gail Jefferson (e.g. 2004). These conventions, typically labelled Jeffersonian, were originally developed for use in conversation analysis, but have increasingly been used by many—but by no means all—discursive psychologists. An overview of the transcription conventions can be found in the Appendix.

References

  • Anderson, A., & Christie, D. J. (2001). Some contributions of psychology to policies promoting cultures of peace. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 7, 173–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Antaki, C. (1994). Explaining and arguing: The social organization of accounts. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Antaki, C., Condor, S., & Levine, M. (1996). Social identities in talk: Speakers’ own orientations. British Journal of Social Psychology, 35, 473–492.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Antaki, C., & Widdicombe, S. (Eds.) (1998). Identities in talk. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Augoustinos, M., & Every, D. (2007). The language of “race” an prejudice: A discourse of denial, reason, and liberal-practical politics. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 26, 123–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Augoustinos, M., & Tileagă, C. (2012). Twenty five years of discursive psychology [Special issue]. British Journal of Social Psychology, 51(3), 405–412.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Avdi, E., & Georgaca, E. (2007). Discourse analysis and psychotherapy: A critical review. European Journal of Psychotherapy and Counselling, 9, 157–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Billig, M. (1991). Ideology and opinions: Studies in rhetorical psychology. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Billig, M. (1996). Arguing and thinking: A rhetorical approach to social psychology (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Billig, M. (1999). Freudian repression: Conversation creating the unconscious. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Billig, M., & MacMillan, K. (2005). Metaphor, idiom and ideology: The search for ‘no smoking guns’ across time. Discourse & Society, 16, 459–480.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Billig, M. (2012). Undiscipline beginnings, academic success, and discursive psychology. British Journal of Social Psychology, 51, 413–424. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309.2011.02086.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Blumberg, H. H., Hare, A. P., & Costin, A. (2006). Peace psychology: A comprehensive introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Boehnke, K., Fuss, D., & Kindervater, A. (2005). Peace psychology in Germany. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 11, 229–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bretherton, D., & Balvin, N. (Eds.). (2012). Peace psychology in Australia. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bretherton, D., & Law, S. F. (Eds.). (2015). Methodologies in peace psychology: Peace research by peaceful means. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, G., & Yule, G. (1983). Discourse analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cameron, L., Maslen, R., & Todd, Z. (2013). The dialogic construction of self and other in response to terrorism. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 19, 3–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christie, D. J. (1999). Peace studies: The multidisciplinary foundations of peace psychology. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 5, 95–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christie, D. J. (2006). What is peace psychology the psychology of? Journal of Social Issues, 62, 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christie, D. J. (Ed.). (2012). The encyclopedia of peace psychology. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christie, D. J., Wagner, R. V., & Winter, D. D. (2001). Peace, conflict, and violence: Peace psychology for the 21st century. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clayman, S. E. (1988). Displaying neutrality in television news interviews. Social Problems, 35, 474–492.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohrs, J. C., & Moschner, B. (2002). Antiwar knowledge and generalized political attitudes as determinants of attitude toward the Kosovo war. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 8, 139–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohrs, J. C., Moschner, B., Maes, J., & Kielmann, S. (2005). Personal values and attitudes toward war. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 11, 293–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Condor, S., Tileagă, C., & Billig, M. (2013). Political rhetoric. In L. Huddy, D. O. Sears, & J. S. Levy (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of political psychology (2nd ed., pp. 262–297). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Rivera, J. (2004). Assessing cultures of peace. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 10, 95–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Rivera, J. (Ed.). (2008). Handbook on building cultures of peace. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Demasi, M. (in press). Facts as social action in political debates about Great Britain and the European Union. Political Psychology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dick, P. (2013). The politics of experience: A discursive psychology approach to understanding different accounts of sexism in the workplace. Human Relations, 66, 645–669.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Durrheim, K. (1997). Peace talk and violence: An analysis of the power of ‘peace’. In A. Levett, A. Kottler, E. Burman, & I. Parker (Eds.), Culture, power and difference: Discourse analysis in South Africa (pp. 31–43). London: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Earp, B. D., & Trafimow, D. (2015). Replication, falsification, and the crisis of confidence in social psychology. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 621.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Edley, N., & Wetherell, M. (1995). Men in perspective: Practice, power and identity. London: Prentice Hall-Harvester Wheatsheaf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, D. (1991). Categories are for talking: On the cognitive and discursive bases of categorization. Theory and Psychology, 1, 515–542.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, D. (1994). Script formulations: A study of event descriptions in conversation. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 13, 211–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, D. (1997). Discourse and cognition. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, D. (1999). Emotion discourse. Culture & Psychology, 5, 271–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, D., & Potter, J. (1992). Discursive psychology. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, D., & Potter, J. (1993). Language and causation: A discursive action model of description and attribution. Psychological Review, 100, 23–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fairclough, N. (2013). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language (2nd ed.). Abingdon: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Faye, C. (2012). American social psychology: Examining the contours of the 1970s crisis. Studies in History and Philosophy of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, 43, 514–521. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsc.2011.11.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finlay, W. M. L. (2018). Language and civilian deaths: Denying responsibility for causalities in the Gaza Conflict 2014. Political Psychology, 39, 595–609.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fox, D., Prilleltensky, I., & Austin, S. (2009). Critical psychology: An introduction. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galtung, J. (1969). Violence, peace, and peace research. Journal of Peace Research, 6, 167–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galtung, J. (1990). Cultural violence. Journal of Peace Research, 27, 291–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gavriely-Nuri, D. (2010). The idiosyncratic language of Israeli ‘peace’: A cultural approach to critical discourse analysis (CCDA). Discourse & Society, 21, 565–585.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gergen, K. J. (1999). An invitation to social construction. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gergen, K. J. (2001). Social construction in context. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, S. (2011). Social psychology, war and peace: Towards a critical discursive peace psychology. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 5, 239–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, S. (2012a). ‘I’m not a war monger but…’: Discourse analysis and social psychological peace research. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 22, 159–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, S. (2012b). History in action: The construction of historical analogies in televised debates concerning the Iraq War. Papers on Social Representations, 21, 13.1–13.35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, S. (2012c). Supporting the troops, serving the country: Rhetorical commonplaces in the representation of military service. In S. Gibson & S. Mollan (Eds.), Representations of peace and conflict (pp. 143–159). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, S. (2013). Milgram’s obedience experiments: A rhetorical analysis. British Journal of Social Psychology, 52, 290–309.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, S. (in press). Arguing, obeying and defying: A rhetorical perspective on Stanley Milgram’s obedience experiments. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, E. (1981). Forms of talk. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, S. (2014). Developing an understanding of race talk. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 8, 147–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, S., Sirriyeh, A., & McMahon, S. (2017). The evolving (re)categorisations of refugees throughout the “refugee/migrant crisis”. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 27, 105–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gough, B. (Ed.). (2017). The Palgrave handbook of critical social psychology. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gough, B., McFaddden, M., & McDonald, M. (2013). Critical social psychology (2nd ed.). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, C. (2007). Being dead and being there: Research interviews, sharing hand cream and the preference for analysing ‘naturally occurring data’. Discourse Studies, 9, 246–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harré, R. (1992). Introduction: The second cognitive revolution. American Behavioral Scientist, 36, 5–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hepburn, A. (2003). An introduction to critical social psychology. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hepburn, A., & Potter, J. (2011). Threats: Power, family mealtimes, and social influence. British Journal of Social Psychology, 50, 99–120.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hewitt, J. P., & Stokes, R. (1975). Disclaimers. American Sociological Review, 40, 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodges, A., & Nilep, C. (Eds.). (2011). Discourse, war and terrorism. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchby, I., & Wooffitt, R. (1998). Conversation analysis: Principles, practices and applications. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ibáñez, T., & ĺñiguez, L. (Eds.). (1997). Critical social psychology. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, R. (2005). Writing the war on terrorism: Language, politics and counter-terrorism. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jefferson, G. (2004). Glossary of transcription symbols with an introduction. In G. H. Lerner (Ed.), Conversation analysis: Studies from the first generation (pp. 13–31). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karlberg, M. (2012). Discourse theory and peace. In D. J. Christie (Ed.), The encyclopedia of peace psychology. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiguwa, P., & Ally, Y. (2018). Constructed representations of street protest violence: Speaking violence, speaking race. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 24, 36–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kilby, L. (2017). Social representations of peace in terrorism talk: A United Kingdom talk-radio analysis. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 23, 106–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kroger, R. O., & Wood, L. A. (1998). The turn to discourse in social psychology. Canadian Psychology, 39, 266–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leudar, I., Marsland, V., & Nekvapil, J. (2004). On membership categorisation: ‘Us’, ‘them’ and ‘doing violence’ in political discourse. Discourse & Society, 15, 243–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lilienfeld, S. O. (2017). Psychology’s replication crisis and the grant culture: Righting the ship. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 12, 660–664.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Locke, A. (2008). Managing agency for athletic performance: A discursive approach to the zone. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 5, 103–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacNair, R. M. (2012). The psychology of peace: An introduction (2nd ed.). Santa Barbara, CA: Praeger.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maxwell, S. E., Lau, M. Y., & Howard, G. S. (2015). Is psychology suffering from a replication crisis? What does “failure to replicate” really mean? American Psychologist, 70, 487–498.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McKinlay, A., & McVittie, C. (2008). Social psychology and discourse. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • McKinlay, A., McVittie, C., & Sambaraju, R. (2012). ‘This is ordinary behaviour’: Categorization and culpability in Hamas leaders’ accounts of the Palestinian/Israeli conflict. British Journal of Social Psychology, 51, 534–550.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Middleton, D., & Edwards, D. (Eds.). (1990). Collective remembering. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, P. K. (2012). Arsene didn’t see it: Coaching, research and the promise of a discursive psychology. International Journal of Sports Science and Coaching, 7, 615–628.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montiel, C. J. (2003). Peace psychology in Asia. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 9, 195–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montiel, C. J. (2018). Peace psychologists and social transformation: A global south perspective. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 24, 64–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montiel, C. J., & Noor, N. M. (Eds.). (2009). Peace psychology in Asia. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morawski, J. G., & Goldstein, S. E. (1985). Psychology and nuclear war: A chapter in our legacy of social responsibility. American Psychologist, 40, 276–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Reilly, M., Kiyimba, N., & Lester, J. N. (2018). Discursive psychology as a method of analysis for the study of couple and family therapy. Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 44(3), 409–425. https://doi.org/10.1111/jmft.12288.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Opotow, S., & Luke, T. J. (2013). Diverse contexts and approaches in peace psychology research. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 19, 1–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parker, I. (2015). Critical discursive psychology (2nd ed.). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, I. (1992). Discourse dynamics: Critical analysis for social and individual psychology. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Potter, J. (1996). Representing reality: Discourse, rhetoric and social construction. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Potter, J. (1998). Discursive social psychology: From attitudes to evaluative practices. European Review of Social Psychology, 9, 233–266. https://doi.org/10.1080/14792779843000090

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Potter, J. (2007). Discourse and psychology (Vols. I-III). London: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Potter, J., & Edwards, D. (1999). Social representations and discursive psychology: From cognition to action. Culture & Psychology, 5, 447–458. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354067X9954004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Potter, J. (2000). Post-cognitive psychology. Theory & Psychology, 10, 31–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Potter, J., & Edwards, D. (2001). Discursive social psychology. In W. P. Robinson & H. Giles (Eds.), The new handbook of language and social psychology (pp. 103–118). Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Potter, J., & Hepburn, A. (2005). Qualitative interviews in psychology: Problems and possibilities. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 2, 281–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Potter, J., & Hepburn, A. (2007). Life is out there: A comment on Griffin. Discourse Studies, 9, 276–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Potter, J., & Hepburn, A. (2008). Discursive constructionism. In J. A. Holstein & J. F. Gubrium (Eds.), Handbook of constructionist research (pp. 275–293). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Potter, J., & Hepburn, A. (2012). Eight challenges for interview researchers. In J. F. Gubrium, J. A. Holstein, A. B. Marvasti, & K. D. McKinney (Eds.), The Sage handbook of interview research: The complexity of the craft (2nd ed., pp. 555–570). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Potter, J., & Wetherell, M. (1987). Discourse and social psychology: Beyond attitudes and behaviour. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rapley, T. (2016). Questions of context: Qualitative interviews as a source of knowledge. In C. Tileagă & E. Stokoe (Eds.), Discursive psychology: Classic and contemporary issues (pp. 70–84). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rijsman, J., & Stroebe, W. (1989). The two social psychologies or whatever happened to the crisis? European Journal of Social Psychology, 19, 339-344. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2420190502

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sacks, H. (1995). Lectures on conversation. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Saucier, D. A., Webster, R. J., McManus, J. L., Sonnentag, T. L., O’Dea, C. J., & Strain, M. L. (2018). Individual difference in masculine honor beliefs predict attitudes toward aggressive security measures, war, and peace. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 24, 112–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schegloff, E. A. (2007). Sequence organization in interaction: A primer in conversation analysis (Vol. 1). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schäffner, C., & Wenden, A. L. (1995). Language and peace. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schegloff, E. A. (1972). Notes on a conversational practice: Formulating place. In D. Sudnow (Ed.), Studies in social interaction (pp. 75–119). New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schegloff, E. A. (1997). Whose text? Whose context? Discourse & Society, 8, 165–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schegloff, E. A. (1998). Reply to Wetherell. Discourse & Society, 9, 413–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seedat, M., Suffla, S., & Christie, D. J. (Eds.). (2017). Enlarging the scope of peace psychology: African and world-regional contributions. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seymour-Smith, S. (2015). Applying discursive approaches to health psychology. Health Psychology, 34, 371–380.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shotter, J. (1993). Conversational realities: Constructing life through language. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simić, O., Volčič, Z., & Philpot, C. R. (2012). Peace psychology in the Balkans: Dealing with a violent past while building peace. New York: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Speer, S. A., & Stokoe, E. (Eds.). (2011). Conversation and gender. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stokoe, E., & Wiggins, S. (2005). Discursive approaches. In J. Miles & P. Gilbert (Eds.), A handbook of research methods for clinical & health psychology (pp. 161–174). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sundberg, R. (2014). Violent values: Exploring the relationship between human values and violent attitudes. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 20, 68–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Symon, G. (2000). Everyday rhetoric: Argument and persuasion in everyday life. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 9, 477–488.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • te Molder, H. (2016). What happened to post-cognitive psychology? In C. Tileagă & E. Stokoe (Eds.), Discursive psychology: Classic and contemporary issues (pp. 87–100). Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tileagă, C. (2013). Political psychology: Critical perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tileagă, C., & Stokoe, E. (Eds.) (2016). Discursive psychology: Classic and contemporary issues. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuffin, K. (2005). Understanding critical social psychology. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vollhardt, J. K., & Bilali, R. (2008). Social psychology’s contribution to the psychological study of peace: A review. Social Psychology, 39, 12–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weatherall, A. (2016). Interpretative repertories, conversation analysis and being critical. In C. Tileagă & E. Stokoe (Eds.), Discursive psychology: Classic and contemporary issues (pp. 15–28). Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wessells, M. G. (1996). A history of Division 48 (peace psychology). In D. A. Dewsbury (Ed.), Unification through division: Histories of the Divisions of the American Psychological Association (Volume 1) (pp. 265–298). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Wetherell, M. (1998). Positioning and interpretative repertoires: Conversation analysis and post-structuralism in dialogue. Discourse & Society, 9, 387–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wetherell, M. (2012). Affect and emotion: A new social science understanding. London: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wetherell, M. (2015). Discursive psychology: Key tenets, some splits, and two examples. In I. Parker (Ed.), Handbook of critical psychology (pp. 315–324). Hove: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wetherell, M., & Edley, N. (2014). A discursive psychological framework for analysing men and masculinities. Psychology of Men and Masculinity, 15, 355–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wetherell, M., & Potter, J. (1992). Mapping the language of racism: Discourse and the legitimation of exploitation. London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wetherell, M., Stiven, H., & Potter, J. (1987). Unequal egalitarianism: A preliminary study of discourses concerning gender and employment opportunities. British Journal of Social Psychology, 26, 59–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiggins, S. (2017). Discursive psychology: Theory, method and applications. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willig, C. (2008). Introducing qualitative research in psychology: Adventures in theory and method (2nd ed.). Maidenhead: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stephen Gibson .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix

Appendix

Transcription Conventions (adapted from Hutchby & Wooffitt, 1998, pp. vi–vii)

(1.0) The number in parentheses indicates a time gap to the nearest tenth of a second.

(.) A dot enclosed in parentheses indicates a pause in the talk of less than two-tenths of a second.

[ ] Square brackets between adjacent lines of concurrent speech indicate the onset and end of a spate of overlapping talk.

.hh A dot before an ‘h’ indicates speaker in-breath. The more h’s, the longer the in-breath.

hh An ‘h’ indicates an out-breath. The more h’s, the longer the breath.

(( )) A description enclosed in double parentheses indicates a non-verbal activity. For example, ((pointing)). Alternatively double parentheses may enclose the transcriber’s comments on contextual or other features.

- A dash indicates the sharp cut-off of the prior word or sound.

: Colons indicate that the speaker has stretched the preceding sound. The more the colons, the greater the extent of stretching.

! Exclamation marks are used to indicate an animated or emphatic tone.

that Underlined fragments indicate speaker emphasis.

° ° Degree signs are used to indicate that the talk they encompass is spoken noticeably quieter than the surrounding talk.

> < ‘More than’ and ‘less than’ signs indicate that the talk they encompass was produced noticeably quicker than the surrounding talk.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Gibson, S. (2018). Discursive Psychology and Peace Psychology. In: Gibson, S. (eds) Discourse, Peace, and Conflict. Peace Psychology Book Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99094-1_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics