Advertisement

Looking to the Future

  • Jean MercierEmail author
  • Fanny Tremblay-Racicot
  • Mario Carrier
  • Fábio Duarte
Chapter
  • 114 Downloads

Abstract

In this quite short and incisive concluding chapter, the authors use their study of sustainable urban transport to better understand the complex policy of reducing greenhouse gases. If worldwide urban transport is taken as a microcosm of what lies ahead in reducing greenhouse gases, it is easy to be pessimistic, say the authors. Indeed, the transportation sector, as a whole, is not really progressing in terms of reduction, in fact the opposite is true. If it is easy to point the finger at the American lifestyle, with its suburban component and huge transport energy needs, because these elements are to a large extent true, more fundamental causes can be identified, according to Mercier and his colleagues. There is a widespread individualism in consumer patterns, worldwide, and these patterns encourage in turn individual transport patterns and demands to meet them, which cannot usually be met by public or nonmotorized transport modes. There are, according to the authors, a possibility of a cultural war between partisans of public transport and public spaces, on the one hand, and privatizers and partisans of the automobile culture on the other hand. However, this cultural war could evolve into a lessening of their differences, with technological and cultural change.

Keywords

Greenhouse gases American lifestyle Individualism Choice Externalities Urban future 

References

  1. Bache, I., Bartle, I., Flinders, M., & Marsden, G. (2015). Blame Game and Climate Change: Accountability, Multi-Level Governance and Carbon Management. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 17(1), 64–88.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-856X.12040.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barber, B. R. (2013). If Mayors Ruled the World. Dysfunctional Nations, Rising Cities. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Bouteligier, S. (2013). Cities, Networks, and Global Environmental Governance. Spaces of Innovation, Places of Leadership. New York and London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  4. Giddens, A. (2009). The Politics of Climate Change. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  5. Hardin, G. (1968). The Tragedy of the Commons. Science, 162(3859), 1243–1248.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.162.3859.1243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Jacobs, J. (1992). The Death and Life of Great American Cities. New York: Vintage Press.Google Scholar
  7. Kuntsler, J. H. (2005). The Long Emergency: Surviving the Converging Catastrophes of the Twenty-First Century. New York: Grove/Atlantic.Google Scholar
  8. Marsden, G., Mullen, C., Bache, I., Bartle, I., & Flinders, M. (2014). Carbon Reduction and Travel Behaviour: Discourses, Disputes and Contradictions in Governance. Transport Policy, 35(2014), 71–78.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2014.05.012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Mercier, J. (2006). American Hesitation to Reduce Greenhouse Gas Emission: An Institutional Interpretation. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 72(1), 101–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Mongin, O. (2005). La condition urbaine: La ville à l’heure de la mondialisation. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
  11. Offner, J. M. (2013). Les Mobilités. In T. Paquot (Ed.), Repenser l’urbanisme (pp. 53–71). Gollion: Infolio.Google Scholar
  12. Paquot, T. (2006). Terre urbaine. Cinq défis pour le devenir urbain de la planète. Paris: La Découverte.Google Scholar
  13. Paquot, T. (2013). Introduction. L’urbanisme est à repenser. In T. Paquot (Ed.), Repenser l’urbanisme (pp. 11–38). Gollion: Infolio.Google Scholar
  14. Sachs, W. (2002). Planet Dialectics. Exploration in Environment and Development. Frankfort: Brandes and Apset.Google Scholar
  15. Sperling, D. (2018). Three Revolutions: Steering Automated, Shared and Electric Vehicles to a Better Future. Washington, DC: Island Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Sperling, D., & Gordon, D. (2009). Two Billion Cars: Driving Toward Sustainability. Oxford: Oxford University Press.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-8947.2009.01243.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division. (2015). Population 2030: Demographic Challenges and Opportunities for Sustainable Development Planning (ST/ESA/SER.A/389).Google Scholar
  18. Walker, J. (2011). Human Transit: How Clearer Thinking About Public Transit Can Enrich Our Communities and Our Lives. Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jean Mercier
    • 1
    Email author
  • Fanny Tremblay-Racicot
    • 2
  • Mario Carrier
    • 3
  • Fábio Duarte
    • 4
  1. 1.Université LavalQuébecCanada
  2. 2.École nationale d’administration publiqueQuébecCanada
  3. 3.Université LavalQuébecCanada
  4. 4.Massachusetts Institute of TechnologyCambridgeUSA

Personalised recommendations