Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Mathematics ((HISTORYMS,volume 2222))

  • 1114 Accesses

Abstract

As I have told in Sect. 6.2 Hasse originally was interested in the estimate of solutions of diophantine congruences. It was Artin who in November of 1932, when Hasse was visiting Hamburg, told him that the estimating problem was pointing to the RHp. It appears that at that time Hasse did not yet believe in the general validity of the RHp for all function fields with higher genus gā€‰>ā€‰1. (See page 65.)

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 19.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 29.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    In the summer term of 1933 Davenport stayed in Gƶttingen with a stipend he had got from his College. Thus he became a witness of the dissolution of the Gƶttingen mathematical scene due to the disastrous policy of the Nazi government. On weekends he often went to Marburg, which is not far from Gƶttingen, in order to meet Hasse. But sometimes there were letters exchanged.

  2. 2.

    It appears that Hasse had those automorphisms in mind which respect the ā€œadditionā€ of two point sets. He knew already from the elliptic case that there are more field automorphisms, namely the translations. See page 95.

  3. 3.

    President of the University.

  4. 4.

    The official organization of mathematics students which at that time was dominated by Nazi students.

  5. 5.

    An additional reason for removing Tornier from Gƶttingen may have been that he permanently produced financial trouble. He had pawned a large part of his future salary and also had asked for and received high sums from the university as advance payment. It appears that he had fallen back to his addiction to drugs (morphine) which Hasse had mentioned in a letter to Fraenkel of 10 July 1927. (At that time Hasse had believed that Tornier had been able to overcome this.) But at Berlin University Tornier did not stop this behavior and in 1938, when he was caught in financial fraud he had to leave the university and also the Nazi party. More precisely, in order to avoid public scandal he was ā€œadvisedā€ to leave the party and the university on his own application. He then retreated to a psychiatric clinic in Silesia. These facts are documented in the personal files for Tornier at the archive of Humboldt University in Berlin.

  6. 6.

    That was what apparently many people at those times still expected or at least hoped. And not only at those times.

  7. 7.

    As to the terminology and the description of the situation see page 96 ff.

  8. 8.

    Among them was the work of Weilā€™s student Elizabeth Lutz at Strassbourg on the structure of the group of rational points of an elliptic curve over a \(\mathfrak {p}\)-adic field (\(\mathfrak {p}\)-adic uniformization). Weil had proposed to have Lutzā€™s paper published in Gƶttingen as a ā€œsign of continued cooperationā€. Hasse gladly agreed; he accepted Lutzā€™s paper for Crelleā€™s Journal [Lut37].

  9. 9.

    I have found this expression in Schappacherā€™s survey [Sch07].

  10. 10.

    Rohrbach had held a position at Berlin University but had got there into trouble because of political reasons.

  11. 11.

    She too came from Berlin. There she did not like the Nazi dominated atmosphere and therefore she had asked Rohrbach where to go for her Ph.D. Rohrbach suggested to come to Gƶttingen too and study with Hasse. The latter proposed to her to work on the foundation of arithmetics in higher dimensional function fields. But one year later von Caemmerer suddenly left Gƶttingen and went to Britain where she married Bernhard Neumann with whom she had been secretly engaged in Berlin already. He was Jewish and therefore had to leave Germany. Both Hanna and Bernhard grew to become well known group theorists.

References

  1. M. Deuring, Algebren. Erg. d. Math. u. ihrer Grenzgebiete. Julius (Springer, Berlin, 1935), 143 pp.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  2. M. Deuring, Arithmetische Theorie der Korrespondenzen algebraischer Funktionenkƶrper. I. J. Reine Angew. Math. 177, 161ā€“191 (1937)

    MATHĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  3. M. Deuring, Arithmetische Theorie der Korrespondenzen algebraischer Funktionenkƶrper. II. J. Reine Angew. Math. 183, 25ā€“36 (1940)

    MATHĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  4. M. Deuring, Reduktion algebraischer Funktionenkƶrper nach Primdivisoren des Konstantenkƶrpers. Math. Z. 47, 643ā€“654 (1942)

    ArticleĀ  MathSciNetĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  5. G. Frei, P. Roquette (eds.), Emil Artin and Helmut Hasse. Their correspondence 1923ā€“1934. With contributions of Franz Lemmermeyer and an introduction in English. (UniversitƤtsā€“Verlag, Gƶttingen, 2008), 497 pp.

    MATHĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  6. H. Hasse, Bericht Ć¼ber neuere Untersuchungen und Probleme aus der Theorie der algebraischen Zahlkƶrper. II: ReziprozitƤtsgesetz. Jahresber. Dtsch. Math.-Ver., 6(ErgƤnzungsband), 1930. IV + 204 pp.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  7. H. Hasse, Theory of cyclic algebras over an algebraic number field. Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 34, 171ā€“214 (1932)

    ArticleĀ  MathSciNetĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  8. H. Hasse, Beweis des Analogons der Riemannschen Vermutung fĆ¼r die Artinschen und F. K. Schmidtschen Kongruenzzetafunktionen in gewissen elliptischen FƤllen. VorlƤufige Mitteilung. Nachr. Ges. Wiss. Gƶttingen, Math.ā€“Phys. Kl. I 1933(42), 253ā€“262 (1933)

    Google ScholarĀ 

  9. H. Hasse, Zur Theorie der abstrakten elliptischen Funktionenkƶrper. Nachr. Ges. Wiss. Gƶttingen I. N.F. 1, 119ā€“129 (1935)

    Google ScholarĀ 

  10. H. Hasse, Die Gruppe der p n-primƤren Zahlen fĆ¼r einen Primteiler \({\mathfrak {p}}\) von p. J. Reine Angew. Math. 176, 174ā€“183 (1937)

    Google ScholarĀ 

  11. H. Hasse, Ɯber die Riemannsche Vermutung in Funktionenkƶrpern, in C. R. du CongrĆØs Internat. Math. Oslo 1936, vol. 1, pp. 189ā€“206 (1937)

    Google ScholarĀ 

  12. D. Hilbert, On the theory of the relative abelian number fields. (Ɯber die Theorie der relativ-Abelā€™schen Zahlkƶrper.). Gƶtt. Nachr. 1898, 370ā€“399 (1898)

    Google ScholarĀ 

  13. A. Hurwitz, Ɯber algebraische Korrespondenzen und das verallgemeinerte Korrespondenzprinzip. Berichte v.d. sƤchsischen Gesellsch. d. Wissenschaften, mathematisch-physikalische Klasse. 1886, 10ā€“38 (1886). Wiederabdruck in Math. Ann. Bd.28 (1887) 561ā€“585

    Google ScholarĀ 

  14. W. Krull, Idealtheorie. Erg. d. Math. u. ihrer Grenzgebiete. Julius (Springer, Berlin, 1935). V, 172 pp.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  15. S. Lefschetz, Correspondences between algebraic curves, in Selected topics in Algebraic Geometry, V. Snyder et al. Bulletin of the National Research Council, vol. 63 (1928), pp. 381ā€“448

    Google ScholarĀ 

  16. E. Lutz, Sur lā€™equation y 2ā€‰=ā€‰x 3ā€‰āˆ’ā€‰Axā€‰āˆ’ā€‰B dans les corps \(\mathfrak {p}\)-adiques. J. Reine Angew. Math. 177, 238ā€“247 (1937)

    Google ScholarĀ 

  17. P. Roquette, The Brauer-Hasse-Noether Theorem in Historical Perspective.. Schriftenreihe der Heidelberger Akademie der Wissenschaften, vol. 15 (Springer, Berlin, 2005). I, 77 pp.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  18. O.F.G Schilling, Ɯber gewisse Beziehungen zwischen der Arithmetik hyperkompler Zahlsysteme und algebraischer Zahlkƶrper. Math. Ann. 111, 372ā€“398 (1935)

    Google ScholarĀ 

  19. H.L. Schmid, Zyklische algebraische Funktionenkƶrper vom Grade p n Ć¼ber endlichem Konstantenkƶrper der Charakteristik p. J. Reine Angew. Math. 175, 108ā€“123 (1935)

    Google ScholarĀ 

  20. O.F.G. Schilling, The Theory of Valuations. Mathematical Surveys, vol. IV (American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 1950), 253 pp.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  21. N. Schappacher, Das mathematische Institut der UniversitƤt Gƶttingen 1929ā€“1950, in Die UniversitƤt Gƶttingen unter dem Nationalsozialismus, ed. by H. Becker, andere, pp. 345ā€“373. K. G. Saur (1987)

    Google ScholarĀ 

  22. N. Schappacher, A historical sketch of B. L. van der Waerdenā€™s work in algebraic geometry: 1926ā€“1946. In Episodes in the history of modern algebra (1800ā€“1950). Based on a workshop held at MSRI, Berkeley, CA, USA, April 2003 (American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2007); (London Mathematical Society, London 2007), pp. 245ā€“283

    Google ScholarĀ 

  23. F. Severi, Trattato di geometria algebrica. Vol.I. Parte I. Geometria delle serie lineari. Zanichelli, Bologna, 1926. 358 pp.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  24. I. Shafarevic, Das allgemeine ReziprozitƤtsgesetz. Mat. Sbornik, n.S. 26(68), 113ā€“146 (1951). Russisch

    Google ScholarĀ 

  25. N. Schappacher, E. Scholz (eds.), Oswald TeichmĆ¼ller ā€“ Leben und Werk. Jahresber. Dtsch. Math.-Ver. 94, 1ā€“39 (1992)

    Google ScholarĀ 

  26. B.L. van der Waerden, Zur algebraischen Geometrie. Selected Papers. (Springer, Berlin, 1983), VII + 479 pp.

    Google ScholarĀ 

  27. A. Weil, Lā€™arithmĆ©tique sur les courbes algĆ©briques. Acta Math. 52, 281ā€“315 (1929)

    ArticleĀ  MathSciNetĀ  Google ScholarĀ 

  28. A. Weil, Œuvres scientifiques. Collected papers. Vol. I (1926ā€“1951). (Springer, Berlin, 1979)

    Google ScholarĀ 

  29. E. Witt, Zyklische Kƶrper und Algebren der Charakteristik p vom Grad p n. Struktur diskret bewerteter perfekter Kƶrper mit vollkommenem Restklassenkƶrper der Charakteristik p. J. Reine Angew. Math. 176, 126ā€“140 (1936)

    Google ScholarĀ 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

Ā© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Roquette, P. (2018). Towards Higher Genus. In: The Riemann Hypothesis in Characteristic p in Historical Perspective. Lecture Notes in Mathematics(), vol 2222. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99067-5_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics